Features of Auxiliaries That Enable Native Chemical Ligation beyond Glycine and Cleavage via Radical Fragmentation

Native chemical ligation (NCL) is an invaluable tool in the total chemical synthesis of proteins. Ligation auxiliaries overcome the requirement for cysteine. However, the reported auxiliaries remained limited to glycine‐containing ligation sites and the acidic conditions applied for cleavage of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemistry : a European journal 2018-03, Vol.24 (14), p.3623-3633
Hauptverfasser: Loibl, Simon F., Dallmann, Andre, Hennig, Kathleen, Juds, Carmen, Seitz, Oliver
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3633
container_issue 14
container_start_page 3623
container_title Chemistry : a European journal
container_volume 24
creator Loibl, Simon F.
Dallmann, Andre
Hennig, Kathleen
Juds, Carmen
Seitz, Oliver
description Native chemical ligation (NCL) is an invaluable tool in the total chemical synthesis of proteins. Ligation auxiliaries overcome the requirement for cysteine. However, the reported auxiliaries remained limited to glycine‐containing ligation sites and the acidic conditions applied for cleavage of the typically applied N‐benzyl‐type linkages promote side reactions. With the aim to improve upon both ligation and cleavage, we systematically investigated alternative ligation scaffolds that challenge the N‐benzyl dogma. The study revealed that auxiliary‐mediated peptide couplings are fastest when the ligation proceeds via 5‐membered rather than 6‐membered rings. Substituents in α‐position of the amine shall be avoided. We observed, perhaps surprisingly, that additional β‐substituents accelerated the ligation conferred by the β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold. We also describe a potentially general means to remove ligation auxiliaries by treatment with an aqueous solution of triscarboxyethylphosphine (TCEP) and morpholine at pH 8.5. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labeled auxiliary showed that cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical‐triggered oxidative fragmentation. High ligation rates provided by β‐substituted 2‐mercaptoethyl scaffolds, their facile introduction as well as the mildness of the cleavage reaction are attractive features for protein synthesis beyond cysteine and glycine ligation sites. Efficient peptide ligation auxiliaries have a β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold and avoid substituent in α‐position to the amine. Surprisingly, β‐substituents accelerate ligation reactions. All presented auxiliaries can be removed under mild‐basic conditions. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labelled auxiliary indicated that auxiliary cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical oxidation‐fragmentation cascade.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/chem.201705927
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989595204</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2011243102</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-273ec60b7f5bdcadeacd00f5118f17098275ac874f2386a3a8b35e47f9f5854b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0EokvhyhFZ4sIliz_iOD5W0W6LtICEytmaOJOtKycpdrKw_z1utxSJCyePrd9745lHyFvO1pwx8dHd4LAWjGumjNDPyIorwQupK_WcrJgpdVEpac7Iq5RuGWOmkvIlORNGyrLkckXiFmFeIiY69fRi-eWDh-jz9foGZroZoQ1Iv8DsD0ib3Ms7CHTn9_llGmmLx2ns6GU4Oj8ihVw3AeEAe6QHD_QbdA-CbYT9gOP8oHpNXvQQEr55PM_J9-3murkqdl8vPzUXu8KVnOlCaImuYq3uVds56BBcx1ivOK_7PK6phVbgal32QtYVSKhbqbDUvelVrcpWnpMPJ9-7OP1YMM128MlhCDDitCTLTW2UUYKVGX3_D3o7LXHMv7N5t1yUkjORqfWJcnFKKWJv76IfIB4tZ_Y-DXufhn1KIwvePdou7YDdE_5n_RkwJ-CnD3j8j51trjaf_5r_BnssljY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2011243102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Features of Auxiliaries That Enable Native Chemical Ligation beyond Glycine and Cleavage via Radical Fragmentation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Loibl, Simon F. ; Dallmann, Andre ; Hennig, Kathleen ; Juds, Carmen ; Seitz, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Simon F. ; Dallmann, Andre ; Hennig, Kathleen ; Juds, Carmen ; Seitz, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>Native chemical ligation (NCL) is an invaluable tool in the total chemical synthesis of proteins. Ligation auxiliaries overcome the requirement for cysteine. However, the reported auxiliaries remained limited to glycine‐containing ligation sites and the acidic conditions applied for cleavage of the typically applied N‐benzyl‐type linkages promote side reactions. With the aim to improve upon both ligation and cleavage, we systematically investigated alternative ligation scaffolds that challenge the N‐benzyl dogma. The study revealed that auxiliary‐mediated peptide couplings are fastest when the ligation proceeds via 5‐membered rather than 6‐membered rings. Substituents in α‐position of the amine shall be avoided. We observed, perhaps surprisingly, that additional β‐substituents accelerated the ligation conferred by the β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold. We also describe a potentially general means to remove ligation auxiliaries by treatment with an aqueous solution of triscarboxyethylphosphine (TCEP) and morpholine at pH 8.5. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labeled auxiliary showed that cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical‐triggered oxidative fragmentation. High ligation rates provided by β‐substituted 2‐mercaptoethyl scaffolds, their facile introduction as well as the mildness of the cleavage reaction are attractive features for protein synthesis beyond cysteine and glycine ligation sites. Efficient peptide ligation auxiliaries have a β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold and avoid substituent in α‐position to the amine. Surprisingly, β‐substituents accelerate ligation reactions. All presented auxiliaries can be removed under mild‐basic conditions. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labelled auxiliary indicated that auxiliary cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical oxidation‐fragmentation cascade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0947-6539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-3765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/chem.201705927</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29334413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Chemical synthesis ; Chemistry ; Cleavage ; Couplings ; Cysteine ; Fragmentation ; Glycine ; Morpholine ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; peptide coupling ; peptide ligation ; protecting groups ; Protein biosynthesis ; Protein synthesis ; Proteins ; radical reactions ; Scaffolds ; Side reactions</subject><ispartof>Chemistry : a European journal, 2018-03, Vol.24 (14), p.3623-3633</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-273ec60b7f5bdcadeacd00f5118f17098275ac874f2386a3a8b35e47f9f5854b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-273ec60b7f5bdcadeacd00f5118f17098275ac874f2386a3a8b35e47f9f5854b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0611-4810</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fchem.201705927$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fchem.201705927$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29334413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Simon F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallmann, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennig, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juds, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Features of Auxiliaries That Enable Native Chemical Ligation beyond Glycine and Cleavage via Radical Fragmentation</title><title>Chemistry : a European journal</title><addtitle>Chemistry</addtitle><description>Native chemical ligation (NCL) is an invaluable tool in the total chemical synthesis of proteins. Ligation auxiliaries overcome the requirement for cysteine. However, the reported auxiliaries remained limited to glycine‐containing ligation sites and the acidic conditions applied for cleavage of the typically applied N‐benzyl‐type linkages promote side reactions. With the aim to improve upon both ligation and cleavage, we systematically investigated alternative ligation scaffolds that challenge the N‐benzyl dogma. The study revealed that auxiliary‐mediated peptide couplings are fastest when the ligation proceeds via 5‐membered rather than 6‐membered rings. Substituents in α‐position of the amine shall be avoided. We observed, perhaps surprisingly, that additional β‐substituents accelerated the ligation conferred by the β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold. We also describe a potentially general means to remove ligation auxiliaries by treatment with an aqueous solution of triscarboxyethylphosphine (TCEP) and morpholine at pH 8.5. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labeled auxiliary showed that cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical‐triggered oxidative fragmentation. High ligation rates provided by β‐substituted 2‐mercaptoethyl scaffolds, their facile introduction as well as the mildness of the cleavage reaction are attractive features for protein synthesis beyond cysteine and glycine ligation sites. Efficient peptide ligation auxiliaries have a β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold and avoid substituent in α‐position to the amine. Surprisingly, β‐substituents accelerate ligation reactions. All presented auxiliaries can be removed under mild‐basic conditions. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labelled auxiliary indicated that auxiliary cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical oxidation‐fragmentation cascade.</description><subject>Chemical synthesis</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Cleavage</subject><subject>Couplings</subject><subject>Cysteine</subject><subject>Fragmentation</subject><subject>Glycine</subject><subject>Morpholine</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>peptide coupling</subject><subject>peptide ligation</subject><subject>protecting groups</subject><subject>Protein biosynthesis</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>radical reactions</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Side reactions</subject><issn>0947-6539</issn><issn>1521-3765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0EokvhyhFZ4sIliz_iOD5W0W6LtICEytmaOJOtKycpdrKw_z1utxSJCyePrd9745lHyFvO1pwx8dHd4LAWjGumjNDPyIorwQupK_WcrJgpdVEpac7Iq5RuGWOmkvIlORNGyrLkckXiFmFeIiY69fRi-eWDh-jz9foGZroZoQ1Iv8DsD0ib3Ms7CHTn9_llGmmLx2ns6GU4Oj8ihVw3AeEAe6QHD_QbdA-CbYT9gOP8oHpNXvQQEr55PM_J9-3murkqdl8vPzUXu8KVnOlCaImuYq3uVds56BBcx1ivOK_7PK6phVbgal32QtYVSKhbqbDUvelVrcpWnpMPJ9-7OP1YMM128MlhCDDitCTLTW2UUYKVGX3_D3o7LXHMv7N5t1yUkjORqfWJcnFKKWJv76IfIB4tZ_Y-DXufhn1KIwvePdou7YDdE_5n_RkwJ-CnD3j8j51trjaf_5r_BnssljY</recordid><startdate>20180307</startdate><enddate>20180307</enddate><creator>Loibl, Simon F.</creator><creator>Dallmann, Andre</creator><creator>Hennig, Kathleen</creator><creator>Juds, Carmen</creator><creator>Seitz, Oliver</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-4810</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180307</creationdate><title>Features of Auxiliaries That Enable Native Chemical Ligation beyond Glycine and Cleavage via Radical Fragmentation</title><author>Loibl, Simon F. ; Dallmann, Andre ; Hennig, Kathleen ; Juds, Carmen ; Seitz, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4107-273ec60b7f5bdcadeacd00f5118f17098275ac874f2386a3a8b35e47f9f5854b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Chemical synthesis</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Cleavage</topic><topic>Couplings</topic><topic>Cysteine</topic><topic>Fragmentation</topic><topic>Glycine</topic><topic>Morpholine</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>peptide coupling</topic><topic>peptide ligation</topic><topic>protecting groups</topic><topic>Protein biosynthesis</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>radical reactions</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Side reactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loibl, Simon F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dallmann, Andre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hennig, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juds, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loibl, Simon F.</au><au>Dallmann, Andre</au><au>Hennig, Kathleen</au><au>Juds, Carmen</au><au>Seitz, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Features of Auxiliaries That Enable Native Chemical Ligation beyond Glycine and Cleavage via Radical Fragmentation</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle><addtitle>Chemistry</addtitle><date>2018-03-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>3623</spage><epage>3633</epage><pages>3623-3633</pages><issn>0947-6539</issn><eissn>1521-3765</eissn><abstract>Native chemical ligation (NCL) is an invaluable tool in the total chemical synthesis of proteins. Ligation auxiliaries overcome the requirement for cysteine. However, the reported auxiliaries remained limited to glycine‐containing ligation sites and the acidic conditions applied for cleavage of the typically applied N‐benzyl‐type linkages promote side reactions. With the aim to improve upon both ligation and cleavage, we systematically investigated alternative ligation scaffolds that challenge the N‐benzyl dogma. The study revealed that auxiliary‐mediated peptide couplings are fastest when the ligation proceeds via 5‐membered rather than 6‐membered rings. Substituents in α‐position of the amine shall be avoided. We observed, perhaps surprisingly, that additional β‐substituents accelerated the ligation conferred by the β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold. We also describe a potentially general means to remove ligation auxiliaries by treatment with an aqueous solution of triscarboxyethylphosphine (TCEP) and morpholine at pH 8.5. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labeled auxiliary showed that cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical‐triggered oxidative fragmentation. High ligation rates provided by β‐substituted 2‐mercaptoethyl scaffolds, their facile introduction as well as the mildness of the cleavage reaction are attractive features for protein synthesis beyond cysteine and glycine ligation sites. Efficient peptide ligation auxiliaries have a β‐mercaptoethyl scaffold and avoid substituent in α‐position to the amine. Surprisingly, β‐substituents accelerate ligation reactions. All presented auxiliaries can be removed under mild‐basic conditions. NMR analysis of a 13C‐labelled auxiliary indicated that auxiliary cleavage most likely proceeds through a radical oxidation‐fragmentation cascade.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29334413</pmid><doi>10.1002/chem.201705927</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-4810</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0947-6539
ispartof Chemistry : a European journal, 2018-03, Vol.24 (14), p.3623-3633
issn 0947-6539
1521-3765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989595204
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Chemical synthesis
Chemistry
Cleavage
Couplings
Cysteine
Fragmentation
Glycine
Morpholine
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
peptide coupling
peptide ligation
protecting groups
Protein biosynthesis
Protein synthesis
Proteins
radical reactions
Scaffolds
Side reactions
title Features of Auxiliaries That Enable Native Chemical Ligation beyond Glycine and Cleavage via Radical Fragmentation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A42%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Features%20of%20Auxiliaries%20That%20Enable%20Native%20Chemical%20Ligation%20beyond%20Glycine%20and%20Cleavage%20via%20Radical%20Fragmentation&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20:%20a%20European%20journal&rft.au=Loibl,%20Simon%20F.&rft.date=2018-03-07&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=3623&rft.epage=3633&rft.pages=3623-3633&rft.issn=0947-6539&rft.eissn=1521-3765&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/chem.201705927&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2011243102%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2011243102&rft_id=info:pmid/29334413&rfr_iscdi=true