A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships

Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk mark...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trauma, Violence, & Abuse Violence, & Abuse, 2019-07, Vol.20 (3), p.374-384
Hauptverfasser: Kimmes, Jonathan G., Mallory, Allen B., Spencer, Chelsea, Beck, Austin R., Cafferky, Bryan, Stith, Sandra M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 384
container_issue 3
container_start_page 374
container_title Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
container_volume 20
creator Kimmes, Jonathan G.
Mallory, Allen B.
Spencer, Chelsea
Beck, Austin R.
Cafferky, Bryan
Stith, Sandra M.
description Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1524838017708784
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989595187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27010973</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1524838017708784</sage_id><sourcerecordid>27010973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMo7ncvSsCLl9bsnRwHcQNFcT02mUy19tjTGVM9oP_eDOMCHjxVQX3vFe8RssPZIedlecS1UFZalndmS6uWyDrXWhRWCrU834Uq5vc1soE4ZowbJ8wqWRNOSulMuU6eBvQKel8MOt9-YIM01vS2wVd65dMrJKR1TPSi65uJ74He-NR3kOhjE1voAtCmo3d-AsUdvNNbaH3fxA5fmilukZXatwjbX3OTPJye3B-fF5fXZxfHg8siSFv2RbBSmpFy2joxkpzZMBQMhkw6C9roOnAhBNfBBGFqxyGPoWSKccZry0yQm-Rg4TtN8W0G2FeTBgO0re8gzrDizjrtNLdlRvf_oOM4Szk3VkIopZ1RymWKLaiQImKCupqmHD59VJxV89Krv6Vnyd6X8Ww4gdGP4LvlDBQLAP0z_H79x3B3wY-xj-nXr8y5XSnlJ-eFj-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2244596449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kimmes, Jonathan G. ; Mallory, Allen B. ; Spencer, Chelsea ; Beck, Austin R. ; Cafferky, Bryan ; Stith, Sandra M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimmes, Jonathan G. ; Mallory, Allen B. ; Spencer, Chelsea ; Beck, Austin R. ; Cafferky, Bryan ; Stith, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><description>Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-8380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1524838017708784</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29333967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Abuse ; Aggression ; Crime Victims - psychology ; Crime Victims - rehabilitation ; Domestic violence ; Emotional abuse ; Females ; Heterosexuality ; HIV ; Homophobia ; Homosexuality - psychology ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Intimate partner violence ; Intimate Partner Violence - prevention &amp; control ; Intimate Partner Violence - psychology ; Markers ; Men ; Meta-analysis ; Review Manuscript ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Search engines ; Sex ; Sexual behavior ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Specificity ; Spouse Abuse - prevention &amp; control ; Spouse Abuse - psychology ; STD ; Victimization ; Victims ; Violence ; Women</subject><ispartof>Trauma, Violence, &amp; Abuse, 2019-07, Vol.20 (3), p.374-384</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1312-1103</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27010973$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27010973$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,21819,27922,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29333967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallory, Allen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Austin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafferky, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stith, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</title><title>Trauma, Violence, &amp; Abuse</title><addtitle>Trauma Violence Abuse</addtitle><description>Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.</description><subject>Abuse</subject><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Crime Victims - psychology</subject><subject>Crime Victims - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Emotional abuse</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Heterosexuality</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Homophobia</subject><subject>Homosexuality - psychology</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intimate partner violence</subject><subject>Intimate Partner Violence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Review Manuscript</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1524-8380</issn><issn>1552-8324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMo7ncvSsCLl9bsnRwHcQNFcT02mUy19tjTGVM9oP_eDOMCHjxVQX3vFe8RssPZIedlecS1UFZalndmS6uWyDrXWhRWCrU834Uq5vc1soE4ZowbJ8wqWRNOSulMuU6eBvQKel8MOt9-YIM01vS2wVd65dMrJKR1TPSi65uJ74He-NR3kOhjE1voAtCmo3d-AsUdvNNbaH3fxA5fmilukZXatwjbX3OTPJye3B-fF5fXZxfHg8siSFv2RbBSmpFy2joxkpzZMBQMhkw6C9roOnAhBNfBBGFqxyGPoWSKccZry0yQm-Rg4TtN8W0G2FeTBgO0re8gzrDizjrtNLdlRvf_oOM4Szk3VkIopZ1RymWKLaiQImKCupqmHD59VJxV89Krv6Vnyd6X8Ww4gdGP4LvlDBQLAP0z_H79x3B3wY-xj-nXr8y5XSnlJ-eFj-c</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</creator><creator>Mallory, Allen B.</creator><creator>Spencer, Chelsea</creator><creator>Beck, Austin R.</creator><creator>Cafferky, Bryan</creator><creator>Stith, Sandra M.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1312-1103</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</title><author>Kimmes, Jonathan G. ; Mallory, Allen B. ; Spencer, Chelsea ; Beck, Austin R. ; Cafferky, Bryan ; Stith, Sandra M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abuse</topic><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Crime Victims - psychology</topic><topic>Crime Victims - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Emotional abuse</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Heterosexuality</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Homophobia</topic><topic>Homosexuality - psychology</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intimate partner violence</topic><topic>Intimate Partner Violence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Review Manuscript</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallory, Allen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Austin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafferky, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stith, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trauma, Violence, &amp; Abuse</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</au><au>Mallory, Allen B.</au><au>Spencer, Chelsea</au><au>Beck, Austin R.</au><au>Cafferky, Bryan</au><au>Stith, Sandra M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</atitle><jtitle>Trauma, Violence, &amp; Abuse</jtitle><addtitle>Trauma Violence Abuse</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>374-384</pages><issn>1524-8380</issn><eissn>1552-8324</eissn><abstract>Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><pmid>29333967</pmid><doi>10.1177/1524838017708784</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1312-1103</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1524-8380
ispartof Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2019-07, Vol.20 (3), p.374-384
issn 1524-8380
1552-8324
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989595187
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Abuse
Aggression
Crime Victims - psychology
Crime Victims - rehabilitation
Domestic violence
Emotional abuse
Females
Heterosexuality
HIV
Homophobia
Homosexuality - psychology
Human immunodeficiency virus
Humans
Intimate partner violence
Intimate Partner Violence - prevention & control
Intimate Partner Violence - psychology
Markers
Men
Meta-analysis
Review Manuscript
Risk
Risk analysis
Risk Factors
Search engines
Sex
Sexual behavior
Sexually transmitted diseases
Specificity
Spouse Abuse - prevention & control
Spouse Abuse - psychology
STD
Victimization
Victims
Violence
Women
title A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Risk%20Markers%20for%20Intimate%20Partner%20Violence%20in%20Same-Sex%20Relationships&rft.jtitle=Trauma,%20Violence,%20&%20Abuse&rft.au=Kimmes,%20Jonathan%20G.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=374-384&rft.issn=1524-8380&rft.eissn=1552-8324&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1524838017708784&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27010973%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2244596449&rft_id=info:pmid/29333967&rft_jstor_id=27010973&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1524838017708784&rfr_iscdi=true