Could we perform vaginal mesh surgery for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women?

Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse will increase with the aging of the population. Concerning the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal route is often preferred for elderly women. However few data are available concerning transvaginal mesh surgery in this population. The aim of this stud...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progrès en urologie (Paris) 2018-03, Vol.28 (4), p.221-229
Hauptverfasser: Allègre, L, Abdirahman, S, Hedde, A, Fatton, B, de Tayrac, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:fre
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 229
container_issue 4
container_start_page 221
container_title Progrès en urologie (Paris)
container_volume 28
creator Allègre, L
Abdirahman, S
Hedde, A
Fatton, B
de Tayrac, R
description Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse will increase with the aging of the population. Concerning the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal route is often preferred for elderly women. However few data are available concerning transvaginal mesh surgery in this population. The aim of this study was to compare efficiency and complications of transvaginal mesh surgery between women aged over 75 and younger women. A monocentric, retrospective study included all women who underwent anterior sacrospinous suspension with mesh for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The primary endpoint was anatomical success at the last follow-up, defined by a pelvic organ prolapse stage 0 or 1 of POP-Q classification. The secondary endpoints were rate of complications and urinary, colorectal and sexual functional results. We included 329 patients, 69 were under 75 years old and 260 were aged over 75. The median of follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 6). The rate of anatomical success was significantly higher in patients aged over 75: 92% versus 85% in younger patients (P=0.02). However this difference was no more significant in multivariate analysis after inclusion of confusions factors (P=0.82). The rate of perioperative complications was low and similar in the 2 groups even in multivariate analysis. Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh seems to achieve at least similar results between women aged more than 75 years and younger women. There is no excess risk of complications in elderly women. 4.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.purol.2017.12.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989594396</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989594396</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-1d03536d0417f9362e464f70bfdf56cc32a8fdb76a7425bfdc538454a97055263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtLw0AUhWeh2Fr9BYLM0k3jnXdmJVJ8QcGNbg3T5E5NmTycSSr990asqwPnfJx7OYRcMcgYMH27y_oxdiHjwEzGeAYMTsicMa2XBnIzI-cp7QA0QG7PyIxbISyTMCcfq24MFf1G2mP0XWzo3m3r1gXaYPqkaYxbjAc6JXSI6IYG24F2fqLDvi5pF7eupf102vUJad1SDBXGcKDf3YTeXZBT70LCy6MuyPvjw9vqebl-fXpZ3a-XPWdsWLIKhBK6AsmMt0JzlFp6AxtfeaXLUnCX-2pjtDOSq8ktlcilks4aUIprsSA3f73TK18jpqFo6lRiCK7FbkwFs7lVVgr7i14f0XHTYFX0sW5cPBT_m4gf3I1jiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989594396</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Could we perform vaginal mesh surgery for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Allègre, L ; Abdirahman, S ; Hedde, A ; Fatton, B ; de Tayrac, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Allègre, L ; Abdirahman, S ; Hedde, A ; Fatton, B ; de Tayrac, R</creatorcontrib><description>Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse will increase with the aging of the population. Concerning the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal route is often preferred for elderly women. However few data are available concerning transvaginal mesh surgery in this population. The aim of this study was to compare efficiency and complications of transvaginal mesh surgery between women aged over 75 and younger women. A monocentric, retrospective study included all women who underwent anterior sacrospinous suspension with mesh for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The primary endpoint was anatomical success at the last follow-up, defined by a pelvic organ prolapse stage 0 or 1 of POP-Q classification. The secondary endpoints were rate of complications and urinary, colorectal and sexual functional results. We included 329 patients, 69 were under 75 years old and 260 were aged over 75. The median of follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 6). The rate of anatomical success was significantly higher in patients aged over 75: 92% versus 85% in younger patients (P=0.02). However this difference was no more significant in multivariate analysis after inclusion of confusions factors (P=0.82). The rate of perioperative complications was low and similar in the 2 groups even in multivariate analysis. Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh seems to achieve at least similar results between women aged more than 75 years and younger women. There is no excess risk of complications in elderly women. 4.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1166-7087</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2017.12.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29339140</identifier><language>fre</language><publisher>France</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Humans ; Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Mesh ; Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Progrès en urologie (Paris), 2018-03, Vol.28 (4), p.221-229</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29339140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allègre, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdirahman, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedde, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatton, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Tayrac, R</creatorcontrib><title>Could we perform vaginal mesh surgery for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women?</title><title>Progrès en urologie (Paris)</title><addtitle>Prog Urol</addtitle><description>Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse will increase with the aging of the population. Concerning the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal route is often preferred for elderly women. However few data are available concerning transvaginal mesh surgery in this population. The aim of this study was to compare efficiency and complications of transvaginal mesh surgery between women aged over 75 and younger women. A monocentric, retrospective study included all women who underwent anterior sacrospinous suspension with mesh for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The primary endpoint was anatomical success at the last follow-up, defined by a pelvic organ prolapse stage 0 or 1 of POP-Q classification. The secondary endpoints were rate of complications and urinary, colorectal and sexual functional results. We included 329 patients, 69 were under 75 years old and 260 were aged over 75. The median of follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 6). The rate of anatomical success was significantly higher in patients aged over 75: 92% versus 85% in younger patients (P=0.02). However this difference was no more significant in multivariate analysis after inclusion of confusions factors (P=0.82). The rate of perioperative complications was low and similar in the 2 groups even in multivariate analysis. Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh seems to achieve at least similar results between women aged more than 75 years and younger women. There is no excess risk of complications in elderly women. 4.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>1166-7087</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtLw0AUhWeh2Fr9BYLM0k3jnXdmJVJ8QcGNbg3T5E5NmTycSSr990asqwPnfJx7OYRcMcgYMH27y_oxdiHjwEzGeAYMTsicMa2XBnIzI-cp7QA0QG7PyIxbISyTMCcfq24MFf1G2mP0XWzo3m3r1gXaYPqkaYxbjAc6JXSI6IYG24F2fqLDvi5pF7eupf102vUJad1SDBXGcKDf3YTeXZBT70LCy6MuyPvjw9vqebl-fXpZ3a-XPWdsWLIKhBK6AsmMt0JzlFp6AxtfeaXLUnCX-2pjtDOSq8ktlcilks4aUIprsSA3f73TK18jpqFo6lRiCK7FbkwFs7lVVgr7i14f0XHTYFX0sW5cPBT_m4gf3I1jiQ</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Allègre, L</creator><creator>Abdirahman, S</creator><creator>Hedde, A</creator><creator>Fatton, B</creator><creator>de Tayrac, R</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Could we perform vaginal mesh surgery for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women?</title><author>Allègre, L ; Abdirahman, S ; Hedde, A ; Fatton, B ; de Tayrac, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-1d03536d0417f9362e464f70bfdf56cc32a8fdb76a7425bfdc538454a97055263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>fre</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allègre, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdirahman, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedde, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fatton, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Tayrac, R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Progrès en urologie (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allègre, L</au><au>Abdirahman, S</au><au>Hedde, A</au><au>Fatton, B</au><au>de Tayrac, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Could we perform vaginal mesh surgery for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women?</atitle><jtitle>Progrès en urologie (Paris)</jtitle><addtitle>Prog Urol</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>221-229</pages><issn>1166-7087</issn><abstract>Prevalence of pelvic organ prolapse will increase with the aging of the population. Concerning the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse, transvaginal route is often preferred for elderly women. However few data are available concerning transvaginal mesh surgery in this population. The aim of this study was to compare efficiency and complications of transvaginal mesh surgery between women aged over 75 and younger women. A monocentric, retrospective study included all women who underwent anterior sacrospinous suspension with mesh for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. The primary endpoint was anatomical success at the last follow-up, defined by a pelvic organ prolapse stage 0 or 1 of POP-Q classification. The secondary endpoints were rate of complications and urinary, colorectal and sexual functional results. We included 329 patients, 69 were under 75 years old and 260 were aged over 75. The median of follow-up was 12 months (IQR: 6). The rate of anatomical success was significantly higher in patients aged over 75: 92% versus 85% in younger patients (P=0.02). However this difference was no more significant in multivariate analysis after inclusion of confusions factors (P=0.82). The rate of perioperative complications was low and similar in the 2 groups even in multivariate analysis. Utero-vaginal suspension using bilateral vaginal anterior sacrospinous fixation with mesh seems to achieve at least similar results between women aged more than 75 years and younger women. There is no excess risk of complications in elderly women. 4.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pmid>29339140</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.purol.2017.12.010</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1166-7087
ispartof Progrès en urologie (Paris), 2018-03, Vol.28 (4), p.221-229
issn 1166-7087
language fre
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989594396
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Female
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Humans
Pelvic Organ Prolapse - surgery
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Mesh
Urologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Vagina
title Could we perform vaginal mesh surgery for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse in elderly women?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A04%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Could%20we%20perform%20vaginal%20mesh%20surgery%20for%20treatment%20of%20pelvic%20organ%20prolapse%20in%20elderly%20women?&rft.jtitle=Progre%CC%80s%20en%20urologie%20(Paris)&rft.au=All%C3%A8gre,%20L&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=221-229&rft.issn=1166-7087&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.purol.2017.12.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1989594396%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989594396&rft_id=info:pmid/29339140&rfr_iscdi=true