Ecosystem management and public participation: lessons from the field
This study explores the public participation component of the Northern Lower Michigan Ecosystem Management Project. The study was conducted to determine the perceptions of natural resource professionals about public participation and document how those perceptions change over time as a result of a n...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of forestry 1999-10, Vol.97 (10), p.32-38 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 38 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 32 |
| container_title | Journal of forestry |
| container_volume | 97 |
| creator | Smith, P.D McDonough, M.H Mang, M.T |
| description | This study explores the public participation component of the Northern Lower Michigan Ecosystem Management Project. The study was conducted to determine the perceptions of natural resource professionals about public participation and document how those perceptions change over time as a result of a nontraditional, focus group--based model of public participation. The professionals' perceptions were then compared with public perceptions about public participation processes. The results suggest that the new approaches to public participation embodied in ecosystem management are more consistent with public desires than are traditional methods, but improvements are still possible. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jof/97.10.32 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19927690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14521192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-79bd6b340228c1838190790fd44c55c72004d06f815ed0ef35b72b19e7578a633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EEuWxsRMxMJH2-pHYZkNVeUiVGKCz5Th2cZXEwU6G_ntSlYmF6Z4rfffo3IPQDYY5BkkXu-AWkk96TskJmmFJRU45K0_RDICQHBPA5-gipR0AiJKyGVqtTEj7NNg2a3Wnt7a13ZDprs76sWq8yXodB298rwcfusessSmFLmUuhjYbvmzmvG3qK3TmdJPs9e-8RJvn1efyNV-_v7wtn9a5oYINOZdVXVaUTVmEwYIKLIFLcDVjpigMJwCshtIJXNgarKNFxUmFpeUFF7qk9BLdH337GL5HmwbV-mRs0-jOhjEpLCXhpYT_QVYQjCWZwLs_4C6MsZueUISAgFJyPkEPR8jEkFK0TvXRtzruFQZ1aH46ckryw0oPnrdH3Omg9Db6pDYfU_UUiGQYC0l_APeLfgc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220806977</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ecosystem management and public participation: lessons from the field</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Smith, P.D ; McDonough, M.H ; Mang, M.T</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, P.D ; McDonough, M.H ; Mang, M.T</creatorcontrib><description>This study explores the public participation component of the Northern Lower Michigan Ecosystem Management Project. The study was conducted to determine the perceptions of natural resource professionals about public participation and document how those perceptions change over time as a result of a nontraditional, focus group--based model of public participation. The professionals' perceptions were then compared with public perceptions about public participation processes. The results suggest that the new approaches to public participation embodied in ecosystem management are more consistent with public desires than are traditional methods, but improvements are still possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3746</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jof/97.10.32</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>forest management ; perception ; public opinion</subject><ispartof>Journal of forestry, 1999-10, Vol.97 (10), p.32-38</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of American Foresters Oct 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-79bd6b340228c1838190790fd44c55c72004d06f815ed0ef35b72b19e7578a633</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, P.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonough, M.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mang, M.T</creatorcontrib><title>Ecosystem management and public participation: lessons from the field</title><title>Journal of forestry</title><description>This study explores the public participation component of the Northern Lower Michigan Ecosystem Management Project. The study was conducted to determine the perceptions of natural resource professionals about public participation and document how those perceptions change over time as a result of a nontraditional, focus group--based model of public participation. The professionals' perceptions were then compared with public perceptions about public participation processes. The results suggest that the new approaches to public participation embodied in ecosystem management are more consistent with public desires than are traditional methods, but improvements are still possible.</description><subject>forest management</subject><subject>perception</subject><subject>public opinion</subject><issn>0022-1201</issn><issn>1938-3746</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAUhS0EEuWxsRMxMJH2-pHYZkNVeUiVGKCz5Th2cZXEwU6G_ntSlYmF6Z4rfffo3IPQDYY5BkkXu-AWkk96TskJmmFJRU45K0_RDICQHBPA5-gipR0AiJKyGVqtTEj7NNg2a3Wnt7a13ZDprs76sWq8yXodB298rwcfusessSmFLmUuhjYbvmzmvG3qK3TmdJPs9e-8RJvn1efyNV-_v7wtn9a5oYINOZdVXVaUTVmEwYIKLIFLcDVjpigMJwCshtIJXNgarKNFxUmFpeUFF7qk9BLdH337GL5HmwbV-mRs0-jOhjEpLCXhpYT_QVYQjCWZwLs_4C6MsZueUISAgFJyPkEPR8jEkFK0TvXRtzruFQZ1aH46ckryw0oPnrdH3Omg9Db6pDYfU_UUiGQYC0l_APeLfgc</recordid><startdate>19991001</startdate><enddate>19991001</enddate><creator>Smith, P.D</creator><creator>McDonough, M.H</creator><creator>Mang, M.T</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7T4</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19991001</creationdate><title>Ecosystem management and public participation: lessons from the field</title><author>Smith, P.D ; McDonough, M.H ; Mang, M.T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-79bd6b340228c1838190790fd44c55c72004d06f815ed0ef35b72b19e7578a633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>forest management</topic><topic>perception</topic><topic>public opinion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, P.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonough, M.H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mang, M.T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Human Population & Natural Resource Management</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, P.D</au><au>McDonough, M.H</au><au>Mang, M.T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ecosystem management and public participation: lessons from the field</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forestry</jtitle><date>1999-10-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>32-38</pages><issn>0022-1201</issn><eissn>1938-3746</eissn><abstract>This study explores the public participation component of the Northern Lower Michigan Ecosystem Management Project. The study was conducted to determine the perceptions of natural resource professionals about public participation and document how those perceptions change over time as a result of a nontraditional, focus group--based model of public participation. The professionals' perceptions were then compared with public perceptions about public participation processes. The results suggest that the new approaches to public participation embodied in ecosystem management are more consistent with public desires than are traditional methods, but improvements are still possible.</abstract><cop>Bethesda</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jof/97.10.32</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-1201 |
| ispartof | Journal of forestry, 1999-10, Vol.97 (10), p.32-38 |
| issn | 0022-1201 1938-3746 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19927690 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
| subjects | forest management perception public opinion |
| title | Ecosystem management and public participation: lessons from the field |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T22%3A33%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ecosystem%20management%20and%20public%20participation:%20lessons%20from%20the%20field&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forestry&rft.au=Smith,%20P.D&rft.date=1999-10-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=32-38&rft.issn=0022-1201&rft.eissn=1938-3746&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jof/97.10.32&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14521192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220806977&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |