Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation

The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interpersonal violence 2020-02, Vol.35 (3-4), p.1012-1034
Hauptverfasser: Weber, T., Bouman, Yvonne H. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1034
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 1012
container_title Journal of interpersonal violence
container_volume 35
creator Weber, T.
Bouman, Yvonne H. A.
description The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0886260517692994
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1984194650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0886260517692994</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2335978519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPw0AQhE8IREKgp0KWaGgMu7bvRYciXhICCqC1NvYaGTnncHcp-Pc4JICERLXFfDO7O0IcIpwian0GxqhMgUStbGZtsSXGKGWWKolmW4xXcrrSR2IvhDcAQGnMrhhlA12owozF_a2L7ZwiJ4_ko2OfvLR9x67i8-SFfEux7V1IWpc8sl9w9BR7HxJydfLkmeKcXUwuuq6vvsh9sdNQF_hgMyfi-eryaXqT3j1c304v7tIqVzKmM9PAcJw1TJps0aCsAZGz3FTUkNIa6gyoVspYhWTQIAEQ6Nw0tQa0-UScrHMXvn9fcojlvA0Vdx057pehRGsKHF6UMKDHf9C3fundcF2Z5bm02sivQFhTle9D8NyUCz_04j9KhHLVdfm368FytAlezuZc_xi-yx2AdA0EeuXfrf8GfgIdI4TD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2335978519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Weber, T. ; Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, T. ; Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creatorcontrib><description>The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-2605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0886260517692994</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29294648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Deviance ; Domestic violence ; Family Violence ; Humans ; Intimate partner violence ; Intimate Partner Violence - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Personality - classification ; Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Personality Disorders - psychology ; Psychopathology ; Spouse Abuse - psychology ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of interpersonal violence, 2020-02, Vol.35 (3-4), p.1012-1034</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0886260517692994$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886260517692994$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29294648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</title><title>Journal of interpersonal violence</title><addtitle>J Interpers Violence</addtitle><description>The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intimate partner violence</subject><subject>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Personality - classification</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Personality Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0886-2605</issn><issn>1552-6518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPw0AQhE8IREKgp0KWaGgMu7bvRYciXhICCqC1NvYaGTnncHcp-Pc4JICERLXFfDO7O0IcIpwian0GxqhMgUStbGZtsSXGKGWWKolmW4xXcrrSR2IvhDcAQGnMrhhlA12owozF_a2L7ZwiJ4_ko2OfvLR9x67i8-SFfEux7V1IWpc8sl9w9BR7HxJydfLkmeKcXUwuuq6vvsh9sdNQF_hgMyfi-eryaXqT3j1c304v7tIqVzKmM9PAcJw1TJps0aCsAZGz3FTUkNIa6gyoVspYhWTQIAEQ6Nw0tQa0-UScrHMXvn9fcojlvA0Vdx057pehRGsKHF6UMKDHf9C3fundcF2Z5bm02sivQFhTle9D8NyUCz_04j9KhHLVdfm368FytAlezuZc_xi-yx2AdA0EeuXfrf8GfgIdI4TD</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Weber, T.</creator><creator>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</title><author>Weber, T. ; Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intimate partner violence</topic><topic>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Personality - classification</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Personality Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, T.</au><au>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle><addtitle>J Interpers Violence</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1012</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1012-1034</pages><issn>0886-2605</issn><eissn>1552-6518</eissn><abstract>The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29294648</pmid><doi>10.1177/0886260517692994</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-2605
ispartof Journal of interpersonal violence, 2020-02, Vol.35 (3-4), p.1012-1034
issn 0886-2605
1552-6518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1984194650
source MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Adult
Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology
Clinical decision making
Decision making
Deviance
Domestic violence
Family Violence
Humans
Intimate partner violence
Intimate Partner Violence - psychology
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Personality - classification
Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data
Personality Disorders - psychology
Psychopathology
Spouse Abuse - psychology
Violence
title Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intimate%20Partner%20Violence:%20Variations%20in%20Perpetrators%20and%20Treatment%20Allocation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interpersonal%20violence&rft.au=Weber,%20T.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1012&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1012-1034&rft.issn=0886-2605&rft.eissn=1552-6518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0886260517692994&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2335978519%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2335978519&rft_id=info:pmid/29294648&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0886260517692994&rfr_iscdi=true