Effectiveness of monoenergetic and spread-out bragg peak carbon-ions for inactivation of various normal and tumour human cell lines
This work aimed at measuring cell-killing effectiveness of monoenergetic and Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) carbon-ion beams in normal and tumour cells with different radiation sensitivity. Clonogenic survival was assayed in normal and tumour human cell lines exhibiting different radiosensitivity to X...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of radiation research 2008-11, Vol.49 (6), p.597-607 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 607 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 597 |
container_title | Journal of radiation research |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Belli, Mauro Bettega, Daniela Calzolari, Paola Cherubini, Roberto Cuttone, Giacomo Durante, Marco Esposito, Giuseppe Furusawa, Yoshiya Gerardi, Silvia Gialanella, Giancarlo Grossi, Gianfranco Manti, Lorenzo Marchesini, Renato Pugliese, Mariagabriella Scampoli, Paola Simone, Giustina Sorrentino, Eugenio Tabocchini, Maria Antonella Tallone, Lucia |
description | This work aimed at measuring cell-killing effectiveness of monoenergetic and Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) carbon-ion beams in normal and tumour cells with different radiation sensitivity. Clonogenic survival was assayed in normal and tumour human cell lines exhibiting different radiosensitivity to X- or gamma-rays following exposure to monoenergetic carbon-ion beams (incident LET 13-303 keV/microm) and at various positions along the ionization curve of a therapeutic carbon-ion beam, corresponding to three dose-averaged LET (LET(d)) values (40, 50 and 75 keV/microm). Chinese hamster V79 cells were also used. Carbon-ion effectiveness for cell inactivation generally increased with LET for monoenergetic beams, with the largest gain in cell-killing obtained in the cells most radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays. Such an increased effectiveness in cells less responsive to low LET radiation was found also for SOBP irradiation, but the latter was less effective compared with monoenergetic ion beams of the same LET. Our data show the superior effectiveness for cell-killing exhibited by carbon-ion beams compared to lower LET radiation, particularly in tumour cells radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays, hence the advantage of using such beams in radiotherapy. The observed lower effectiveness of SOBP irradiation compared to monoenergetic carbon beam irradiation argues against the radiobiological equivalence between dose-averaged LET in a point in the SOBP and the corresponding monoenergetic beams. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1269/jrr.08052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19919772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A536154375</galeid><sourcerecordid>A536154375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-cd24c5feb8d6b4a4a8651667dbab89f50e54fe9953a6f257f67f4d3f4a7d35543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_owj8gAUFwUW1SeVWWwzA6woAbXYdbebRpq5I2qRpw7R83_QBBskju5bvnHnIQekPJlvZSf9yXsiUDEf0ztKGM605ToZ6jDeHtzYgkV-i61j0hvSKCvERXdNCD4mzYoD_3IXi7xCeffK04BzznlFtRdn6JFkNyuB6KB9fldcFjgd0OHzz8xBbKmFMXc6o45IJjgqMOLK1z1HmCEvNaccplhukktKxzXgv-sc6QsPXThKfY1r5CLwJM1b--3Dfo-6f7b3cP3ePXz1_ubh87KwRZOut6bkXw4-DkyIHDIAWVUrkRxkEHQbzgwWstGMjQCxWkCtyxwEE5JgRnN-j9WfdQ8q_V18XMsR5tQPLNqaFaU61U38B3_4H75js1b4by9qe8l0o0anumdjB5E1PISwHbjvNztDn5EFv_VjBJ2_LTwIfzgC251uKDOZQ4Q_ltKDHHIE0L0pyCbOzbi4V1nL37R16SY38Bsk6a4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1444942675</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of monoenergetic and spread-out bragg peak carbon-ions for inactivation of various normal and tumour human cell lines</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>J-STAGE Free</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Freely Accessible Japanese Titles</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Belli, Mauro ; Bettega, Daniela ; Calzolari, Paola ; Cherubini, Roberto ; Cuttone, Giacomo ; Durante, Marco ; Esposito, Giuseppe ; Furusawa, Yoshiya ; Gerardi, Silvia ; Gialanella, Giancarlo ; Grossi, Gianfranco ; Manti, Lorenzo ; Marchesini, Renato ; Pugliese, Mariagabriella ; Scampoli, Paola ; Simone, Giustina ; Sorrentino, Eugenio ; Tabocchini, Maria Antonella ; Tallone, Lucia</creator><creatorcontrib>Belli, Mauro ; Bettega, Daniela ; Calzolari, Paola ; Cherubini, Roberto ; Cuttone, Giacomo ; Durante, Marco ; Esposito, Giuseppe ; Furusawa, Yoshiya ; Gerardi, Silvia ; Gialanella, Giancarlo ; Grossi, Gianfranco ; Manti, Lorenzo ; Marchesini, Renato ; Pugliese, Mariagabriella ; Scampoli, Paola ; Simone, Giustina ; Sorrentino, Eugenio ; Tabocchini, Maria Antonella ; Tallone, Lucia</creatorcontrib><description>This work aimed at measuring cell-killing effectiveness of monoenergetic and Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) carbon-ion beams in normal and tumour cells with different radiation sensitivity. Clonogenic survival was assayed in normal and tumour human cell lines exhibiting different radiosensitivity to X- or gamma-rays following exposure to monoenergetic carbon-ion beams (incident LET 13-303 keV/microm) and at various positions along the ionization curve of a therapeutic carbon-ion beam, corresponding to three dose-averaged LET (LET(d)) values (40, 50 and 75 keV/microm). Chinese hamster V79 cells were also used. Carbon-ion effectiveness for cell inactivation generally increased with LET for monoenergetic beams, with the largest gain in cell-killing obtained in the cells most radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays. Such an increased effectiveness in cells less responsive to low LET radiation was found also for SOBP irradiation, but the latter was less effective compared with monoenergetic ion beams of the same LET. Our data show the superior effectiveness for cell-killing exhibited by carbon-ion beams compared to lower LET radiation, particularly in tumour cells radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays, hence the advantage of using such beams in radiotherapy. The observed lower effectiveness of SOBP irradiation compared to monoenergetic carbon beam irradiation argues against the radiobiological equivalence between dose-averaged LET in a point in the SOBP and the corresponding monoenergetic beams.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0449-3060</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1349-9157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1269/jrr.08052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18987438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Apoptosis - radiation effects ; Carbon Isotopes ; Cell Survival - radiation effects ; Cells (Biology) ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; Health aspects ; Heavy Ions ; Humans ; Ionization ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Radiation (Physics) ; Radiation Dosage ; Scattering, Radiation ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiation research, 2008-11, Vol.49 (6), p.597-607</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2008 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Japan Science and Technology Agency 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-cd24c5feb8d6b4a4a8651667dbab89f50e54fe9953a6f257f67f4d3f4a7d35543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-cd24c5feb8d6b4a4a8651667dbab89f50e54fe9953a6f257f67f4d3f4a7d35543</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18987438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belli, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettega, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzolari, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherubini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuttone, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durante, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yoshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerardi, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gialanella, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manti, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesini, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugliese, Mariagabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scampoli, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simone, Giustina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorrentino, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabocchini, Maria Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tallone, Lucia</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of monoenergetic and spread-out bragg peak carbon-ions for inactivation of various normal and tumour human cell lines</title><title>Journal of radiation research</title><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><description>This work aimed at measuring cell-killing effectiveness of monoenergetic and Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) carbon-ion beams in normal and tumour cells with different radiation sensitivity. Clonogenic survival was assayed in normal and tumour human cell lines exhibiting different radiosensitivity to X- or gamma-rays following exposure to monoenergetic carbon-ion beams (incident LET 13-303 keV/microm) and at various positions along the ionization curve of a therapeutic carbon-ion beam, corresponding to three dose-averaged LET (LET(d)) values (40, 50 and 75 keV/microm). Chinese hamster V79 cells were also used. Carbon-ion effectiveness for cell inactivation generally increased with LET for monoenergetic beams, with the largest gain in cell-killing obtained in the cells most radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays. Such an increased effectiveness in cells less responsive to low LET radiation was found also for SOBP irradiation, but the latter was less effective compared with monoenergetic ion beams of the same LET. Our data show the superior effectiveness for cell-killing exhibited by carbon-ion beams compared to lower LET radiation, particularly in tumour cells radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays, hence the advantage of using such beams in radiotherapy. The observed lower effectiveness of SOBP irradiation compared to monoenergetic carbon beam irradiation argues against the radiobiological equivalence between dose-averaged LET in a point in the SOBP and the corresponding monoenergetic beams.</description><subject>Apoptosis - radiation effects</subject><subject>Carbon Isotopes</subject><subject>Cell Survival - radiation effects</subject><subject>Cells (Biology)</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Heavy Ions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Radiation (Physics)</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0449-3060</issn><issn>1349-9157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYMoTs_owj8gAUFwUW1SeVWWwzA6woAbXYdbebRpq5I2qRpw7R83_QBBskju5bvnHnIQekPJlvZSf9yXsiUDEf0ztKGM605ToZ6jDeHtzYgkV-i61j0hvSKCvERXdNCD4mzYoD_3IXi7xCeffK04BzznlFtRdn6JFkNyuB6KB9fldcFjgd0OHzz8xBbKmFMXc6o45IJjgqMOLK1z1HmCEvNaccplhukktKxzXgv-sc6QsPXThKfY1r5CLwJM1b--3Dfo-6f7b3cP3ePXz1_ubh87KwRZOut6bkXw4-DkyIHDIAWVUrkRxkEHQbzgwWstGMjQCxWkCtyxwEE5JgRnN-j9WfdQ8q_V18XMsR5tQPLNqaFaU61U38B3_4H75js1b4by9qe8l0o0anumdjB5E1PISwHbjvNztDn5EFv_VjBJ2_LTwIfzgC251uKDOZQ4Q_ltKDHHIE0L0pyCbOzbi4V1nL37R16SY38Bsk6a4A</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Belli, Mauro</creator><creator>Bettega, Daniela</creator><creator>Calzolari, Paola</creator><creator>Cherubini, Roberto</creator><creator>Cuttone, Giacomo</creator><creator>Durante, Marco</creator><creator>Esposito, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Furusawa, Yoshiya</creator><creator>Gerardi, Silvia</creator><creator>Gialanella, Giancarlo</creator><creator>Grossi, Gianfranco</creator><creator>Manti, Lorenzo</creator><creator>Marchesini, Renato</creator><creator>Pugliese, Mariagabriella</creator><creator>Scampoli, Paola</creator><creator>Simone, Giustina</creator><creator>Sorrentino, Eugenio</creator><creator>Tabocchini, Maria Antonella</creator><creator>Tallone, Lucia</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of monoenergetic and spread-out bragg peak carbon-ions for inactivation of various normal and tumour human cell lines</title><author>Belli, Mauro ; Bettega, Daniela ; Calzolari, Paola ; Cherubini, Roberto ; Cuttone, Giacomo ; Durante, Marco ; Esposito, Giuseppe ; Furusawa, Yoshiya ; Gerardi, Silvia ; Gialanella, Giancarlo ; Grossi, Gianfranco ; Manti, Lorenzo ; Marchesini, Renato ; Pugliese, Mariagabriella ; Scampoli, Paola ; Simone, Giustina ; Sorrentino, Eugenio ; Tabocchini, Maria Antonella ; Tallone, Lucia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c550t-cd24c5feb8d6b4a4a8651667dbab89f50e54fe9953a6f257f67f4d3f4a7d35543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Apoptosis - radiation effects</topic><topic>Carbon Isotopes</topic><topic>Cell Survival - radiation effects</topic><topic>Cells (Biology)</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Heavy Ions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Radiation (Physics)</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belli, Mauro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bettega, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calzolari, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cherubini, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuttone, Giacomo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durante, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Esposito, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furusawa, Yoshiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerardi, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gialanella, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossi, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manti, Lorenzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marchesini, Renato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugliese, Mariagabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scampoli, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simone, Giustina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorrentino, Eugenio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabocchini, Maria Antonella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tallone, Lucia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belli, Mauro</au><au>Bettega, Daniela</au><au>Calzolari, Paola</au><au>Cherubini, Roberto</au><au>Cuttone, Giacomo</au><au>Durante, Marco</au><au>Esposito, Giuseppe</au><au>Furusawa, Yoshiya</au><au>Gerardi, Silvia</au><au>Gialanella, Giancarlo</au><au>Grossi, Gianfranco</au><au>Manti, Lorenzo</au><au>Marchesini, Renato</au><au>Pugliese, Mariagabriella</au><au>Scampoli, Paola</au><au>Simone, Giustina</au><au>Sorrentino, Eugenio</au><au>Tabocchini, Maria Antonella</au><au>Tallone, Lucia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of monoenergetic and spread-out bragg peak carbon-ions for inactivation of various normal and tumour human cell lines</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiation research</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiat Res</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>607</epage><pages>597-607</pages><issn>0449-3060</issn><eissn>1349-9157</eissn><abstract>This work aimed at measuring cell-killing effectiveness of monoenergetic and Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) carbon-ion beams in normal and tumour cells with different radiation sensitivity. Clonogenic survival was assayed in normal and tumour human cell lines exhibiting different radiosensitivity to X- or gamma-rays following exposure to monoenergetic carbon-ion beams (incident LET 13-303 keV/microm) and at various positions along the ionization curve of a therapeutic carbon-ion beam, corresponding to three dose-averaged LET (LET(d)) values (40, 50 and 75 keV/microm). Chinese hamster V79 cells were also used. Carbon-ion effectiveness for cell inactivation generally increased with LET for monoenergetic beams, with the largest gain in cell-killing obtained in the cells most radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays. Such an increased effectiveness in cells less responsive to low LET radiation was found also for SOBP irradiation, but the latter was less effective compared with monoenergetic ion beams of the same LET. Our data show the superior effectiveness for cell-killing exhibited by carbon-ion beams compared to lower LET radiation, particularly in tumour cells radioresistant to X- or gamma-rays, hence the advantage of using such beams in radiotherapy. The observed lower effectiveness of SOBP irradiation compared to monoenergetic carbon beam irradiation argues against the radiobiological equivalence between dose-averaged LET in a point in the SOBP and the corresponding monoenergetic beams.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>18987438</pmid><doi>10.1269/jrr.08052</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0449-3060 |
ispartof | Journal of radiation research, 2008-11, Vol.49 (6), p.597-607 |
issn | 0449-3060 1349-9157 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19919772 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; J-STAGE Free; MEDLINE; Freely Accessible Japanese Titles; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Apoptosis - radiation effects Carbon Isotopes Cell Survival - radiation effects Cells (Biology) Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation Health aspects Heavy Ions Humans Ionization Neoplasms - pathology Neoplasms - physiopathology Radiation (Physics) Radiation Dosage Scattering, Radiation Tumors |
title | Effectiveness of monoenergetic and spread-out bragg peak carbon-ions for inactivation of various normal and tumour human cell lines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T14%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20monoenergetic%20and%20spread-out%20bragg%20peak%20carbon-ions%20for%20inactivation%20of%20various%20normal%20and%20tumour%20human%20cell%20lines&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiation%20research&rft.au=Belli,%20Mauro&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=607&rft.pages=597-607&rft.issn=0449-3060&rft.eissn=1349-9157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1269/jrr.08052&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA536154375%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1444942675&rft_id=info:pmid/18987438&rft_galeid=A536154375&rfr_iscdi=true |