Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads

Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2008-12, Vol.6 (10), p.529-538
Hauptverfasser: Craig, Laura S., Palmer, Margaret A., Richardson, David C., Filoso, Solange, Bernhardt, Emily S., Bledsoe, Brian P., Doyle, Martin W., Groffman, Peter M., Hassett, Brooke A., Kaushal, Sujay S., Mayer, Paul M., Smith, Sean M., Wilcock, Peter R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 538
container_issue 10
container_start_page 529
container_title Frontiers in ecology and the environment
container_volume 6
creator Craig, Laura S.
Palmer, Margaret A.
Richardson, David C.
Filoso, Solange
Bernhardt, Emily S.
Bledsoe, Brian P.
Doyle, Martin W.
Groffman, Peter M.
Hassett, Brooke A.
Kaushal, Sujay S.
Mayer, Paul M.
Smith, Sean M.
Wilcock, Peter R.
description Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.
doi_str_mv 10.1890/070080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19798968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20441018</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20441018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMoWKv-A2GffFudXDabPIlIq0JRqPoc0s1sSdluarJV-u_dsl6ehIEZZr4zHA4h5xSuqNJwDSWAggMyooWAXHPQhz8z08UxOUlpBcA4K_iI3Lx0Ee06m2PqQrSdD23Wr2yHS48pq0PsT25b-XaZzf0HxuzJdzEssc1mwbp0So5q2yQ8--5j8jadvN495LPn-8e721luBZQ6X3BcCMUdhdKCE7KW0iorGVtQ7kRdIy84CgZgK-UolVJTq3FfjrMKSj4ml8PfTQzv296sWftUYdPYFsM2GapLrbRUf2AVQ0oRa7OJfm3jzlAw-3zMkE8P0gH89A3u_qHMdDLpXSlJoWC611wMmtU-rV8NAyEoUMW_AH0XbjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19798968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Craig, Laura S. ; Palmer, Margaret A. ; Richardson, David C. ; Filoso, Solange ; Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Bledsoe, Brian P. ; Doyle, Martin W. ; Groffman, Peter M. ; Hassett, Brooke A. ; Kaushal, Sujay S. ; Mayer, Paul M. ; Smith, Sean M. ; Wilcock, Peter R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Craig, Laura S. ; Palmer, Margaret A. ; Richardson, David C. ; Filoso, Solange ; Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Bledsoe, Brian P. ; Doyle, Martin W. ; Groffman, Peter M. ; Hassett, Brooke A. ; Kaushal, Sujay S. ; Mayer, Paul M. ; Smith, Sean M. ; Wilcock, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/070080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Freshwater ; Freshwater ecology ; Groundwater ; Lotic systems ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Restoration ecology ; Reviews ; Riparian ecology ; Stormwater ; Streams ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2008-12, Vol.6 (10), p.529-538</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>The Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20441018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20441018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craig, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Margaret A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filoso, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bledsoe, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Martin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groffman, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassett, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Sujay S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><title>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Lotic systems</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Restoration ecology</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Riparian ecology</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMoWKv-A2GffFudXDabPIlIq0JRqPoc0s1sSdluarJV-u_dsl6ehIEZZr4zHA4h5xSuqNJwDSWAggMyooWAXHPQhz8z08UxOUlpBcA4K_iI3Lx0Ee06m2PqQrSdD23Wr2yHS48pq0PsT25b-XaZzf0HxuzJdzEssc1mwbp0So5q2yQ8--5j8jadvN495LPn-8e721luBZQ6X3BcCMUdhdKCE7KW0iorGVtQ7kRdIy84CgZgK-UolVJTq3FfjrMKSj4ml8PfTQzv296sWftUYdPYFsM2GapLrbRUf2AVQ0oRa7OJfm3jzlAw-3zMkE8P0gH89A3u_qHMdDLpXSlJoWC611wMmtU-rV8NAyEoUMW_AH0XbjY</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Craig, Laura S.</creator><creator>Palmer, Margaret A.</creator><creator>Richardson, David C.</creator><creator>Filoso, Solange</creator><creator>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creator><creator>Bledsoe, Brian P.</creator><creator>Doyle, Martin W.</creator><creator>Groffman, Peter M.</creator><creator>Hassett, Brooke A.</creator><creator>Kaushal, Sujay S.</creator><creator>Mayer, Paul M.</creator><creator>Smith, Sean M.</creator><creator>Wilcock, Peter R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</title><author>Craig, Laura S. ; Palmer, Margaret A. ; Richardson, David C. ; Filoso, Solange ; Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Bledsoe, Brian P. ; Doyle, Martin W. ; Groffman, Peter M. ; Hassett, Brooke A. ; Kaushal, Sujay S. ; Mayer, Paul M. ; Smith, Sean M. ; Wilcock, Peter R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Lotic systems</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Restoration ecology</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Riparian ecology</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craig, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Margaret A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filoso, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bledsoe, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Martin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groffman, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassett, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Sujay S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craig, Laura S.</au><au>Palmer, Margaret A.</au><au>Richardson, David C.</au><au>Filoso, Solange</au><au>Bernhardt, Emily S.</au><au>Bledsoe, Brian P.</au><au>Doyle, Martin W.</au><au>Groffman, Peter M.</au><au>Hassett, Brooke A.</au><au>Kaushal, Sujay S.</au><au>Mayer, Paul M.</au><au>Smith, Sean M.</au><au>Wilcock, Peter R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>538</epage><pages>529-538</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/070080</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1540-9295
ispartof Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2008-12, Vol.6 (10), p.529-538
issn 1540-9295
1540-9309
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19798968
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Freshwater
Freshwater ecology
Groundwater
Lotic systems
Nitrates
Nitrogen
Restoration ecology
Reviews
Riparian ecology
Stormwater
Streams
Watersheds
title Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A41%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stream%20Restoration%20Strategies%20for%20Reducing%20River%20Nitrogen%20Loads&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Craig,%20Laura%20S.&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=538&rft.pages=529-538&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/070080&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20441018%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19798968&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20441018&rfr_iscdi=true