Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report

The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American psychologist 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.26-46
Hauptverfasser: Levitt, Heidi M., Bamberg, Michael, Creswell, John W., Frost, David M., Josselson, Ruthellen, Suárez-Orozco, Carola
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 26
container_title The American psychologist
container_volume 73
creator Levitt, Heidi M.
Bamberg, Michael
Creswell, John W.
Frost, David M.
Josselson, Ruthellen
Suárez-Orozco, Carola
description The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/amp0000151
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989594091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989594091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-4d4541262ba63fdf3ff2b84f27550907442b30d96c84fd6f119f0cf4a265b7e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwwMgS2wQasDXJO4ujCgXtWIog9Sd5Th2JyWJg50g5vF4M84wvQgWeGP7938-HZ8foaeUvKKEF69NPxJYVNJ7aEEVl5lS5OI-WoDIM5LnFwfoUUpXcJWlog_RAVNcSFHKBfr1McxxMB2u4tTazuFzNwY4Dpf4y2SGxsQmYR8i_jybrp3M1P5weBXb3sTt0V_imZtMVgFqC6AjDLX4rP3pmt3DJgDl3CVnot3gdsCrtLWb0IXL7TFebxyuVhVezXXXWoCFIf0pX4a-n4db6U2AZvDapG_4JER70-pj9MCbLrkn1_sh-nrydr18n51-evdhWZ1mRlAxZaKBH1OWs9rk3Deee8_qUnhWSEkUKYRgNSeNyi2ITe4pVZ5YLwzLZV24kh-iF3vuGMP32aVJ922yruvM4MKcNFWlkkoQRcH6_B_r1X7KSTNCGBgLSOY_LmCVkimVF-B6uXfZGFKKzutxP31Nid7Fr-_iB_Oza-Rc9665td7kfUczo9EjhGD2sSc7x-iGaQfTBddUs5z_Bp7Pu3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1988529967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Levitt, Heidi M. ; Bamberg, Michael ; Creswell, John W. ; Frost, David M. ; Josselson, Ruthellen ; Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creator><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Levitt, Heidi M. ; Bamberg, Michael ; Creswell, John W. ; Frost, David M. ; Josselson, Ruthellen ; Suárez-Orozco, Carola ; Kazak, Anne E</creatorcontrib><description>The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/amp0000151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29345485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>American Psychological Association ; Meta Analysis ; Methodology ; Mixed Methods Research ; Professional Standards ; Psychology ; Qualitative Methods ; Qualitative research ; Quantitative analysis ; Reporting Standards ; Scientific Communication ; Social sciences ; Systematic review ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.26-46</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-4d4541262ba63fdf3ff2b84f27550907442b30d96c84fd6f119f0cf4a265b7e83</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9359-2217 ; 0000-0002-9111-6484 ; 0000-0001-9447-1484 ; 0000-0001-9284-5219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Levitt, Heidi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creswell, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josselson, Ruthellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creatorcontrib><title>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.</description><subject>American Psychological Association</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Professional Standards</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative Methods</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Reporting Standards</subject><subject>Scientific Communication</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwwMgS2wQasDXJO4ujCgXtWIog9Sd5Th2JyWJg50g5vF4M84wvQgWeGP7938-HZ8foaeUvKKEF69NPxJYVNJ7aEEVl5lS5OI-WoDIM5LnFwfoUUpXcJWlog_RAVNcSFHKBfr1McxxMB2u4tTazuFzNwY4Dpf4y2SGxsQmYR8i_jybrp3M1P5weBXb3sTt0V_imZtMVgFqC6AjDLX4rP3pmt3DJgDl3CVnot3gdsCrtLWb0IXL7TFebxyuVhVezXXXWoCFIf0pX4a-n4db6U2AZvDapG_4JER70-pj9MCbLrkn1_sh-nrydr18n51-evdhWZ1mRlAxZaKBH1OWs9rk3Deee8_qUnhWSEkUKYRgNSeNyi2ITe4pVZ5YLwzLZV24kh-iF3vuGMP32aVJ922yruvM4MKcNFWlkkoQRcH6_B_r1X7KSTNCGBgLSOY_LmCVkimVF-B6uXfZGFKKzutxP31Nid7Fr-_iB_Oza-Rc9665td7kfUczo9EjhGD2sSc7x-iGaQfTBddUs5z_Bp7Pu3A</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Levitt, Heidi M.</creator><creator>Bamberg, Michael</creator><creator>Creswell, John W.</creator><creator>Frost, David M.</creator><creator>Josselson, Ruthellen</creator><creator>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-2217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-6484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-1484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-5219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</title><author>Levitt, Heidi M. ; Bamberg, Michael ; Creswell, John W. ; Frost, David M. ; Josselson, Ruthellen ; Suárez-Orozco, Carola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-4d4541262ba63fdf3ff2b84f27550907442b30d96c84fd6f119f0cf4a265b7e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>American Psychological Association</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Professional Standards</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative Methods</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Reporting Standards</topic><topic>Scientific Communication</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levitt, Heidi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creswell, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josselson, Ruthellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levitt, Heidi M.</au><au>Bamberg, Michael</au><au>Creswell, John W.</au><au>Frost, David M.</au><au>Josselson, Ruthellen</au><au>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</au><au>Kazak, Anne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>26-46</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>29345485</pmid><doi>10.1037/amp0000151</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-2217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-6484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-1484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-5219</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-066X
ispartof The American psychologist, 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.26-46
issn 0003-066X
1935-990X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989594091
source APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects American Psychological Association
Meta Analysis
Methodology
Mixed Methods Research
Professional Standards
Psychology
Qualitative Methods
Qualitative research
Quantitative analysis
Reporting Standards
Scientific Communication
Social sciences
Systematic review
Traditions
title Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Journal%20Article%20Reporting%20Standards%20for%20Qualitative%20Primary,%20Qualitative%20Meta-Analytic,%20and%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research%20in%20Psychology:%20The%20APA%20Publications%20and%20Communications%20Board%20Task%20Force%20Report&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Levitt,%20Heidi%20M.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=26-46&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/amp0000151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989594091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1988529967&rft_id=info:pmid/29345485&rfr_iscdi=true