Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells
The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of huma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.446-451 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 451 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 446 |
container_title | Journal of endodontics |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Sultana, Neha Singh, Manisha Nawal, Ruchika Roongta Chaudhry, Sarika Yadav, Seema Mohanty, Sujata Talwar, Sangeeta |
description | The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA).
Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay).
ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs.
All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989538803</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S009923991731261X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1989538803</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhBTggH7kkeOJkN5a40FVpkVoVqe3Z8p9J8SqxF9tZtDfegUPfjyfBqy0cOY1m9Ps-zcxHyFtgNTBYftjUm4C-bhisaoC6jJ6RBfSrvuJd1z4nC8aEqBouxAl5ldKGFZDz1Uty0gjOlh1nC_J4vlPjrLILnoaBnrlgwrQtvXajy3uqvKU3KWN4QO8M_Roy-uzUeIDvojNqNG6e6G2hjcr4--cvrRJausapgIneJ-cf6OU8KU_Pgkd6rWIMPwpnMbpdIa8xoTff9lMxvc04Fek4ptfkxaDGhG-e6im5_3x-t76srm4uvqw_XVWGd8tcaQTOoWOdwWYADU3LW9EYKzrkjRhEq7kB0Ewvh1YZZcFqgda01rYM-GD5KXl_9N3G8H3GlOXkkikbKI9hThJELzre94wXtDmiJoaUIg5yG92k4l4Ck4dA5EYeApGHQCSALKMievfkP-sJ7T_J3wQK8PEIYLly5zDKZFx5CFoX0WRpg_uf_x-tm6HO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1989538803</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Sultana, Neha ; Singh, Manisha ; Nawal, Ruchika Roongta ; Chaudhry, Sarika ; Yadav, Seema ; Mohanty, Sujata ; Talwar, Sangeeta</creator><creatorcontrib>Sultana, Neha ; Singh, Manisha ; Nawal, Ruchika Roongta ; Chaudhry, Sarika ; Yadav, Seema ; Mohanty, Sujata ; Talwar, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><description>The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA).
Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay).
ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs.
All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-2399</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-3554</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29306530</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biocompatibility ; Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology ; Calcium Compounds - pharmacology ; calcium silicate–based cements ; Cells, Cultured ; Dental Cements - pharmacology ; Dentistry ; human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects ; Osteogenesis - drug effects ; osteogenic potential ; root-end filling materials ; Silicates - pharmacology</subject><ispartof>Journal of endodontics, 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.446-451</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association of Endodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0001-7502</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29306530$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sultana, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Sarika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Sujata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><title>Journal of endodontics</title><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><description>The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA).
Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay).
ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs.
All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.</description><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology</subject><subject>Calcium Compounds - pharmacology</subject><subject>calcium silicate–based cements</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Dental Cements - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects</subject><subject>Osteogenesis - drug effects</subject><subject>osteogenic potential</subject><subject>root-end filling materials</subject><subject>Silicates - pharmacology</subject><issn>0099-2399</issn><issn>1878-3554</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhBTggH7kkeOJkN5a40FVpkVoVqe3Z8p9J8SqxF9tZtDfegUPfjyfBqy0cOY1m9Ps-zcxHyFtgNTBYftjUm4C-bhisaoC6jJ6RBfSrvuJd1z4nC8aEqBouxAl5ldKGFZDz1Uty0gjOlh1nC_J4vlPjrLILnoaBnrlgwrQtvXajy3uqvKU3KWN4QO8M_Roy-uzUeIDvojNqNG6e6G2hjcr4--cvrRJausapgIneJ-cf6OU8KU_Pgkd6rWIMPwpnMbpdIa8xoTff9lMxvc04Fek4ptfkxaDGhG-e6im5_3x-t76srm4uvqw_XVWGd8tcaQTOoWOdwWYADU3LW9EYKzrkjRhEq7kB0Ewvh1YZZcFqgda01rYM-GD5KXl_9N3G8H3GlOXkkikbKI9hThJELzre94wXtDmiJoaUIg5yG92k4l4Ck4dA5EYeApGHQCSALKMievfkP-sJ7T_J3wQK8PEIYLly5zDKZFx5CFoX0WRpg_uf_x-tm6HO</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Sultana, Neha</creator><creator>Singh, Manisha</creator><creator>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</creator><creator>Chaudhry, Sarika</creator><creator>Yadav, Seema</creator><creator>Mohanty, Sujata</creator><creator>Talwar, Sangeeta</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-7502</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</title><author>Sultana, Neha ; Singh, Manisha ; Nawal, Ruchika Roongta ; Chaudhry, Sarika ; Yadav, Seema ; Mohanty, Sujata ; Talwar, Sangeeta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-be1331505ce2f1b1243492cd95e329f94b3c11b0b6f4acad1db9edc4dd4013fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology</topic><topic>Calcium Compounds - pharmacology</topic><topic>calcium silicate–based cements</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Dental Cements - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects</topic><topic>Osteogenesis - drug effects</topic><topic>osteogenic potential</topic><topic>root-end filling materials</topic><topic>Silicates - pharmacology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sultana, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Manisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaudhry, Sarika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Seema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohanty, Sujata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Talwar, Sangeeta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sultana, Neha</au><au>Singh, Manisha</au><au>Nawal, Ruchika Roongta</au><au>Chaudhry, Sarika</au><au>Yadav, Seema</au><au>Mohanty, Sujata</au><au>Talwar, Sangeeta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells</atitle><jtitle>Journal of endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>J Endod</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>446</spage><epage>451</epage><pages>446-451</pages><issn>0099-2399</issn><eissn>1878-3554</eissn><abstract>The success of endodontic regeneration lies in the appropriate combination of stem cells and bioactive materials. Several novel dental materials are available on the market in this regard. Hence, the current study aimed to evaluate the proliferation, differentiation, and osteogenic potential of human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) onto biomaterials like ProRoot MTA (MTA; Dentsply Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK), Biodentine (BD; Septodont, Saint Maur de Fosses, France), and EndoSequence Root Repair Material (ERRM; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA).
Dental cements were formulated into discs and assessed for their biocompatibility. hBMSCs were used to study biocompatitibility and the proliferative and osteogenic potential of these dental cements. A live dead assay was performed using confocal microscopy to study the biocompatibility, proliferation, and cell attachment property of the cements. An 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay was also performed on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to study growth kinetics. The osteogenic potential of these cements was studied by inducing hBMSCs over them using osteogenic differentiation medium (assessed by alkaline phosphatase assay).
ERRM and MTA have shown the best biocompatibility among the tricalcium silicate materials used with no significant difference between them. Both have shown significantly higher osteogenic bioactivity than BD. All 3 tricalcium silicate cements support good adherence of hBMSCs.
All of the dental cements used in this study are biocompatible with the potential to induce proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs. Therefore, the newly introduced ERRM can be the material of choice in various endodontic applications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29306530</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-7502</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-2399 |
ispartof | Journal of endodontics, 2018-03, Vol.44 (3), p.446-451 |
issn | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1989538803 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Biocompatibility Biocompatible Materials - pharmacology Calcium Compounds - pharmacology calcium silicate–based cements Cells, Cultured Dental Cements - pharmacology Dentistry human bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stem cells Humans Materials Testing Mesenchymal Stem Cells - drug effects Osteogenesis - drug effects osteogenic potential root-end filling materials Silicates - pharmacology |
title | Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Osteogenic Potential of Tricalcium Silicate–based Cements Using Human Bone Marrow–derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T08%3A12%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Biocompatibility%20and%20Osteogenic%20Potential%20of%20Tricalcium%20Silicate%E2%80%93based%20Cements%20Using%20Human%20Bone%20Marrow%E2%80%93derived%20Mesenchymal%20Stem%20Cells&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20endodontics&rft.au=Sultana,%20Neha&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=446&rft.epage=451&rft.pages=446-451&rft.issn=0099-2399&rft.eissn=1878-3554&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.joen.2017.11.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1989538803%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1989538803&rft_id=info:pmid/29306530&rft_els_id=S009923991731261X&rfr_iscdi=true |