Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost
Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2006-02, Vol.280 (1-2), p.171-176 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 176 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-2 |
container_start_page | 171 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 280 |
creator | Meunchang, S Panichsakpatana, S Weaver, R.W |
description | Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19842352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24125242</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24125242</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9iEfQWnUnapjmK-AWCB1fwFrJJunZpmzVpkf33ZqkoOJdhZp55eXkJOUG4QgBxHRERcgpQUCZzSXGHzLAQnBbAy10yA-CMgpDv--QgxhVsZyxn5GbuOz34bBn81_CRNX0WfdNmunO9dTb7atIyjksdsq5p22yxoevg7WiGmBnfrX0cjsherdvojn_6IXm7v5vfPtLnl4en25tnariQA3VWGMw5GCnrShhpUHLLUObJClqXM6yFWADUFXLrSiwXujILy520Eowo-CG5nHSTgc_RxUF1TTSubXXv_BgVyipnvGAJPP8HrvwY-uRNiQKRVakShBNkgo8xuFqtQ9PpsFEIapuomhJVKVG1TVRh-rn4EdbR6LYOujdN_HsUJQfGeeJOJ24VBx9-7yxHVrB8a_BsutfaK70MSePtlQFyQBCCVcC_AT2xh2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751128888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Meunchang, S ; Panichsakpatana, S ; Weaver, R.W</creator><creatorcontrib>Meunchang, S ; Panichsakpatana, S ; Weaver, R.W</creatorcontrib><description>Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PLSOA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agrology ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Azospirillum ; Azotobacter vinelandii ; Bacteria ; bacterial colonization ; Beijerinckia ; Beijerinckia derxii ; Biological and medical sciences ; Byproducts ; Compost ; Composting ; Composts ; fertilizer application ; Fertilizers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Lycopersicon esculentum ; milling byproducts ; Nitrogen ; nitrogen fertilizers ; nitrogen-fixing bacteria ; nutrient content ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; plant byproducts ; Plant growth ; plant nutrition ; Plant roots ; Plants ; Saccharum officinarum ; Soil amendment ; soil amendments ; Soil inoculation ; soil properties ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum ; Sugar ; sugarcane ; sugarcane bagasse ; Tomatoes</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2006-02, Vol.280 (1-2), p.171-176</ispartof><rights>Springer 2006</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24125242$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24125242$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17630233$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meunchang, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panichsakpatana, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, R.W</creatorcontrib><title>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</title><title>Plant and soil</title><description>Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants.</description><subject>Agrology</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Azospirillum</subject><subject>Azotobacter vinelandii</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>bacterial colonization</subject><subject>Beijerinckia</subject><subject>Beijerinckia derxii</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Byproducts</subject><subject>Compost</subject><subject>Composting</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Lycopersicon esculentum</subject><subject>milling byproducts</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>nitrogen-fixing bacteria</subject><subject>nutrient content</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>plant byproducts</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>plant nutrition</subject><subject>Plant roots</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Saccharum officinarum</subject><subject>Soil amendment</subject><subject>soil amendments</subject><subject>Soil inoculation</subject><subject>soil properties</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>sugarcane</subject><subject>sugarcane bagasse</subject><subject>Tomatoes</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMouH78AA9iEfQWnUnapjmK-AWCB1fwFrJJunZpmzVpkf33ZqkoOJdhZp55eXkJOUG4QgBxHRERcgpQUCZzSXGHzLAQnBbAy10yA-CMgpDv--QgxhVsZyxn5GbuOz34bBn81_CRNX0WfdNmunO9dTb7atIyjksdsq5p22yxoevg7WiGmBnfrX0cjsherdvojn_6IXm7v5vfPtLnl4en25tnariQA3VWGMw5GCnrShhpUHLLUObJClqXM6yFWADUFXLrSiwXujILy520Eowo-CG5nHSTgc_RxUF1TTSubXXv_BgVyipnvGAJPP8HrvwY-uRNiQKRVakShBNkgo8xuFqtQ9PpsFEIapuomhJVKVG1TVRh-rn4EdbR6LYOujdN_HsUJQfGeeJOJ24VBx9-7yxHVrB8a_BsutfaK70MSePtlQFyQBCCVcC_AT2xh2Y</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Meunchang, S</creator><creator>Panichsakpatana, S</creator><creator>Weaver, R.W</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</title><author>Meunchang, S ; Panichsakpatana, S ; Weaver, R.W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-ed7c1430c99f87c9c193d21940001de421f77b00f813de616ba8cbd3e9d90c753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agrology</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Azospirillum</topic><topic>Azotobacter vinelandii</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>bacterial colonization</topic><topic>Beijerinckia</topic><topic>Beijerinckia derxii</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Byproducts</topic><topic>Compost</topic><topic>Composting</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Lycopersicon esculentum</topic><topic>milling byproducts</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>nitrogen-fixing bacteria</topic><topic>nutrient content</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>plant byproducts</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>plant nutrition</topic><topic>Plant roots</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Saccharum officinarum</topic><topic>Soil amendment</topic><topic>soil amendments</topic><topic>Soil inoculation</topic><topic>soil properties</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>sugarcane</topic><topic>sugarcane bagasse</topic><topic>Tomatoes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meunchang, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panichsakpatana, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weaver, R.W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meunchang, S</au><au>Panichsakpatana, S</au><au>Weaver, R.W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>280</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>171</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>171-176</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><coden>PLSOA2</coden><abstract>Sugar mill by-products compost may be a good soil amendment to promote tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) growth. In addition, the compost may further promote plant growth by inoculation with N2-fixing bacteria. Compost from sugar-mill waste was prepared with and without the N2-fixing bacteria, Azotobacter vinelandii, Beijerinckia derxii and Azospirillum sp. and incubated for 50 days. Each compost type was added to 10 kg of soil in pots at rates of 0, 15, and 45 g with and without fertilizer N at rates of 0, 0.75, and 1.54 g. A blanket application of P and K was applied to all pots. Shoot and root dry weights and N content of the whole plant was measured at 55 days. Dry weight of tomato shoots was increased by 40% by addition of fertilizer N and root weight was increased by 66%. Without fertilizer N the high rate of inoculated compost increased shoot growth 180% and uninoculated compost increased shoot growth 112%. For most treatments with and without fertilizer N, inoculated compost enhanced shoot growth and nitrogen content more than uninoculated compost. Root weights were nearly doubled by addition of either compost in comparison to the 0 N treatment. At the low rate of compost addition without fertilizer N, root weight was the same for uninoculated and inoculated compost but at the high rate of compost addition root weight was 32% higher for inoculated compost. The N2-fixing bacteria colonized roots when inoculated compost was used. Sugar mill by-products compost proved to be an effective soil amendment for promoting the growth of tomato plants.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 2006-02, Vol.280 (1-2), p.171-176 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19842352 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agrology Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Azospirillum Azotobacter vinelandii Bacteria bacterial colonization Beijerinckia Beijerinckia derxii Biological and medical sciences Byproducts Compost Composting Composts fertilizer application Fertilizers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Lycopersicon esculentum milling byproducts Nitrogen nitrogen fertilizers nitrogen-fixing bacteria nutrient content Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries plant byproducts Plant growth plant nutrition Plant roots Plants Saccharum officinarum Soil amendment soil amendments Soil inoculation soil properties Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments Solanum lycopersicum var. lycopersicum Sugar sugarcane sugarcane bagasse Tomatoes |
title | Tomato growth in soil amended with sugar mill by-products compost |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T04%3A11%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tomato%20growth%20in%20soil%20amended%20with%20sugar%20mill%20by-products%20compost&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Meunchang,%20S&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=280&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=171&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=171-176&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft.coden=PLSOA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-005-2949-1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24125242%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751128888&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24125242&rfr_iscdi=true |