Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years
Aim Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life. Methods Thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS 2018-10, Vol.15 (4), p.309-317 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 317 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Shlain, Iris Lavy, Yuval Arbel, Revital Shveiky, David Woloski Wruble, Anna Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal |
description | Aim
Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life.
Methods
This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL).
Results
The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI.
Conclusion
The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jjns.12200 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989586719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989586719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90btuFDEUBmALgUgINDwAskSDomzwdS7poihcoggKSG2d8ZyJvJqxJ_aMVtPRUsFL8GJ5ErzZkCIFbmzJn3_Z_gl5zdkxz-P9eu3TMReCsSdkn5dKrMpaqKcPayn2yIuU1oxJLiv5nOyJWirNVLVPfl1F5yEu1Hkb_OQ8eot0WkY8omkZxikM6YiCb-nNDL2bFho62rsOT-gptWEYIboUPG1w2iB6eh23dpj7yeUtuDvpg7_98fvxziYM2cM1tvT25x_N6IIQ00vyrIM-4av7-YBcfTj_fvZpdfn14-ez08uVVWXFVghCt53stGpq3uW3QNu0lisoGgQmbN2U0NWl5VxXDHTZQKtlUxRWMQEFl_KAvNvljjHczJgmM7hkse_BY5iT4XVV66ooeZ3p20d0Hebo8-2M4EIprQqusjrcKRtDShE7M0Y35J81nJltTWZbk7mrKeM395FzM2D7QP_1kgHfgY3rcflPlLm4-PJtF_oXK9Ggww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124454614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Shlain, Iris ; Lavy, Yuval ; Arbel, Revital ; Shveiky, David ; Woloski Wruble, Anna ; Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creator><creatorcontrib>Shlain, Iris ; Lavy, Yuval ; Arbel, Revital ; Shveiky, David ; Woloski Wruble, Anna ; Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life.
Methods
This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL).
Results
The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI.
Conclusion
The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-7924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29345048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Female ; grand multipara ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; non‐grand multipara ; Nursing ; Parity ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2018-10, Vol.15 (4), p.309-317</ispartof><rights>2018 Japan Academy of Nursing Science</rights><rights>2018 Japan Academy of Nursing Science.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5856-4840</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjjns.12200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjjns.12200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shlain, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavy, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbel, Revital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shveiky, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woloski Wruble, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creatorcontrib><title>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</title><title>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</title><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><description>Aim
Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life.
Methods
This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL).
Results
The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI.
Conclusion
The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>grand multipara</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>non‐grand multipara</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1742-7932</issn><issn>1742-7924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90btuFDEUBmALgUgINDwAskSDomzwdS7poihcoggKSG2d8ZyJvJqxJ_aMVtPRUsFL8GJ5ErzZkCIFbmzJn3_Z_gl5zdkxz-P9eu3TMReCsSdkn5dKrMpaqKcPayn2yIuU1oxJLiv5nOyJWirNVLVPfl1F5yEu1Hkb_OQ8eot0WkY8omkZxikM6YiCb-nNDL2bFho62rsOT-gptWEYIboUPG1w2iB6eh23dpj7yeUtuDvpg7_98fvxziYM2cM1tvT25x_N6IIQ00vyrIM-4av7-YBcfTj_fvZpdfn14-ez08uVVWXFVghCt53stGpq3uW3QNu0lisoGgQmbN2U0NWl5VxXDHTZQKtlUxRWMQEFl_KAvNvljjHczJgmM7hkse_BY5iT4XVV66ooeZ3p20d0Hebo8-2M4EIprQqusjrcKRtDShE7M0Y35J81nJltTWZbk7mrKeM395FzM2D7QP_1kgHfgY3rcflPlLm4-PJtF_oXK9Ggww</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Shlain, Iris</creator><creator>Lavy, Yuval</creator><creator>Arbel, Revital</creator><creator>Shveiky, David</creator><creator>Woloski Wruble, Anna</creator><creator>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-4840</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</title><author>Shlain, Iris ; Lavy, Yuval ; Arbel, Revital ; Shveiky, David ; Woloski Wruble, Anna ; Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>grand multipara</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>non‐grand multipara</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shlain, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavy, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbel, Revital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shveiky, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woloski Wruble, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shlain, Iris</au><au>Lavy, Yuval</au><au>Arbel, Revital</au><au>Shveiky, David</au><au>Woloski Wruble, Anna</au><au>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</atitle><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>309-317</pages><issn>1742-7932</issn><eissn>1742-7924</eissn><abstract>Aim
Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life.
Methods
This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL).
Results
The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI.
Conclusion
The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>29345048</pmid><doi>10.1111/jjns.12200</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-4840</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-7932 |
ispartof | Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2018-10, Vol.15 (4), p.309-317 |
issn | 1742-7932 1742-7924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989586719 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Age Aged Female grand multipara Humans Middle Aged non‐grand multipara Nursing Parity Quality of Life Questionnaires Risk Factors Surveys and Questionnaires Urinary incontinence Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology Womens health |
title | Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urinary%20incontinence%20type,%20symptoms,%20and%20quality%20of%20life:%20A%20comparison%20between%20grand%20multipara%20and%20non%E2%80%90grand%20multipara%20women%20aged%20%E2%89%A550%20years&rft.jtitle=Japan%20journal%20of%20nursing%20science%20:%20JJNS&rft.au=Shlain,%20Iris&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=309-317&rft.issn=1742-7932&rft.eissn=1742-7924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jjns.12200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989586719%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124454614&rft_id=info:pmid/29345048&rfr_iscdi=true |