Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report
The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American psychologist 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.26-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | The American psychologist |
container_volume | 73 |
creator | Levitt, Heidi M. Bamberg, Michael Creswell, John W. Frost, David M. Josselson, Ruthellen Suárez-Orozco, Carola |
description | The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/amp0000151 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989594091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989594091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-4d4541262ba63fdf3ff2b84f27550907442b30d96c84fd6f119f0cf4a265b7e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwwMgS2wQasDXJO4ujCgXtWIog9Sd5Th2JyWJg50g5vF4M84wvQgWeGP7938-HZ8foaeUvKKEF69NPxJYVNJ7aEEVl5lS5OI-WoDIM5LnFwfoUUpXcJWlog_RAVNcSFHKBfr1McxxMB2u4tTazuFzNwY4Dpf4y2SGxsQmYR8i_jybrp3M1P5weBXb3sTt0V_imZtMVgFqC6AjDLX4rP3pmt3DJgDl3CVnot3gdsCrtLWb0IXL7TFebxyuVhVezXXXWoCFIf0pX4a-n4db6U2AZvDapG_4JER70-pj9MCbLrkn1_sh-nrydr18n51-evdhWZ1mRlAxZaKBH1OWs9rk3Deee8_qUnhWSEkUKYRgNSeNyi2ITe4pVZ5YLwzLZV24kh-iF3vuGMP32aVJ922yruvM4MKcNFWlkkoQRcH6_B_r1X7KSTNCGBgLSOY_LmCVkimVF-B6uXfZGFKKzutxP31Nid7Fr-_iB_Oza-Rc9665td7kfUczo9EjhGD2sSc7x-iGaQfTBddUs5z_Bp7Pu3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1988529967</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Levitt, Heidi M. ; Bamberg, Michael ; Creswell, John W. ; Frost, David M. ; Josselson, Ruthellen ; Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creator><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Levitt, Heidi M. ; Bamberg, Michael ; Creswell, John W. ; Frost, David M. ; Josselson, Ruthellen ; Suárez-Orozco, Carola ; Kazak, Anne E</creatorcontrib><description>The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-066X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-990X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/amp0000151</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29345485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>American Psychological Association ; Meta Analysis ; Methodology ; Mixed Methods Research ; Professional Standards ; Psychology ; Qualitative Methods ; Qualitative research ; Quantitative analysis ; Reporting Standards ; Scientific Communication ; Social sciences ; Systematic review ; Traditions</subject><ispartof>The American psychologist, 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.26-46</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Jan 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-4d4541262ba63fdf3ff2b84f27550907442b30d96c84fd6f119f0cf4a265b7e83</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-9359-2217 ; 0000-0002-9111-6484 ; 0000-0001-9447-1484 ; 0000-0001-9284-5219</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kazak, Anne E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Levitt, Heidi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creswell, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josselson, Ruthellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creatorcontrib><title>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</title><title>The American psychologist</title><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><description>The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.</description><subject>American Psychological Association</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Mixed Methods Research</subject><subject>Professional Standards</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Qualitative Methods</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Reporting Standards</subject><subject>Scientific Communication</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><issn>0003-066X</issn><issn>1935-990X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokNhwwMgS2wQasDXJO4ujCgXtWIog9Sd5Th2JyWJg50g5vF4M84wvQgWeGP7938-HZ8foaeUvKKEF69NPxJYVNJ7aEEVl5lS5OI-WoDIM5LnFwfoUUpXcJWlog_RAVNcSFHKBfr1McxxMB2u4tTazuFzNwY4Dpf4y2SGxsQmYR8i_jybrp3M1P5weBXb3sTt0V_imZtMVgFqC6AjDLX4rP3pmt3DJgDl3CVnot3gdsCrtLWb0IXL7TFebxyuVhVezXXXWoCFIf0pX4a-n4db6U2AZvDapG_4JER70-pj9MCbLrkn1_sh-nrydr18n51-evdhWZ1mRlAxZaKBH1OWs9rk3Deee8_qUnhWSEkUKYRgNSeNyi2ITe4pVZ5YLwzLZV24kh-iF3vuGMP32aVJ922yruvM4MKcNFWlkkoQRcH6_B_r1X7KSTNCGBgLSOY_LmCVkimVF-B6uXfZGFKKzutxP31Nid7Fr-_iB_Oza-Rc9665td7kfUczo9EjhGD2sSc7x-iGaQfTBddUs5z_Bp7Pu3A</recordid><startdate>201801</startdate><enddate>201801</enddate><creator>Levitt, Heidi M.</creator><creator>Bamberg, Michael</creator><creator>Creswell, John W.</creator><creator>Frost, David M.</creator><creator>Josselson, Ruthellen</creator><creator>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-2217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-6484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-1484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-5219</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201801</creationdate><title>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</title><author>Levitt, Heidi M. ; Bamberg, Michael ; Creswell, John W. ; Frost, David M. ; Josselson, Ruthellen ; Suárez-Orozco, Carola</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a414t-4d4541262ba63fdf3ff2b84f27550907442b30d96c84fd6f119f0cf4a265b7e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>American Psychological Association</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Mixed Methods Research</topic><topic>Professional Standards</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Qualitative Methods</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Reporting Standards</topic><topic>Scientific Communication</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Levitt, Heidi M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberg, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creswell, John W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frost, David M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Josselson, Ruthellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Levitt, Heidi M.</au><au>Bamberg, Michael</au><au>Creswell, John W.</au><au>Frost, David M.</au><au>Josselson, Ruthellen</au><au>Suárez-Orozco, Carola</au><au>Kazak, Anne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report</atitle><jtitle>The American psychologist</jtitle><addtitle>Am Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>73</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>26-46</pages><issn>0003-066X</issn><eissn>1935-990X</eissn><abstract>The American Psychological Association Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Research (JARS-Qual Working Group) was charged with examining the state of journal article reporting standards as they applied to qualitative research and with generating recommendations for standards that would be appropriate for a wide range of methods within the discipline of psychology. These standards describe what should be included in a research report to enable and facilitate the review process. This publication marks a historical moment-the first inclusion of qualitative research in APA Style, which is the basis of both the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA, 2010) and APA Style CENTRAL, an online program to support APA Style. In addition to the general JARS-Qual guidelines, the Working Group has developed standards for both qualitative meta-analysis and mixed methods research. The reporting standards were developed for psychological qualitative research but may hold utility for a broad range of social sciences. They honor a range of qualitative traditions, methods, and reporting styles. The Working Group was composed of a group of researchers with backgrounds in varying methods, research topics, and approaches to inquiry. In this article, they present these standards and their rationale, and they detail the ways that the standards differ from the quantitative research reporting standards. They describe how the standards can be used by authors in the process of writing qualitative research for submission as well as by reviewers and editors in the process of reviewing research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>29345485</pmid><doi>10.1037/amp0000151</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9359-2217</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9111-6484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-1484</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9284-5219</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-066X |
ispartof | The American psychologist, 2018-01, Vol.73 (1), p.26-46 |
issn | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989594091 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | American Psychological Association Meta Analysis Methodology Mixed Methods Research Professional Standards Psychology Qualitative Methods Qualitative research Quantitative analysis Reporting Standards Scientific Communication Social sciences Systematic review Traditions |
title | Journal Article Reporting Standards for Qualitative Primary, Qualitative Meta-Analytic, and Mixed Methods Research in Psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A18%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Journal%20Article%20Reporting%20Standards%20for%20Qualitative%20Primary,%20Qualitative%20Meta-Analytic,%20and%20Mixed%20Methods%20Research%20in%20Psychology:%20The%20APA%20Publications%20and%20Communications%20Board%20Task%20Force%20Report&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20psychologist&rft.au=Levitt,%20Heidi%20M.&rft.date=2018-01&rft.volume=73&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=26-46&rft.issn=0003-066X&rft.eissn=1935-990X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/amp0000151&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989594091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1988529967&rft_id=info:pmid/29345485&rfr_iscdi=true |