In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing

Fissure sealants are effective in preventing caries. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two different enamel surface preparation techniques for pit and fissure sealing. Sixty extracted sound third molars were used. For each tooth, the mesial half of the occlusal fissures w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of paediatric dentistry 2017-12, Vol.18 (4), p.263-267
Hauptverfasser: Ferrazzano, G F, Ingenito, A, Alcidi, B, Sangianantoni, G, Schiavone, M G, Cantile, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 267
container_issue 4
container_start_page 263
container_title European journal of paediatric dentistry
container_volume 18
creator Ferrazzano, G F
Ingenito, A
Alcidi, B
Sangianantoni, G
Schiavone, M G
Cantile, T
description Fissure sealants are effective in preventing caries. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two different enamel surface preparation techniques for pit and fissure sealing. Sixty extracted sound third molars were used. For each tooth, the mesial half of the occlusal fissures was treated with ultrasound diamond tip T1 mounted on an ultrasonic handpiece, while the distal half with conventional diamond bur. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 30/each). Group 1 samples were stored in distilled water at 4 °C. For group 2 samples, sealing of occlusal fissures was performed according to standard procedures. Bucco-lingual cuts parallel to the long axis of the tooth were made in order to separate the two different types of preparations. The effects of the executed procedures were assessed with SEM. Surfaces prepared with ultrasound system showed the presence of residual debris and appeared more irregular than surfaces prepared with traditional bur system. Furthermore, images showed the presence of cracks on the bottom and on the walls of the ultrasound prepared fissures. Conventional bur surface treatment showed a better performance when compared to ultrasound preparation and could probably ensure superior sealant retention.
doi_str_mv 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.01
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993010246</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1993010246</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-76e55bfee4af72e46bb13ca2b2d408b29f9e34c2baa32ce43a43b1f93dbde5203</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkD1PwzAYhD2AaCn8AiTkkaXBX0nrEVV8VKrEAhJb9Np5Da6S2NgJH_-eSJQB6aS74bkbjpALzgoh10xd4z42hWB8VfB1wVTB-BGZ81LzpdbVy4yc5rxnrFRaqRMyE3oqVZzNyde2px9-SIFGTC6kDnqLNDg6tkOCHMa-odhDhy2NCSMkGHzoqQ3dlLGhn354o7aFnL2Flpox_eMmRT9QmFacz3lMSDNC6_vXM3LsoM14fvAFeb67fdo8LHeP99vNzW4ZuaiG5arCsjQOUYFbCVSVMVxaEEY0iq2N0E6jVFYYACksKglKGu60bEyDpWByQa5-d2MK7yPmoe58tti20GMYc821lowzoaoJvTygo-mwqWPyHaTv-u8t-QMONW8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993010246</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ferrazzano, G F ; Ingenito, A ; Alcidi, B ; Sangianantoni, G ; Schiavone, M G ; Cantile, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferrazzano, G F ; Ingenito, A ; Alcidi, B ; Sangianantoni, G ; Schiavone, M G ; Cantile, T</creatorcontrib><description>Fissure sealants are effective in preventing caries. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two different enamel surface preparation techniques for pit and fissure sealing. Sixty extracted sound third molars were used. For each tooth, the mesial half of the occlusal fissures was treated with ultrasound diamond tip T1 mounted on an ultrasonic handpiece, while the distal half with conventional diamond bur. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 30/each). Group 1 samples were stored in distilled water at 4 °C. For group 2 samples, sealing of occlusal fissures was performed according to standard procedures. Bucco-lingual cuts parallel to the long axis of the tooth were made in order to separate the two different types of preparations. The effects of the executed procedures were assessed with SEM. Surfaces prepared with ultrasound system showed the presence of residual debris and appeared more irregular than surfaces prepared with traditional bur system. Furthermore, images showed the presence of cracks on the bottom and on the walls of the ultrasound prepared fissures. Conventional bur surface treatment showed a better performance when compared to ultrasound preparation and could probably ensure superior sealant retention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1591-996X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.01</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29380610</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy</publisher><subject>Dentistry</subject><ispartof>European journal of paediatric dentistry, 2017-12, Vol.18 (4), p.263-267</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29380610$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferrazzano, G F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingenito, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcidi, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangianantoni, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiavone, M G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantile, T</creatorcontrib><title>In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing</title><title>European journal of paediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>Eur J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><description>Fissure sealants are effective in preventing caries. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two different enamel surface preparation techniques for pit and fissure sealing. Sixty extracted sound third molars were used. For each tooth, the mesial half of the occlusal fissures was treated with ultrasound diamond tip T1 mounted on an ultrasonic handpiece, while the distal half with conventional diamond bur. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 30/each). Group 1 samples were stored in distilled water at 4 °C. For group 2 samples, sealing of occlusal fissures was performed according to standard procedures. Bucco-lingual cuts parallel to the long axis of the tooth were made in order to separate the two different types of preparations. The effects of the executed procedures were assessed with SEM. Surfaces prepared with ultrasound system showed the presence of residual debris and appeared more irregular than surfaces prepared with traditional bur system. Furthermore, images showed the presence of cracks on the bottom and on the walls of the ultrasound prepared fissures. Conventional bur surface treatment showed a better performance when compared to ultrasound preparation and could probably ensure superior sealant retention.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><issn>1591-996X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkD1PwzAYhD2AaCn8AiTkkaXBX0nrEVV8VKrEAhJb9Np5Da6S2NgJH_-eSJQB6aS74bkbjpALzgoh10xd4z42hWB8VfB1wVTB-BGZ81LzpdbVy4yc5rxnrFRaqRMyE3oqVZzNyde2px9-SIFGTC6kDnqLNDg6tkOCHMa-odhDhy2NCSMkGHzoqQ3dlLGhn354o7aFnL2Flpox_eMmRT9QmFacz3lMSDNC6_vXM3LsoM14fvAFeb67fdo8LHeP99vNzW4ZuaiG5arCsjQOUYFbCVSVMVxaEEY0iq2N0E6jVFYYACksKglKGu60bEyDpWByQa5-d2MK7yPmoe58tti20GMYc821lowzoaoJvTygo-mwqWPyHaTv-u8t-QMONW8U</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Ferrazzano, G F</creator><creator>Ingenito, A</creator><creator>Alcidi, B</creator><creator>Sangianantoni, G</creator><creator>Schiavone, M G</creator><creator>Cantile, T</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing</title><author>Ferrazzano, G F ; Ingenito, A ; Alcidi, B ; Sangianantoni, G ; Schiavone, M G ; Cantile, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p126t-76e55bfee4af72e46bb13ca2b2d408b29f9e34c2baa32ce43a43b1f93dbde5203</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferrazzano, G F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingenito, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alcidi, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sangianantoni, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schiavone, M G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantile, T</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferrazzano, G F</au><au>Ingenito, A</au><au>Alcidi, B</au><au>Sangianantoni, G</au><au>Schiavone, M G</au><au>Cantile, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing</atitle><jtitle>European journal of paediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Paediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>263</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>263-267</pages><issn>1591-996X</issn><abstract>Fissure sealants are effective in preventing caries. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two different enamel surface preparation techniques for pit and fissure sealing. Sixty extracted sound third molars were used. For each tooth, the mesial half of the occlusal fissures was treated with ultrasound diamond tip T1 mounted on an ultrasonic handpiece, while the distal half with conventional diamond bur. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 30/each). Group 1 samples were stored in distilled water at 4 °C. For group 2 samples, sealing of occlusal fissures was performed according to standard procedures. Bucco-lingual cuts parallel to the long axis of the tooth were made in order to separate the two different types of preparations. The effects of the executed procedures were assessed with SEM. Surfaces prepared with ultrasound system showed the presence of residual debris and appeared more irregular than surfaces prepared with traditional bur system. Furthermore, images showed the presence of cracks on the bottom and on the walls of the ultrasound prepared fissures. Conventional bur surface treatment showed a better performance when compared to ultrasound preparation and could probably ensure superior sealant retention.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pmid>29380610</pmid><doi>10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.01</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1591-996X
ispartof European journal of paediatric dentistry, 2017-12, Vol.18 (4), p.263-267
issn 1591-996X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993010246
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Dentistry
title In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A49%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vitro%20performance%20of%20ultrasound%20enamel%20preparation%20compared%20with%20classical%20bur%20preparation%20on%20pit%20and%20fissure%20sealing&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20paediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=Ferrazzano,%20G%20F&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=263-267&rft.issn=1591-996X&rft_id=info:doi/10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.01&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1993010246%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993010246&rft_id=info:pmid/29380610&rfr_iscdi=true