Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor vs. mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose calcineurin inhibitor in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To seek an optimized immunotherapy which can preserve renal function while maintaining low acute rejection rates, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nephrology 2018-05, Vol.89 (5), p.336-344
Hauptverfasser: He, Lihong, Deng, Jin, Yang, Bo, Jiang, Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 344
container_issue 5
container_start_page 336
container_title Clinical nephrology
container_volume 89
creator He, Lihong
Deng, Jin
Yang, Bo
Jiang, Wei
description To seek an optimized immunotherapy which can preserve renal function while maintaining low acute rejection rates, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) vs. mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus standard-dose CNI regimen after kidney transplantation (KT). We searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of EVR plus low-dose CNI and MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT and identified eligible RCTs according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Eleven RCTs with 850 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis showed that EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was associated with comparable renal function (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.16, 95% CI (-0.03, 0.35), p = 0.09) and a similar rate of acute rejection (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI (0.96, 1.42), p = 0.13), graft loss (RR 0.89, 95% CI (0.63, 1.24), p = 0.49) and mortality (RR 1.19, 95% CI (0.69, 2.08), p = 0.53) compared to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. In addition, EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen could reduce the rate of cytomegalovirus and infection, whereas a lower rate of other adverse events were noted in MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was similar in efficacy and safety to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT. However, this should be confirmed by further studies.
.
doi_str_mv 10.5414/cn109287
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1983849636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2111141160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-e6ebb41f469d36e77fc912b83267d3a9cc55a0df2ff3acc808421243e9382643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhbVIadK0kCcogm66caq_a1vdhUv6AyHZZG9keUQUZMnVyDf4JftMVXvTFrqoBiQknfk4zCHkgrPLneLqg42cadF3J-SMScYbpiQ7Ja8QHxkTrJf9S3IqdK1WyzPy_do5b43dqIkTReOgbDQ5CgfIKfh5RbqEuoX01EwJgVoTrI-wZh-pjw9-9CVlesBLOm82LQ8QUzAF6JwqyodjN5ZKN3n6H6JeMkQTaMkm4hJMLPXB-sVDLPiRXlHcsMBsirf14-Dh6ZfnGYppTG3c0ONr8sKZgPDm-Twn95-u7_dfmpu7z1_3VzeNlawrDbQwjoo71epJttB1zmouxl6Ktpuk0dbudoZNTjgnjbU965XgQknQshetkufk_RG75PRtBSzD7NFCqKYhrThwXeesdCvbKn33j_QxrbnaxUHwuhTnLfsLtDkhZnDDkv1s8jZwNvyMddjfHmOt0rfPwHWcYfoj_J2p_AEVxKRZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2111141160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor vs. mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose calcineurin inhibitor in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>He, Lihong ; Deng, Jin ; Yang, Bo ; Jiang, Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>He, Lihong ; Deng, Jin ; Yang, Bo ; Jiang, Wei</creatorcontrib><description>To seek an optimized immunotherapy which can preserve renal function while maintaining low acute rejection rates, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) vs. mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus standard-dose CNI regimen after kidney transplantation (KT). We searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of EVR plus low-dose CNI and MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT and identified eligible RCTs according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Eleven RCTs with 850 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis showed that EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was associated with comparable renal function (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.16, 95% CI (-0.03, 0.35), p = 0.09) and a similar rate of acute rejection (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI (0.96, 1.42), p = 0.13), graft loss (RR 0.89, 95% CI (0.63, 1.24), p = 0.49) and mortality (RR 1.19, 95% CI (0.69, 2.08), p = 0.53) compared to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. In addition, EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen could reduce the rate of cytomegalovirus and infection, whereas a lower rate of other adverse events were noted in MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was similar in efficacy and safety to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT. However, this should be confirmed by further studies.
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-0430</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5414/cn109287</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29292693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Dustri - Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle GmbH &amp; Co. KG</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Kidney transplants ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Nephrology ; Patients ; Plantations ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Clinical nephrology, 2018-05, Vol.89 (5), p.336-344</ispartof><rights>Copyright Dustri - Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle GmbH &amp; Co. KG May 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-e6ebb41f469d36e77fc912b83267d3a9cc55a0df2ff3acc808421243e9382643</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29292693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>He, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor vs. mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose calcineurin inhibitor in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Clinical nephrology</title><addtitle>Clin Nephrol</addtitle><description>To seek an optimized immunotherapy which can preserve renal function while maintaining low acute rejection rates, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) vs. mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus standard-dose CNI regimen after kidney transplantation (KT). We searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of EVR plus low-dose CNI and MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT and identified eligible RCTs according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Eleven RCTs with 850 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis showed that EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was associated with comparable renal function (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.16, 95% CI (-0.03, 0.35), p = 0.09) and a similar rate of acute rejection (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI (0.96, 1.42), p = 0.13), graft loss (RR 0.89, 95% CI (0.63, 1.24), p = 0.49) and mortality (RR 1.19, 95% CI (0.69, 2.08), p = 0.53) compared to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. In addition, EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen could reduce the rate of cytomegalovirus and infection, whereas a lower rate of other adverse events were noted in MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was similar in efficacy and safety to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT. However, this should be confirmed by further studies.
.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Kidney transplants</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0301-0430</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1q3TAQhbVIadK0kCcogm66caq_a1vdhUv6AyHZZG9keUQUZMnVyDf4JftMVXvTFrqoBiQknfk4zCHkgrPLneLqg42cadF3J-SMScYbpiQ7Ja8QHxkTrJf9S3IqdK1WyzPy_do5b43dqIkTReOgbDQ5CgfIKfh5RbqEuoX01EwJgVoTrI-wZh-pjw9-9CVlesBLOm82LQ8QUzAF6JwqyodjN5ZKN3n6H6JeMkQTaMkm4hJMLPXB-sVDLPiRXlHcsMBsirf14-Dh6ZfnGYppTG3c0ONr8sKZgPDm-Twn95-u7_dfmpu7z1_3VzeNlawrDbQwjoo71epJttB1zmouxl6Ktpuk0dbudoZNTjgnjbU965XgQknQshetkufk_RG75PRtBSzD7NFCqKYhrThwXeesdCvbKn33j_QxrbnaxUHwuhTnLfsLtDkhZnDDkv1s8jZwNvyMddjfHmOt0rfPwHWcYfoj_J2p_AEVxKRZ</recordid><startdate>201805</startdate><enddate>201805</enddate><creator>He, Lihong</creator><creator>Deng, Jin</creator><creator>Yang, Bo</creator><creator>Jiang, Wei</creator><general>Dustri - Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle GmbH &amp; Co. KG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201805</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor vs. mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose calcineurin inhibitor in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>He, Lihong ; Deng, Jin ; Yang, Bo ; Jiang, Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-e6ebb41f469d36e77fc912b83267d3a9cc55a0df2ff3acc808421243e9382643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Kidney transplants</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>He, Lihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nephrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>He, Lihong</au><au>Deng, Jin</au><au>Yang, Bo</au><au>Jiang, Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor vs. mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose calcineurin inhibitor in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nephrology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nephrol</addtitle><date>2018-05</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>344</epage><pages>336-344</pages><issn>0301-0430</issn><abstract>To seek an optimized immunotherapy which can preserve renal function while maintaining low acute rejection rates, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus (EVR) plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) vs. mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) plus standard-dose CNI regimen after kidney transplantation (KT). We searched for RCTs comparing the outcomes of EVR plus low-dose CNI and MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT and identified eligible RCTs according to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two authors independently assessed the quality of included studies and performed a meta-analysis using RevMan5.3. Eleven RCTs with 850 renal transplant recipients were included. This meta-analysis showed that EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was associated with comparable renal function (standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.16, 95% CI (-0.03, 0.35), p = 0.09) and a similar rate of acute rejection (risk ratio (RR) 1.16, 95% CI (0.96, 1.42), p = 0.13), graft loss (RR 0.89, 95% CI (0.63, 1.24), p = 0.49) and mortality (RR 1.19, 95% CI (0.69, 2.08), p = 0.53) compared to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. In addition, EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen could reduce the rate of cytomegalovirus and infection, whereas a lower rate of other adverse events were noted in MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen. EVR plus low-dose CNI regimen was similar in efficacy and safety to MMF plus standard-dose CNI regimen after KT. However, this should be confirmed by further studies.
.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Dustri - Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle GmbH &amp; Co. KG</pub><pmid>29292693</pmid><doi>10.5414/cn109287</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-0430
ispartof Clinical nephrology, 2018-05, Vol.89 (5), p.336-344
issn 0301-0430
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1983849636
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Clinical trials
Kidney transplants
Meta-analysis
Mortality
Nephrology
Patients
Plantations
Systematic review
title Efficacy and safety of everolimus plus low-dose calcineurin inhibitor vs. mycophenolate mofetil plus standard-dose calcineurin inhibitor in renal transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T13%3A21%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20everolimus%20plus%20low-dose%20calcineurin%20inhibitor%20vs.%20mycophenolate%20mofetil%20plus%20standard-dose%20calcineurin%20inhibitor%20in%20renal%20transplant%20recipients:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nephrology&rft.au=He,%20Lihong&rft.date=2018-05&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=344&rft.pages=336-344&rft.issn=0301-0430&rft_id=info:doi/10.5414/cn109287&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2111141160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2111141160&rft_id=info:pmid/29292693&rfr_iscdi=true