Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost

Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant and soil 2006-02, Vol.280 (1-2), p.171-176
Hauptverfasser: Meunchang, S, Panichsakpatana, S, Weaver, R.W
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 176
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 171
container_title Plant and soil
container_volume 280
creator Meunchang, S
Panichsakpatana, S
Weaver, R.W
description Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19842352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24125242</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24125242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9iEfQWnUnapjmK-AWCB1fwFrJJunZpmzVpkf33ZqkoOJdhZp55eXkJOUG4QgBxHRERcgpQUCZzSXGHzLAQnBbAy10yA-CMgpDv--QgxhVsZyxn5GbuOz34bBn81_CRNX0WfdNmunO9dTb7atIyjksdsq5p22yxoevg7WiGmBnfrX0cjsherdvojn_6IXm7v5vfPtLnl4en25tnariQA3VWGMw5GCnrShhpUHLLUObJClqXM6yFWADUFXLrSiwXujILy520Eowo-CG5nHSTgc_RxUF1TTSubXXv_BgVyipnvGAJPP8HrvwY-uRNiQKRVakShBNkgo8xuFqtQ9PpsFEIapuomhJVKVG1TVRh-rn4EdbR6LYOujdN_HsUJQfGeeJOJ24VBx9-7yxHVrB8a_BsutfaK70MSePtlQFyQBCCVcC_AT2xh2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751128888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Meunchang, S ; Panichsakpatana, S ; Weaver, R.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Meunchang, S ; Panichsakpatana, S ; Weaver, R.W</creatorcontrib><description>Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agrology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Azospirillum ; Azotobacter vinelandii ; Bacteria ; bacterial colonization ; Beijerinckia ; Beijerinckia derxii ; Biological and medical sciences ; Byproducts ; Compost ; Composting ; Composts ; fertilizer application ; Fertilizers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Lycopersicon esculentum ; milling byproducts ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen fertilizers ; nitrogen-fixing bacteria ; nutrient content ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; plant byproducts ; Plant growth ; plant nutrition ; Plant roots ; Plants ; Saccharum officinarum ; Soil amendment ; soil amendments ; Soil inoculation ; soil properties ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum ; Sugar ; sugarcane ; sugarcane bagasse ; Tomatoes</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2006-02, Vol.280 (1-2), p.171-176</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24125242$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24125242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17630233$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meunchang, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panichsakpatana, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, R.W</creatorcontrib><title>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</title><title>Plant and soil</title><description>Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants.</description><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Azospirillum</subject><subject>Azotobacter vinelandii</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial colonization</subject><subject>Beijerinckia</subject><subject>Beijerinckia derxii</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>Compost</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum</subject><subject>milling byproducts</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>nitrogen-fixing bacteria</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>plant byproducts</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>plant nutrition</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Saccharum officinarum</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>soil amendments</subject><subject>Soil inoculation</subject><subject>soil properties</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>sugarcane</subject><subject>sugarcane bagasse</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9iEfQWnUnapjmK-AWCB1fwFrJJunZpmzVpkf33ZqkoOJdhZp55eXkJOUG4QgBxHRERcgpQUCZzSXGHzLAQnBbAy10yA-CMgpDv--QgxhVsZyxn5GbuOz34bBn81_CRNX0WfdNmunO9dTb7atIyjksdsq5p22yxoevg7WiGmBnfrX0cjsherdvojn_6IXm7v5vfPtLnl4en25tnariQA3VWGMw5GCnrShhpUHLLUObJClqXM6yFWADUFXLrSiwXujILy520Eowo-CG5nHSTgc_RxUF1TTSubXXv_BgVyipnvGAJPP8HrvwY-uRNiQKRVakShBNkgo8xuFqtQ9PpsFEIapuomhJVKVG1TVRh-rn4EdbR6LYOujdN_HsUJQfGeeJOJ24VBx9-7yxHVrB8a_BsutfaK70MSePtlQFyQBCCVcC_AT2xh2Y</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Meunchang, S</creator><creator>Panichsakpatana, S</creator><creator>Weaver, R.W</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</title><author>Meunchang, S ; Panichsakpatana, S ; Weaver, R.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Azospirillum</topic><topic>Azotobacter vinelandii</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial colonization</topic><topic>Beijerinckia</topic><topic>Beijerinckia derxii</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>Compost</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum</topic><topic>milling byproducts</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>nitrogen-fixing bacteria</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>plant byproducts</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>plant nutrition</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Saccharum officinarum</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>soil amendments</topic><topic>Soil inoculation</topic><topic>soil properties</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>sugarcane</topic><topic>sugarcane bagasse</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meunchang, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panichsakpatana, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, R.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meunchang, S</au><au>Panichsakpatana, S</au><au>Weaver, R.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>171-176</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-079X
ispartof Plant and soil, 2006-02, Vol.280 (1-2), p.171-176
issn 0032-079X
1573-5036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19842352
source Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Agrology
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Azospirillum
Azotobacter vinelandii
Bacteria
bacterial colonization
Beijerinckia
Beijerinckia derxii
Biological and medical sciences
Byproducts
Compost
Composting
Composts
fertilizer application
Fertilizers
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Lycopersicon esculentum
milling byproducts
Nitrogen
nitrogen fertilizers
nitrogen-fixing bacteria
nutrient content
Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries
plant byproducts
Plant growth
plant nutrition
Plant roots
Plants
Saccharum officinarum
Soil amendment
soil amendments
Soil inoculation
soil properties
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum
Sugar
sugarcane
sugarcane bagasse
Tomatoes
title Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A11%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tomato%20growth%20in%20soil%20amended%20with%20sugar%20mill%20by-products%20compost&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Meunchang,%20S&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=171-176&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24125242%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751128888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24125242&rfr_iscdi=true