NEW SCREEN-WASHING APPROACHES TO BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF NONMARINE ROCKS, CRETACEOUS OF UTAH

Surface prospecting methods used for identifying microvertebrate localities suitable for wet screen-washing yield highly biased samples limited to horizons containing obvious accumulations of fossil remains. The technique is restricted to areas with well-exposed strata and results in the recovery of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History 2004-12, Vol.36 (1), p.21-30
1. Verfasser: EATON, JEFFREY G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History
container_volume 36
creator EATON, JEFFREY G
description Surface prospecting methods used for identifying microvertebrate localities suitable for wet screen-washing yield highly biased samples limited to horizons containing obvious accumulations of fossil remains. The technique is restricted to areas with well-exposed strata and results in the recovery of hydrologically concentrated faunas that are not in situ. In many areas of Utah, Cretaceous strata are either exposed in cliff faces (if the sequences are sandstone dominated), or in road cuts (if the sequences are dominated by mudstones). In order to recover fossils from these kinds of exposures in either critical stratigraphic intervals or geographic areas, I have simply “blind washed” fine-grained horizons that lack little or any evidence of fossils at the surface. This method has yielded well-preserved dentitions and skeletal elements of mammals, lizards, amphibians, and other vertebrates as well as ostracodes and gastropods. This approach permits sampling throughout the entire stratigraphic thickness of formations (providing fine-grained intervals are present) including bases and tops of units. This method also permits the recovery of biostratigraphic materials in areas where outcrops are very steep or limited to road cuts. Faunas recovered from fine-grained horizons show little evidence of transport and provide a more reliable basis for paleoecologic interpretation than hydrologically concentrated fossil accumulations. Multidisciplinary approaches to nonmarine biostratigraphy that incorporate all vertebrates, invertebrates, and palynomorphs as well as “blind washing” techniques should be able to establish biostratigraphies with resolutions that rival marine biostratigraphic schemes.
doi_str_mv 10.2992/0145-9058(2004)36[21:NSATBA]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19795205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19795205</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2415-a35480e934e687e9111c3ff96a7ffffcea1447b014bca6a667284e192c8a4353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkMtKw0AUhgdRsF7eYVai0NS55TK6mo7TJlgzJYlIERmmYYKVtqmJXfj2JlR8AM_mLP7_fHA-AIYYjQjn5BZh5nsc-dE1QYjd0OCV4Ls0F8VYvJERGkl9T47AgOCAeAwzegwGfyen4KxtPxDyKWJ8AN5T9QJzmSmVei8ij5N0CsV8nmkhY5XDQsNxovMiE0UyzcQ8XkCRPsC5mCmtpJ7p6QLqCUx1-iSyJFUw0_IxH8IOWAip9HPex8-FiC_ASWXXrbv83eegmKhCxl7HSKSYeZYw7HuW-ixCjlPmgih0HGNc0qrigQ2rbkpnMWPhsntnWdrABkFIIuYwJ2VkGfXpObg6YHdN_bl37ZfZrNrSrdd26-p9azAPuU9QX3w4FMumbtvGVWbXrDa2-TYYmd6y6ZWZXpnpLRsaGILNwbLpUiO1IR1mfMAsV3W9df-D_ADPB33U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19795205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>NEW SCREEN-WASHING APPROACHES TO BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF NONMARINE ROCKS, CRETACEOUS OF UTAH</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>EATON, JEFFREY G</creator><creatorcontrib>EATON, JEFFREY G</creatorcontrib><description>Surface prospecting methods used for identifying microvertebrate localities suitable for wet screen-washing yield highly biased samples limited to horizons containing obvious accumulations of fossil remains. The technique is restricted to areas with well-exposed strata and results in the recovery of hydrologically concentrated faunas that are not in situ. In many areas of Utah, Cretaceous strata are either exposed in cliff faces (if the sequences are sandstone dominated), or in road cuts (if the sequences are dominated by mudstones). In order to recover fossils from these kinds of exposures in either critical stratigraphic intervals or geographic areas, I have simply “blind washed” fine-grained horizons that lack little or any evidence of fossils at the surface. This method has yielded well-preserved dentitions and skeletal elements of mammals, lizards, amphibians, and other vertebrates as well as ostracodes and gastropods. This approach permits sampling throughout the entire stratigraphic thickness of formations (providing fine-grained intervals are present) including bases and tops of units. This method also permits the recovery of biostratigraphic materials in areas where outcrops are very steep or limited to road cuts. Faunas recovered from fine-grained horizons show little evidence of transport and provide a more reliable basis for paleoecologic interpretation than hydrologically concentrated fossil accumulations. Multidisciplinary approaches to nonmarine biostratigraphy that incorporate all vertebrates, invertebrates, and palynomorphs as well as “blind washing” techniques should be able to establish biostratigraphies with resolutions that rival marine biostratigraphic schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0145-9058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2162-4143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2992/0145-9058(2004)36[21:NSATBA]2.0.CO;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Carnegie Institute</publisher><subject>Gastropoda ; Lacertilia</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 2004-12, Vol.36 (1), p.21-30</ispartof><rights>2004 by Carnegie Museum of Natural History</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2415-a35480e934e687e9111c3ff96a7ffffcea1447b014bca6a667284e192c8a4353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2415-a35480e934e687e9111c3ff96a7ffffcea1447b014bca6a667284e192c8a4353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.2992/0145-9058(2004)36[21:NSATBA]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,26959,27905,27906,52344</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>EATON, JEFFREY G</creatorcontrib><title>NEW SCREEN-WASHING APPROACHES TO BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF NONMARINE ROCKS, CRETACEOUS OF UTAH</title><title>Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History</title><description>Surface prospecting methods used for identifying microvertebrate localities suitable for wet screen-washing yield highly biased samples limited to horizons containing obvious accumulations of fossil remains. The technique is restricted to areas with well-exposed strata and results in the recovery of hydrologically concentrated faunas that are not in situ. In many areas of Utah, Cretaceous strata are either exposed in cliff faces (if the sequences are sandstone dominated), or in road cuts (if the sequences are dominated by mudstones). In order to recover fossils from these kinds of exposures in either critical stratigraphic intervals or geographic areas, I have simply “blind washed” fine-grained horizons that lack little or any evidence of fossils at the surface. This method has yielded well-preserved dentitions and skeletal elements of mammals, lizards, amphibians, and other vertebrates as well as ostracodes and gastropods. This approach permits sampling throughout the entire stratigraphic thickness of formations (providing fine-grained intervals are present) including bases and tops of units. This method also permits the recovery of biostratigraphic materials in areas where outcrops are very steep or limited to road cuts. Faunas recovered from fine-grained horizons show little evidence of transport and provide a more reliable basis for paleoecologic interpretation than hydrologically concentrated fossil accumulations. Multidisciplinary approaches to nonmarine biostratigraphy that incorporate all vertebrates, invertebrates, and palynomorphs as well as “blind washing” techniques should be able to establish biostratigraphies with resolutions that rival marine biostratigraphic schemes.</description><subject>Gastropoda</subject><subject>Lacertilia</subject><issn>0145-9058</issn><issn>2162-4143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdkMtKw0AUhgdRsF7eYVai0NS55TK6mo7TJlgzJYlIERmmYYKVtqmJXfj2JlR8AM_mLP7_fHA-AIYYjQjn5BZh5nsc-dE1QYjd0OCV4Ls0F8VYvJERGkl9T47AgOCAeAwzegwGfyen4KxtPxDyKWJ8AN5T9QJzmSmVei8ij5N0CsV8nmkhY5XDQsNxovMiE0UyzcQ8XkCRPsC5mCmtpJ7p6QLqCUx1-iSyJFUw0_IxH8IOWAip9HPex8-FiC_ASWXXrbv83eegmKhCxl7HSKSYeZYw7HuW-ixCjlPmgih0HGNc0qrigQ2rbkpnMWPhsntnWdrABkFIIuYwJ2VkGfXpObg6YHdN_bl37ZfZrNrSrdd26-p9azAPuU9QX3w4FMumbtvGVWbXrDa2-TYYmd6y6ZWZXpnpLRsaGILNwbLpUiO1IR1mfMAsV3W9df-D_ADPB33U</recordid><startdate>20041201</startdate><enddate>20041201</enddate><creator>EATON, JEFFREY G</creator><general>Carnegie Institute</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041201</creationdate><title>NEW SCREEN-WASHING APPROACHES TO BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF NONMARINE ROCKS, CRETACEOUS OF UTAH</title><author>EATON, JEFFREY G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2415-a35480e934e687e9111c3ff96a7ffffcea1447b014bca6a667284e192c8a4353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Gastropoda</topic><topic>Lacertilia</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>EATON, JEFFREY G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>EATON, JEFFREY G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>NEW SCREEN-WASHING APPROACHES TO BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF NONMARINE ROCKS, CRETACEOUS OF UTAH</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History</jtitle><date>2004-12-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>21-30</pages><issn>0145-9058</issn><eissn>2162-4143</eissn><abstract>Surface prospecting methods used for identifying microvertebrate localities suitable for wet screen-washing yield highly biased samples limited to horizons containing obvious accumulations of fossil remains. The technique is restricted to areas with well-exposed strata and results in the recovery of hydrologically concentrated faunas that are not in situ. In many areas of Utah, Cretaceous strata are either exposed in cliff faces (if the sequences are sandstone dominated), or in road cuts (if the sequences are dominated by mudstones). In order to recover fossils from these kinds of exposures in either critical stratigraphic intervals or geographic areas, I have simply “blind washed” fine-grained horizons that lack little or any evidence of fossils at the surface. This method has yielded well-preserved dentitions and skeletal elements of mammals, lizards, amphibians, and other vertebrates as well as ostracodes and gastropods. This approach permits sampling throughout the entire stratigraphic thickness of formations (providing fine-grained intervals are present) including bases and tops of units. This method also permits the recovery of biostratigraphic materials in areas where outcrops are very steep or limited to road cuts. Faunas recovered from fine-grained horizons show little evidence of transport and provide a more reliable basis for paleoecologic interpretation than hydrologically concentrated fossil accumulations. Multidisciplinary approaches to nonmarine biostratigraphy that incorporate all vertebrates, invertebrates, and palynomorphs as well as “blind washing” techniques should be able to establish biostratigraphies with resolutions that rival marine biostratigraphic schemes.</abstract><pub>Carnegie Institute</pub><doi>10.2992/0145-9058(2004)36[21:NSATBA]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0145-9058
ispartof Bulletin of Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 2004-12, Vol.36 (1), p.21-30
issn 0145-9058
2162-4143
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19795205
source BioOne Complete
subjects Gastropoda
Lacertilia
title NEW SCREEN-WASHING APPROACHES TO BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEOECOLOGY OF NONMARINE ROCKS, CRETACEOUS OF UTAH
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T13%3A31%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=NEW%20SCREEN-WASHING%20APPROACHES%20TO%20BIOSTRATIGRAPHY%20AND%20PALEOECOLOGY%20OF%20NONMARINE%20ROCKS,%20CRETACEOUS%20OF%20UTAH&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20Carnegie%20Museum%20of%20Natural%20History&rft.au=EATON,%20JEFFREY%20G&rft.date=2004-12-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=21-30&rft.issn=0145-9058&rft.eissn=2162-4143&rft_id=info:doi/10.2992/0145-9058(2004)36%5B21:NSATBA%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19795205%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19795205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true