Clinical evidence of prevention strategies for capecitabine‐induced hand‐foot syndrome

Hand‐foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common adverse effect of capecitabine‐containing chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacies of various prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were performed to identi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cancer 2018-06, Vol.142 (12), p.2567-2577
Hauptverfasser: Huang, Xuan‐Zhang, Chen, You, Chen, Wen‐Jun, Zhang, Xi, Wu, Cong‐Cong, Wang, Zhen‐Ning, Wu, Jian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2577
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2567
container_title International journal of cancer
container_volume 142
creator Huang, Xuan‐Zhang
Chen, You
Chen, Wen‐Jun
Zhang, Xi
Wu, Cong‐Cong
Wang, Zhen‐Ning
Wu, Jian
description Hand‐foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common adverse effect of capecitabine‐containing chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacies of various prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were performed to identify relevant studies. The risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate the efficacies of these prevention and treatment strategies. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests. Overall and subgroup analyses were conducted. All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata software version 12.0. Seventeen eligible studies were included. Our results indicated that celecoxib was significantly associated with a lower incidence of grade ≥2 capecitabine‐induced HFS without heterogeneity (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.23–0.81, I2 = 0.0%). However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid were not effective toward preventing capecitabine‐induced grade 1, 2, 3, ≥1 or ≥2 HFS. Moreover, pyridoxine was not effective in treating capecitabine‐induced HFS. Similar results were obtained by subgroup analysis. Our results indicate that celecoxib has potential prophylactic efficacy for capecitabine‐induced HFS. However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid are not associated with a decrease in the incidence of capecitabine‐induced HFS. What's new? Capecitabine is effective against breast, colorectal and gastric cancers and can be orally administered, making it an appealing therapeutic option. Its use, however, can be limited by the development of hand‐foot syndrome (HFS), a common side effect that negatively impacts quality of life. The effectiveness of HFS prevention strategies is unclear. The authors of this study evaluated previously reported prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Celecoxib was associated with reduced occurrence of grade 2 or higher HFS, while pyridoxine did not significantly improve HFS symptoms and topical urea/lactic acid was found to be ineffective in preventing the condition.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ijc.31269
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989913949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989913949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4549-d3bf73c5a497e652df7f27e015c25d121ad6190cf9ac4f63a93f2dbaa05daa673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWh8Lf0AG3Ohi2jwmE7OU4hPBjW7chDS50ZRpUpOZSnd-gt_olzhadSG4ulzu4XA5CO0TPCQY05GfmiEjtJZraECwFCWmhK-jQX_DpSCs3kLbOU8xJoTjahNtUck4l6IeoIdx44M3uilg4S0EA0V0xTzBAkLrYyhym3QLjx5y4WIqjJ6D8a2e-ADvr28-2M6ALZ50sP3qYmyLvAw2xRnsog2nmwx733MH3Z-f3Y0vy5vbi6vx6U1pKl7J0rKJE8xwXUkBNafWCUcFYMIN5ZZQom1NJDZOalO5mmnJHLUTrTG3WteC7aCjlXee4nMHuVUznw00jQ4Qu6yIPJGSMFnJHj38g05jl0L_naKYClJJLk966nhFmRRzTuDUPPmZTktFsPoMrvrg6it4zx58G7vJDOwv-VO4B0Yr4MU3sPzfpK6uxyvlB-ZajK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2027149598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical evidence of prevention strategies for capecitabine‐induced hand‐foot syndrome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Huang, Xuan‐Zhang ; Chen, You ; Chen, Wen‐Jun ; Zhang, Xi ; Wu, Cong‐Cong ; Wang, Zhen‐Ning ; Wu, Jian</creator><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xuan‐Zhang ; Chen, You ; Chen, Wen‐Jun ; Zhang, Xi ; Wu, Cong‐Cong ; Wang, Zhen‐Ning ; Wu, Jian</creatorcontrib><description>Hand‐foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common adverse effect of capecitabine‐containing chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacies of various prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were performed to identify relevant studies. The risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate the efficacies of these prevention and treatment strategies. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests. Overall and subgroup analyses were conducted. All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata software version 12.0. Seventeen eligible studies were included. Our results indicated that celecoxib was significantly associated with a lower incidence of grade ≥2 capecitabine‐induced HFS without heterogeneity (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.23–0.81, I2 = 0.0%). However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid were not effective toward preventing capecitabine‐induced grade 1, 2, 3, ≥1 or ≥2 HFS. Moreover, pyridoxine was not effective in treating capecitabine‐induced HFS. Similar results were obtained by subgroup analysis. Our results indicate that celecoxib has potential prophylactic efficacy for capecitabine‐induced HFS. However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid are not associated with a decrease in the incidence of capecitabine‐induced HFS. What's new? Capecitabine is effective against breast, colorectal and gastric cancers and can be orally administered, making it an appealing therapeutic option. Its use, however, can be limited by the development of hand‐foot syndrome (HFS), a common side effect that negatively impacts quality of life. The effectiveness of HFS prevention strategies is unclear. The authors of this study evaluated previously reported prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Celecoxib was associated with reduced occurrence of grade 2 or higher HFS, while pyridoxine did not significantly improve HFS symptoms and topical urea/lactic acid was found to be ineffective in preventing the condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31269</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29355976</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - adverse effects ; Cancer ; capecitabine ; Capecitabine - adverse effects ; Celecoxib ; Chemotherapy ; Feet ; Hand-Foot Syndrome - epidemiology ; Hand-Foot Syndrome - prevention &amp; control ; hand‐foot syndrome ; Humans ; Incidence ; Lactic acid ; Medical research ; prevention strategies ; Pyridoxine ; Statistical analysis ; Urea</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2018-06, Vol.142 (12), p.2567-2577</ispartof><rights>2018 UICC</rights><rights>2018 UICC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4549-d3bf73c5a497e652df7f27e015c25d121ad6190cf9ac4f63a93f2dbaa05daa673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4549-d3bf73c5a497e652df7f27e015c25d121ad6190cf9ac4f63a93f2dbaa05daa673</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5719-5820 ; 0000-0003-0557-3097</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.31269$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.31269$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355976$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xuan‐Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, You</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wen‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Cong‐Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen‐Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jian</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical evidence of prevention strategies for capecitabine‐induced hand‐foot syndrome</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>Hand‐foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common adverse effect of capecitabine‐containing chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacies of various prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were performed to identify relevant studies. The risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate the efficacies of these prevention and treatment strategies. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests. Overall and subgroup analyses were conducted. All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata software version 12.0. Seventeen eligible studies were included. Our results indicated that celecoxib was significantly associated with a lower incidence of grade ≥2 capecitabine‐induced HFS without heterogeneity (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.23–0.81, I2 = 0.0%). However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid were not effective toward preventing capecitabine‐induced grade 1, 2, 3, ≥1 or ≥2 HFS. Moreover, pyridoxine was not effective in treating capecitabine‐induced HFS. Similar results were obtained by subgroup analysis. Our results indicate that celecoxib has potential prophylactic efficacy for capecitabine‐induced HFS. However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid are not associated with a decrease in the incidence of capecitabine‐induced HFS. What's new? Capecitabine is effective against breast, colorectal and gastric cancers and can be orally administered, making it an appealing therapeutic option. Its use, however, can be limited by the development of hand‐foot syndrome (HFS), a common side effect that negatively impacts quality of life. The effectiveness of HFS prevention strategies is unclear. The authors of this study evaluated previously reported prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Celecoxib was associated with reduced occurrence of grade 2 or higher HFS, while pyridoxine did not significantly improve HFS symptoms and topical urea/lactic acid was found to be ineffective in preventing the condition.</description><subject>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>capecitabine</subject><subject>Capecitabine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Celecoxib</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Hand-Foot Syndrome - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hand-Foot Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>hand‐foot syndrome</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Lactic acid</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>prevention strategies</subject><subject>Pyridoxine</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Urea</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMoWh8Lf0AG3Ohi2jwmE7OU4hPBjW7chDS50ZRpUpOZSnd-gt_olzhadSG4ulzu4XA5CO0TPCQY05GfmiEjtJZraECwFCWmhK-jQX_DpSCs3kLbOU8xJoTjahNtUck4l6IeoIdx44M3uilg4S0EA0V0xTzBAkLrYyhym3QLjx5y4WIqjJ6D8a2e-ADvr28-2M6ALZ50sP3qYmyLvAw2xRnsog2nmwx733MH3Z-f3Y0vy5vbi6vx6U1pKl7J0rKJE8xwXUkBNafWCUcFYMIN5ZZQom1NJDZOalO5mmnJHLUTrTG3WteC7aCjlXee4nMHuVUznw00jQ4Qu6yIPJGSMFnJHj38g05jl0L_naKYClJJLk966nhFmRRzTuDUPPmZTktFsPoMrvrg6it4zx58G7vJDOwv-VO4B0Yr4MU3sPzfpK6uxyvlB-ZajK4</recordid><startdate>20180615</startdate><enddate>20180615</enddate><creator>Huang, Xuan‐Zhang</creator><creator>Chen, You</creator><creator>Chen, Wen‐Jun</creator><creator>Zhang, Xi</creator><creator>Wu, Cong‐Cong</creator><creator>Wang, Zhen‐Ning</creator><creator>Wu, Jian</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-5820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-3097</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180615</creationdate><title>Clinical evidence of prevention strategies for capecitabine‐induced hand‐foot syndrome</title><author>Huang, Xuan‐Zhang ; Chen, You ; Chen, Wen‐Jun ; Zhang, Xi ; Wu, Cong‐Cong ; Wang, Zhen‐Ning ; Wu, Jian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4549-d3bf73c5a497e652df7f27e015c25d121ad6190cf9ac4f63a93f2dbaa05daa673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>capecitabine</topic><topic>Capecitabine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Celecoxib</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Hand-Foot Syndrome - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hand-Foot Syndrome - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>hand‐foot syndrome</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Lactic acid</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>prevention strategies</topic><topic>Pyridoxine</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Urea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huang, Xuan‐Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, You</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wen‐Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Cong‐Cong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhen‐Ning</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Jian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huang, Xuan‐Zhang</au><au>Chen, You</au><au>Chen, Wen‐Jun</au><au>Zhang, Xi</au><au>Wu, Cong‐Cong</au><au>Wang, Zhen‐Ning</au><au>Wu, Jian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical evidence of prevention strategies for capecitabine‐induced hand‐foot syndrome</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2018-06-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2567</spage><epage>2577</epage><pages>2567-2577</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>Hand‐foot syndrome (HFS) is the most common adverse effect of capecitabine‐containing chemotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacies of various prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Searches of the PubMed and Embase databases were performed to identify relevant studies. The risk ratio (RR) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) was used as an effect measure to evaluate the efficacies of these prevention and treatment strategies. Publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's tests. Overall and subgroup analyses were conducted. All statistical analyses were conducted with Stata software version 12.0. Seventeen eligible studies were included. Our results indicated that celecoxib was significantly associated with a lower incidence of grade ≥2 capecitabine‐induced HFS without heterogeneity (RR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.23–0.81, I2 = 0.0%). However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid were not effective toward preventing capecitabine‐induced grade 1, 2, 3, ≥1 or ≥2 HFS. Moreover, pyridoxine was not effective in treating capecitabine‐induced HFS. Similar results were obtained by subgroup analysis. Our results indicate that celecoxib has potential prophylactic efficacy for capecitabine‐induced HFS. However, pyridoxine and topical urea/lactic acid are not associated with a decrease in the incidence of capecitabine‐induced HFS. What's new? Capecitabine is effective against breast, colorectal and gastric cancers and can be orally administered, making it an appealing therapeutic option. Its use, however, can be limited by the development of hand‐foot syndrome (HFS), a common side effect that negatively impacts quality of life. The effectiveness of HFS prevention strategies is unclear. The authors of this study evaluated previously reported prevention and treatment strategies for capecitabine‐induced HFS. Celecoxib was associated with reduced occurrence of grade 2 or higher HFS, while pyridoxine did not significantly improve HFS symptoms and topical urea/lactic acid was found to be ineffective in preventing the condition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29355976</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.31269</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-5820</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0557-3097</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-7136
ispartof International journal of cancer, 2018-06, Vol.142 (12), p.2567-2577
issn 0020-7136
1097-0215
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989913949
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic - adverse effects
Cancer
capecitabine
Capecitabine - adverse effects
Celecoxib
Chemotherapy
Feet
Hand-Foot Syndrome - epidemiology
Hand-Foot Syndrome - prevention & control
hand‐foot syndrome
Humans
Incidence
Lactic acid
Medical research
prevention strategies
Pyridoxine
Statistical analysis
Urea
title Clinical evidence of prevention strategies for capecitabine‐induced hand‐foot syndrome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A44%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20evidence%20of%20prevention%20strategies%20for%20capecitabine%E2%80%90induced%20hand%E2%80%90foot%20syndrome&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Huang,%20Xuan%E2%80%90Zhang&rft.date=2018-06-15&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2567&rft.epage=2577&rft.pages=2567-2577&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.31269&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989913949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2027149598&rft_id=info:pmid/29355976&rfr_iscdi=true