Sagebrush-Steppe Vegetation Dynamics and Restoration Potential in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A

We modeled the dynamics and restoration of sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats for Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the interior Columbia Basin and adjacent portions of the Great Basin (referred to as the basin). Greater Sage-Grouse have undergone widespread decline and are the foc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2002-10, Vol.16 (5), p.1243-1255
Hauptverfasser: Hemstrom, Miles A., Wisdom, Michael J., Hann, Wendel J., Rowland, Mary M., Wales, Barbara C., Gravenmier, Rebecca A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1255
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1243
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 16
creator Hemstrom, Miles A.
Wisdom, Michael J.
Hann, Wendel J.
Rowland, Mary M.
Wales, Barbara C.
Gravenmier, Rebecca A.
description We modeled the dynamics and restoration of sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats for Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the interior Columbia Basin and adjacent portions of the Great Basin (referred to as the basin). Greater Sage-Grouse have undergone widespread decline and are the focus of conservation on over 13 million ha of sagebrush steppe in the basin, much of which is managed by the U.S. Forest Service (FS) and U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Consequently, we evaluated changes in the amount and quality of sage-grouse habitat on 8.1 million ha of FS-BLM lands in the basin. Changes were estimated from historical to current conditions and from current conditions to those projected 100 years in the future under proposed management and under two restoration scenarios. These two scenarios were designed to improve long-term (100-year) projections of sage-grouse habitat on FS-BLM lands in relation to current conditions and proposed management. Scenario 1 assumed a 50% reduction in detrimental grazing effects by livestock (through changes in stocking rates and grazing systems) and a six-fold increase in areas treated with active restoration relative to proposed management. Scenario 2 assumed a 100% reduction in detrimental grazing effects and the same level of active restoration as scenario 1. Under the two scenarios, the amount of FS-BLM habitat for sage grouse within treated areas declined by 17-19% 100 years in the future compared with the current period, but was 10-14% higher than the 100-year projection under proposed management. Habitat quality under both scenarios was substantially improved compared with the current period and proposed management. Our results suggest that aggressive restoration could slow the rate of sagebrush loss and improve the quality of remaining habitat.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01075.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19913817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3095320</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3095320</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-e6f0c5e567a66f20a7f43a203102a1b3f1220a89e14ee370ef9591983afaf9173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9zEyEYhxlHZ4zRb-CBi57cLSz7By7OtKmtmanWSax6Y95sX1riho1AxuTbl-124tUTDL8fD_BACOUs56ysT9Y5rwqR8UaovGCsyBlnTZXvn5HJMXhOJkxKmUmpipfkVQhrxpiqeDkht0u4w5XfhftsGXG7RfoD7zBCtL2j5wcHG9sGCu6WLjDE3o_Btz6iixY6ah2N90jnLqK3vaezvtttVhboGQTrPtCbfJmfviYvDHQB3zyNU3Jz8en77HN2dX05n51eZW0piirD2rC2wqpuoK5NwaAxpYCCCc4K4CtheJEWpUJeIoqGoVGV4koKMGBUeuiUvB-5W9__2aX76o0NLXYdOOx3QXOluJCPRTkWW9-H4NHorbcb8AfNmR606rUe7OnBnh606ketep-2vns6A0ILnfHgWhv-7ReqknXDU-_j2PtrOzz8N1_Prs_mwzQB3o6A9eD9CBDp40RyMiXZGNsQcX-Mwf_WdSMS6ufXS_1lIX4tFhdMn4sHjDijPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19913817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sagebrush-Steppe Vegetation Dynamics and Restoration Potential in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Hemstrom, Miles A. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Hann, Wendel J. ; Rowland, Mary M. ; Wales, Barbara C. ; Gravenmier, Rebecca A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hemstrom, Miles A. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Hann, Wendel J. ; Rowland, Mary M. ; Wales, Barbara C. ; Gravenmier, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><description>We modeled the dynamics and restoration of sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats for Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the interior Columbia Basin and adjacent portions of the Great Basin (referred to as the basin). Greater Sage-Grouse have undergone widespread decline and are the focus of conservation on over 13 million ha of sagebrush steppe in the basin, much of which is managed by the U.S. Forest Service (FS) and U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Consequently, we evaluated changes in the amount and quality of sage-grouse habitat on 8.1 million ha of FS-BLM lands in the basin. Changes were estimated from historical to current conditions and from current conditions to those projected 100 years in the future under proposed management and under two restoration scenarios. These two scenarios were designed to improve long-term (100-year) projections of sage-grouse habitat on FS-BLM lands in relation to current conditions and proposed management. Scenario 1 assumed a 50% reduction in detrimental grazing effects by livestock (through changes in stocking rates and grazing systems) and a six-fold increase in areas treated with active restoration relative to proposed management. Scenario 2 assumed a 100% reduction in detrimental grazing effects and the same level of active restoration as scenario 1. Under the two scenarios, the amount of FS-BLM habitat for sage grouse within treated areas declined by 17-19% 100 years in the future compared with the current period, but was 10-14% higher than the 100-year projection under proposed management. Habitat quality under both scenarios was substantially improved compared with the current period and proposed management. Our results suggest that aggressive restoration could slow the rate of sagebrush loss and improve the quality of remaining habitat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01075.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Science, Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Artemisia ; Biological and medical sciences ; Centrocercus urophasianus ; Conservation in Practice ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Forest service ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grazing ; Grazing management ; Grouse ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat loss ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Land management ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Plants ; Steppes ; Vegetation ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2002-10, Vol.16 (5), p.1243-1255</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-e6f0c5e567a66f20a7f43a203102a1b3f1220a89e14ee370ef9591983afaf9173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-e6f0c5e567a66f20a7f43a203102a1b3f1220a89e14ee370ef9591983afaf9173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3095320$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3095320$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1418,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13958671$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hemstrom, Miles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisdom, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hann, Wendel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Mary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Barbara C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravenmier, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><title>Sagebrush-Steppe Vegetation Dynamics and Restoration Potential in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>We modeled the dynamics and restoration of sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats for Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the interior Columbia Basin and adjacent portions of the Great Basin (referred to as the basin). Greater Sage-Grouse have undergone widespread decline and are the focus of conservation on over 13 million ha of sagebrush steppe in the basin, much of which is managed by the U.S. Forest Service (FS) and U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Consequently, we evaluated changes in the amount and quality of sage-grouse habitat on 8.1 million ha of FS-BLM lands in the basin. Changes were estimated from historical to current conditions and from current conditions to those projected 100 years in the future under proposed management and under two restoration scenarios. These two scenarios were designed to improve long-term (100-year) projections of sage-grouse habitat on FS-BLM lands in relation to current conditions and proposed management. Scenario 1 assumed a 50% reduction in detrimental grazing effects by livestock (through changes in stocking rates and grazing systems) and a six-fold increase in areas treated with active restoration relative to proposed management. Scenario 2 assumed a 100% reduction in detrimental grazing effects and the same level of active restoration as scenario 1. Under the two scenarios, the amount of FS-BLM habitat for sage grouse within treated areas declined by 17-19% 100 years in the future compared with the current period, but was 10-14% higher than the 100-year projection under proposed management. Habitat quality under both scenarios was substantially improved compared with the current period and proposed management. Our results suggest that aggressive restoration could slow the rate of sagebrush loss and improve the quality of remaining habitat.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Artemisia</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Centrocercus urophasianus</subject><subject>Conservation in Practice</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Forest service</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Grazing management</subject><subject>Grouse</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Steppes</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9zEyEYhxlHZ4zRb-CBi57cLSz7By7OtKmtmanWSax6Y95sX1riho1AxuTbl-124tUTDL8fD_BACOUs56ysT9Y5rwqR8UaovGCsyBlnTZXvn5HJMXhOJkxKmUmpipfkVQhrxpiqeDkht0u4w5XfhftsGXG7RfoD7zBCtL2j5wcHG9sGCu6WLjDE3o_Btz6iixY6ah2N90jnLqK3vaezvtttVhboGQTrPtCbfJmfviYvDHQB3zyNU3Jz8en77HN2dX05n51eZW0piirD2rC2wqpuoK5NwaAxpYCCCc4K4CtheJEWpUJeIoqGoVGV4koKMGBUeuiUvB-5W9__2aX76o0NLXYdOOx3QXOluJCPRTkWW9-H4NHorbcb8AfNmR606rUe7OnBnh606ketep-2vns6A0ILnfHgWhv-7ReqknXDU-_j2PtrOzz8N1_Prs_mwzQB3o6A9eD9CBDp40RyMiXZGNsQcX-Mwf_WdSMS6ufXS_1lIX4tFhdMn4sHjDijPQ</recordid><startdate>200210</startdate><enddate>200210</enddate><creator>Hemstrom, Miles A.</creator><creator>Wisdom, Michael J.</creator><creator>Hann, Wendel J.</creator><creator>Rowland, Mary M.</creator><creator>Wales, Barbara C.</creator><creator>Gravenmier, Rebecca A.</creator><general>Blackwell Science, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200210</creationdate><title>Sagebrush-Steppe Vegetation Dynamics and Restoration Potential in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A</title><author>Hemstrom, Miles A. ; Wisdom, Michael J. ; Hann, Wendel J. ; Rowland, Mary M. ; Wales, Barbara C. ; Gravenmier, Rebecca A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4325-e6f0c5e567a66f20a7f43a203102a1b3f1220a89e14ee370ef9591983afaf9173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Artemisia</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Centrocercus urophasianus</topic><topic>Conservation in Practice</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Forest service</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Grazing management</topic><topic>Grouse</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Steppes</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hemstrom, Miles A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wisdom, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hann, Wendel J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowland, Mary M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wales, Barbara C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gravenmier, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hemstrom, Miles A.</au><au>Wisdom, Michael J.</au><au>Hann, Wendel J.</au><au>Rowland, Mary M.</au><au>Wales, Barbara C.</au><au>Gravenmier, Rebecca A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sagebrush-Steppe Vegetation Dynamics and Restoration Potential in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>2002-10</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1243</spage><epage>1255</epage><pages>1243-1255</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>We modeled the dynamics and restoration of sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) habitats for Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) in the interior Columbia Basin and adjacent portions of the Great Basin (referred to as the basin). Greater Sage-Grouse have undergone widespread decline and are the focus of conservation on over 13 million ha of sagebrush steppe in the basin, much of which is managed by the U.S. Forest Service (FS) and U.S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Consequently, we evaluated changes in the amount and quality of sage-grouse habitat on 8.1 million ha of FS-BLM lands in the basin. Changes were estimated from historical to current conditions and from current conditions to those projected 100 years in the future under proposed management and under two restoration scenarios. These two scenarios were designed to improve long-term (100-year) projections of sage-grouse habitat on FS-BLM lands in relation to current conditions and proposed management. Scenario 1 assumed a 50% reduction in detrimental grazing effects by livestock (through changes in stocking rates and grazing systems) and a six-fold increase in areas treated with active restoration relative to proposed management. Scenario 2 assumed a 100% reduction in detrimental grazing effects and the same level of active restoration as scenario 1. Under the two scenarios, the amount of FS-BLM habitat for sage grouse within treated areas declined by 17-19% 100 years in the future compared with the current period, but was 10-14% higher than the 100-year projection under proposed management. Habitat quality under both scenarios was substantially improved compared with the current period and proposed management. Our results suggest that aggressive restoration could slow the rate of sagebrush loss and improve the quality of remaining habitat.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science, Inc</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01075.x</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2002-10, Vol.16 (5), p.1243-1255
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19913817
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Artemisia
Biological and medical sciences
Centrocercus urophasianus
Conservation in Practice
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Forest service
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grazing
Grazing management
Grouse
Habitat conservation
Habitat loss
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Land management
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Plants
Steppes
Vegetation
Water resources
title Sagebrush-Steppe Vegetation Dynamics and Restoration Potential in the Interior Columbia Basin, U.S.A
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T04%3A26%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sagebrush-Steppe%20Vegetation%20Dynamics%20and%20Restoration%20Potential%20in%20the%20Interior%20Columbia%20Basin,%20U.S.A&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Hemstrom,%20Miles%20A.&rft.date=2002-10&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1243&rft.epage=1255&rft.pages=1243-1255&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01075.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3095320%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19913817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3095320&rfr_iscdi=true