The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families

Plantation forests with timber production as the major function are highly fragmented and disturbed regarding the tree species composition and stand area. Their closed canopies also have different microclimatic conditions compared with better studied conservation areas. We studied three beetle famil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of entomological research 2018-12, Vol.108 (6), p.750-764
Hauptverfasser: Mladenović, S, Loskotová, T, Boháč, J, Pavlíček, J, Brestovanský, J, Horák, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 764
container_issue 6
container_start_page 750
container_title Bulletin of entomological research
container_volume 108
creator Mladenović, S
Loskotová, T
Boháč, J
Pavlíček, J
Brestovanský, J
Horák, J
description Plantation forests with timber production as the major function are highly fragmented and disturbed regarding the tree species composition and stand area. Their closed canopies also have different microclimatic conditions compared with better studied conservation areas. We studied three beetle families (click, longhorn, and rove beetles) with different ecological demands in lowland plantation forests dominated by Sessile oak and Norway spruce in the Czech Republic. Our main interest was how their species richness, abundance, diversity, body length, rarity, red-list status, species composition and individual species were driven by the main tree species, stand area and canopy openness. We analyzed 3466 individuals from 198 beetle species and the results revealed complex and contrasting responses of the studied beetle families - click beetles mostly preferred sun-exposure and spruce as the dominant tree species, longhorn beetles mainly preferred large stands, whereas rove beetles were mostly influenced by oak as the dominant tree species and increasing area. We also observed that some species had different preferences in plantation forests than is known from the literature. The main conclusions of our results are that the dominance of non-natural spruce plantations and a large stand area (both originating from artificially replanted large clear-cuts) did not affect the majority of the studied taxa as we expected. On the other hand, our results might have been influenced by other factor, such as the current small total area of the former vegetation, which in the past might have led to extinction debt; or a large area of other conifers in the surroundings that might have promoted conifer-associated fauna.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0007485317001304
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989556515</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1989556515</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-fa72c3a2b6480bc70df3af546f9c97c136b8739284ba0b11db964fc26d49d2523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkc1u1TAQhS0EorctD8AGWWLDJuDxTxwvUVWgUiUWbdeR7djUVWIH2xH0EXhrHPXCAlajmfOdsUcHoddA3gMB-eGGECL5IBhIQoAR_gwdgEvR0V6S5-iwy92un6DTUh5ayxVXL9EJVYxIBnBAv27vHXbeO1sLTh7_CPU-RFyqjhOeQqlbNjpah9twnXWsuoYUsU_ZleYIcQpWV4dtWtbZ_cS7zaZYsy41xG-4YWuKxRWsl9T6XT--YZyrs8NeL2EOrpyjF17Pxb061jN09-ny9uJLd_3189XFx-vOMqpq57Wklmlqej4QYyWZPNNe8N4rq6QF1ptBMkUHbjQxAJNRPfeW9hNXExWUnaF3T3vXnL5v7YpxCcW6uR3n0lZGUIMSohcgGvr2H_QhbTm2340UqARFhWKNgifK5lRKdn5cc1h0fhyBjHtO4385Nc-b4-bNLG766_gTDPsNMv6PWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2127192593</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Mladenović, S ; Loskotová, T ; Boháč, J ; Pavlíček, J ; Brestovanský, J ; Horák, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Mladenović, S ; Loskotová, T ; Boháč, J ; Pavlíček, J ; Brestovanský, J ; Horák, J</creatorcontrib><description>Plantation forests with timber production as the major function are highly fragmented and disturbed regarding the tree species composition and stand area. Their closed canopies also have different microclimatic conditions compared with better studied conservation areas. We studied three beetle families (click, longhorn, and rove beetles) with different ecological demands in lowland plantation forests dominated by Sessile oak and Norway spruce in the Czech Republic. Our main interest was how their species richness, abundance, diversity, body length, rarity, red-list status, species composition and individual species were driven by the main tree species, stand area and canopy openness. We analyzed 3466 individuals from 198 beetle species and the results revealed complex and contrasting responses of the studied beetle families - click beetles mostly preferred sun-exposure and spruce as the dominant tree species, longhorn beetles mainly preferred large stands, whereas rove beetles were mostly influenced by oak as the dominant tree species and increasing area. We also observed that some species had different preferences in plantation forests than is known from the literature. The main conclusions of our results are that the dominance of non-natural spruce plantations and a large stand area (both originating from artificially replanted large clear-cuts) did not affect the majority of the studied taxa as we expected. On the other hand, our results might have been influenced by other factor, such as the current small total area of the former vegetation, which in the past might have led to extinction debt; or a large area of other conifers in the surroundings that might have promoted conifer-associated fauna.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-4853</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-2670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0007485317001304</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29307311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Agriculture ; Animals ; Area ; Beetles ; Biodiversity ; Biogeography ; Biota ; Body length ; Canopies ; Clearcutting ; Coleoptera - physiology ; Community composition ; Composition ; Coniferous trees ; Conifers ; Conservation ; Conservation areas ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Czech Republic ; Dominant species ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Endangered &amp; extinct species ; Forest management ; Forestry ; Forests ; Habitat loss ; Habitats ; Insects ; Microclimate ; Pine trees ; Plant cover ; Plant species ; Plantations ; Population Dynamics ; Species checklists ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Species extinction ; Species richness ; Staphylinidae ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of entomological research, 2018-12, Vol.108 (6), p.750-764</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-fa72c3a2b6480bc70df3af546f9c97c136b8739284ba0b11db964fc26d49d2523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-fa72c3a2b6480bc70df3af546f9c97c136b8739284ba0b11db964fc26d49d2523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29307311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mladenović, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loskotová, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boháč, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlíček, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brestovanský, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horák, J</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families</title><title>Bulletin of entomological research</title><addtitle>Bull Entomol Res</addtitle><description>Plantation forests with timber production as the major function are highly fragmented and disturbed regarding the tree species composition and stand area. Their closed canopies also have different microclimatic conditions compared with better studied conservation areas. We studied three beetle families (click, longhorn, and rove beetles) with different ecological demands in lowland plantation forests dominated by Sessile oak and Norway spruce in the Czech Republic. Our main interest was how their species richness, abundance, diversity, body length, rarity, red-list status, species composition and individual species were driven by the main tree species, stand area and canopy openness. We analyzed 3466 individuals from 198 beetle species and the results revealed complex and contrasting responses of the studied beetle families - click beetles mostly preferred sun-exposure and spruce as the dominant tree species, longhorn beetles mainly preferred large stands, whereas rove beetles were mostly influenced by oak as the dominant tree species and increasing area. We also observed that some species had different preferences in plantation forests than is known from the literature. The main conclusions of our results are that the dominance of non-natural spruce plantations and a large stand area (both originating from artificially replanted large clear-cuts) did not affect the majority of the studied taxa as we expected. On the other hand, our results might have been influenced by other factor, such as the current small total area of the former vegetation, which in the past might have led to extinction debt; or a large area of other conifers in the surroundings that might have promoted conifer-associated fauna.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Area</subject><subject>Beetles</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biota</subject><subject>Body length</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Coleoptera - physiology</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Coniferous trees</subject><subject>Conifers</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation areas</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Czech Republic</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Endangered &amp; extinct species</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Habitat loss</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Microclimate</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Species checklists</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Staphylinidae</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0007-4853</issn><issn>1475-2670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkc1u1TAQhS0EorctD8AGWWLDJuDxTxwvUVWgUiUWbdeR7djUVWIH2xH0EXhrHPXCAlajmfOdsUcHoddA3gMB-eGGECL5IBhIQoAR_gwdgEvR0V6S5-iwy92un6DTUh5ayxVXL9EJVYxIBnBAv27vHXbeO1sLTh7_CPU-RFyqjhOeQqlbNjpah9twnXWsuoYUsU_ZleYIcQpWV4dtWtbZ_cS7zaZYsy41xG-4YWuKxRWsl9T6XT--YZyrs8NeL2EOrpyjF17Pxb061jN09-ny9uJLd_3189XFx-vOMqpq57Wklmlqej4QYyWZPNNe8N4rq6QF1ptBMkUHbjQxAJNRPfeW9hNXExWUnaF3T3vXnL5v7YpxCcW6uR3n0lZGUIMSohcgGvr2H_QhbTm2340UqARFhWKNgifK5lRKdn5cc1h0fhyBjHtO4385Nc-b4-bNLG766_gTDPsNMv6PWQ</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Mladenović, S</creator><creator>Loskotová, T</creator><creator>Boháč, J</creator><creator>Pavlíček, J</creator><creator>Brestovanský, J</creator><creator>Horák, J</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families</title><author>Mladenović, S ; Loskotová, T ; Boháč, J ; Pavlíček, J ; Brestovanský, J ; Horák, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-fa72c3a2b6480bc70df3af546f9c97c136b8739284ba0b11db964fc26d49d2523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Area</topic><topic>Beetles</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biota</topic><topic>Body length</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Coleoptera - physiology</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Coniferous trees</topic><topic>Conifers</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation areas</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Czech Republic</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Endangered &amp; extinct species</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Habitat loss</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Microclimate</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Species checklists</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Staphylinidae</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mladenović, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loskotová, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boháč, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pavlíček, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brestovanský, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horák, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mladenović, S</au><au>Loskotová, T</au><au>Boháč, J</au><au>Pavlíček, J</au><au>Brestovanský, J</au><au>Horák, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of entomological research</jtitle><addtitle>Bull Entomol Res</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>750</spage><epage>764</epage><pages>750-764</pages><issn>0007-4853</issn><eissn>1475-2670</eissn><abstract>Plantation forests with timber production as the major function are highly fragmented and disturbed regarding the tree species composition and stand area. Their closed canopies also have different microclimatic conditions compared with better studied conservation areas. We studied three beetle families (click, longhorn, and rove beetles) with different ecological demands in lowland plantation forests dominated by Sessile oak and Norway spruce in the Czech Republic. Our main interest was how their species richness, abundance, diversity, body length, rarity, red-list status, species composition and individual species were driven by the main tree species, stand area and canopy openness. We analyzed 3466 individuals from 198 beetle species and the results revealed complex and contrasting responses of the studied beetle families - click beetles mostly preferred sun-exposure and spruce as the dominant tree species, longhorn beetles mainly preferred large stands, whereas rove beetles were mostly influenced by oak as the dominant tree species and increasing area. We also observed that some species had different preferences in plantation forests than is known from the literature. The main conclusions of our results are that the dominance of non-natural spruce plantations and a large stand area (both originating from artificially replanted large clear-cuts) did not affect the majority of the studied taxa as we expected. On the other hand, our results might have been influenced by other factor, such as the current small total area of the former vegetation, which in the past might have led to extinction debt; or a large area of other conifers in the surroundings that might have promoted conifer-associated fauna.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>29307311</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0007485317001304</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-4853
ispartof Bulletin of entomological research, 2018-12, Vol.108 (6), p.750-764
issn 0007-4853
1475-2670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989556515
source MEDLINE; Cambridge Journals
subjects Abundance
Agriculture
Animals
Area
Beetles
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Biota
Body length
Canopies
Clearcutting
Coleoptera - physiology
Community composition
Composition
Coniferous trees
Conifers
Conservation
Conservation areas
Conservation of Natural Resources
Czech Republic
Dominant species
Ecology
Ecosystems
Endangered & extinct species
Forest management
Forestry
Forests
Habitat loss
Habitats
Insects
Microclimate
Pine trees
Plant cover
Plant species
Plantations
Population Dynamics
Species checklists
Species composition
Species diversity
Species extinction
Species richness
Staphylinidae
Trees
title The effects of within stand disturbance in plantation forests indicate complex and contrasting responses among and within beetle families
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T17%3A25%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20within%20stand%20disturbance%20in%20plantation%20forests%20indicate%20complex%20and%20contrasting%20responses%20among%20and%20within%20beetle%20families&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20entomological%20research&rft.au=Mladenovi%C4%87,%20S&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=750&rft.epage=764&rft.pages=750-764&rft.issn=0007-4853&rft.eissn=1475-2670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0007485317001304&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989556515%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2127192593&rft_id=info:pmid/29307311&rfr_iscdi=true