A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization

Objective There has been moderate evidence of telehealth utilization in the field of emergency medicine, but less is known about telehealth in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this study is to explore the extent, focus, and utilization of telehealth for prehospital emer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of telemedicine and telecare 2018-08, Vol.24 (7), p.473-481
Hauptverfasser: Winburn, Andrew S, Brixey, Juliana J, Langabeer, James, Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 481
container_issue 7
container_start_page 473
container_title Journal of telemedicine and telecare
container_volume 24
creator Winburn, Andrew S
Brixey, Juliana J
Langabeer, James
Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany
description Objective There has been moderate evidence of telehealth utilization in the field of emergency medicine, but less is known about telehealth in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this study is to explore the extent, focus, and utilization of telehealth for prehospital emergency care through the analysis of published research. Methods The authors conducted a systematic literature review by extracting data from multiple research databases (including MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and Google Scholar) published since 2000. We used consistent key search terms to identify clinical interventions and feasibility studies involving telehealth and EMS, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results We identified 68 articles focused specifically on telehealth interventions in prehospital care. The majority (54%) of the studies involved stroke and acute cardiovascular care, while only 7% of these (4) focused on telehealth for primary care. The two most common delivery methods were real-time video-conferencing capabilities (38%) and store and forward (25%); and this variation was based upon the clinical focus. There has been a significant and positive trend towards greater telehealth utilization. European telehealth programs were most common (51% of the studies), while 38% were from the United States. Discussion and Conclusions Despite positive trends, telehealth utilization in prehospital emergency care is fairly limited given the sheer number of EMS agencies worldwide. The results of this study suggest there are significant opportunities for wider diffusion in prehospital care. Future work should examine barriers and incentives for telehealth adoption in EMS.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1357633X17713140
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1981055034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1357633X17713140</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2200952554</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d0a5d0a8cbe75a216700a39bd4a5d97629d9b5a69bc07d7ad2e37a374850fd8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUnAi5fo7G42mz2W4hcUvCh4C5tkYrckTdzdKPXXu6VVoeBhmGHmmXeGl5BzCteUSnlDuZAp56-hppwmcEDGVIosphTUYajDON7MR-TEuSUAo4lQx2TEFJOZUumYqGnk1s5jq70pI4sfBj-jro56i4vO9cbrJvLY4AJ14xfR4E1jvgLbrU7JUa0bh2e7PCEvd7fPs4d4_nT_OJvO45KnwscVaBEiKwuUQjOaSgDNVVEloa9kylSlCqFTVZQgK6krhlxqLpNMQF1lNZ-Qq61ub7v3AZ3PW-NKbBq9wm5wOVUZBSGAJwG93EOX3WBX4bucMQAlmBAbCrZUaTvnLNZ5b02r7TqnkG9szfdtDSsXO-GhaLH6XfjxMQDxFnD6Df-u_iv4DS5gfsM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200952554</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Winburn, Andrew S ; Brixey, Juliana J ; Langabeer, James ; Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany</creator><creatorcontrib>Winburn, Andrew S ; Brixey, Juliana J ; Langabeer, James ; Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><description>Objective There has been moderate evidence of telehealth utilization in the field of emergency medicine, but less is known about telehealth in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this study is to explore the extent, focus, and utilization of telehealth for prehospital emergency care through the analysis of published research. Methods The authors conducted a systematic literature review by extracting data from multiple research databases (including MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and Google Scholar) published since 2000. We used consistent key search terms to identify clinical interventions and feasibility studies involving telehealth and EMS, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results We identified 68 articles focused specifically on telehealth interventions in prehospital care. The majority (54%) of the studies involved stroke and acute cardiovascular care, while only 7% of these (4) focused on telehealth for primary care. The two most common delivery methods were real-time video-conferencing capabilities (38%) and store and forward (25%); and this variation was based upon the clinical focus. There has been a significant and positive trend towards greater telehealth utilization. European telehealth programs were most common (51% of the studies), while 38% were from the United States. Discussion and Conclusions Despite positive trends, telehealth utilization in prehospital emergency care is fairly limited given the sheer number of EMS agencies worldwide. The results of this study suggest there are significant opportunities for wider diffusion in prehospital care. Future work should examine barriers and incentives for telehealth adoption in EMS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1357-633X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1357633X17713140</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29278996</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Critical Care - organization &amp; administration ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Medical Services - organization &amp; administration ; Emergency Medicine - organization &amp; administration ; Feasibility studies ; Humans ; Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Systematic review ; Telemedicine ; Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2018-08, Vol.24 (7), p.473-481</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d0a5d0a8cbe75a216700a39bd4a5d97629d9b5a69bc07d7ad2e37a374850fd8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d0a5d0a8cbe75a216700a39bd4a5d97629d9b5a69bc07d7ad2e37a374850fd8f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1357633X17713140$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1357633X17713140$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29278996$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winburn, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brixey, Juliana J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langabeer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization</title><title>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</title><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><description>Objective There has been moderate evidence of telehealth utilization in the field of emergency medicine, but less is known about telehealth in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this study is to explore the extent, focus, and utilization of telehealth for prehospital emergency care through the analysis of published research. Methods The authors conducted a systematic literature review by extracting data from multiple research databases (including MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and Google Scholar) published since 2000. We used consistent key search terms to identify clinical interventions and feasibility studies involving telehealth and EMS, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results We identified 68 articles focused specifically on telehealth interventions in prehospital care. The majority (54%) of the studies involved stroke and acute cardiovascular care, while only 7% of these (4) focused on telehealth for primary care. The two most common delivery methods were real-time video-conferencing capabilities (38%) and store and forward (25%); and this variation was based upon the clinical focus. There has been a significant and positive trend towards greater telehealth utilization. European telehealth programs were most common (51% of the studies), while 38% were from the United States. Discussion and Conclusions Despite positive trends, telehealth utilization in prehospital emergency care is fairly limited given the sheer number of EMS agencies worldwide. The results of this study suggest there are significant opportunities for wider diffusion in prehospital care. Future work should examine barriers and incentives for telehealth adoption in EMS.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Critical Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency Medical Services - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>Feasibility studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1357-633X</issn><issn>1758-1109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1Lw0AQhhdRbK3ePUnAi5fo7G42mz2W4hcUvCh4C5tkYrckTdzdKPXXu6VVoeBhmGHmmXeGl5BzCteUSnlDuZAp56-hppwmcEDGVIosphTUYajDON7MR-TEuSUAo4lQx2TEFJOZUumYqGnk1s5jq70pI4sfBj-jro56i4vO9cbrJvLY4AJ14xfR4E1jvgLbrU7JUa0bh2e7PCEvd7fPs4d4_nT_OJvO45KnwscVaBEiKwuUQjOaSgDNVVEloa9kylSlCqFTVZQgK6krhlxqLpNMQF1lNZ-Qq61ub7v3AZ3PW-NKbBq9wm5wOVUZBSGAJwG93EOX3WBX4bucMQAlmBAbCrZUaTvnLNZ5b02r7TqnkG9szfdtDSsXO-GhaLH6XfjxMQDxFnD6Df-u_iv4DS5gfsM</recordid><startdate>201808</startdate><enddate>201808</enddate><creator>Winburn, Andrew S</creator><creator>Brixey, Juliana J</creator><creator>Langabeer, James</creator><creator>Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201808</creationdate><title>A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization</title><author>Winburn, Andrew S ; Brixey, Juliana J ; Langabeer, James ; Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-d0a5d0a8cbe75a216700a39bd4a5d97629d9b5a69bc07d7ad2e37a374850fd8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Critical Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency Medical Services - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>Feasibility studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>Telemedicine - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winburn, Andrew S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brixey, Juliana J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langabeer, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winburn, Andrew S</au><au>Brixey, Juliana J</au><au>Langabeer, James</au><au>Champagne-Langabeer, Tiffany</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization</atitle><jtitle>Journal of telemedicine and telecare</jtitle><addtitle>J Telemed Telecare</addtitle><date>2018-08</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>473</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>473-481</pages><issn>1357-633X</issn><eissn>1758-1109</eissn><abstract>Objective There has been moderate evidence of telehealth utilization in the field of emergency medicine, but less is known about telehealth in prehospital emergency medical services (EMS). The objective of this study is to explore the extent, focus, and utilization of telehealth for prehospital emergency care through the analysis of published research. Methods The authors conducted a systematic literature review by extracting data from multiple research databases (including MEDLINE/PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and Google Scholar) published since 2000. We used consistent key search terms to identify clinical interventions and feasibility studies involving telehealth and EMS, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Results We identified 68 articles focused specifically on telehealth interventions in prehospital care. The majority (54%) of the studies involved stroke and acute cardiovascular care, while only 7% of these (4) focused on telehealth for primary care. The two most common delivery methods were real-time video-conferencing capabilities (38%) and store and forward (25%); and this variation was based upon the clinical focus. There has been a significant and positive trend towards greater telehealth utilization. European telehealth programs were most common (51% of the studies), while 38% were from the United States. Discussion and Conclusions Despite positive trends, telehealth utilization in prehospital emergency care is fairly limited given the sheer number of EMS agencies worldwide. The results of this study suggest there are significant opportunities for wider diffusion in prehospital care. Future work should examine barriers and incentives for telehealth adoption in EMS.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29278996</pmid><doi>10.1177/1357633X17713140</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1357-633X
ispartof Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2018-08, Vol.24 (7), p.473-481
issn 1357-633X
1758-1109
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1981055034
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete
subjects Clinical Competence
Critical Care - organization & administration
Emergency medical care
Emergency Medical Services - organization & administration
Emergency Medicine - organization & administration
Feasibility studies
Humans
Monitoring, Ambulatory - methods
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Systematic review
Telemedicine
Telemedicine - organization & administration
United States
title A systematic review of prehospital telehealth utilization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T23%3A50%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20prehospital%20telehealth%20utilization&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20telemedicine%20and%20telecare&rft.au=Winburn,%20Andrew%20S&rft.date=2018-08&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=473&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=473-481&rft.issn=1357-633X&rft.eissn=1758-1109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1357633X17713140&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2200952554%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200952554&rft_id=info:pmid/29278996&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1357633X17713140&rfr_iscdi=true