Comparing the Efficacy of Tolterodine and Gabapentin Versus Placebo in Catheter Related Bladder Discomfort After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of tolterodine and gabapentin vs placebo in catheter related bladder discomfort (CRBD) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study was a double-blind parallel group randomized clinical trial. Patients who were candidates of PCNL wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2018-02, Vol.32 (2), p.168-174
Hauptverfasser: Maghsoudi, Robab, Farhadi-Niaki, Saeed, Etemadian, Masoud, Kashi, Amir H, Shadpour, Pejman, Shirani, Asemaneh, Samadinezhad-Khoshbaf-Sorkhabi, Rana, Tabatabaei, Meghdad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of tolterodine and gabapentin vs placebo in catheter related bladder discomfort (CRBD) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study was a double-blind parallel group randomized clinical trial. Patients who were candidates of PCNL were enrolled. Patients were randomized to treatment groups of tolterodine 2 mg orally (PO) (group T, n = 50), gabapentin 600 mg PO (group G, n = 50), and placebo (group P, n = 70) 1 hour before operation using balanced block randomization. The primary endpoint of interest was visual analog pain scale in 1, 3, 12, and 24 hours after the operation. Secondary endpoints included rescue analgesic use (opioid and nonopioid). The frequency of severe CRBD in 1,12, and 24 hours after the operation was 4%, 4%, and 6% in group T vs 4%, 0%, and 2% in group G vs 47%, 14%, and 6% in the P group (p 
ISSN:0892-7790
1557-900X
DOI:10.1089/end.2017.0563