Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells

The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of huma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endodontics 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.446-451
Hauptverfasser: Sultana, Neha, Singh, Manisha, Nawal, Ruchika Roongta, Chaudhry, Sarika, Yadav, Seema, Mohanty, Sujata, Talwar, Sangeeta
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 451
container_issue 3
container_start_page 446
container_title Journal of endodontics
container_volume 44
creator Sultana, Neha
Singh, Manisha
Nawal, Ruchika Roongta
Chaudhry, Sarika
Yadav, Seema
Mohanty, Sujata
Talwar, Sangeeta
description The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA). Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay). ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs. All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989538803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S009923991731261X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1989538803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhBTggH7kkeOJkN5a40FVpkVoVqe3Z8p9J8SqxF9tZtDfegUPfjyfBqy0cOY1m9Ps-zcxHyFtgNTBYftjUm4C-bhisaoC6jJ6RBfSrvuJd1z4nC8aEqBouxAl5ldKGFZDz1Uty0gjOlh1nC_J4vlPjrLILnoaBnrlgwrQtvXajy3uqvKU3KWN4QO8M_Roy-uzUeIDvojNqNG6e6G2hjcr4--cvrRJausapgIneJ-cf6OU8KU_Pgkd6rWIMPwpnMbpdIa8xoTff9lMxvc04Fek4ptfkxaDGhG-e6im5_3x-t76srm4uvqw_XVWGd8tcaQTOoWOdwWYADU3LW9EYKzrkjRhEq7kB0Ewvh1YZZcFqgda01rYM-GD5KXl_9N3G8H3GlOXkkikbKI9hThJELzre94wXtDmiJoaUIg5yG92k4l4Ck4dA5EYeApGHQCSALKMievfkP-sJ7T_J3wQK8PEIYLly5zDKZFx5CFoX0WRpg_uf_x-tm6HO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989538803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Sultana, Neha ; Singh, Manisha ; Nawal, Ruchika Roongta ; Chaudhry, Sarika ; Yadav, Seema ; Mohanty, Sujata ; Talwar, Sangeeta</creator><creatorcontrib>Sultana, Neha ; Singh, Manisha ; Nawal, Ruchika Roongta ; Chaudhry, Sarika ; Yadav, Seema ; Mohanty, Sujata ; Talwar, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><description>The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA). Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay). ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs. All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29306530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biocompatibility ; Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology ; Calcium Compounds - pharmacology ; calcium silicate–based cements ; Cells, Cultured ; Dental Cements - pharmacology ; Dentistry ; human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects ; Osteogenesis - drug effects ; osteogenic potential ; root-end filling materials ; Silicates - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.446-451</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0001-7502</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sultana, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Sarika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Sujata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA). Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay). ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs. All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.</description><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology</subject><subject>Calcium Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>calcium silicate–based cements</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Dental Cements - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - drug effects</subject><subject>osteogenic potential</subject><subject>root-end filling materials</subject><subject>Silicates - pharmacology</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhBTggH7kkeOJkN5a40FVpkVoVqe3Z8p9J8SqxF9tZtDfegUPfjyfBqy0cOY1m9Ps-zcxHyFtgNTBYftjUm4C-bhisaoC6jJ6RBfSrvuJd1z4nC8aEqBouxAl5ldKGFZDz1Uty0gjOlh1nC_J4vlPjrLILnoaBnrlgwrQtvXajy3uqvKU3KWN4QO8M_Roy-uzUeIDvojNqNG6e6G2hjcr4--cvrRJausapgIneJ-cf6OU8KU_Pgkd6rWIMPwpnMbpdIa8xoTff9lMxvc04Fek4ptfkxaDGhG-e6im5_3x-t76srm4uvqw_XVWGd8tcaQTOoWOdwWYADU3LW9EYKzrkjRhEq7kB0Ewvh1YZZcFqgda01rYM-GD5KXl_9N3G8H3GlOXkkikbKI9hThJELzre94wXtDmiJoaUIg5yG92k4l4Ck4dA5EYeApGHQCSALKMievfkP-sJ7T_J3wQK8PEIYLly5zDKZFx5CFoX0WRpg_uf_x-tm6HO</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Sultana, Neha</creator><creator>Singh, Manisha</creator><creator>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</creator><creator>Chaudhry, Sarika</creator><creator>Yadav, Seema</creator><creator>Mohanty, Sujata</creator><creator>Talwar, Sangeeta</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-7502</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><author>Sultana, Neha ; Singh, Manisha ; Nawal, Ruchika Roongta ; Chaudhry, Sarika ; Yadav, Seema ; Mohanty, Sujata ; Talwar, Sangeeta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology</topic><topic>Calcium Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>calcium silicate–based cements</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Dental Cements - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - drug effects</topic><topic>osteogenic potential</topic><topic>root-end filling materials</topic><topic>Silicates - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sultana, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Sarika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Sujata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sultana, Neha</au><au>Singh, Manisha</au><au>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</au><au>Chaudhry, Sarika</au><au>Yadav, Seema</au><au>Mohanty, Sujata</au><au>Talwar, Sangeeta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>446-451</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA). Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay). ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs. All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29306530</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-7502</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-2399
ispartof Journal of endodontics, 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.446-451
issn 0099-2399
1878-3554
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989538803
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Biocompatibility
Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology
Calcium Compounds - pharmacology
calcium silicate–based cements
Cells, Cultured
Dental Cements - pharmacology
Dentistry
human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells
Humans
Materials Testing
Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects
Osteogenesis - drug effects
osteogenic potential
root-end filling materials
Silicates - pharmacology
title Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A12%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Biocompatibility%20and%20Osteogenic%20Potential%20of%20Tricalcium%20Silicate%E2%80%93based%20Cements%20Using%20Human%20Bone%20Marrow%E2%80%93derived%20Mesenchymal%20Stem%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Sultana,%20Neha&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=446-451&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989538803%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989538803&rft_id=info:pmid/29306530&rft_els_id=S009923991731261X&rfr_iscdi=true