Inside the secret world of auditing: Business Todaytakes a peek into the inscrutable Indian operations of the global Big Four. Do they deserve the flak they've come in for in the wake of the Satyam fraud? Yes and no. Suman Layak & Puja Mehra go into the details
6.Local firms can leave one umbrella and enter a rival oneTo be sure, it didn't need a fraud in India to provide an opportunity to take the accountants to the cleaners. Every accounting fraud and there are plenty of them globally is greeted with ridicule being heaped on this fraternity. And it&...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Business today (New Delhi, India) India), 2009-02 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Business today (New Delhi, India) |
container_volume | |
creator | Layak, Suman Mehra, Puja |
description | 6.Local firms can leave one umbrella and enter a rival oneTo be sure, it didn't need a fraud in India to provide an opportunity to take the accountants to the cleaners. Every accounting fraud and there are plenty of them globally is greeted with ridicule being heaped on this fraternity. And it's not just restricted to the Big Four. The US arm of BDO International, the world's #5 accounting firm (which in India has an -affiliation with Haribhakti & Co.), has to pony up damages of $521 million awarded against it for a negligent audit. A month ago, three of the Big Four PwC, KPMG and EY were dragged into Bernard Madoff's alleged $50-billion fraud they were all auditors of the feeder funds that channelled money into the accounts of Madoff's New York brokerage. And let's not forget Deloitte, which as the external auditor to GM in the US, was dragged into an accounting fraud allegedly perpetrated by the automobile giant. Deloitte stood accused of falsely certifying GM's accounts the Detroit major had apparently accelerated the booking of income between 2002 and 2006. The Indian rules, revised in the mid-1980S with an eye on the world Trade Organisation (WTO) negotiations on opening up of services, do not permit the Big Four or any multinational audit or accounting firm to be registered in India as auditors. So two of them EY and KPMG are actually registered in India as management consultants; PwC registered two firms as Price Waterhouse (PW) and Price Waterhouse & Co. back in the pre-Independence era and Deloitte had registered one firm under the name Deloitte Haskins & Sells in 1978 before these rules came into force. That may explain why the audit business of the Big Four is smaller than the rest of their operations advisory, corporate finance and tax. Audit (assurance in accounting jargon) is conducted by local audit firms who are part of the respective networks of the Big Four (for example, S.R. Batliboi does it for EY, A.F. Ferguson and C.C. Choksi for Deloitte, BSR for KPMG and PW and Lovelock & Lewes for PwC). The chartered accountants and audit firms in India are regulated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and, therefore, the Big Four must have as local members firms registered in the name of local chartered accountants. All the audit work is handled by the local firm, which supposedly follows global standards. The global brand is still not allowed to be used in the audit business. The ICAI, for its part, sees the MNCs' entry into |
format | Magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_198326089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1867725551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_1983260893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0sDQ30TU2MzXgYOAqLs4yMDAyMjY24GRQ9swrzkxJVSjJSFUoTk0uSi1RKM8vyklRyE9TSCxNySzJzEvnYWBNS8wpTuWF0twM6m6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhpYWxkZmBhaWxsSrBADODjEx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>198326089</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Inside the secret world of auditing: Business Todaytakes a peek into the inscrutable Indian operations of the global Big Four. Do they deserve the flak they've come in for in the wake of the Satyam fraud? Yes and no. Suman Layak & Puja Mehra go into the details</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Layak, Suman ; Mehra, Puja</creator><creatorcontrib>Layak, Suman ; Mehra, Puja</creatorcontrib><description>6.Local firms can leave one umbrella and enter a rival oneTo be sure, it didn't need a fraud in India to provide an opportunity to take the accountants to the cleaners. Every accounting fraud and there are plenty of them globally is greeted with ridicule being heaped on this fraternity. And it's not just restricted to the Big Four. The US arm of BDO International, the world's #5 accounting firm (which in India has an -affiliation with Haribhakti & Co.), has to pony up damages of $521 million awarded against it for a negligent audit. A month ago, three of the Big Four PwC, KPMG and EY were dragged into Bernard Madoff's alleged $50-billion fraud they were all auditors of the feeder funds that channelled money into the accounts of Madoff's New York brokerage. And let's not forget Deloitte, which as the external auditor to GM in the US, was dragged into an accounting fraud allegedly perpetrated by the automobile giant. Deloitte stood accused of falsely certifying GM's accounts the Detroit major had apparently accelerated the booking of income between 2002 and 2006. The Indian rules, revised in the mid-1980S with an eye on the world Trade Organisation (WTO) negotiations on opening up of services, do not permit the Big Four or any multinational audit or accounting firm to be registered in India as auditors. So two of them EY and KPMG are actually registered in India as management consultants; PwC registered two firms as Price Waterhouse (PW) and Price Waterhouse & Co. back in the pre-Independence era and Deloitte had registered one firm under the name Deloitte Haskins & Sells in 1978 before these rules came into force. That may explain why the audit business of the Big Four is smaller than the rest of their operations advisory, corporate finance and tax. Audit (assurance in accounting jargon) is conducted by local audit firms who are part of the respective networks of the Big Four (for example, S.R. Batliboi does it for EY, A.F. Ferguson and C.C. Choksi for Deloitte, BSR for KPMG and PW and Lovelock & Lewes for PwC). The chartered accountants and audit firms in India are regulated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and, therefore, the Big Four must have as local members firms registered in the name of local chartered accountants. All the audit work is handled by the local firm, which supposedly follows global standards. The global brand is still not allowed to be used in the audit business. The ICAI, for its part, sees the MNCs' entry into India as a backdoor one.To go and seek auditing work as an international firm and then sign the balance sheet as an Indian firm can't be tolerated,says Ved Jain, the outgoing President of the ICAI. The PwC-Satyam saga is being used as a pressure point to negotiate in the WTO, a reciprocal access for Indian auditing firms to the US, the UK and to other countries in return for opening up India to the Big Four. Evidently, there are many. let's begin with partner rotation: This entails that the same 'lead engagement' partner is not involved with the listed audit client for more than five years. With some clients, partners are rotated every three years. Then, there's the independent partner review, whereby all audits of listed clients go through a review by a second partner; this could be followed by a 'Hot Review'; before the audited accounts are submitted to the company's board, many a time a quick desktop review is done by an independent technical team to check if all presentations and disclosures are appropriate. There's also an 'audit quality review', or AQR, which firms like EY follow; this is a review of a large number of audits by visiting partners and senior managers from member firms worldwide, with local support.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-3650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Living Media India, Limited</publisher><subject>Accounting firms ; Auditing ; Auditors ; Audits ; Big Four accounting firms ; Chartered accountants ; Fraud ; Investment bankers ; Liability ; Limited liability companies ; Management consultants ; Stockholders</subject><ispartof>Business today (New Delhi, India), 2009-02</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) Living Media India Limited. Not to be reprinted or reused in any way without prior permission of the publisher.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Layak, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Puja</creatorcontrib><title>Inside the secret world of auditing: Business Todaytakes a peek into the inscrutable Indian operations of the global Big Four. Do they deserve the flak they've come in for in the wake of the Satyam fraud? Yes and no. Suman Layak & Puja Mehra go into the details</title><title>Business today (New Delhi, India)</title><description>6.Local firms can leave one umbrella and enter a rival oneTo be sure, it didn't need a fraud in India to provide an opportunity to take the accountants to the cleaners. Every accounting fraud and there are plenty of them globally is greeted with ridicule being heaped on this fraternity. And it's not just restricted to the Big Four. The US arm of BDO International, the world's #5 accounting firm (which in India has an -affiliation with Haribhakti & Co.), has to pony up damages of $521 million awarded against it for a negligent audit. A month ago, three of the Big Four PwC, KPMG and EY were dragged into Bernard Madoff's alleged $50-billion fraud they were all auditors of the feeder funds that channelled money into the accounts of Madoff's New York brokerage. And let's not forget Deloitte, which as the external auditor to GM in the US, was dragged into an accounting fraud allegedly perpetrated by the automobile giant. Deloitte stood accused of falsely certifying GM's accounts the Detroit major had apparently accelerated the booking of income between 2002 and 2006. The Indian rules, revised in the mid-1980S with an eye on the world Trade Organisation (WTO) negotiations on opening up of services, do not permit the Big Four or any multinational audit or accounting firm to be registered in India as auditors. So two of them EY and KPMG are actually registered in India as management consultants; PwC registered two firms as Price Waterhouse (PW) and Price Waterhouse & Co. back in the pre-Independence era and Deloitte had registered one firm under the name Deloitte Haskins & Sells in 1978 before these rules came into force. That may explain why the audit business of the Big Four is smaller than the rest of their operations advisory, corporate finance and tax. Audit (assurance in accounting jargon) is conducted by local audit firms who are part of the respective networks of the Big Four (for example, S.R. Batliboi does it for EY, A.F. Ferguson and C.C. Choksi for Deloitte, BSR for KPMG and PW and Lovelock & Lewes for PwC). The chartered accountants and audit firms in India are regulated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and, therefore, the Big Four must have as local members firms registered in the name of local chartered accountants. All the audit work is handled by the local firm, which supposedly follows global standards. The global brand is still not allowed to be used in the audit business. The ICAI, for its part, sees the MNCs' entry into India as a backdoor one.To go and seek auditing work as an international firm and then sign the balance sheet as an Indian firm can't be tolerated,says Ved Jain, the outgoing President of the ICAI. The PwC-Satyam saga is being used as a pressure point to negotiate in the WTO, a reciprocal access for Indian auditing firms to the US, the UK and to other countries in return for opening up India to the Big Four. Evidently, there are many. let's begin with partner rotation: This entails that the same 'lead engagement' partner is not involved with the listed audit client for more than five years. With some clients, partners are rotated every three years. Then, there's the independent partner review, whereby all audits of listed clients go through a review by a second partner; this could be followed by a 'Hot Review'; before the audited accounts are submitted to the company's board, many a time a quick desktop review is done by an independent technical team to check if all presentations and disclosures are appropriate. There's also an 'audit quality review', or AQR, which firms like EY follow; this is a review of a large number of audits by visiting partners and senior managers from member firms worldwide, with local support.</description><subject>Accounting firms</subject><subject>Auditing</subject><subject>Auditors</subject><subject>Audits</subject><subject>Big Four accounting firms</subject><subject>Chartered accountants</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>Investment bankers</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Limited liability companies</subject><subject>Management consultants</subject><subject>Stockholders</subject><issn>0974-3650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0sDQ30TU2MzXgYOAqLs4yMDAyMjY24GRQ9swrzkxJVSjJSFUoTk0uSi1RKM8vyklRyE9TSCxNySzJzEvnYWBNS8wpTuWF0twM6m6uIc4eugVF-YWlqcUl8bmZxcmpOTmJean5pcXxhpYWxkZmBhaWxsSrBADODjEx</recordid><startdate>20090222</startdate><enddate>20090222</enddate><creator>Layak, Suman</creator><creator>Mehra, Puja</creator><general>Living Media India, Limited</general><scope>0TT</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>7RO</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8AI</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AXJJW</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FREBS</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090222</creationdate><title>Inside the secret world of auditing</title><author>Layak, Suman ; Mehra, Puja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_1983260893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Accounting firms</topic><topic>Auditing</topic><topic>Auditors</topic><topic>Audits</topic><topic>Big Four accounting firms</topic><topic>Chartered accountants</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>Investment bankers</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Limited liability companies</topic><topic>Management consultants</topic><topic>Stockholders</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Layak, Suman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehra, Puja</creatorcontrib><collection>News PRO</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Asian Business Database</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Asian Business Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Asian & European Business Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Newsstand Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Business today (New Delhi, India)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Layak, Suman</au><au>Mehra, Puja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inside the secret world of auditing: Business Todaytakes a peek into the inscrutable Indian operations of the global Big Four. Do they deserve the flak they've come in for in the wake of the Satyam fraud? Yes and no. Suman Layak & Puja Mehra go into the details</atitle><jtitle>Business today (New Delhi, India)</jtitle><date>2009-02-22</date><risdate>2009</risdate><issn>0974-3650</issn><abstract>6.Local firms can leave one umbrella and enter a rival oneTo be sure, it didn't need a fraud in India to provide an opportunity to take the accountants to the cleaners. Every accounting fraud and there are plenty of them globally is greeted with ridicule being heaped on this fraternity. And it's not just restricted to the Big Four. The US arm of BDO International, the world's #5 accounting firm (which in India has an -affiliation with Haribhakti & Co.), has to pony up damages of $521 million awarded against it for a negligent audit. A month ago, three of the Big Four PwC, KPMG and EY were dragged into Bernard Madoff's alleged $50-billion fraud they were all auditors of the feeder funds that channelled money into the accounts of Madoff's New York brokerage. And let's not forget Deloitte, which as the external auditor to GM in the US, was dragged into an accounting fraud allegedly perpetrated by the automobile giant. Deloitte stood accused of falsely certifying GM's accounts the Detroit major had apparently accelerated the booking of income between 2002 and 2006. The Indian rules, revised in the mid-1980S with an eye on the world Trade Organisation (WTO) negotiations on opening up of services, do not permit the Big Four or any multinational audit or accounting firm to be registered in India as auditors. So two of them EY and KPMG are actually registered in India as management consultants; PwC registered two firms as Price Waterhouse (PW) and Price Waterhouse & Co. back in the pre-Independence era and Deloitte had registered one firm under the name Deloitte Haskins & Sells in 1978 before these rules came into force. That may explain why the audit business of the Big Four is smaller than the rest of their operations advisory, corporate finance and tax. Audit (assurance in accounting jargon) is conducted by local audit firms who are part of the respective networks of the Big Four (for example, S.R. Batliboi does it for EY, A.F. Ferguson and C.C. Choksi for Deloitte, BSR for KPMG and PW and Lovelock & Lewes for PwC). The chartered accountants and audit firms in India are regulated by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) and, therefore, the Big Four must have as local members firms registered in the name of local chartered accountants. All the audit work is handled by the local firm, which supposedly follows global standards. The global brand is still not allowed to be used in the audit business. The ICAI, for its part, sees the MNCs' entry into India as a backdoor one.To go and seek auditing work as an international firm and then sign the balance sheet as an Indian firm can't be tolerated,says Ved Jain, the outgoing President of the ICAI. The PwC-Satyam saga is being used as a pressure point to negotiate in the WTO, a reciprocal access for Indian auditing firms to the US, the UK and to other countries in return for opening up India to the Big Four. Evidently, there are many. let's begin with partner rotation: This entails that the same 'lead engagement' partner is not involved with the listed audit client for more than five years. With some clients, partners are rotated every three years. Then, there's the independent partner review, whereby all audits of listed clients go through a review by a second partner; this could be followed by a 'Hot Review'; before the audited accounts are submitted to the company's board, many a time a quick desktop review is done by an independent technical team to check if all presentations and disclosures are appropriate. There's also an 'audit quality review', or AQR, which firms like EY follow; this is a review of a large number of audits by visiting partners and senior managers from member firms worldwide, with local support.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Living Media India, Limited</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0974-3650 |
ispartof | Business today (New Delhi, India), 2009-02 |
issn | 0974-3650 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_198326089 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Accounting firms Auditing Auditors Audits Big Four accounting firms Chartered accountants Fraud Investment bankers Liability Limited liability companies Management consultants Stockholders |
title | Inside the secret world of auditing: Business Todaytakes a peek into the inscrutable Indian operations of the global Big Four. Do they deserve the flak they've come in for in the wake of the Satyam fraud? Yes and no. Suman Layak & Puja Mehra go into the details |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T10%3A02%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inside%20the%20secret%20world%20of%20auditing:%20Business%20Todaytakes%20a%20peek%20into%20the%20inscrutable%20Indian%20operations%20of%20the%20global%20Big%20Four.%20Do%20they%20deserve%20the%20flak%20they've%20come%20in%20for%20in%20the%20wake%20of%20the%20Satyam%20fraud?%20Yes%20and%20no.%20Suman%20Layak%20&%20Puja%20Mehra%20go%20into%20the%20details&rft.jtitle=Business%20today%20(New%20Delhi,%20India)&rft.au=Layak,%20Suman&rft.date=2009-02-22&rft.issn=0974-3650&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1867725551%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=198326089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |