Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning
We observe a tension in the target article as it stresses an integrated gesture-speech system that can nevertheless consist of contradictory representational states, which are reflected by mismatches in gesture and speech or sign. Beyond problems of coherence, this prevents furthering our understand...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Behavioral and brain sciences 2017, Vol.40, p.e68-e68, Article e68 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | e68 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | e68 |
| container_title | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| container_volume | 40 |
| creator | Pouw, Wim T. J. L. van Gog, Tamara Zwaan, Rolf A. Paas, Fred |
| description | We observe a tension in the target article as it stresses an integrated gesture-speech system that can nevertheless consist of contradictory representational states, which are reflected by mismatches in gesture and speech or sign. Beyond problems of coherence, this prevents furthering our understanding of gesture-related learning. As a possible antidote, we invite a more dynamically embodied perspective to the stage. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0140525X15003039 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989584165</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0140525X15003039</cupid><sourcerecordid>1988263184</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a217a216d290fb49b122db89b9b6ecbbdb41cb12446f6641d51741003a5d525b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbggS1y4hNqOnY1PaFVBQarUA63ELfKfydZV7Cx2gpSn4hWZbUOFQByskWZ-3zfjGUJec_aeM749-8q4ZEqob1wxVrNaPyEbLhtd8Vaop2RzLFfH-gl5UcodY0xJpZ-TE6FrKZSQG_Jzl4HuoUwzRpM8LQcAd0tjKNFM7hYKPeTRzw48tQsSNKQJ9tlMmFh11aopS5kgfqA7Gkd080syMTgzDAuFaEcfUHKAjLSbwg-godAE4DHbj5nOyWNtwhlC2j9aZxjuWw1gcsLCS_KsN0OBV2s8JTefPl6ff64ury6-nO8uKyd5M1VG8C2-xgvNeiu15UJ422qrbQPOWm8ld5iUsumbRnKv-FZyXKJRHhdm61Py7sEXf_99xmE63IiDYTAJxrl0XLdatdhLIfr2L_RunHPC6Y5UK5qatxIp_kC5PJaSoe8OOUSTl46z7njN7p9roubN6jzbCP5R8ft8CNSrqYk2B7-HP3r_1_YXNpmtCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1988263184</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Pouw, Wim T. J. L. ; van Gog, Tamara ; Zwaan, Rolf A. ; Paas, Fred</creator><creatorcontrib>Pouw, Wim T. J. L. ; van Gog, Tamara ; Zwaan, Rolf A. ; Paas, Fred</creatorcontrib><description>We observe a tension in the target article as it stresses an integrated gesture-speech system that can nevertheless consist of contradictory representational states, which are reflected by mismatches in gesture and speech or sign. Beyond problems of coherence, this prevents furthering our understanding of gesture-related learning. As a possible antidote, we invite a more dynamically embodied perspective to the stage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-525X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15003039</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29342524</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cognition & reasoning ; Experimental psychology ; Nonverbal communication ; Observational learning ; Open Peer Commentary ; Speech</subject><ispartof>The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2017, Vol.40, p.e68-e68, Article e68</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a217a216d290fb49b122db89b9b6ecbbdb41cb12446f6641d51741003a5d525b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a217a216d290fb49b122db89b9b6ecbbdb41cb12446f6641d51741003a5d525b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0140525X15003039/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29342524$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pouw, Wim T. J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gog, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwaan, Rolf A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paas, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning</title><title>The Behavioral and brain sciences</title><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><description>We observe a tension in the target article as it stresses an integrated gesture-speech system that can nevertheless consist of contradictory representational states, which are reflected by mismatches in gesture and speech or sign. Beyond problems of coherence, this prevents furthering our understanding of gesture-related learning. As a possible antidote, we invite a more dynamically embodied perspective to the stage.</description><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Nonverbal communication</subject><subject>Observational learning</subject><subject>Open Peer Commentary</subject><subject>Speech</subject><issn>0140-525X</issn><issn>1469-1825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbggS1y4hNqOnY1PaFVBQarUA63ELfKfydZV7Cx2gpSn4hWZbUOFQByskWZ-3zfjGUJec_aeM749-8q4ZEqob1wxVrNaPyEbLhtd8Vaop2RzLFfH-gl5UcodY0xJpZ-TE6FrKZSQG_Jzl4HuoUwzRpM8LQcAd0tjKNFM7hYKPeTRzw48tQsSNKQJ9tlMmFh11aopS5kgfqA7Gkd080syMTgzDAuFaEcfUHKAjLSbwg-godAE4DHbj5nOyWNtwhlC2j9aZxjuWw1gcsLCS_KsN0OBV2s8JTefPl6ff64ury6-nO8uKyd5M1VG8C2-xgvNeiu15UJ422qrbQPOWm8ld5iUsumbRnKv-FZyXKJRHhdm61Py7sEXf_99xmE63IiDYTAJxrl0XLdatdhLIfr2L_RunHPC6Y5UK5qatxIp_kC5PJaSoe8OOUSTl46z7njN7p9roubN6jzbCP5R8ft8CNSrqYk2B7-HP3r_1_YXNpmtCA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Pouw, Wim T. J. L.</creator><creator>van Gog, Tamara</creator><creator>Zwaan, Rolf A.</creator><creator>Paas, Fred</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning</title><author>Pouw, Wim T. J. L. ; van Gog, Tamara ; Zwaan, Rolf A. ; Paas, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-a217a216d290fb49b122db89b9b6ecbbdb41cb12446f6641d51741003a5d525b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Nonverbal communication</topic><topic>Observational learning</topic><topic>Open Peer Commentary</topic><topic>Speech</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pouw, Wim T. J. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Gog, Tamara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwaan, Rolf A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paas, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pouw, Wim T. J. L.</au><au>van Gog, Tamara</au><au>Zwaan, Rolf A.</au><au>Paas, Fred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning</atitle><jtitle>The Behavioral and brain sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Brain Sci</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>40</volume><spage>e68</spage><epage>e68</epage><pages>e68-e68</pages><artnum>e68</artnum><issn>0140-525X</issn><eissn>1469-1825</eissn><abstract>We observe a tension in the target article as it stresses an integrated gesture-speech system that can nevertheless consist of contradictory representational states, which are reflected by mismatches in gesture and speech or sign. Beyond problems of coherence, this prevents furthering our understanding of gesture-related learning. As a possible antidote, we invite a more dynamically embodied perspective to the stage.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>29342524</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0140525X15003039</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0140-525X |
| ispartof | The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2017, Vol.40, p.e68-e68, Article e68 |
| issn | 0140-525X 1469-1825 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989584165 |
| source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
| subjects | Cognition & reasoning Experimental psychology Nonverbal communication Observational learning Open Peer Commentary Speech |
| title | Are gesture and speech mismatches produced by an integrated gesture-speech system? A more dynamically embodied perspective is needed for understanding gesture-related learning |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20gesture%20and%20speech%20mismatches%20produced%20by%20an%20integrated%20gesture-speech%20system?%20A%20more%20dynamically%20embodied%20perspective%20is%20needed%20for%20understanding%20gesture-related%20learning&rft.jtitle=The%20Behavioral%20and%20brain%20sciences&rft.au=Pouw,%20Wim%20T.%20J.%20L.&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=40&rft.spage=e68&rft.epage=e68&rft.pages=e68-e68&rft.artnum=e68&rft.issn=0140-525X&rft.eissn=1469-1825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0140525X15003039&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1988263184%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1988263184&rft_id=info:pmid/29342524&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0140525X15003039&rfr_iscdi=true |