Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task

Currently, there are two opposing views on feature binding in the auditory modalityaccording to behavioral studies, this process requires focused attention, whereas electrophysiological studies suggest that feature binding may be fully automatic and independent of attention. Here, we examined whethe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroreport 2018-03, Vol.29 (4), p.308-313
Hauptverfasser: Lazarev, Ivan E, Sayfulina, Ksenia E, Chernysheva, Elena G, Bryzgalov, Dmitri V, Chernyshev, Boris V
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 313
container_issue 4
container_start_page 308
container_title Neuroreport
container_volume 29
creator Lazarev, Ivan E
Sayfulina, Ksenia E
Chernysheva, Elena G
Bryzgalov, Dmitri V
Chernyshev, Boris V
description Currently, there are two opposing views on feature binding in the auditory modalityaccording to behavioral studies, this process requires focused attention, whereas electrophysiological studies suggest that feature binding may be fully automatic and independent of attention. Here, we examined whether feature binding depends on higher-level attentional processes by manipulating the attentional focus. We used four auditory stimuli that differed in two featurespitch and location. Two rare deviants could be detected within a sequence of two frequent standards exclusively by feature conjunctions rather than by any single feature alone. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli were analyzed for four conditionsselective attention to target auditory deviants, selective ignoring of nontarget auditory deviants, nonselective distributed attention to all stimuli within auditory modality, and selective attention diverted from auditory to visual modality. The negative difference (Nd) between event-related potentials to deviants and standards was measured within two time intervals, corresponding to mismatch negativity (100–200 ms) and N2b (200–300 ms). Only under the condition of selective attention to specific feature conjunctions, prominent Nd was observed in mismatch negativity as well in N2b time ranges, whereas no significant Nd was observed in other conditions. As Nd is considered a marker of deviance processing, our results support the view that deviance was not detected unless attention was focused on the stimuli, thus supporting the view that feature binding requires attention.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000960
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1983848266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1983848266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-927714d8fc065da7ccdd78a19e7fc600761c13a3a28b8073e8c43bda54efc9153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVoSLbbfoMQdOzFW8myLekYlvwphBRCS3IzY2mcVeK1dyU5yV77yavNbkrpocPAwPB7b4ZHyAlnM860_Hp3cztjf5eu2AGZ8EKKrCzV_QcyYbrUWaGr8ph8DOFxyzCujshxrnMtuBQT8usCIY4eaeN66_oH6noKo3Vx8Bu6HCx0Lm6ox_XoPAYKMWIf3ZCgkFCLr2hpk0gXlhDNgvb4ANE9b0XQW3qTN2-OqU1aI7UuGO-Wroc3lwjh6RM5bKEL-Hk_p-TnxfmP-VV2_f3y2_zsOjOirFimcyl5YVVrWFVakMZYKxVwjbI1FWOy4oYLEJCrRjEpUJlCNBbKAlujeSmm5MvOd-WH9Ygh1ulrg10HPQ5jqLlWQhUqr6qEFjvU-CEEj229Sk-D39Sc1dv065R-_W_6SXa6vzA2S7R_RO9xJ0DtgJehi-jDUze-oK8XCF1c_N_7NyCRk50</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1983848266</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Lazarev, Ivan E ; Sayfulina, Ksenia E ; Chernysheva, Elena G ; Bryzgalov, Dmitri V ; Chernyshev, Boris V</creator><creatorcontrib>Lazarev, Ivan E ; Sayfulina, Ksenia E ; Chernysheva, Elena G ; Bryzgalov, Dmitri V ; Chernyshev, Boris V</creatorcontrib><description>Currently, there are two opposing views on feature binding in the auditory modalityaccording to behavioral studies, this process requires focused attention, whereas electrophysiological studies suggest that feature binding may be fully automatic and independent of attention. Here, we examined whether feature binding depends on higher-level attentional processes by manipulating the attentional focus. We used four auditory stimuli that differed in two featurespitch and location. Two rare deviants could be detected within a sequence of two frequent standards exclusively by feature conjunctions rather than by any single feature alone. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli were analyzed for four conditionsselective attention to target auditory deviants, selective ignoring of nontarget auditory deviants, nonselective distributed attention to all stimuli within auditory modality, and selective attention diverted from auditory to visual modality. The negative difference (Nd) between event-related potentials to deviants and standards was measured within two time intervals, corresponding to mismatch negativity (100–200 ms) and N2b (200–300 ms). Only under the condition of selective attention to specific feature conjunctions, prominent Nd was observed in mismatch negativity as well in N2b time ranges, whereas no significant Nd was observed in other conditions. As Nd is considered a marker of deviance processing, our results support the view that deviance was not detected unless attention was focused on the stimuli, thus supporting the view that feature binding requires attention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-4965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-558X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000960</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29293173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Brain - physiology ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory ; Humans ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Neuroreport, 2018-03, Vol.29 (4), p.308-313</ispartof><rights>2017 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-927714d8fc065da7ccdd78a19e7fc600761c13a3a28b8073e8c43bda54efc9153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-927714d8fc065da7ccdd78a19e7fc600761c13a3a28b8073e8c43bda54efc9153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29293173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lazarev, Ivan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayfulina, Ksenia E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernysheva, Elena G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryzgalov, Dmitri V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernyshev, Boris V</creatorcontrib><title>Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task</title><title>Neuroreport</title><addtitle>Neuroreport</addtitle><description>Currently, there are two opposing views on feature binding in the auditory modalityaccording to behavioral studies, this process requires focused attention, whereas electrophysiological studies suggest that feature binding may be fully automatic and independent of attention. Here, we examined whether feature binding depends on higher-level attentional processes by manipulating the attentional focus. We used four auditory stimuli that differed in two featurespitch and location. Two rare deviants could be detected within a sequence of two frequent standards exclusively by feature conjunctions rather than by any single feature alone. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli were analyzed for four conditionsselective attention to target auditory deviants, selective ignoring of nontarget auditory deviants, nonselective distributed attention to all stimuli within auditory modality, and selective attention diverted from auditory to visual modality. The negative difference (Nd) between event-related potentials to deviants and standards was measured within two time intervals, corresponding to mismatch negativity (100–200 ms) and N2b (200–300 ms). Only under the condition of selective attention to specific feature conjunctions, prominent Nd was observed in mismatch negativity as well in N2b time ranges, whereas no significant Nd was observed in other conditions. As Nd is considered a marker of deviance processing, our results support the view that deviance was not detected unless attention was focused on the stimuli, thus supporting the view that feature binding requires attention.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0959-4965</issn><issn>1473-558X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVoSLbbfoMQdOzFW8myLekYlvwphBRCS3IzY2mcVeK1dyU5yV77yavNbkrpocPAwPB7b4ZHyAlnM860_Hp3cztjf5eu2AGZ8EKKrCzV_QcyYbrUWaGr8ph8DOFxyzCujshxrnMtuBQT8usCIY4eaeN66_oH6noKo3Vx8Bu6HCx0Lm6ox_XoPAYKMWIf3ZCgkFCLr2hpk0gXlhDNgvb4ANE9b0XQW3qTN2-OqU1aI7UuGO-Wroc3lwjh6RM5bKEL-Hk_p-TnxfmP-VV2_f3y2_zsOjOirFimcyl5YVVrWFVakMZYKxVwjbI1FWOy4oYLEJCrRjEpUJlCNBbKAlujeSmm5MvOd-WH9Ygh1ulrg10HPQ5jqLlWQhUqr6qEFjvU-CEEj229Sk-D39Sc1dv065R-_W_6SXa6vzA2S7R_RO9xJ0DtgJehi-jDUze-oK8XCF1c_N_7NyCRk50</recordid><startdate>20180307</startdate><enddate>20180307</enddate><creator>Lazarev, Ivan E</creator><creator>Sayfulina, Ksenia E</creator><creator>Chernysheva, Elena G</creator><creator>Bryzgalov, Dmitri V</creator><creator>Chernyshev, Boris V</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180307</creationdate><title>Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task</title><author>Lazarev, Ivan E ; Sayfulina, Ksenia E ; Chernysheva, Elena G ; Bryzgalov, Dmitri V ; Chernyshev, Boris V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3560-927714d8fc065da7ccdd78a19e7fc600761c13a3a28b8073e8c43bda54efc9153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lazarev, Ivan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayfulina, Ksenia E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernysheva, Elena G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryzgalov, Dmitri V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chernyshev, Boris V</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuroreport</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lazarev, Ivan E</au><au>Sayfulina, Ksenia E</au><au>Chernysheva, Elena G</au><au>Bryzgalov, Dmitri V</au><au>Chernyshev, Boris V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task</atitle><jtitle>Neuroreport</jtitle><addtitle>Neuroreport</addtitle><date>2018-03-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>308</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>308-313</pages><issn>0959-4965</issn><eissn>1473-558X</eissn><abstract>Currently, there are two opposing views on feature binding in the auditory modalityaccording to behavioral studies, this process requires focused attention, whereas electrophysiological studies suggest that feature binding may be fully automatic and independent of attention. Here, we examined whether feature binding depends on higher-level attentional processes by manipulating the attentional focus. We used four auditory stimuli that differed in two featurespitch and location. Two rare deviants could be detected within a sequence of two frequent standards exclusively by feature conjunctions rather than by any single feature alone. Event-related potentials to auditory stimuli were analyzed for four conditionsselective attention to target auditory deviants, selective ignoring of nontarget auditory deviants, nonselective distributed attention to all stimuli within auditory modality, and selective attention diverted from auditory to visual modality. The negative difference (Nd) between event-related potentials to deviants and standards was measured within two time intervals, corresponding to mismatch negativity (100–200 ms) and N2b (200–300 ms). Only under the condition of selective attention to specific feature conjunctions, prominent Nd was observed in mismatch negativity as well in N2b time ranges, whereas no significant Nd was observed in other conditions. As Nd is considered a marker of deviance processing, our results support the view that deviance was not detected unless attention was focused on the stimuli, thus supporting the view that feature binding requires attention.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>29293173</pmid><doi>10.1097/WNR.0000000000000960</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-4965
ispartof Neuroreport, 2018-03, Vol.29 (4), p.308-313
issn 0959-4965
1473-558X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1983848266
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Acoustic Stimulation
Adolescent
Adult
Attention - physiology
Auditory Perception - physiology
Brain - physiology
Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology
Electroencephalography
Evoked Potentials, Auditory
Humans
Young Adult
title Feature binding in auditory modality requires attention as indexed by mismatch negativity and N2b in an active discrimination task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T23%3A29%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feature%20binding%20in%20auditory%20modality%20requires%20attention%20as%20indexed%20by%20mismatch%20negativity%20and%20N2b%20in%20an%20active%20discrimination%20task&rft.jtitle=Neuroreport&rft.au=Lazarev,%20Ivan%20E&rft.date=2018-03-07&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=308&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=308-313&rft.issn=0959-4965&rft.eissn=1473-558X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000960&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1983848266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1983848266&rft_id=info:pmid/29293173&rfr_iscdi=true