Validation of Individual and Multiple-Sequential Interventions for Reduction of Microbial Populations during Processing of Poultry Carcasses and Parts
Changes in aerobic plate counts (APC), total coliform counts (TCC), Escherichia coli counts (ECC), and Salmonella incidence on poultry carcasses and parts and in poultry processing water were evaluated. Bacterial counts were estimated before and after individual interventions and after poultry carca...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food protection 2007-06, Vol.70 (6), p.1393-1401 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1401 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1393 |
container_title | Journal of food protection |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Stopforth, J.D O'Connor, R Lopes, M Kottapalli, B Hill, W.E Samadpour, M |
description | Changes in aerobic plate counts (APC), total coliform counts (TCC), Escherichia coli counts (ECC), and Salmonella incidence on poultry carcasses and parts and in poultry processing water were evaluated. Bacterial counts were estimated before and after individual interventions and after poultry carcasses were exposed to multiple-sequential interventions at various stages during the slaughter process. Individual and multiple-sequential interventions were evaluated at three processing plants: (i) plant A (New York wash, postevisceration wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, chlorine dioxide wash, chlorine dioxide wash plus chlorine chiller, chiller exit spray, and postchiller wash), (ii) plant B (New York wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, trisodium phosphate wash, and chlorine chiller), and (iii) plant C (trisodium phosphate wash and chlorine chiller). The majority of individual interventions effectively or significantly (P < 0.05) reduced microbial populations on or in carcasses, carcass parts, and processing water. Reductions in APC, TCC, and ECC due to individual interventions ranged from 0 to 1.2, 0 to 1.2, and 0 to 0.8 log CFU/ml, respectively. Individual interventions reduced Salmonella incidence by 0 to 100% depending on the type of process and product. Multiple-sequential interventions resulted in significant reductions (P < 0.05) in APC, TCC, ECC, and Salmonella incidence of 2.4, 2.8, and 2.9 log CFU/ml and 79%, respectively, at plant A; 1.8, 1.7, and 1.6 log CFU/ml and 91%, respectively, at plant B; and 0.8, 1.1, and 0.9 log CFU/ml and 40%, respectively, at plant C. These results enabled validation of in-plant poultry processing interventions and provide a source of information to help the industry in its selection of antimicrobial strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4315/0362-028X-70.6.1393 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19796372</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19796372</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-52c735c56f105ed741396bab6619c1022c9ee032e8d362429b50070f1ee818233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkd1u1DAQhS0EotvCEyBBbuhdlvFP7PgSrfhZqRUrShF3lmM7lZHXXuykUl-E58VhF3o1HuubMzpnEHqFYc0o7t4B5aQF0v9oBaz5GlNJn6AVloy1EqR4ilb_iTN0XspPACCS8OfoDAuOCXC5Qr-_6-CtnnyKTRqbbbT-3ttZh0ZH21zPYfKH4Nob92t2cfL1fxsnl--XJsXSjCk3X52dzT-Fa29yGhZwlw5z0EfMztnHu2aXk3GlLM-K7lKVzw_NRmejS3Hl786dzlN5gZ6NOhT38lQv0O3HD982n9urL5-2m_dXrWGUTm1HjKCd6fiIoXNWsBoCH_TAOZYGAyFGOgeUuN7WKBiRQwcgYMTO9bgnlF6gy6PuIafqsExq74txIejo0lwUlkJyKkgF6RGs7krJblSH7Pc6PygMajmHWsJWS9hKgOJqOUeden2Sn4e9s48zp_wr8PYE6GJ0GLOOxpdHru8ZYRhX7s2RG3VS-i5X5vaGAKbVjuypYPQPV7-eOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19796372</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of Individual and Multiple-Sequential Interventions for Reduction of Microbial Populations during Processing of Poultry Carcasses and Parts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Stopforth, J.D ; O'Connor, R ; Lopes, M ; Kottapalli, B ; Hill, W.E ; Samadpour, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Stopforth, J.D ; O'Connor, R ; Lopes, M ; Kottapalli, B ; Hill, W.E ; Samadpour, M</creatorcontrib><description>Changes in aerobic plate counts (APC), total coliform counts (TCC), Escherichia coli counts (ECC), and Salmonella incidence on poultry carcasses and parts and in poultry processing water were evaluated. Bacterial counts were estimated before and after individual interventions and after poultry carcasses were exposed to multiple-sequential interventions at various stages during the slaughter process. Individual and multiple-sequential interventions were evaluated at three processing plants: (i) plant A (New York wash, postevisceration wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, chlorine dioxide wash, chlorine dioxide wash plus chlorine chiller, chiller exit spray, and postchiller wash), (ii) plant B (New York wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, trisodium phosphate wash, and chlorine chiller), and (iii) plant C (trisodium phosphate wash and chlorine chiller). The majority of individual interventions effectively or significantly (P < 0.05) reduced microbial populations on or in carcasses, carcass parts, and processing water. Reductions in APC, TCC, and ECC due to individual interventions ranged from 0 to 1.2, 0 to 1.2, and 0 to 0.8 log CFU/ml, respectively. Individual interventions reduced Salmonella incidence by 0 to 100% depending on the type of process and product. Multiple-sequential interventions resulted in significant reductions (P < 0.05) in APC, TCC, ECC, and Salmonella incidence of 2.4, 2.8, and 2.9 log CFU/ml and 79%, respectively, at plant A; 1.8, 1.7, and 1.6 log CFU/ml and 91%, respectively, at plant B; and 0.8, 1.1, and 0.9 log CFU/ml and 40%, respectively, at plant C. These results enabled validation of in-plant poultry processing interventions and provide a source of information to help the industry in its selection of antimicrobial strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-028X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-9097</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X-70.6.1393</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17612069</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFPRDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Des Moines, IA: International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians</publisher><subject>aerobes ; Animals ; Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology ; antibacterial properties ; Bacteria, Aerobic - drug effects ; Bacteria, Aerobic - isolation & purification ; bacterial contamination ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chickens - microbiology ; chlorine chiller ; chlorine dioxide ; coliform bacteria ; Colony Count, Microbial ; Consumer Product Safety ; coolers ; Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects ; Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification ; Escherichia coli ; Escherichia coli - drug effects ; Escherichia coli - isolation & purification ; evisceration ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Food Handling - methods ; Food industries ; Food Microbiology ; food pathogens ; food sanitation ; Food-Processing Industry - standards ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; HACCP ; Humans ; Meat and meat product industries ; meat cuts ; microbiological quality ; plate count ; poultry carcasses ; poultry industry ; poultry meat ; processing stages ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - drug effects ; Salmonella - isolation & purification ; sanitizing ; slaughterhouses ; sodium phosphate ; washing ; water</subject><ispartof>Journal of food protection, 2007-06, Vol.70 (6), p.1393-1401</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-52c735c56f105ed741396bab6619c1022c9ee032e8d362429b50070f1ee818233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-52c735c56f105ed741396bab6619c1022c9ee032e8d362429b50070f1ee818233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18842411$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17612069$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stopforth, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kottapalli, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, W.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samadpour, M</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of Individual and Multiple-Sequential Interventions for Reduction of Microbial Populations during Processing of Poultry Carcasses and Parts</title><title>Journal of food protection</title><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><description>Changes in aerobic plate counts (APC), total coliform counts (TCC), Escherichia coli counts (ECC), and Salmonella incidence on poultry carcasses and parts and in poultry processing water were evaluated. Bacterial counts were estimated before and after individual interventions and after poultry carcasses were exposed to multiple-sequential interventions at various stages during the slaughter process. Individual and multiple-sequential interventions were evaluated at three processing plants: (i) plant A (New York wash, postevisceration wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, chlorine dioxide wash, chlorine dioxide wash plus chlorine chiller, chiller exit spray, and postchiller wash), (ii) plant B (New York wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, trisodium phosphate wash, and chlorine chiller), and (iii) plant C (trisodium phosphate wash and chlorine chiller). The majority of individual interventions effectively or significantly (P < 0.05) reduced microbial populations on or in carcasses, carcass parts, and processing water. Reductions in APC, TCC, and ECC due to individual interventions ranged from 0 to 1.2, 0 to 1.2, and 0 to 0.8 log CFU/ml, respectively. Individual interventions reduced Salmonella incidence by 0 to 100% depending on the type of process and product. Multiple-sequential interventions resulted in significant reductions (P < 0.05) in APC, TCC, ECC, and Salmonella incidence of 2.4, 2.8, and 2.9 log CFU/ml and 79%, respectively, at plant A; 1.8, 1.7, and 1.6 log CFU/ml and 91%, respectively, at plant B; and 0.8, 1.1, and 0.9 log CFU/ml and 40%, respectively, at plant C. These results enabled validation of in-plant poultry processing interventions and provide a source of information to help the industry in its selection of antimicrobial strategies.</description><subject>aerobes</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology</subject><subject>antibacterial properties</subject><subject>Bacteria, Aerobic - drug effects</subject><subject>Bacteria, Aerobic - isolation & purification</subject><subject>bacterial contamination</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chickens - microbiology</subject><subject>chlorine chiller</subject><subject>chlorine dioxide</subject><subject>coliform bacteria</subject><subject>Colony Count, Microbial</subject><subject>Consumer Product Safety</subject><subject>coolers</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</subject><subject>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Escherichia coli</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - drug effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</subject><subject>evisceration</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>food pathogens</subject><subject>food sanitation</subject><subject>Food-Processing Industry - standards</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>HACCP</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>meat cuts</subject><subject>microbiological quality</subject><subject>plate count</subject><subject>poultry carcasses</subject><subject>poultry industry</subject><subject>poultry meat</subject><subject>processing stages</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - drug effects</subject><subject>Salmonella - isolation & purification</subject><subject>sanitizing</subject><subject>slaughterhouses</subject><subject>sodium phosphate</subject><subject>washing</subject><subject>water</subject><issn>0362-028X</issn><issn>1944-9097</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkd1u1DAQhS0EotvCEyBBbuhdlvFP7PgSrfhZqRUrShF3lmM7lZHXXuykUl-E58VhF3o1HuubMzpnEHqFYc0o7t4B5aQF0v9oBaz5GlNJn6AVloy1EqR4ilb_iTN0XspPACCS8OfoDAuOCXC5Qr-_6-CtnnyKTRqbbbT-3ttZh0ZH21zPYfKH4Nob92t2cfL1fxsnl--XJsXSjCk3X52dzT-Fa29yGhZwlw5z0EfMztnHu2aXk3GlLM-K7lKVzw_NRmejS3Hl786dzlN5gZ6NOhT38lQv0O3HD982n9urL5-2m_dXrWGUTm1HjKCd6fiIoXNWsBoCH_TAOZYGAyFGOgeUuN7WKBiRQwcgYMTO9bgnlF6gy6PuIafqsExq74txIejo0lwUlkJyKkgF6RGs7krJblSH7Pc6PygMajmHWsJWS9hKgOJqOUeden2Sn4e9s48zp_wr8PYE6GJ0GLOOxpdHru8ZYRhX7s2RG3VS-i5X5vaGAKbVjuypYPQPV7-eOw</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Stopforth, J.D</creator><creator>O'Connor, R</creator><creator>Lopes, M</creator><creator>Kottapalli, B</creator><creator>Hill, W.E</creator><creator>Samadpour, M</creator><general>International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Validation of Individual and Multiple-Sequential Interventions for Reduction of Microbial Populations during Processing of Poultry Carcasses and Parts</title><author>Stopforth, J.D ; O'Connor, R ; Lopes, M ; Kottapalli, B ; Hill, W.E ; Samadpour, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c433t-52c735c56f105ed741396bab6619c1022c9ee032e8d362429b50070f1ee818233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>aerobes</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology</topic><topic>antibacterial properties</topic><topic>Bacteria, Aerobic - drug effects</topic><topic>Bacteria, Aerobic - isolation & purification</topic><topic>bacterial contamination</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chickens - microbiology</topic><topic>chlorine chiller</topic><topic>chlorine dioxide</topic><topic>coliform bacteria</topic><topic>Colony Count, Microbial</topic><topic>Consumer Product Safety</topic><topic>coolers</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects</topic><topic>Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Escherichia coli</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - drug effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - isolation & purification</topic><topic>evisceration</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>food pathogens</topic><topic>food sanitation</topic><topic>Food-Processing Industry - standards</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>HACCP</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>meat cuts</topic><topic>microbiological quality</topic><topic>plate count</topic><topic>poultry carcasses</topic><topic>poultry industry</topic><topic>poultry meat</topic><topic>processing stages</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - drug effects</topic><topic>Salmonella - isolation & purification</topic><topic>sanitizing</topic><topic>slaughterhouses</topic><topic>sodium phosphate</topic><topic>washing</topic><topic>water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stopforth, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lopes, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kottapalli, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, W.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samadpour, M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stopforth, J.D</au><au>O'Connor, R</au><au>Lopes, M</au><au>Kottapalli, B</au><au>Hill, W.E</au><au>Samadpour, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of Individual and Multiple-Sequential Interventions for Reduction of Microbial Populations during Processing of Poultry Carcasses and Parts</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food protection</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Prot</addtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1393</spage><epage>1401</epage><pages>1393-1401</pages><issn>0362-028X</issn><eissn>1944-9097</eissn><coden>JFPRDR</coden><abstract>Changes in aerobic plate counts (APC), total coliform counts (TCC), Escherichia coli counts (ECC), and Salmonella incidence on poultry carcasses and parts and in poultry processing water were evaluated. Bacterial counts were estimated before and after individual interventions and after poultry carcasses were exposed to multiple-sequential interventions at various stages during the slaughter process. Individual and multiple-sequential interventions were evaluated at three processing plants: (i) plant A (New York wash, postevisceration wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, chlorine dioxide wash, chlorine dioxide wash plus chlorine chiller, chiller exit spray, and postchiller wash), (ii) plant B (New York wash, inside-outside bird washes 1 and 2, trisodium phosphate wash, and chlorine chiller), and (iii) plant C (trisodium phosphate wash and chlorine chiller). The majority of individual interventions effectively or significantly (P < 0.05) reduced microbial populations on or in carcasses, carcass parts, and processing water. Reductions in APC, TCC, and ECC due to individual interventions ranged from 0 to 1.2, 0 to 1.2, and 0 to 0.8 log CFU/ml, respectively. Individual interventions reduced Salmonella incidence by 0 to 100% depending on the type of process and product. Multiple-sequential interventions resulted in significant reductions (P < 0.05) in APC, TCC, ECC, and Salmonella incidence of 2.4, 2.8, and 2.9 log CFU/ml and 79%, respectively, at plant A; 1.8, 1.7, and 1.6 log CFU/ml and 91%, respectively, at plant B; and 0.8, 1.1, and 0.9 log CFU/ml and 40%, respectively, at plant C. These results enabled validation of in-plant poultry processing interventions and provide a source of information to help the industry in its selection of antimicrobial strategies.</abstract><cop>Des Moines, IA</cop><pub>International Association of Milk, Food and Environmental Sanitarians</pub><pmid>17612069</pmid><doi>10.4315/0362-028X-70.6.1393</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0362-028X |
ispartof | Journal of food protection, 2007-06, Vol.70 (6), p.1393-1401 |
issn | 0362-028X 1944-9097 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19796372 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | aerobes Animals Anti-Infective Agents, Local - pharmacology antibacterial properties Bacteria, Aerobic - drug effects Bacteria, Aerobic - isolation & purification bacterial contamination Biological and medical sciences Chickens - microbiology chlorine chiller chlorine dioxide coliform bacteria Colony Count, Microbial Consumer Product Safety coolers Enterobacteriaceae - drug effects Enterobacteriaceae - isolation & purification Escherichia coli Escherichia coli - drug effects Escherichia coli - isolation & purification evisceration Food Contamination - analysis Food Handling - methods Food industries Food Microbiology food pathogens food sanitation Food-Processing Industry - standards Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology HACCP Humans Meat and meat product industries meat cuts microbiological quality plate count poultry carcasses poultry industry poultry meat processing stages Salmonella Salmonella - drug effects Salmonella - isolation & purification sanitizing slaughterhouses sodium phosphate washing water |
title | Validation of Individual and Multiple-Sequential Interventions for Reduction of Microbial Populations during Processing of Poultry Carcasses and Parts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T16%3A06%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20Individual%20and%20Multiple-Sequential%20Interventions%20for%20Reduction%20of%20Microbial%20Populations%20during%20Processing%20of%20Poultry%20Carcasses%20and%20Parts&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20protection&rft.au=Stopforth,%20J.D&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1393&rft.epage=1401&rft.pages=1393-1401&rft.issn=0362-028X&rft.eissn=1944-9097&rft.coden=JFPRDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.4315/0362-028X-70.6.1393&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19796372%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19796372&rft_id=info:pmid/17612069&rfr_iscdi=true |