Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?
Objective Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach. Indications Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis. Contraindications Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie 2018-02, Vol.30 (1), p.3-12 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 12 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 3 |
container_title | Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Kothe, R. Schmeiser, G. Papavero, L. |
description | Objective
Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach.
Indications
Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis.
Contraindications
Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7.
Surgical technique
Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach.
Postoperative management
Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary.
Results
A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty:
n
= 30; laminoplasty/fusion:
n
= 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989576993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989576993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-1173e4966ad5e4145a7143d10d1966bdffd5777d1cfa099c5f2c02a2aca092743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBCIhECLRIMoaQy7fsYlinhJkdJAbTm2DyW6F3auyN_j6AIl1Wp3Z2Z3hpAbhAcE0I8ZAJSggJqCZJryEzJFwQ0FM8dTMgXDBVXKiAm5yHlb0FxpPCcTZjgHqWFKrld9bGnounRXu2bTdn3t8m5_Sc4qV-d4dawz8vny_LF4o8vV6_viaUk9M2pHETWPwijlgowChXS63A8IActwHaoqSK11QF85MMbLinlgjjlfWqYFn5H7UbdP3fcQ8842m-xjXbs2dkO2aOZGamXKvzOCI9SnLucUK9unTePS3iLYQxx2jMOWOOwhDnvg3B7lh3UTwx_j138BsBGQy6r9isluuyG1xfI_qj8XM2gm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989576993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kothe, R. ; Schmeiser, G. ; Papavero, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kothe, R. ; Schmeiser, G. ; Papavero, L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach.
Indications
Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis.
Contraindications
Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7.
Surgical technique
Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach.
Postoperative management
Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary.
Results
A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty:
n
= 30; laminoplasty/fusion:
n
= 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0934-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29330570</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Munich: Springer Medizin</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anatomy ; Cervical Vertebrae ; Decompression, Surgical ; Hand Surgery ; Humans ; Laminectomy ; Laminoplasty ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Orthopedics ; Plastic Surgery ; Spinal Stenosis - surgery ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Surgical Techniques ; Traumatic Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2018-02, Vol.30 (1), p.3-12</ispartof><rights>Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-1173e4966ad5e4145a7143d10d1966bdffd5777d1cfa099c5f2c02a2aca092743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29330570$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kothe, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmeiser, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papavero, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?</title><title>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</title><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><description>Objective
Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach.
Indications
Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis.
Contraindications
Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7.
Surgical technique
Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach.
Postoperative management
Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary.
Results
A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty:
n
= 30; laminoplasty/fusion:
n
= 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae</subject><subject>Decompression, Surgical</subject><subject>Hand Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laminectomy</subject><subject>Laminoplasty</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Surgical Techniques</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0934-6694</issn><issn>1439-0981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBCIhECLRIMoaQy7fsYlinhJkdJAbTm2DyW6F3auyN_j6AIl1Wp3Z2Z3hpAbhAcE0I8ZAJSggJqCZJryEzJFwQ0FM8dTMgXDBVXKiAm5yHlb0FxpPCcTZjgHqWFKrld9bGnounRXu2bTdn3t8m5_Sc4qV-d4dawz8vny_LF4o8vV6_viaUk9M2pHETWPwijlgowChXS63A8IActwHaoqSK11QF85MMbLinlgjjlfWqYFn5H7UbdP3fcQ8842m-xjXbs2dkO2aOZGamXKvzOCI9SnLucUK9unTePS3iLYQxx2jMOWOOwhDnvg3B7lh3UTwx_j138BsBGQy6r9isluuyG1xfI_qj8XM2gm</recordid><startdate>20180201</startdate><enddate>20180201</enddate><creator>Kothe, R.</creator><creator>Schmeiser, G.</creator><creator>Papavero, L.</creator><general>Springer Medizin</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180201</creationdate><title>Open-door laminoplasty</title><author>Kothe, R. ; Schmeiser, G. ; Papavero, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c296t-1173e4966ad5e4145a7143d10d1966bdffd5777d1cfa099c5f2c02a2aca092743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae</topic><topic>Decompression, Surgical</topic><topic>Hand Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laminectomy</topic><topic>Laminoplasty</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Surgical Techniques</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kothe, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmeiser, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papavero, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kothe, R.</au><au>Schmeiser, G.</au><au>Papavero, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer?</atitle><jtitle>Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie</jtitle><stitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Oper Orthop Traumatol</addtitle><date>2018-02-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>3-12</pages><issn>0934-6694</issn><eissn>1439-0981</eissn><abstract>Objective
Multilevel posterior decompression of subaxial cervical spinal canal stenosis through a less-invasive unilateral approach.
Indications
Degenerative cervical myelopathy due to multilevel subaxial spinal canal stenosis.
Contraindications
Cervical kyphosis or instability, bilateral radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis, involvement of C2 or C7.
Surgical technique
Unilateral subaxial approach with detachment of muscles only on one side. The ipsilateral laminae C6 to C3 are cut at the laminofacet junction and opened up. The loss of resistance is usually due to a greenstick fracture in the proximity of the contralateral laminofacet junction. The opened laminae are fixed with Z‑shaped thin titanium plates. If necessary, the laminoplasty can be combined with a unilateral fixation and fusion by the same approach.
Postoperative management
Early mobilization 4–6 h postoperatively. No orthosis necessary.
Results
A total of 131 patients (77 men, mean age 67 years) with a multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) underwent surgery using a posterior approach. In 52 patients (40%), a unilateral approach was performed (laminoplasty:
n
= 30; laminoplasty/fusion:
n
= 22). In this group, the mean operation time was less compared with two other techniques (unilateral approach: 110 min; laminectomy/fusion: 150 min; 360° approach: 210 min). The postoperative European myelopathy score (EMS) improved from 12.8 to 15.2. The overall complication rate was 17% (unilateral approach: 9%; laminectomy/fusion: 18%; 360° approach: 27%).</abstract><cop>Munich</cop><pub>Springer Medizin</pub><pmid>29330570</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0934-6694 |
ispartof | Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie, 2018-02, Vol.30 (1), p.3-12 |
issn | 0934-6694 1439-0981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989576993 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Anatomy Cervical Vertebrae Decompression, Surgical Hand Surgery Humans Laminectomy Laminoplasty Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Orthopedics Plastic Surgery Spinal Stenosis - surgery Surgical Orthopedics Surgical Techniques Traumatic Surgery Treatment Outcome |
title | Open-door laminoplasty: What can the unilateral approach offer? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A22%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Open-door%20laminoplasty:%20What%20can%20the%20unilateral%20approach%20offer?&rft.jtitle=Operative%20Orthop%C3%A4die%20und%20Traumatologie&rft.au=Kothe,%20R.&rft.date=2018-02-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=3-12&rft.issn=0934-6694&rft.eissn=1439-0981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00064-017-0527-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989576993%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989576993&rft_id=info:pmid/29330570&rfr_iscdi=true |