Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads
Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Frontiers in ecology and the environment 2008-12, Vol.6 (10), p.529-538 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 538 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 529 |
container_title | Frontiers in ecology and the environment |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Craig, Laura S. Palmer, Margaret A. Richardson, David C. Filoso, Solange Bernhardt, Emily S. Bledsoe, Brian P. Doyle, Martin W. Groffman, Peter M. Hassett, Brooke A. Kaushal, Sujay S. Mayer, Paul M. Smith, Sean M. Wilcock, Peter R. |
description | Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1890/070080 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19798968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20441018</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20441018</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMoWKv-A2GffFudXDabPIlIq0JRqPoc0s1sSdluarJV-u_dsl6ehIEZZr4zHA4h5xSuqNJwDSWAggMyooWAXHPQhz8z08UxOUlpBcA4K_iI3Lx0Ee06m2PqQrSdD23Wr2yHS48pq0PsT25b-XaZzf0HxuzJdzEssc1mwbp0So5q2yQ8--5j8jadvN495LPn-8e721luBZQ6X3BcCMUdhdKCE7KW0iorGVtQ7kRdIy84CgZgK-UolVJTq3FfjrMKSj4ml8PfTQzv296sWftUYdPYFsM2GapLrbRUf2AVQ0oRa7OJfm3jzlAw-3zMkE8P0gH89A3u_qHMdDLpXSlJoWC611wMmtU-rV8NAyEoUMW_AH0XbjY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19798968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Craig, Laura S. ; Palmer, Margaret A. ; Richardson, David C. ; Filoso, Solange ; Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Bledsoe, Brian P. ; Doyle, Martin W. ; Groffman, Peter M. ; Hassett, Brooke A. ; Kaushal, Sujay S. ; Mayer, Paul M. ; Smith, Sean M. ; Wilcock, Peter R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Craig, Laura S. ; Palmer, Margaret A. ; Richardson, David C. ; Filoso, Solange ; Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Bledsoe, Brian P. ; Doyle, Martin W. ; Groffman, Peter M. ; Hassett, Brooke A. ; Kaushal, Sujay S. ; Mayer, Paul M. ; Smith, Sean M. ; Wilcock, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-9295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-9309</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/070080</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Freshwater ; Freshwater ecology ; Groundwater ; Lotic systems ; Nitrates ; Nitrogen ; Restoration ecology ; Reviews ; Riparian ecology ; Stormwater ; Streams ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2008-12, Vol.6 (10), p.529-538</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>The Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20441018$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20441018$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Craig, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Margaret A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filoso, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bledsoe, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Martin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groffman, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassett, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Sujay S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><title>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</title><title>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</title><description>Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Lotic systems</subject><subject>Nitrates</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Restoration ecology</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Riparian ecology</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>1540-9295</issn><issn>1540-9309</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kFtLAzEQhYMoWKv-A2GffFudXDabPIlIq0JRqPoc0s1sSdluarJV-u_dsl6ehIEZZr4zHA4h5xSuqNJwDSWAggMyooWAXHPQhz8z08UxOUlpBcA4K_iI3Lx0Ee06m2PqQrSdD23Wr2yHS48pq0PsT25b-XaZzf0HxuzJdzEssc1mwbp0So5q2yQ8--5j8jadvN495LPn-8e721luBZQ6X3BcCMUdhdKCE7KW0iorGVtQ7kRdIy84CgZgK-UolVJTq3FfjrMKSj4ml8PfTQzv296sWftUYdPYFsM2GapLrbRUf2AVQ0oRa7OJfm3jzlAw-3zMkE8P0gH89A3u_qHMdDLpXSlJoWC611wMmtU-rV8NAyEoUMW_AH0XbjY</recordid><startdate>20081201</startdate><enddate>20081201</enddate><creator>Craig, Laura S.</creator><creator>Palmer, Margaret A.</creator><creator>Richardson, David C.</creator><creator>Filoso, Solange</creator><creator>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creator><creator>Bledsoe, Brian P.</creator><creator>Doyle, Martin W.</creator><creator>Groffman, Peter M.</creator><creator>Hassett, Brooke A.</creator><creator>Kaushal, Sujay S.</creator><creator>Mayer, Paul M.</creator><creator>Smith, Sean M.</creator><creator>Wilcock, Peter R.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081201</creationdate><title>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</title><author>Craig, Laura S. ; Palmer, Margaret A. ; Richardson, David C. ; Filoso, Solange ; Bernhardt, Emily S. ; Bledsoe, Brian P. ; Doyle, Martin W. ; Groffman, Peter M. ; Hassett, Brooke A. ; Kaushal, Sujay S. ; Mayer, Paul M. ; Smith, Sean M. ; Wilcock, Peter R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a4079-b3eb483d107a0d46f66a8a622b13d4ffe353e4200ac8d116691a9ea9ead32c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Lotic systems</topic><topic>Nitrates</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Restoration ecology</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Riparian ecology</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Craig, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palmer, Margaret A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filoso, Solange</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernhardt, Emily S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bledsoe, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doyle, Martin W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groffman, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassett, Brooke A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaushal, Sujay S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayer, Paul M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sean M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcock, Peter R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Craig, Laura S.</au><au>Palmer, Margaret A.</au><au>Richardson, David C.</au><au>Filoso, Solange</au><au>Bernhardt, Emily S.</au><au>Bledsoe, Brian P.</au><au>Doyle, Martin W.</au><au>Groffman, Peter M.</au><au>Hassett, Brooke A.</au><au>Kaushal, Sujay S.</au><au>Mayer, Paul M.</au><au>Smith, Sean M.</au><au>Wilcock, Peter R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads</atitle><jtitle>Frontiers in ecology and the environment</jtitle><date>2008-12-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>538</epage><pages>529-538</pages><issn>1540-9295</issn><eissn>1540-9309</eissn><abstract>Despite decades of work on implementing best management practices to reduce the movement of excess nitrogen (N) to aquatic ecosystems, the amount of N in streams and rivers remains high in many watersheds. Stream restoration has become increasingly popular, yet efforts to quantify N-removal benefits are only just beginning. Natural resource managers are asking scientists to provide advice for reducing the downstream flux of N. Here, we propose a framework for prioritizing restoration sites that involves identifying where potential N loads are large due to sizeable sources and efficient delivery to streams, and when the majority of N is exported. Small streams (1st-3rd order) with considerable loads delivered during low to moderate flows offer the greatest opportunities for N removal. We suggest approaches that increase in-stream carbon availability, contact between the water and benthos, and connections between streams and adjacent terrestrial environments. Because of uncertainties concerning the magnitude of N reduction possible, potential approaches should be tested in various landscape contexts; until more is known, stream restoration alone is not appropriate for compensatory mitigation and should be seen as complementary to land-based best management practices.</abstract><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/070080</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1540-9295 |
ispartof | Frontiers in ecology and the environment, 2008-12, Vol.6 (10), p.529-538 |
issn | 1540-9295 1540-9309 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19798968 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Freshwater Freshwater ecology Groundwater Lotic systems Nitrates Nitrogen Restoration ecology Reviews Riparian ecology Stormwater Streams Watersheds |
title | Stream Restoration Strategies for Reducing River Nitrogen Loads |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A41%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stream%20Restoration%20Strategies%20for%20Reducing%20River%20Nitrogen%20Loads&rft.jtitle=Frontiers%20in%20ecology%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Craig,%20Laura%20S.&rft.date=2008-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=538&rft.pages=529-538&rft.issn=1540-9295&rft.eissn=1540-9309&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/070080&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20441018%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19798968&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20441018&rfr_iscdi=true |