Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
BACKGROUND Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a mo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2018-08, Vol.98 (10), p.3627-3635 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3635 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3627 |
container_title | Journal of the science of food and agriculture |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Ocvirk, Miha Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar Košir, Iztok J |
description | BACKGROUND
Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment.
RESULTS
Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jsfa.8840 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978321410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2053444653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10T1PwzAQBmALgUQpDPwDSywwpD07aT7GqqJ8qBIDMFsX59KmSuJgJ6Bs_HRSwgRiseW7x6eTXsYuBcwEgJzvXY6zOA7giE0EJJEHIOCYTYae9BYikKfszLk9ACRJGE7Y58pUDdrCmZqbnDuqnbE9xzrjekdVobHk9I5lh20xkhK3ZHlKw4HWVMjTnm_RDfzwas3WYrMbJ_wtzyt0jruGdDuUqbX9OTvJsXR08XNP2ev69mV1722e7h5Wy42nfR_AozBMdSgSkUCEaSQhjeIcSOdBEslYa8jCVMaLICFfhzFmWmZZhiQhw9SPc-FP2fU4t7HmrSPXqqpwmsoSazKdUyKJYl-KQMBAr37RvelsPWynJCz8IAjChT-om1Fpa5yzlKvGFhXaXglQhyzUIQt1yGKw89F-FCX1_0P1-Lxefv_4AsCJjiY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2053444653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ocvirk, Miha ; Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar ; Košir, Iztok J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ocvirk, Miha ; Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar ; Košir, Iztok J</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment.
RESULTS
Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Alcohols ; Aroma ; Beer ; Breweries ; Brewing ; Chemical analysis ; Chromatography ; Discriminant analysis ; Essential oils ; Esters ; Fermentation ; Gas chromatography ; Headspace ; HS‐SPME ; Human factors ; Lager ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Organic chemistry ; Raw materials ; Scientific imaging ; Sensory evaluation ; Solid phase methods ; Spectroscopy ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Volatile compounds ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2018-08, Vol.98 (10), p.3627-3635</ispartof><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2018 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2829-1335</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjsfa.8840$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjsfa.8840$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ocvirk, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Košir, Iztok J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><description>BACKGROUND
Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment.
RESULTS
Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Aroma</subject><subject>Beer</subject><subject>Breweries</subject><subject>Brewing</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Essential oils</subject><subject>Esters</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Headspace</subject><subject>HS‐SPME</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Lager</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Solid phase methods</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10T1PwzAQBmALgUQpDPwDSywwpD07aT7GqqJ8qBIDMFsX59KmSuJgJ6Bs_HRSwgRiseW7x6eTXsYuBcwEgJzvXY6zOA7giE0EJJEHIOCYTYae9BYikKfszLk9ACRJGE7Y58pUDdrCmZqbnDuqnbE9xzrjekdVobHk9I5lh20xkhK3ZHlKw4HWVMjTnm_RDfzwas3WYrMbJ_wtzyt0jruGdDuUqbX9OTvJsXR08XNP2ev69mV1722e7h5Wy42nfR_AozBMdSgSkUCEaSQhjeIcSOdBEslYa8jCVMaLICFfhzFmWmZZhiQhw9SPc-FP2fU4t7HmrSPXqqpwmsoSazKdUyKJYl-KQMBAr37RvelsPWynJCz8IAjChT-om1Fpa5yzlKvGFhXaXglQhyzUIQt1yGKw89F-FCX1_0P1-Lxefv_4AsCJjiY</recordid><startdate>20180815</startdate><enddate>20180815</enddate><creator>Ocvirk, Miha</creator><creator>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</creator><creator>Košir, Iztok J</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-1335</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180815</creationdate><title>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</title><author>Ocvirk, Miha ; Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar ; Košir, Iztok J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Aroma</topic><topic>Beer</topic><topic>Breweries</topic><topic>Brewing</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Essential oils</topic><topic>Esters</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Headspace</topic><topic>HS‐SPME</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Lager</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Solid phase methods</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ocvirk, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Košir, Iztok J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ocvirk, Miha</au><au>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</au><au>Košir, Iztok J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><date>2018-08-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3627</spage><epage>3635</epage><pages>3627-3635</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment.
RESULTS
Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis.
CONCLUSION
The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jsfa.8840</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-1335</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-5142 |
ispartof | Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2018-08, Vol.98 (10), p.3627-3635 |
issn | 0022-5142 1097-0010 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978321410 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Alcohol Alcohols Aroma Beer Breweries Brewing Chemical analysis Chromatography Discriminant analysis Essential oils Esters Fermentation Gas chromatography Headspace HS‐SPME Human factors Lager Mass spectrometry Mass spectroscopy Organic chemistry Raw materials Scientific imaging Sensory evaluation Solid phase methods Spectroscopy Statistical analysis Statistical methods Volatile compounds Volatiles |
title | Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A53%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20sensory%20and%20chemical%20evaluation%20of%20lager%20beer%20aroma%20by%20gas%20chromatography%20and%20gas%20chromatography/mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Ocvirk,%20Miha&rft.date=2018-08-15&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3627&rft.epage=3635&rft.pages=3627-3635&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jsfa.8840&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2053444653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2053444653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |