Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years

Aim Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life. Methods Thi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS 2018-10, Vol.15 (4), p.309-317
Hauptverfasser: Shlain, Iris, Lavy, Yuval, Arbel, Revital, Shveiky, David, Woloski Wruble, Anna, Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 317
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
container_title Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS
container_volume 15
creator Shlain, Iris
Lavy, Yuval
Arbel, Revital
Shveiky, David
Woloski Wruble, Anna
Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal
description Aim Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life. Methods This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL). Results The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI. Conclusion The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jjns.12200
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989586719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989586719</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90btuFDEUBmALgUgINDwAskSDomzwdS7poihcoggKSG2d8ZyJvJqxJ_aMVtPRUsFL8GJ5ErzZkCIFbmzJn3_Z_gl5zdkxz-P9eu3TMReCsSdkn5dKrMpaqKcPayn2yIuU1oxJLiv5nOyJWirNVLVPfl1F5yEu1Hkb_OQ8eot0WkY8omkZxikM6YiCb-nNDL2bFho62rsOT-gptWEYIboUPG1w2iB6eh23dpj7yeUtuDvpg7_98fvxziYM2cM1tvT25x_N6IIQ00vyrIM-4av7-YBcfTj_fvZpdfn14-ez08uVVWXFVghCt53stGpq3uW3QNu0lisoGgQmbN2U0NWl5VxXDHTZQKtlUxRWMQEFl_KAvNvljjHczJgmM7hkse_BY5iT4XVV66ooeZ3p20d0Hebo8-2M4EIprQqusjrcKRtDShE7M0Y35J81nJltTWZbk7mrKeM395FzM2D7QP_1kgHfgY3rcflPlLm4-PJtF_oXK9Ggww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2124454614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Shlain, Iris ; Lavy, Yuval ; Arbel, Revital ; Shveiky, David ; Woloski Wruble, Anna ; Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creator><creatorcontrib>Shlain, Iris ; Lavy, Yuval ; Arbel, Revital ; Shveiky, David ; Woloski Wruble, Anna ; Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life. Methods This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL). Results The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI. Conclusion The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7932</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-7924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jjns.12200</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29345048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Age ; Aged ; Female ; grand multipara ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; non‐grand multipara ; Nursing ; Parity ; Quality of Life ; Questionnaires ; Risk Factors ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2018-10, Vol.15 (4), p.309-317</ispartof><rights>2018 Japan Academy of Nursing Science</rights><rights>2018 Japan Academy of Nursing Science.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5856-4840</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjjns.12200$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjjns.12200$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29345048$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shlain, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavy, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbel, Revital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shveiky, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woloski Wruble, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creatorcontrib><title>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</title><title>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</title><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><description>Aim Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life. Methods This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL). Results The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI. Conclusion The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>grand multipara</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>non‐grand multipara</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Parity</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1742-7932</issn><issn>1742-7924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90btuFDEUBmALgUgINDwAskSDomzwdS7poihcoggKSG2d8ZyJvJqxJ_aMVtPRUsFL8GJ5ErzZkCIFbmzJn3_Z_gl5zdkxz-P9eu3TMReCsSdkn5dKrMpaqKcPayn2yIuU1oxJLiv5nOyJWirNVLVPfl1F5yEu1Hkb_OQ8eot0WkY8omkZxikM6YiCb-nNDL2bFho62rsOT-gptWEYIboUPG1w2iB6eh23dpj7yeUtuDvpg7_98fvxziYM2cM1tvT25x_N6IIQ00vyrIM-4av7-YBcfTj_fvZpdfn14-ez08uVVWXFVghCt53stGpq3uW3QNu0lisoGgQmbN2U0NWl5VxXDHTZQKtlUxRWMQEFl_KAvNvljjHczJgmM7hkse_BY5iT4XVV66ooeZ3p20d0Hebo8-2M4EIprQqusjrcKRtDShE7M0Y35J81nJltTWZbk7mrKeM395FzM2D7QP_1kgHfgY3rcflPlLm4-PJtF_oXK9Ggww</recordid><startdate>201810</startdate><enddate>201810</enddate><creator>Shlain, Iris</creator><creator>Lavy, Yuval</creator><creator>Arbel, Revital</creator><creator>Shveiky, David</creator><creator>Woloski Wruble, Anna</creator><creator>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-4840</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201810</creationdate><title>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</title><author>Shlain, Iris ; Lavy, Yuval ; Arbel, Revital ; Shveiky, David ; Woloski Wruble, Anna ; Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4780-ea25df3f54b91f450adbdc14a6bea02c9b7af97c11580a57bad53b66c402a6133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>grand multipara</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>non‐grand multipara</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Parity</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shlain, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavy, Yuval</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arbel, Revital</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shveiky, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woloski Wruble, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shlain, Iris</au><au>Lavy, Yuval</au><au>Arbel, Revital</au><au>Shveiky, David</au><au>Woloski Wruble, Anna</au><au>Liebergall‐Wischnitzer, Michal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years</atitle><jtitle>Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS</jtitle><addtitle>Jpn J Nurs Sci</addtitle><date>2018-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>317</epage><pages>309-317</pages><issn>1742-7932</issn><eissn>1742-7924</eissn><abstract>Aim Parity and age are risk factors for urinary incontinence (UI). The aim of this study was to compare grand multipara women (GMP) to non‐grand multipara (NGMP) women concerning UI types (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], urge urinary incontinence [UUI]), symptoms, and quality of life. Methods This correlation–comparative study used three tools: a demographic/health questionnaire, Questionnaire for Urinary Incontinence Diagnosis (QUID), and Incontinence Quality of Life (I‐QOL). Results The sample included 132 women, from 50–88 years of age: 65 NGMP women (mean age: 67.23 years) and 67 GMP women (mean age: 65.04 years). The GMP group had a higher score, compared to the NGMP group, for UI type (by QUID) and a lower QOL (by I‐QOL) , with none of the scores found to be statistically significant. By dividing the sample into age groups, 50–59 and ≥60 years, the interaction between the parity and the age groups was found to be significant for both the SUI and UUI. Conclusion The innovation of this study is the in‐depth insight into the association between parity and age regarding UI type.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>29345048</pmid><doi>10.1111/jjns.12200</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5856-4840</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-7932
ispartof Japan journal of nursing science : JJNS, 2018-10, Vol.15 (4), p.309-317
issn 1742-7932
1742-7924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989586719
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Age
Aged
Female
grand multipara
Humans
Middle Aged
non‐grand multipara
Nursing
Parity
Quality of Life
Questionnaires
Risk Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
Urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence - physiopathology
Womens health
title Urinary incontinence type, symptoms, and quality of life: A comparison between grand multipara and non‐grand multipara women aged ≥50 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A42%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Urinary%20incontinence%20type,%20symptoms,%20and%20quality%20of%20life:%20A%20comparison%20between%20grand%20multipara%20and%20non%E2%80%90grand%20multipara%20women%20aged%20%E2%89%A550%20years&rft.jtitle=Japan%20journal%20of%20nursing%20science%20:%20JJNS&rft.au=Shlain,%20Iris&rft.date=2018-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=317&rft.pages=309-317&rft.issn=1742-7932&rft.eissn=1742-7924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jjns.12200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989586719%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2124454614&rft_id=info:pmid/29345048&rfr_iscdi=true