An Assessment of Radiology Residency Program Websites
When prospective radiology residents decide where to apply to residency, many will use the Internet as a resource to garner information. Therefore, it is important for residency programs to produce and maintain an informative and comprehensive website. Here, we review 179 radiology residency program...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Radiology 2018-04, Vol.15 (4), p.663-666 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 666 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 663 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Hansberry, David R. Bornstein, Jonathan Agarwal, Nitin McClure, Kristen E. Deshmukh, Sandeep P. Long, Suzanne |
description | When prospective radiology residents decide where to apply to residency, many will use the Internet as a resource to garner information. Therefore, it is important for residency programs to produce and maintain an informative and comprehensive website. Here, we review 179 radiology residency program websites for 19 criteria including various aspects related to the residency application process, benefits, didactics, research, clinical training, and faculty leadership.
We evaluated 179 radiology residency program websites for the inclusion of 19 different criteria. Criteria for information not available directly on the website and links with no information were considered not present.
Only 12 of the 179 (6.7%) program websites had at least 80% of the 19 criteria. In addition, 41 programs (23%) had less than 50% of the criteria listed on their websites. Websites ranged from having 16% of the criteria to as much as 95%.
Although previous studies have shown that prospective radiology resident applicants are influenced by intangibles like current resident satisfaction and academic reputation, they have also shown that applicants are influenced by the educational curriculum, clinical training, program resources, research opportunities, and quality of faculty. Therefore, it is imperative to provide online resources for prospective candidates in an attempt for residency programs to remain competitive in recruiting high-quality US medical student graduates. These findings suggest there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of information provided on radiology residency program websites. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1979962925</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1546144017314382</els_id><sourcerecordid>1979962925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9520be32c63de8f0f1fcfa81a6fa1ae87419b9aa00837924256d1f881a6285143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobk7_AQ_So5fWfGnaJuBliL9goAxFbyFNv4yUdp1JJ-y_t2XTo6fvOzzvC-9DyCXQBCjkN3VSa-MTRqFIABIK9IhMIctEnHL5eTz-PI-BczohZyHUlLKiEOKUTJhkRcoLPiXZfB3NQ8AQWlz3UWejpa5c13SrXbTE4Cpcm1306ruV1230gWVwPYZzcmJ1E_DicGfk_eH-7e4pXrw8Pt_NF7FJs7yPZcZoiSkzeVqhsNSCNVYL0LnVoFEUHGQptaZUpIVknGV5BVaMABMZ8HRGrve9G999bTH0qnXBYNPoNXbboEAWUubDmmxA2R41vgvBo1Ub71rtdwqoGnWpWo261KhLAahB1xC6OvRvyxarv8ivnwG43QM4rPx26FUwblCClfNoelV17r_-H2zZeio</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1979962925</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Assessment of Radiology Residency Program Websites</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Hansberry, David R. ; Bornstein, Jonathan ; Agarwal, Nitin ; McClure, Kristen E. ; Deshmukh, Sandeep P. ; Long, Suzanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansberry, David R. ; Bornstein, Jonathan ; Agarwal, Nitin ; McClure, Kristen E. ; Deshmukh, Sandeep P. ; Long, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><description>When prospective radiology residents decide where to apply to residency, many will use the Internet as a resource to garner information. Therefore, it is important for residency programs to produce and maintain an informative and comprehensive website. Here, we review 179 radiology residency program websites for 19 criteria including various aspects related to the residency application process, benefits, didactics, research, clinical training, and faculty leadership.
We evaluated 179 radiology residency program websites for the inclusion of 19 different criteria. Criteria for information not available directly on the website and links with no information were considered not present.
Only 12 of the 179 (6.7%) program websites had at least 80% of the 19 criteria. In addition, 41 programs (23%) had less than 50% of the criteria listed on their websites. Websites ranged from having 16% of the criteria to as much as 95%.
Although previous studies have shown that prospective radiology resident applicants are influenced by intangibles like current resident satisfaction and academic reputation, they have also shown that applicants are influenced by the educational curriculum, clinical training, program resources, research opportunities, and quality of faculty. Therefore, it is imperative to provide online resources for prospective candidates in an attempt for residency programs to remain competitive in recruiting high-quality US medical student graduates. These findings suggest there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of information provided on radiology residency program websites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29273474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>applicant ; Career Choice ; Decision Making ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; ERAS ; Humans ; Information Services - standards ; Internet ; Internship and Residency ; Job Application ; medical student ; NRMP ; Personnel Selection ; Radiology - education ; Radiology residency ; website</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2018-04, Vol.15 (4), p.663-666</ispartof><rights>2017 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9520be32c63de8f0f1fcfa81a6fa1ae87419b9aa00837924256d1f881a6285143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9520be32c63de8f0f1fcfa81a6fa1ae87419b9aa00837924256d1f881a6285143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144017314382$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29273474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansberry, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Kristen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Sandeep P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><title>An Assessment of Radiology Residency Program Websites</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>When prospective radiology residents decide where to apply to residency, many will use the Internet as a resource to garner information. Therefore, it is important for residency programs to produce and maintain an informative and comprehensive website. Here, we review 179 radiology residency program websites for 19 criteria including various aspects related to the residency application process, benefits, didactics, research, clinical training, and faculty leadership.
We evaluated 179 radiology residency program websites for the inclusion of 19 different criteria. Criteria for information not available directly on the website and links with no information were considered not present.
Only 12 of the 179 (6.7%) program websites had at least 80% of the 19 criteria. In addition, 41 programs (23%) had less than 50% of the criteria listed on their websites. Websites ranged from having 16% of the criteria to as much as 95%.
Although previous studies have shown that prospective radiology resident applicants are influenced by intangibles like current resident satisfaction and academic reputation, they have also shown that applicants are influenced by the educational curriculum, clinical training, program resources, research opportunities, and quality of faculty. Therefore, it is imperative to provide online resources for prospective candidates in an attempt for residency programs to remain competitive in recruiting high-quality US medical student graduates. These findings suggest there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of information provided on radiology residency program websites.</description><subject>applicant</subject><subject>Career Choice</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate</subject><subject>ERAS</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information Services - standards</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Job Application</subject><subject>medical student</subject><subject>NRMP</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Radiology - education</subject><subject>Radiology residency</subject><subject>website</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAYhoMobk7_AQ_So5fWfGnaJuBliL9goAxFbyFNv4yUdp1JJ-y_t2XTo6fvOzzvC-9DyCXQBCjkN3VSa-MTRqFIABIK9IhMIctEnHL5eTz-PI-BczohZyHUlLKiEOKUTJhkRcoLPiXZfB3NQ8AQWlz3UWejpa5c13SrXbTE4Cpcm1306ruV1230gWVwPYZzcmJ1E_DicGfk_eH-7e4pXrw8Pt_NF7FJs7yPZcZoiSkzeVqhsNSCNVYL0LnVoFEUHGQptaZUpIVknGV5BVaMABMZ8HRGrve9G999bTH0qnXBYNPoNXbboEAWUubDmmxA2R41vgvBo1Ub71rtdwqoGnWpWo261KhLAahB1xC6OvRvyxarv8ivnwG43QM4rPx26FUwblCClfNoelV17r_-H2zZeio</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Hansberry, David R.</creator><creator>Bornstein, Jonathan</creator><creator>Agarwal, Nitin</creator><creator>McClure, Kristen E.</creator><creator>Deshmukh, Sandeep P.</creator><creator>Long, Suzanne</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>An Assessment of Radiology Residency Program Websites</title><author>Hansberry, David R. ; Bornstein, Jonathan ; Agarwal, Nitin ; McClure, Kristen E. ; Deshmukh, Sandeep P. ; Long, Suzanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-9520be32c63de8f0f1fcfa81a6fa1ae87419b9aa00837924256d1f881a6285143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>applicant</topic><topic>Career Choice</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate</topic><topic>ERAS</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information Services - standards</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Job Application</topic><topic>medical student</topic><topic>NRMP</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Radiology - education</topic><topic>Radiology residency</topic><topic>website</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansberry, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bornstein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, Nitin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClure, Kristen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Sandeep P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansberry, David R.</au><au>Bornstein, Jonathan</au><au>Agarwal, Nitin</au><au>McClure, Kristen E.</au><au>Deshmukh, Sandeep P.</au><au>Long, Suzanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Assessment of Radiology Residency Program Websites</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>663</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>663-666</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>When prospective radiology residents decide where to apply to residency, many will use the Internet as a resource to garner information. Therefore, it is important for residency programs to produce and maintain an informative and comprehensive website. Here, we review 179 radiology residency program websites for 19 criteria including various aspects related to the residency application process, benefits, didactics, research, clinical training, and faculty leadership.
We evaluated 179 radiology residency program websites for the inclusion of 19 different criteria. Criteria for information not available directly on the website and links with no information were considered not present.
Only 12 of the 179 (6.7%) program websites had at least 80% of the 19 criteria. In addition, 41 programs (23%) had less than 50% of the criteria listed on their websites. Websites ranged from having 16% of the criteria to as much as 95%.
Although previous studies have shown that prospective radiology resident applicants are influenced by intangibles like current resident satisfaction and academic reputation, they have also shown that applicants are influenced by the educational curriculum, clinical training, program resources, research opportunities, and quality of faculty. Therefore, it is imperative to provide online resources for prospective candidates in an attempt for residency programs to remain competitive in recruiting high-quality US medical student graduates. These findings suggest there is room for improving the comprehensiveness of information provided on radiology residency program websites.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29273474</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.010</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-1440 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2018-04, Vol.15 (4), p.663-666 |
issn | 1546-1440 1558-349X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1979962925 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | applicant Career Choice Decision Making Education, Medical, Graduate ERAS Humans Information Services - standards Internet Internship and Residency Job Application medical student NRMP Personnel Selection Radiology - education Radiology residency website |
title | An Assessment of Radiology Residency Program Websites |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A23%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Assessment%20of%20Radiology%20Residency%20Program%20Websites&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Hansberry,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=663&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=663-666&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.11.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1979962925%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1979962925&rft_id=info:pmid/29273474&rft_els_id=S1546144017314382&rfr_iscdi=true |