Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?

Objective Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach. Indications Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis. Contraindications Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 2018-02, Vol.30 (1), p.3-12
Hauptverfasser: Kothe, R., Schmeiser, G., Papavero, L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie
container_volume 30
creator Kothe, R.
Schmeiser, G.
Papavero, L.
description Objective Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach. Indications Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis. Contraindications Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7. Surgical technique Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach. Postoperative management Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary. Results A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty: n  = 30; laminoplasty/fusion: n  = 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%).
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989576993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989576993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-1173e4966ad5e4145a7143d10d1966bdffd5777d1cfa099c5f2c02a2aca092743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBCIhECLRIMoaQy7fsYlinhJkdJAbTm2DyW6F3auyN_j6AIl1Wp3Z2Z3hpAbhAcE0I8ZAJSggJqCZJryEzJFwQ0FM8dTMgXDBVXKiAm5yHlb0FxpPCcTZjgHqWFKrld9bGnounRXu2bTdn3t8m5_Sc4qV-d4dawz8vny_LF4o8vV6_viaUk9M2pHETWPwijlgowChXS63A8IActwHaoqSK11QF85MMbLinlgjjlfWqYFn5H7UbdP3fcQ8842m-xjXbs2dkO2aOZGamXKvzOCI9SnLucUK9unTePS3iLYQxx2jMOWOOwhDnvg3B7lh3UTwx_j138BsBGQy6r9isluuyG1xfI_qj8XM2gm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989576993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kothe, R. ; Schmeiser, G. ; Papavero, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kothe, R. ; Schmeiser, G. ; Papavero, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach. Indications Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis. Contraindications Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7. Surgical technique Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach. Postoperative management Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary. Results A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty: n  = 30; laminoplasty/fusion: n  = 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29330570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Munich: Springer Medizin</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anatomy ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Decompression, Surgical ; Hand Surgery ; Humans ; Laminectomy ; Laminoplasty ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Orthopedics ; Plastic Surgery ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Surgical Techniques ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2018-02, Vol.30 (1), p.3-12</ispartof><rights>Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-1173e4966ad5e4145a7143d10d1966bdffd5777d1cfa099c5f2c02a2aca092743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kothe, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmeiser, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papavero, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?</title><title>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</title><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><description>Objective Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach. Indications Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis. Contraindications Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7. Surgical technique Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach. Postoperative management Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary. Results A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty: n  = 30; laminoplasty/fusion: n  = 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical</subject><subject>Hand Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminectomy</subject><subject>Laminoplasty</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Surgical Techniques</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0934-6694</issn><issn>1439-0981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBCIhECLRIMoaQy7fsYlinhJkdJAbTm2DyW6F3auyN_j6AIl1Wp3Z2Z3hpAbhAcE0I8ZAJSggJqCZJryEzJFwQ0FM8dTMgXDBVXKiAm5yHlb0FxpPCcTZjgHqWFKrld9bGnounRXu2bTdn3t8m5_Sc4qV-d4dawz8vny_LF4o8vV6_viaUk9M2pHETWPwijlgowChXS63A8IActwHaoqSK11QF85MMbLinlgjjlfWqYFn5H7UbdP3fcQ8842m-xjXbs2dkO2aOZGamXKvzOCI9SnLucUK9unTePS3iLYQxx2jMOWOOwhDnvg3B7lh3UTwx_j138BsBGQy6r9isluuyG1xfI_qj8XM2gm</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Kothe, R.</creator><creator>Schmeiser, G.</creator><creator>Papavero, L.</creator><general>Springer Medizin</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Open-door laminoplasty</title><author>Kothe, R. ; Schmeiser, G. ; Papavero, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-1173e4966ad5e4145a7143d10d1966bdffd5777d1cfa099c5f2c02a2aca092743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical</topic><topic>Hand Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminectomy</topic><topic>Laminoplasty</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Surgical Techniques</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kothe, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmeiser, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papavero, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kothe, R.</au><au>Schmeiser, G.</au><au>Papavero, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?</atitle><jtitle>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</jtitle><stitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>3-12</pages><issn>0934-6694</issn><eissn>1439-0981</eissn><abstract>Objective Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach. Indications Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis. Contraindications Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7. Surgical technique Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach. Postoperative management Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary. Results A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty: n  = 30; laminoplasty/fusion: n  = 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%).</abstract><cop>Munich</cop><pub>Springer Medizin</pub><pmid>29330570</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0934-6694
ispartof Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2018-02, Vol.30 (1), p.3-12
issn 0934-6694
1439-0981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989576993
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anatomy
Cervical Vertebrae
Decompression, Surgical
Hand Surgery
Humans
Laminectomy
Laminoplasty
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Orthopedics
Plastic Surgery
Spinal Stenosis - surgery
Surgical Orthopedics
Surgical Techniques
Traumatic Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open-door%20laminoplasty:%20What%20can%20the%20unilateral%20approach%20offer?&rft.jtitle=Operative%20Orthop%C3%A4die%20und%20Traumatologie&rft.au=Kothe,%20R.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=3-12&rft.issn=0934-6694&rft.eissn=1439-0981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989576993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989576993&rft_id=info:pmid/29330570&rfr_iscdi=true