Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia

Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2016-09, Vol.97 (9), p.1515-1519
Hauptverfasser: Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L, Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L, Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L, DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1519
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1515
container_title Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
container_volume 97
creator Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L
Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L
Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L
DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH
description Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1979057366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999316001647</els_id><sourcerecordid>1815367505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b9cdd692ae9cd098eb45d49cc4f6f66075635a965264e1afd0ca60f63e1736373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7rj6B3yQPPrSYy6d9AREWBZ1hAXvF_Ah1CTVmrE7GZNuYf69aWb1wQcVClIJ3zmEOkXIfc7WnHH9aL-Gw5jXovZrJmqJG2TFlRTNRvBPN8mKMSYbY4w8I3dK2derVpLfJmdCG9PJVq3I5w8wBA9TSJGmngJ9g-BD_EIvSsFSRowT7VOmrzCXFAv9GKavdJvGFI9jmgvd4hggpkMAWqnXM_gMcTq93CW3ehgK3rs-z8n7Z0_fXW6bq5fPX1xeXDWuFZup2RnnvTYCsDbMbHDXKt8a59pe91qzTmmpwGgldIsces8caNZribyTWnbynDw8-R5y-j5jmewYisNhgIj1j5abzjBVWf1vdFP9mFDC_AdaR607xVRFxQl1OZWSsbeHHEbIR8uZXaKye7tEZZeoLBO1RBU9uPafdyP635Jf2VTg8QnAOrsfAbMtLmB06ENGN1mfwt_9n_whd0OIwcHwDY9Y9mnOsaZiuS1VYN8uy7LsCtesurSd_AmTNLlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815367505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L ; Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L ; Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L ; DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L ; Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L ; Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L ; DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P &lt;.0001). Persons with quadrantanopia read significantly faster than did persons with HH ( t36 =2.25; P =.03) or those with central field loss ( t48 =3.17; P =.0027). These findings confirmed that the VSRT correctly discriminated between groups in terms of reading performance. Conclusions Preliminary validation results indicate that the VSRT demonstrates adequate evidence of reliability and validity to evaluate reading performance in adults with HH or quadrantanopia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26997345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brain injuries ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Hemianopsia - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy Modalities - standards ; Reading ; Rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Vision Tests ; Vision, low ; Visual Fields</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2016-09, Vol.97 (9), p.1515-1519</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b9cdd692ae9cd098eb45d49cc4f6f66075635a965264e1afd0ca60f63e1736373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999316001647$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P &lt;.0001). Persons with quadrantanopia read significantly faster than did persons with HH ( t36 =2.25; P =.03) or those with central field loss ( t48 =3.17; P =.0027). These findings confirmed that the VSRT correctly discriminated between groups in terms of reading performance. Conclusions Preliminary validation results indicate that the VSRT demonstrates adequate evidence of reliability and validity to evaluate reading performance in adults with HH or quadrantanopia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brain injuries</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemianopsia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - standards</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vision Tests</subject><subject>Vision, low</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7rj6B3yQPPrSYy6d9AREWBZ1hAXvF_Ah1CTVmrE7GZNuYf69aWb1wQcVClIJ3zmEOkXIfc7WnHH9aL-Gw5jXovZrJmqJG2TFlRTNRvBPN8mKMSYbY4w8I3dK2derVpLfJmdCG9PJVq3I5w8wBA9TSJGmngJ9g-BD_EIvSsFSRowT7VOmrzCXFAv9GKavdJvGFI9jmgvd4hggpkMAWqnXM_gMcTq93CW3ehgK3rs-z8n7Z0_fXW6bq5fPX1xeXDWuFZup2RnnvTYCsDbMbHDXKt8a59pe91qzTmmpwGgldIsces8caNZribyTWnbynDw8-R5y-j5jmewYisNhgIj1j5abzjBVWf1vdFP9mFDC_AdaR607xVRFxQl1OZWSsbeHHEbIR8uZXaKye7tEZZeoLBO1RBU9uPafdyP635Jf2VTg8QnAOrsfAbMtLmB06ENGN1mfwt_9n_whd0OIwcHwDY9Y9mnOsaZiuS1VYN8uy7LsCtesurSd_AmTNLlc</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</creator><creator>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</creator><creator>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</creator><creator>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</title><author>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L ; Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L ; Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L ; DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b9cdd692ae9cd098eb45d49cc4f6f66075635a965264e1afd0ca60f63e1736373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brain injuries</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemianopsia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - standards</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vision Tests</topic><topic>Vision, low</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</au><au>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</au><au>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</au><au>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1515</spage><epage>1519</epage><pages>1515-1519</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P &lt;.0001). Persons with quadrantanopia read significantly faster than did persons with HH ( t36 =2.25; P =.03) or those with central field loss ( t48 =3.17; P =.0027). These findings confirmed that the VSRT correctly discriminated between groups in terms of reading performance. Conclusions Preliminary validation results indicate that the VSRT demonstrates adequate evidence of reliability and validity to evaluate reading performance in adults with HH or quadrantanopia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26997345</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-9993
ispartof Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2016-09, Vol.97 (9), p.1515-1519
issn 0003-9993
1532-821X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1979057366
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain injuries
Disability Evaluation
Female
Hemianopsia - rehabilitation
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy Modalities - standards
Reading
Rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Vision Tests
Vision, low
Visual Fields
title Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T06%3A34%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20Reading%20Assessment%20for%20Persons%20With%20Homonymous%20Hemianopia%20or%20Quadrantanopia&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Blaylock,%20Sarah%20E.,%20MS,%20OTR/L&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1515&rft.epage=1519&rft.pages=1515-1519&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815367505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815367505&rft_id=info:pmid/26997345&rft_els_id=S0003999316001647&rfr_iscdi=true