Allalic Association Analysis of the Functional Insertion/Deletion Polymorphism in the Promoter Region of the Serotonin Transporter Gene in Bipolar Affective Disorder
The human serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) is a candidate for the pathogenesis of mood disorders, including bipolar disorder (BPD). The 5-HTT gene has a 44-bp insertion/deletion polymorphism within the promoter region (5-HTTLPR) with 2 allelic forms, the long (l) and the short (s) variants, which...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of molecular neuroscience 2005-10, Vol.27 (2), p.219-224 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The human serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) is a candidate for the pathogenesis of mood disorders, including bipolar disorder (BPD). The 5-HTT gene has a 44-bp insertion/deletion polymorphism within the promoter region (5-HTTLPR) with 2 allelic forms, the long (l) and the short (s) variants, which affect transcriptional rates of the 5-HTT gene. Association between the low-activity s variant and BPD has been suggested but remains controversial, as replication has not been consistent. In the present study, we examined the frequency of this polymorphism in a group of 266 Brazilian BPD patients and 306 control subjects. Genotyping for the 5-HTTLPR was performed using PCR. The allele frequencies were found to differ between BPD patients and controls (p approximately 0.03), with a higher frequency of the / allele in the patients compared with the controls (60.5% vs 54.4%). The distribution of genotypes also differed significantly between cases and controls (x super(2) = 10.4, 2 df, p = 0.005), with higher frequency of heterozygous l/s genotype in the BPD patient group (52.6% vs 44%). Because prior evidence from gene expression studies indicated that l/s and s/s genotypes are not distinguishable biochemically, we compared the distribution of the l/l genotype and the combined group l/s plus s/s between case and controls, but there was no significant difference (x super(2) = 0.22). Likewise, a logistic regression model considering a dominant role for the s variant was not significant (OR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.64-1.32). Our results suggest that the low-activity s variant does not influence susceptibility to BPD in our population. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0895-8696 |