Comparative Study of the Effects of Fluconazole and Voriconazole on Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa Biofilms

Infections by non- albicans Candida species are a life-threatening condition, and formation of biofilms can lead to treatment failure in a clinical setting. This study was aimed to demonstrate the in vitro antibiofilm activity of fluconazole (FLU) and voriconazole (VOR) against C. glabrata , C. para...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mycopathologia (1975) 2018-06, Vol.183 (3), p.499-511
Hauptverfasser: Madhavan, Priya, Jamal, Farida, Pei, Chong Pei, Othman, Fauziah, Karunanidhi, Arunkumar, Ng, Kee Peng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 511
container_issue 3
container_start_page 499
container_title Mycopathologia (1975)
container_volume 183
creator Madhavan, Priya
Jamal, Farida
Pei, Chong Pei
Othman, Fauziah
Karunanidhi, Arunkumar
Ng, Kee Peng
description Infections by non- albicans Candida species are a life-threatening condition, and formation of biofilms can lead to treatment failure in a clinical setting. This study was aimed to demonstrate the in vitro antibiofilm activity of fluconazole (FLU) and voriconazole (VOR) against C. glabrata , C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa with diverse antifungal susceptibilities to FLU and VOR. The antibiofilm activities of FLU and VOR in the form of suspension as well as pre-coatings were assessed by XTT [2,3- bis -(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)- 2H -tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide] reduction assay. Morphological and intracellular changes exerted by the antifungal drugs on Candida cells were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The results of the antibiofilm activities showed that FLU drug suspension was capable of killing C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 4× MIC FLU and 256× MIC FLU, respectively. While VOR MICs ranging from 2× to 32× were capable of killing the biofilms of all Candida spp tested. The antibiofilm activities of pre-coated FLU were able to kill the biofilms at ¼× MIC FLU and ½× MIC FLU for C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa strains, respectively. While pre-coated VOR was able to kill the biofilms, all three Candida sp at ½× MIC VOR. SEM and TEM examinations showed that FLU and VOR treatments exerted significant impact on Candida cell with various degrees of morphological changes. In conclusion, a fourfold reduction in MIC 50 of FLU and VOR towards ATCC strains of C. glabrata , C. rugosa and C. rugosa clinical strain was observed in this study.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11046-018-0243-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993006932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A539282428</galeid><sourcerecordid>A539282428</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3ce510808acceedaeca047378ea44c287654fb140a54a22e29cb13ceb98fb3cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbigSFxaqSn-l8Q5llVLK1VCooC4WRNnElwl8WInVbsPwHPjdNtVF4F8sDzz-z7NjIeQt4weM0qLD4ExKvOUMpVSLkW6fkYWLCtESpXgz8mCCspSqfIfe-RVCNeURhUrXpI9XgoVVWpBfi9dvwIPo73B5Gqc6rvENcn4E5PTpkEzhvl51k3GDbB2HSYw1Ml35-024IZkGYO2hqTtoIpWcLSNzNarYDsXbLiXPib81LoAyUfrGtv14TV50UAX8M3DvU--nZ1-XZ6nl58_XSxPLlOTiXJMhcGMUUUVGINYAxqgshCFQpDScFXkmWwqJilkEjhHXpqKRVFVqqYSxoh9crDxXXn3a8Iw6t4Gg10HA7opaFaWgtK8FDyi7_9Cr93kh1jdPZVxyvInVAsdajs0bvRgZlN9EkvmikuuInX8DyqeGvt5khiHgLuCwx1BZEa8HVuYQtAXV192WbZhjXcheGz0ytse_J1mVM97ojd7ouOP63lP9Dpq3j00N1U91lvF42JEgG-AEFNDi_5J9_91_QPjX8fO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1993520162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Study of the Effects of Fluconazole and Voriconazole on Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa Biofilms</title><source>SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)</source><creator>Madhavan, Priya ; Jamal, Farida ; Pei, Chong Pei ; Othman, Fauziah ; Karunanidhi, Arunkumar ; Ng, Kee Peng</creator><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Priya ; Jamal, Farida ; Pei, Chong Pei ; Othman, Fauziah ; Karunanidhi, Arunkumar ; Ng, Kee Peng</creatorcontrib><description>Infections by non- albicans Candida species are a life-threatening condition, and formation of biofilms can lead to treatment failure in a clinical setting. This study was aimed to demonstrate the in vitro antibiofilm activity of fluconazole (FLU) and voriconazole (VOR) against C. glabrata , C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa with diverse antifungal susceptibilities to FLU and VOR. The antibiofilm activities of FLU and VOR in the form of suspension as well as pre-coatings were assessed by XTT [2,3- bis -(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)- 2H -tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide] reduction assay. Morphological and intracellular changes exerted by the antifungal drugs on Candida cells were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The results of the antibiofilm activities showed that FLU drug suspension was capable of killing C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 4× MIC FLU and 256× MIC FLU, respectively. While VOR MICs ranging from 2× to 32× were capable of killing the biofilms of all Candida spp tested. The antibiofilm activities of pre-coated FLU were able to kill the biofilms at ¼× MIC FLU and ½× MIC FLU for C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa strains, respectively. While pre-coated VOR was able to kill the biofilms, all three Candida sp at ½× MIC VOR. SEM and TEM examinations showed that FLU and VOR treatments exerted significant impact on Candida cell with various degrees of morphological changes. In conclusion, a fourfold reduction in MIC 50 of FLU and VOR towards ATCC strains of C. glabrata , C. rugosa and C. rugosa clinical strain was observed in this study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-486X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0832</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11046-018-0243-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29380188</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Antifungal agents ; Biofilms ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Candida ; Candida parapsilosis ; Coatings ; Comparative analysis ; Electron microscopes ; Eukaryotic Microbiology ; Fluconazole ; Fungicides ; Health aspects ; Influenza ; Life Sciences ; Medical Microbiology ; Microbial Ecology ; Microbiology ; Minimum inhibitory concentration ; Morphology ; Original Paper ; Plant Sciences ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Transmission electron microscopes ; Transmission electron microscopy ; Voriconazole</subject><ispartof>Mycopathologia (1975), 2018-06, Vol.183 (3), p.499-511</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Mycopathologia is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3ce510808acceedaeca047378ea44c287654fb140a54a22e29cb13ceb98fb3cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3ce510808acceedaeca047378ea44c287654fb140a54a22e29cb13ceb98fb3cc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11046-018-0243-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11046-018-0243-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29380188$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Farida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Chong Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Fauziah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karunanidhi, Arunkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Kee Peng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Study of the Effects of Fluconazole and Voriconazole on Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa Biofilms</title><title>Mycopathologia (1975)</title><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><description>Infections by non- albicans Candida species are a life-threatening condition, and formation of biofilms can lead to treatment failure in a clinical setting. This study was aimed to demonstrate the in vitro antibiofilm activity of fluconazole (FLU) and voriconazole (VOR) against C. glabrata , C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa with diverse antifungal susceptibilities to FLU and VOR. The antibiofilm activities of FLU and VOR in the form of suspension as well as pre-coatings were assessed by XTT [2,3- bis -(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)- 2H -tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide] reduction assay. Morphological and intracellular changes exerted by the antifungal drugs on Candida cells were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The results of the antibiofilm activities showed that FLU drug suspension was capable of killing C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 4× MIC FLU and 256× MIC FLU, respectively. While VOR MICs ranging from 2× to 32× were capable of killing the biofilms of all Candida spp tested. The antibiofilm activities of pre-coated FLU were able to kill the biofilms at ¼× MIC FLU and ½× MIC FLU for C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa strains, respectively. While pre-coated VOR was able to kill the biofilms, all three Candida sp at ½× MIC VOR. SEM and TEM examinations showed that FLU and VOR treatments exerted significant impact on Candida cell with various degrees of morphological changes. In conclusion, a fourfold reduction in MIC 50 of FLU and VOR towards ATCC strains of C. glabrata , C. rugosa and C. rugosa clinical strain was observed in this study.</description><subject>Antifungal agents</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Candida</subject><subject>Candida parapsilosis</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Electron microscopes</subject><subject>Eukaryotic Microbiology</subject><subject>Fluconazole</subject><subject>Fungicides</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Medical Microbiology</subject><subject>Microbial Ecology</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Minimum inhibitory concentration</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopes</subject><subject>Transmission electron microscopy</subject><subject>Voriconazole</subject><issn>0301-486X</issn><issn>1573-0832</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ks9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbigSFxaqSn-l8Q5llVLK1VCooC4WRNnElwl8WInVbsPwHPjdNtVF4F8sDzz-z7NjIeQt4weM0qLD4ExKvOUMpVSLkW6fkYWLCtESpXgz8mCCspSqfIfe-RVCNeURhUrXpI9XgoVVWpBfi9dvwIPo73B5Gqc6rvENcn4E5PTpkEzhvl51k3GDbB2HSYw1Ml35-024IZkGYO2hqTtoIpWcLSNzNarYDsXbLiXPib81LoAyUfrGtv14TV50UAX8M3DvU--nZ1-XZ6nl58_XSxPLlOTiXJMhcGMUUUVGINYAxqgshCFQpDScFXkmWwqJilkEjhHXpqKRVFVqqYSxoh9crDxXXn3a8Iw6t4Gg10HA7opaFaWgtK8FDyi7_9Cr93kh1jdPZVxyvInVAsdajs0bvRgZlN9EkvmikuuInX8DyqeGvt5khiHgLuCwx1BZEa8HVuYQtAXV192WbZhjXcheGz0ytse_J1mVM97ojd7ouOP63lP9Dpq3j00N1U91lvF42JEgG-AEFNDi_5J9_91_QPjX8fO</recordid><startdate>20180601</startdate><enddate>20180601</enddate><creator>Madhavan, Priya</creator><creator>Jamal, Farida</creator><creator>Pei, Chong Pei</creator><creator>Othman, Fauziah</creator><creator>Karunanidhi, Arunkumar</creator><creator>Ng, Kee Peng</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180601</creationdate><title>Comparative Study of the Effects of Fluconazole and Voriconazole on Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa Biofilms</title><author>Madhavan, Priya ; Jamal, Farida ; Pei, Chong Pei ; Othman, Fauziah ; Karunanidhi, Arunkumar ; Ng, Kee Peng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c539t-3ce510808acceedaeca047378ea44c287654fb140a54a22e29cb13ceb98fb3cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antifungal agents</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Candida</topic><topic>Candida parapsilosis</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Electron microscopes</topic><topic>Eukaryotic Microbiology</topic><topic>Fluconazole</topic><topic>Fungicides</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Medical Microbiology</topic><topic>Microbial Ecology</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Minimum inhibitory concentration</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopes</topic><topic>Transmission electron microscopy</topic><topic>Voriconazole</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Priya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamal, Farida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pei, Chong Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othman, Fauziah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karunanidhi, Arunkumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Kee Peng</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madhavan, Priya</au><au>Jamal, Farida</au><au>Pei, Chong Pei</au><au>Othman, Fauziah</au><au>Karunanidhi, Arunkumar</au><au>Ng, Kee Peng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Study of the Effects of Fluconazole and Voriconazole on Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa Biofilms</atitle><jtitle>Mycopathologia (1975)</jtitle><stitle>Mycopathologia</stitle><addtitle>Mycopathologia</addtitle><date>2018-06-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>499</spage><epage>511</epage><pages>499-511</pages><issn>0301-486X</issn><eissn>1573-0832</eissn><abstract>Infections by non- albicans Candida species are a life-threatening condition, and formation of biofilms can lead to treatment failure in a clinical setting. This study was aimed to demonstrate the in vitro antibiofilm activity of fluconazole (FLU) and voriconazole (VOR) against C. glabrata , C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa with diverse antifungal susceptibilities to FLU and VOR. The antibiofilm activities of FLU and VOR in the form of suspension as well as pre-coatings were assessed by XTT [2,3- bis -(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)- 2H -tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide] reduction assay. Morphological and intracellular changes exerted by the antifungal drugs on Candida cells were examined by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). The results of the antibiofilm activities showed that FLU drug suspension was capable of killing C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa at minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 4× MIC FLU and 256× MIC FLU, respectively. While VOR MICs ranging from 2× to 32× were capable of killing the biofilms of all Candida spp tested. The antibiofilm activities of pre-coated FLU were able to kill the biofilms at ¼× MIC FLU and ½× MIC FLU for C. parapsilosis and C. rugosa strains, respectively. While pre-coated VOR was able to kill the biofilms, all three Candida sp at ½× MIC VOR. SEM and TEM examinations showed that FLU and VOR treatments exerted significant impact on Candida cell with various degrees of morphological changes. In conclusion, a fourfold reduction in MIC 50 of FLU and VOR towards ATCC strains of C. glabrata , C. rugosa and C. rugosa clinical strain was observed in this study.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>29380188</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11046-018-0243-z</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-486X
ispartof Mycopathologia (1975), 2018-06, Vol.183 (3), p.499-511
issn 0301-486X
1573-0832
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1993006932
source SpringerLink Journals (MCLS)
subjects Antifungal agents
Biofilms
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Candida
Candida parapsilosis
Coatings
Comparative analysis
Electron microscopes
Eukaryotic Microbiology
Fluconazole
Fungicides
Health aspects
Influenza
Life Sciences
Medical Microbiology
Microbial Ecology
Microbiology
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Morphology
Original Paper
Plant Sciences
Scanning electron microscopy
Transmission electron microscopes
Transmission electron microscopy
Voriconazole
title Comparative Study of the Effects of Fluconazole and Voriconazole on Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis and Candida rugosa Biofilms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A34%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Study%20of%20the%20Effects%20of%20Fluconazole%20and%20Voriconazole%20on%20Candida%20glabrata,%20Candida%20parapsilosis%20and%20Candida%20rugosa%20Biofilms&rft.jtitle=Mycopathologia%20(1975)&rft.au=Madhavan,%20Priya&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=499&rft.epage=511&rft.pages=499-511&rft.issn=0301-486X&rft.eissn=1573-0832&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11046-018-0243-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA539282428%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1993520162&rft_id=info:pmid/29380188&rft_galeid=A539282428&rfr_iscdi=true