Outcomes after free tissue transfer for composite oral cavity resections involving skin

Background Resections involving oral cavity mucosa, bone, and skin present a unique challenge. Optimizing outcomes often requires technically demanding reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of several reconstructive approaches for patients with composite through‐and‐throu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Head & neck 2018-05, Vol.40 (5), p.973-984
Hauptverfasser: Alvi, Sameer A., Hamill, Chelsea S., Lepse, Jason P., Ayala, Marco, Girod, Douglas A., Tsue, Terance T., Shnayder, Yelizaveta, Kakarala, Kiran
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 984
container_issue 5
container_start_page 973
container_title Head & neck
container_volume 40
creator Alvi, Sameer A.
Hamill, Chelsea S.
Lepse, Jason P.
Ayala, Marco
Girod, Douglas A.
Tsue, Terance T.
Shnayder, Yelizaveta
Kakarala, Kiran
description Background Resections involving oral cavity mucosa, bone, and skin present a unique challenge. Optimizing outcomes often requires technically demanding reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of several reconstructive approaches for patients with composite through‐and‐through defects, with a focus on the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the cohort of patients treated for composite through‐and‐through defects with cutaneous involvement who underwent free flap reconstruction from August 2012 through October 2015. Results Seventeen patients received a single flap (12 cases of osteocutaneous RFFF), whereas 10 patients underwent a combination of flaps. Complication rates and functional outcomes were favorable in patients who underwent osteocutaneous RFFFs. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) was used as a second flap in 3 cases. Conclusion The osteocutaneous RFFF provides a valuable reconstructive option for complex composite resection defects involving skin. When 2 flaps are required, the SCAIF is a viable alternative to a second free flap or pectoralis flap.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hed.25062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1990488811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1990488811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-df79bcda1d06e079847d0787bf3e1396efdf2c6d9d7cdfcb9d33dbf07e473aa93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LHTEUhkNp8asu-gck0I0uRk-ScZIsi58FwY3SZcgkJ2107uQ2mbly_725Xt0UunoPLw8vh4eQbwxOGQA_-4P-lJ9Dxz-RPQZaNiBa-Xlzt6IRINtdsl_KEwCIruU7ZJdr0QGXao_8up8nlxZYqA0TZhoyIp1iKXONbMcSNmXKtELLVOKENGU7UGdXcVrTjAXdFNNYaBxXaVjF8Tctz3H8Sr4EOxQ8fM8D8nh99XBx29zd3_y8-HHXOHEueOOD1L3zlnnoEKRWrfQgleyDQCZ0h8EH7jqvvXQ-uF57IXwfQGIrhbVaHJDj7e4yp78zlsksYnE4DHbENBfDtIZWKcVYRb__gz6lOY_1O8OBKyWqH1Wpky3lciolYzDLHBc2rw0Ds7Ftqm3zZruyR--Lc7-o7Qf5obcCZ1vgJQ64_v-Sub263E6-Akkpijw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2028830008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Outcomes after free tissue transfer for composite oral cavity resections involving skin</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Alvi, Sameer A. ; Hamill, Chelsea S. ; Lepse, Jason P. ; Ayala, Marco ; Girod, Douglas A. ; Tsue, Terance T. ; Shnayder, Yelizaveta ; Kakarala, Kiran</creator><creatorcontrib>Alvi, Sameer A. ; Hamill, Chelsea S. ; Lepse, Jason P. ; Ayala, Marco ; Girod, Douglas A. ; Tsue, Terance T. ; Shnayder, Yelizaveta ; Kakarala, Kiran</creatorcontrib><description>Background Resections involving oral cavity mucosa, bone, and skin present a unique challenge. Optimizing outcomes often requires technically demanding reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of several reconstructive approaches for patients with composite through‐and‐through defects, with a focus on the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the cohort of patients treated for composite through‐and‐through defects with cutaneous involvement who underwent free flap reconstruction from August 2012 through October 2015. Results Seventeen patients received a single flap (12 cases of osteocutaneous RFFF), whereas 10 patients underwent a combination of flaps. Complication rates and functional outcomes were favorable in patients who underwent osteocutaneous RFFFs. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) was used as a second flap in 3 cases. Conclusion The osteocutaneous RFFF provides a valuable reconstructive option for complex composite resection defects involving skin. When 2 flaps are required, the SCAIF is a viable alternative to a second free flap or pectoralis flap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-3074</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hed.25062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29360278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery ; Clavicle ; composite resection ; Defects ; Female ; Forearm ; free flap reconstruction ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Graft Survival ; Head &amp; neck cancer ; Head and neck ; head and neck cancer ; Humans ; Male ; Mandible ; microvascular reconstruction ; Middle Aged ; Mouth Neoplasms - pathology ; Mouth Neoplasms - surgery ; Mucosa ; Oral cavity ; oral cavity cancer ; osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap ; Osteoradionecrosis - pathology ; Osteoradionecrosis - surgery ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Retrospective Studies ; Skin ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Head &amp; neck, 2018-05, Vol.40 (5), p.973-984</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-df79bcda1d06e079847d0787bf3e1396efdf2c6d9d7cdfcb9d33dbf07e473aa93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-df79bcda1d06e079847d0787bf3e1396efdf2c6d9d7cdfcb9d33dbf07e473aa93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9313-3376 ; 0000-0003-3902-1346</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhed.25062$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhed.25062$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29360278$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alvi, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamill, Chelsea S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepse, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girod, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsue, Terance T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shnayder, Yelizaveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakarala, Kiran</creatorcontrib><title>Outcomes after free tissue transfer for composite oral cavity resections involving skin</title><title>Head &amp; neck</title><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><description>Background Resections involving oral cavity mucosa, bone, and skin present a unique challenge. Optimizing outcomes often requires technically demanding reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of several reconstructive approaches for patients with composite through‐and‐through defects, with a focus on the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the cohort of patients treated for composite through‐and‐through defects with cutaneous involvement who underwent free flap reconstruction from August 2012 through October 2015. Results Seventeen patients received a single flap (12 cases of osteocutaneous RFFF), whereas 10 patients underwent a combination of flaps. Complication rates and functional outcomes were favorable in patients who underwent osteocutaneous RFFFs. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) was used as a second flap in 3 cases. Conclusion The osteocutaneous RFFF provides a valuable reconstructive option for complex composite resection defects involving skin. When 2 flaps are required, the SCAIF is a viable alternative to a second free flap or pectoralis flap.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Clavicle</subject><subject>composite resection</subject><subject>Defects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forearm</subject><subject>free flap reconstruction</subject><subject>Free Tissue Flaps</subject><subject>Graft Survival</subject><subject>Head &amp; neck cancer</subject><subject>Head and neck</subject><subject>head and neck cancer</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>microvascular reconstruction</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Mucosa</subject><subject>Oral cavity</subject><subject>oral cavity cancer</subject><subject>osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap</subject><subject>Osteoradionecrosis - pathology</subject><subject>Osteoradionecrosis - surgery</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1043-3074</issn><issn>1097-0347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LHTEUhkNp8asu-gck0I0uRk-ScZIsi58FwY3SZcgkJ2107uQ2mbly_725Xt0UunoPLw8vh4eQbwxOGQA_-4P-lJ9Dxz-RPQZaNiBa-Xlzt6IRINtdsl_KEwCIruU7ZJdr0QGXao_8up8nlxZYqA0TZhoyIp1iKXONbMcSNmXKtELLVOKENGU7UGdXcVrTjAXdFNNYaBxXaVjF8Tctz3H8Sr4EOxQ8fM8D8nh99XBx29zd3_y8-HHXOHEueOOD1L3zlnnoEKRWrfQgleyDQCZ0h8EH7jqvvXQ-uF57IXwfQGIrhbVaHJDj7e4yp78zlsksYnE4DHbENBfDtIZWKcVYRb__gz6lOY_1O8OBKyWqH1Wpky3lciolYzDLHBc2rw0Ds7Ftqm3zZruyR--Lc7-o7Qf5obcCZ1vgJQ64_v-Sub263E6-Akkpijw</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>Alvi, Sameer A.</creator><creator>Hamill, Chelsea S.</creator><creator>Lepse, Jason P.</creator><creator>Ayala, Marco</creator><creator>Girod, Douglas A.</creator><creator>Tsue, Terance T.</creator><creator>Shnayder, Yelizaveta</creator><creator>Kakarala, Kiran</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9313-3376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-1346</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Outcomes after free tissue transfer for composite oral cavity resections involving skin</title><author>Alvi, Sameer A. ; Hamill, Chelsea S. ; Lepse, Jason P. ; Ayala, Marco ; Girod, Douglas A. ; Tsue, Terance T. ; Shnayder, Yelizaveta ; Kakarala, Kiran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-df79bcda1d06e079847d0787bf3e1396efdf2c6d9d7cdfcb9d33dbf07e473aa93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Clavicle</topic><topic>composite resection</topic><topic>Defects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forearm</topic><topic>free flap reconstruction</topic><topic>Free Tissue Flaps</topic><topic>Graft Survival</topic><topic>Head &amp; neck cancer</topic><topic>Head and neck</topic><topic>head and neck cancer</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>microvascular reconstruction</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Mouth Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Mucosa</topic><topic>Oral cavity</topic><topic>oral cavity cancer</topic><topic>osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap</topic><topic>Osteoradionecrosis - pathology</topic><topic>Osteoradionecrosis - surgery</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alvi, Sameer A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamill, Chelsea S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepse, Jason P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayala, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girod, Douglas A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsue, Terance T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shnayder, Yelizaveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakarala, Kiran</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Head &amp; neck</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alvi, Sameer A.</au><au>Hamill, Chelsea S.</au><au>Lepse, Jason P.</au><au>Ayala, Marco</au><au>Girod, Douglas A.</au><au>Tsue, Terance T.</au><au>Shnayder, Yelizaveta</au><au>Kakarala, Kiran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Outcomes after free tissue transfer for composite oral cavity resections involving skin</atitle><jtitle>Head &amp; neck</jtitle><addtitle>Head Neck</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>973</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>973-984</pages><issn>1043-3074</issn><eissn>1097-0347</eissn><abstract>Background Resections involving oral cavity mucosa, bone, and skin present a unique challenge. Optimizing outcomes often requires technically demanding reconstruction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of several reconstructive approaches for patients with composite through‐and‐through defects, with a focus on the osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF). Methods We conducted a retrospective evaluation of the cohort of patients treated for composite through‐and‐through defects with cutaneous involvement who underwent free flap reconstruction from August 2012 through October 2015. Results Seventeen patients received a single flap (12 cases of osteocutaneous RFFF), whereas 10 patients underwent a combination of flaps. Complication rates and functional outcomes were favorable in patients who underwent osteocutaneous RFFFs. The supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) was used as a second flap in 3 cases. Conclusion The osteocutaneous RFFF provides a valuable reconstructive option for complex composite resection defects involving skin. When 2 flaps are required, the SCAIF is a viable alternative to a second free flap or pectoralis flap.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29360278</pmid><doi>10.1002/hed.25062</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9313-3376</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-1346</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1043-3074
ispartof Head & neck, 2018-05, Vol.40 (5), p.973-984
issn 1043-3074
1097-0347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1990488811
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Basal Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Basal Cell - surgery
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell - surgery
Clavicle
composite resection
Defects
Female
Forearm
free flap reconstruction
Free Tissue Flaps
Graft Survival
Head & neck cancer
Head and neck
head and neck cancer
Humans
Male
Mandible
microvascular reconstruction
Middle Aged
Mouth Neoplasms - pathology
Mouth Neoplasms - surgery
Mucosa
Oral cavity
oral cavity cancer
osteocutaneous radial forearm free flap
Osteoradionecrosis - pathology
Osteoradionecrosis - surgery
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Retrospective Studies
Skin
Treatment Outcome
title Outcomes after free tissue transfer for composite oral cavity resections involving skin
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A52%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Outcomes%20after%20free%20tissue%20transfer%20for%20composite%20oral%20cavity%20resections%20involving%20skin&rft.jtitle=Head%20&%20neck&rft.au=Alvi,%20Sameer%20A.&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=973&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=973-984&rft.issn=1043-3074&rft.eissn=1097-0347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hed.25062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1990488811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2028830008&rft_id=info:pmid/29360278&rfr_iscdi=true