Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation
The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of interpersonal violence 2020-02, Vol.35 (3-4), p.1012-1034 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1034 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 1012 |
container_title | Journal of interpersonal violence |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Weber, T. Bouman, Yvonne H. A. |
description | The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0886260517692994 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1984194650</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0886260517692994</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2335978519</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPw0AQhE8IREKgp0KWaGgMu7bvRYciXhICCqC1NvYaGTnncHcp-Pc4JICERLXFfDO7O0IcIpwian0GxqhMgUStbGZtsSXGKGWWKolmW4xXcrrSR2IvhDcAQGnMrhhlA12owozF_a2L7ZwiJ4_ko2OfvLR9x67i8-SFfEux7V1IWpc8sl9w9BR7HxJydfLkmeKcXUwuuq6vvsh9sdNQF_hgMyfi-eryaXqT3j1c304v7tIqVzKmM9PAcJw1TJps0aCsAZGz3FTUkNIa6gyoVspYhWTQIAEQ6Nw0tQa0-UScrHMXvn9fcojlvA0Vdx057pehRGsKHF6UMKDHf9C3fundcF2Z5bm02sivQFhTle9D8NyUCz_04j9KhHLVdfm368FytAlezuZc_xi-yx2AdA0EeuXfrf8GfgIdI4TD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2335978519</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Weber, T. ; Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weber, T. ; Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creatorcontrib><description>The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-2605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0886260517692994</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29294648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology ; Clinical decision making ; Decision making ; Deviance ; Domestic violence ; Family Violence ; Humans ; Intimate partner violence ; Intimate Partner Violence - psychology ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Personality - classification ; Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Personality Disorders - psychology ; Psychopathology ; Spouse Abuse - psychology ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of interpersonal violence, 2020-02, Vol.35 (3-4), p.1012-1034</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0886260517692994$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0886260517692994$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33774,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29294648$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weber, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</title><title>Journal of interpersonal violence</title><addtitle>J Interpers Violence</addtitle><description>The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deviance</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Family Violence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intimate partner violence</subject><subject>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Personality - classification</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Personality Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Psychopathology</subject><subject>Spouse Abuse - psychology</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0886-2605</issn><issn>1552-6518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPw0AQhE8IREKgp0KWaGgMu7bvRYciXhICCqC1NvYaGTnncHcp-Pc4JICERLXFfDO7O0IcIpwian0GxqhMgUStbGZtsSXGKGWWKolmW4xXcrrSR2IvhDcAQGnMrhhlA12owozF_a2L7ZwiJ4_ko2OfvLR9x67i8-SFfEux7V1IWpc8sl9w9BR7HxJydfLkmeKcXUwuuq6vvsh9sdNQF_hgMyfi-eryaXqT3j1c304v7tIqVzKmM9PAcJw1TJps0aCsAZGz3FTUkNIa6gyoVspYhWTQIAEQ6Nw0tQa0-UScrHMXvn9fcojlvA0Vdx057pehRGsKHF6UMKDHf9C3fundcF2Z5bm02sivQFhTle9D8NyUCz_04j9KhHLVdfm368FytAlezuZc_xi-yx2AdA0EeuXfrf8GfgIdI4TD</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Weber, T.</creator><creator>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</title><author>Weber, T. ; Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-b8f008898ea7a94f15d011e238cafa6770d20ad668961a8181a00a0738fd70193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deviance</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Family Violence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intimate partner violence</topic><topic>Intimate Partner Violence - psychology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Personality - classification</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Personality Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Psychopathology</topic><topic>Spouse Abuse - psychology</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weber, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weber, T.</au><au>Bouman, Yvonne H. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle><addtitle>J Interpers Violence</addtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>1012</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1012-1034</pages><issn>0886-2605</issn><eissn>1552-6518</eissn><abstract>The division of batterers into subtypes is hardly ever used, neither to describe the type of perpetrator nor to indicate in the clinical decision-making process what treatment should be offered. In this study, a sample of male perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV) who had been advised to seek treatment at a community-based Dutch forensic psychiatric facility (N = 110), either voluntarily or mandatorily, have been divided into four subtypes based on a model reported by Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994). The four subtypes are Family-Only (FO), Borderline-Dysphoric (BD), Generally Violent Antisocial (GVA), and Low-Level Antisocial (LLA). The aim of the study was to identify the subtypes and to compare the different groups on descriptive dimensions and treatment allocation. In the first part of the study, aside from identifying the batterer subtypes, important differences between the subtypes were encountered in the nature of the violence (structural vs. incidental). The characteristics of the BD subtype were found to be similar to the model except for the psychopathological dimension. Differences in allocation of treatment types between batterer subtypes were not substantial raising questions about the correspondence between typological subtypes and the judgment of clinicians. These results do suggest that more attention should be paid to the heterogeneity of the batterer population, which could improve treatment and advance our understanding of IPV.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29294648</pmid><doi>10.1177/0886260517692994</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-2605 |
ispartof | Journal of interpersonal violence, 2020-02, Vol.35 (3-4), p.1012-1034 |
issn | 0886-2605 1552-6518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1984194650 |
source | MEDLINE; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Adult Antisocial Personality Disorder - psychology Clinical decision making Decision making Deviance Domestic violence Family Violence Humans Intimate partner violence Intimate Partner Violence - psychology Male Middle Aged Netherlands Personality - classification Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data Personality Disorders - psychology Psychopathology Spouse Abuse - psychology Violence |
title | Intimate Partner Violence: Variations in Perpetrators and Treatment Allocation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T14%3A56%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intimate%20Partner%20Violence:%20Variations%20in%20Perpetrators%20and%20Treatment%20Allocation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interpersonal%20violence&rft.au=Weber,%20T.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=1012&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1012-1034&rft.issn=0886-2605&rft.eissn=1552-6518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0886260517692994&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2335978519%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2335978519&rft_id=info:pmid/29294648&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0886260517692994&rfr_iscdi=true |