Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia
Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2016-09, Vol.97 (9), p.1515-1519 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1519 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1515 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH |
description | Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1979057366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999316001647</els_id><sourcerecordid>1815367505</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b9cdd692ae9cd098eb45d49cc4f6f66075635a965264e1afd0ca60f63e1736373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7rj6B3yQPPrSYy6d9AREWBZ1hAXvF_Ah1CTVmrE7GZNuYf69aWb1wQcVClIJ3zmEOkXIfc7WnHH9aL-Gw5jXovZrJmqJG2TFlRTNRvBPN8mKMSYbY4w8I3dK2derVpLfJmdCG9PJVq3I5w8wBA9TSJGmngJ9g-BD_EIvSsFSRowT7VOmrzCXFAv9GKavdJvGFI9jmgvd4hggpkMAWqnXM_gMcTq93CW3ehgK3rs-z8n7Z0_fXW6bq5fPX1xeXDWuFZup2RnnvTYCsDbMbHDXKt8a59pe91qzTmmpwGgldIsces8caNZribyTWnbynDw8-R5y-j5jmewYisNhgIj1j5abzjBVWf1vdFP9mFDC_AdaR607xVRFxQl1OZWSsbeHHEbIR8uZXaKye7tEZZeoLBO1RBU9uPafdyP635Jf2VTg8QnAOrsfAbMtLmB06ENGN1mfwt_9n_whd0OIwcHwDY9Y9mnOsaZiuS1VYN8uy7LsCtesurSd_AmTNLlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1815367505</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L ; Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L ; Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L ; DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creator><creatorcontrib>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L ; Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L ; Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L ; DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P <.0001). Persons with quadrantanopia read significantly faster than did persons with HH ( t36 =2.25; P =.03) or those with central field loss ( t48 =3.17; P =.0027). These findings confirmed that the VSRT correctly discriminated between groups in terms of reading performance. Conclusions Preliminary validation results indicate that the VSRT demonstrates adequate evidence of reliability and validity to evaluate reading performance in adults with HH or quadrantanopia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26997345</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Brain injuries ; Disability Evaluation ; Female ; Hemianopsia - rehabilitation ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy Modalities - standards ; Reading ; Rehabilitation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Vision Tests ; Vision, low ; Visual Fields</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2016-09, Vol.97 (9), p.1515-1519</ispartof><rights>American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b9cdd692ae9cd098eb45d49cc4f6f66075635a965264e1afd0ca60f63e1736373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003999316001647$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26997345$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P <.0001). Persons with quadrantanopia read significantly faster than did persons with HH ( t36 =2.25; P =.03) or those with central field loss ( t48 =3.17; P =.0027). These findings confirmed that the VSRT correctly discriminated between groups in terms of reading performance. Conclusions Preliminary validation results indicate that the VSRT demonstrates adequate evidence of reliability and validity to evaluate reading performance in adults with HH or quadrantanopia.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Brain injuries</subject><subject>Disability Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemianopsia - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Physical Therapy Modalities - standards</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vision Tests</subject><subject>Vision, low</subject><subject>Visual Fields</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkluLFDEQhYMo7rj6B3yQPPrSYy6d9AREWBZ1hAXvF_Ah1CTVmrE7GZNuYf69aWb1wQcVClIJ3zmEOkXIfc7WnHH9aL-Gw5jXovZrJmqJG2TFlRTNRvBPN8mKMSYbY4w8I3dK2derVpLfJmdCG9PJVq3I5w8wBA9TSJGmngJ9g-BD_EIvSsFSRowT7VOmrzCXFAv9GKavdJvGFI9jmgvd4hggpkMAWqnXM_gMcTq93CW3ehgK3rs-z8n7Z0_fXW6bq5fPX1xeXDWuFZup2RnnvTYCsDbMbHDXKt8a59pe91qzTmmpwGgldIsces8caNZribyTWnbynDw8-R5y-j5jmewYisNhgIj1j5abzjBVWf1vdFP9mFDC_AdaR607xVRFxQl1OZWSsbeHHEbIR8uZXaKye7tEZZeoLBO1RBU9uPafdyP635Jf2VTg8QnAOrsfAbMtLmB06ENGN1mfwt_9n_whd0OIwcHwDY9Y9mnOsaZiuS1VYN8uy7LsCtesurSd_AmTNLlc</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</creator><creator>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</creator><creator>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</creator><creator>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</title><author>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L ; Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L ; Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L ; DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b9cdd692ae9cd098eb45d49cc4f6f66075635a965264e1afd0ca60f63e1736373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Brain injuries</topic><topic>Disability Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemianopsia - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Physical Therapy Modalities - standards</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vision Tests</topic><topic>Vision, low</topic><topic>Visual Fields</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blaylock, Sarah E., MS, OTR/L</au><au>Warren, Mary, PhD, OTR/L</au><au>Yuen, Hon K., PhD, OTR/L</au><au>DeCarlo, Dawn K., OD, MSPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1515</spage><epage>1519</epage><pages>1515-1519</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To preliminarily validate the Visual Skills for Reading Test (VSRT) for assessing reading performance in persons with homonymous hemianopia (HH) or quadrantanopia. Design Retrospective chart review. Setting University-based outpatient low vision rehabilitation center. Participants Persons (N=38) with HH or quadrantanopia who completed the VSRT. Interventions Validation procedures included testing for equivalence of the 3 test versions, estimation of internal consistency reliability, and known-group comparison using VSRT results from previous studies of adults with normal vision and central field loss. Main Outcome Measures Corrected reading rate, reading accuracy rate, type and number of reading errors, and completion time were recorded and evaluated. Results Cronbach α for the VSRT across all participants was .80, which indicated good internal consistency. A known-group comparison showed that persons with a visual field deficit read significantly slower than did normally sighted adults ( t580 =10.13; P <.0001). Persons with quadrantanopia read significantly faster than did persons with HH ( t36 =2.25; P =.03) or those with central field loss ( t48 =3.17; P =.0027). These findings confirmed that the VSRT correctly discriminated between groups in terms of reading performance. Conclusions Preliminary validation results indicate that the VSRT demonstrates adequate evidence of reliability and validity to evaluate reading performance in adults with HH or quadrantanopia.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26997345</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2016-09, Vol.97 (9), p.1515-1519 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1979057366 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Brain injuries Disability Evaluation Female Hemianopsia - rehabilitation Humans Male Middle Aged Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Physical Therapy Modalities - standards Reading Rehabilitation Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Time Factors Vision Tests Vision, low Visual Fields |
title | Validation of a Reading Assessment for Persons With Homonymous Hemianopia or Quadrantanopia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T06%3A34%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20a%20Reading%20Assessment%20for%20Persons%20With%20Homonymous%20Hemianopia%20or%20Quadrantanopia&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Blaylock,%20Sarah%20E.,%20MS,%20OTR/L&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1515&rft.epage=1519&rft.pages=1515-1519&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815367505%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1815367505&rft_id=info:pmid/26997345&rft_els_id=S0003999316001647&rfr_iscdi=true |