A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships
Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk mark...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trauma, Violence, & Abuse Violence, & Abuse, 2019-07, Vol.20 (3), p.374-384 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 384 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 374 |
container_title | Trauma, Violence, & Abuse |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Kimmes, Jonathan G. Mallory, Allen B. Spencer, Chelsea Beck, Austin R. Cafferky, Bryan Stith, Sandra M. |
description | Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1524838017708784 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989595187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27010973</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1524838017708784</sage_id><sourcerecordid>27010973</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMo7ncvSsCLl9bsnRwHcQNFcT02mUy19tjTGVM9oP_eDOMCHjxVQX3vFe8RssPZIedlecS1UFZalndmS6uWyDrXWhRWCrU834Uq5vc1soE4ZowbJ8wqWRNOSulMuU6eBvQKel8MOt9-YIM01vS2wVd65dMrJKR1TPSi65uJ74He-NR3kOhjE1voAtCmo3d-AsUdvNNbaH3fxA5fmilukZXatwjbX3OTPJye3B-fF5fXZxfHg8siSFv2RbBSmpFy2joxkpzZMBQMhkw6C9roOnAhBNfBBGFqxyGPoWSKccZry0yQm-Rg4TtN8W0G2FeTBgO0re8gzrDizjrtNLdlRvf_oOM4Szk3VkIopZ1RymWKLaiQImKCupqmHD59VJxV89Krv6Vnyd6X8Ww4gdGP4LvlDBQLAP0z_H79x3B3wY-xj-nXr8y5XSnlJ-eFj-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2244596449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Kimmes, Jonathan G. ; Mallory, Allen B. ; Spencer, Chelsea ; Beck, Austin R. ; Cafferky, Bryan ; Stith, Sandra M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kimmes, Jonathan G. ; Mallory, Allen B. ; Spencer, Chelsea ; Beck, Austin R. ; Cafferky, Bryan ; Stith, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><description>Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-8380</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-8324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1524838017708784</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29333967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Abuse ; Aggression ; Crime Victims - psychology ; Crime Victims - rehabilitation ; Domestic violence ; Emotional abuse ; Females ; Heterosexuality ; HIV ; Homophobia ; Homosexuality - psychology ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; Humans ; Intimate partner violence ; Intimate Partner Violence - prevention & control ; Intimate Partner Violence - psychology ; Markers ; Men ; Meta-analysis ; Review Manuscript ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk Factors ; Search engines ; Sex ; Sexual behavior ; Sexually transmitted diseases ; Specificity ; Spouse Abuse - prevention & control ; Spouse Abuse - psychology ; STD ; Victimization ; Victims ; Violence ; Women</subject><ispartof>Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2019-07, Vol.20 (3), p.374-384</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1312-1103</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27010973$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27010973$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,803,21819,27922,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29333967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallory, Allen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Austin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafferky, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stith, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><title>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</title><title>Trauma, Violence, & Abuse</title><addtitle>Trauma Violence Abuse</addtitle><description>Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.</description><subject>Abuse</subject><subject>Aggression</subject><subject>Crime Victims - psychology</subject><subject>Crime Victims - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Emotional abuse</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Heterosexuality</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Homophobia</subject><subject>Homosexuality - psychology</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intimate partner violence</subject><subject>Intimate Partner Violence - prevention & control</subject><subject>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Review Manuscript</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual behavior</subject><subject>Sexually transmitted diseases</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - prevention & control</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>STD</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Victims</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1524-8380</issn><issn>1552-8324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kElLBDEQhYMo7ncvSsCLl9bsnRwHcQNFcT02mUy19tjTGVM9oP_eDOMCHjxVQX3vFe8RssPZIedlecS1UFZalndmS6uWyDrXWhRWCrU834Uq5vc1soE4ZowbJ8wqWRNOSulMuU6eBvQKel8MOt9-YIM01vS2wVd65dMrJKR1TPSi65uJ74He-NR3kOhjE1voAtCmo3d-AsUdvNNbaH3fxA5fmilukZXatwjbX3OTPJye3B-fF5fXZxfHg8siSFv2RbBSmpFy2joxkpzZMBQMhkw6C9roOnAhBNfBBGFqxyGPoWSKccZry0yQm-Rg4TtN8W0G2FeTBgO0re8gzrDizjrtNLdlRvf_oOM4Szk3VkIopZ1RymWKLaiQImKCupqmHD59VJxV89Krv6Vnyd6X8Ww4gdGP4LvlDBQLAP0z_H79x3B3wY-xj-nXr8y5XSnlJ-eFj-c</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</creator><creator>Mallory, Allen B.</creator><creator>Spencer, Chelsea</creator><creator>Beck, Austin R.</creator><creator>Cafferky, Bryan</creator><creator>Stith, Sandra M.</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1312-1103</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</title><author>Kimmes, Jonathan G. ; Mallory, Allen B. ; Spencer, Chelsea ; Beck, Austin R. ; Cafferky, Bryan ; Stith, Sandra M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-c8336d495892d3108cb20eb0398e565fc122215c6c26f91ec26b3040101f806c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abuse</topic><topic>Aggression</topic><topic>Crime Victims - psychology</topic><topic>Crime Victims - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Emotional abuse</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Heterosexuality</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Homophobia</topic><topic>Homosexuality - psychology</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intimate partner violence</topic><topic>Intimate Partner Violence - prevention & control</topic><topic>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Review Manuscript</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual behavior</topic><topic>Sexually transmitted diseases</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - prevention & control</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>STD</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Victims</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mallory, Allen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spencer, Chelsea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Austin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cafferky, Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stith, Sandra M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trauma, Violence, & Abuse</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kimmes, Jonathan G.</au><au>Mallory, Allen B.</au><au>Spencer, Chelsea</au><au>Beck, Austin R.</au><au>Cafferky, Bryan</au><au>Stith, Sandra M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships</atitle><jtitle>Trauma, Violence, & Abuse</jtitle><addtitle>Trauma Violence Abuse</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>384</epage><pages>374-384</pages><issn>1524-8380</issn><eissn>1552-8324</eissn><abstract>Research on intimate partner violence (IPV) has largely focused on heterosexual relationships, but, in recent years, researchers have expanded their focus to include same-sex relationships. Using meta-analytic techniques, this study was conducted to examine the relative strength of various risk markers for men and women being perpetrators and victims of physical IPV in samesex relationships. Articles were identified through research search engines and screened to identify articles fitting the inclusion criteria, a process that resulted in 24 studies and 114 effect sizes for the meta-analysis. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for both male and female perpetration was psychological abuse perpetration. The strongest risk marker among those with at least two effect sizes for IPV victimization was also perpetration of psychological abuse for males and psychological abuse victimization for females. Among same-sex-specific risk markers, internalized homophobia and fusion were the strongest predictors for being perpetrators of IPV for men and women, respectively. HIV status and internalized homophobia were the strongest risk markers for IPV victimization for men and women, respectively. Of 10 comparisons between men and women in risk markers for IPV perpetration and victimization, only 1 significant difference was found. The results suggest that although same-sex and heterosexual relationships may share a number of risk markers for IPV, there are risk markers for physical IPV unique to same-sex relationships. Further research and increased specificity in measurement are needed to better study and understand the influence of same-sex-specific risk markers for IPV.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><pmid>29333967</pmid><doi>10.1177/1524838017708784</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1312-1103</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-8380 |
ispartof | Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 2019-07, Vol.20 (3), p.374-384 |
issn | 1524-8380 1552-8324 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989595187 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Abuse Aggression Crime Victims - psychology Crime Victims - rehabilitation Domestic violence Emotional abuse Females Heterosexuality HIV Homophobia Homosexuality - psychology Human immunodeficiency virus Humans Intimate partner violence Intimate Partner Violence - prevention & control Intimate Partner Violence - psychology Markers Men Meta-analysis Review Manuscript Risk Risk analysis Risk Factors Search engines Sex Sexual behavior Sexually transmitted diseases Specificity Spouse Abuse - prevention & control Spouse Abuse - psychology STD Victimization Victims Violence Women |
title | A Meta-Analysis of Risk Markers for Intimate Partner Violence in Same-Sex Relationships |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A35%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Meta-Analysis%20of%20Risk%20Markers%20for%20Intimate%20Partner%20Violence%20in%20Same-Sex%20Relationships&rft.jtitle=Trauma,%20Violence,%20&%20Abuse&rft.au=Kimmes,%20Jonathan%20G.&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=384&rft.pages=374-384&rft.issn=1524-8380&rft.eissn=1552-8324&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1524838017708784&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27010973%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2244596449&rft_id=info:pmid/29333967&rft_jstor_id=27010973&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1524838017708784&rfr_iscdi=true |