Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry

BACKGROUND Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2018-08, Vol.98 (10), p.3627-3635
Hauptverfasser: Ocvirk, Miha, Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar, Košir, Iztok J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3635
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3627
container_title Journal of the science of food and agriculture
container_volume 98
creator Ocvirk, Miha
Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar
Košir, Iztok J
description BACKGROUND Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment. RESULTS Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis. CONCLUSION The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jsfa.8840
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978321410</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2053444653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10T1PwzAQBmALgUQpDPwDSywwpD07aT7GqqJ8qBIDMFsX59KmSuJgJ6Bs_HRSwgRiseW7x6eTXsYuBcwEgJzvXY6zOA7giE0EJJEHIOCYTYae9BYikKfszLk9ACRJGE7Y58pUDdrCmZqbnDuqnbE9xzrjekdVobHk9I5lh20xkhK3ZHlKw4HWVMjTnm_RDfzwas3WYrMbJ_wtzyt0jruGdDuUqbX9OTvJsXR08XNP2ev69mV1722e7h5Wy42nfR_AozBMdSgSkUCEaSQhjeIcSOdBEslYa8jCVMaLICFfhzFmWmZZhiQhw9SPc-FP2fU4t7HmrSPXqqpwmsoSazKdUyKJYl-KQMBAr37RvelsPWynJCz8IAjChT-om1Fpa5yzlKvGFhXaXglQhyzUIQt1yGKw89F-FCX1_0P1-Lxefv_4AsCJjiY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2053444653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ocvirk, Miha ; Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar ; Košir, Iztok J</creator><creatorcontrib>Ocvirk, Miha ; Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar ; Košir, Iztok J</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment. RESULTS Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis. CONCLUSION The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8840</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Alcohol ; Alcohols ; Aroma ; Beer ; Breweries ; Brewing ; Chemical analysis ; Chromatography ; Discriminant analysis ; Essential oils ; Esters ; Fermentation ; Gas chromatography ; Headspace ; HS‐SPME ; Human factors ; Lager ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Organic chemistry ; Raw materials ; Scientific imaging ; Sensory evaluation ; Solid phase methods ; Spectroscopy ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Volatile compounds ; Volatiles</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2018-08, Vol.98 (10), p.3627-3635</ispartof><rights>2017 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2018 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2829-1335</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjsfa.8840$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjsfa.8840$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ocvirk, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Košir, Iztok J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><description>BACKGROUND Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment. RESULTS Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis. CONCLUSION The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry</description><subject>Alcohol</subject><subject>Alcohols</subject><subject>Aroma</subject><subject>Beer</subject><subject>Breweries</subject><subject>Brewing</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Essential oils</subject><subject>Esters</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Headspace</subject><subject>HS‐SPME</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Lager</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Solid phase methods</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatiles</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10T1PwzAQBmALgUQpDPwDSywwpD07aT7GqqJ8qBIDMFsX59KmSuJgJ6Bs_HRSwgRiseW7x6eTXsYuBcwEgJzvXY6zOA7giE0EJJEHIOCYTYae9BYikKfszLk9ACRJGE7Y58pUDdrCmZqbnDuqnbE9xzrjekdVobHk9I5lh20xkhK3ZHlKw4HWVMjTnm_RDfzwas3WYrMbJ_wtzyt0jruGdDuUqbX9OTvJsXR08XNP2ev69mV1722e7h5Wy42nfR_AozBMdSgSkUCEaSQhjeIcSOdBEslYa8jCVMaLICFfhzFmWmZZhiQhw9SPc-FP2fU4t7HmrSPXqqpwmsoSazKdUyKJYl-KQMBAr37RvelsPWynJCz8IAjChT-om1Fpa5yzlKvGFhXaXglQhyzUIQt1yGKw89F-FCX1_0P1-Lxefv_4AsCJjiY</recordid><startdate>20180815</startdate><enddate>20180815</enddate><creator>Ocvirk, Miha</creator><creator>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</creator><creator>Košir, Iztok J</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-1335</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180815</creationdate><title>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</title><author>Ocvirk, Miha ; Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar ; Košir, Iztok J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3300-e66bc6191907ab720b78f0ecf49728cc0d6b28549e3c68adc2dddae20dab38f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Alcohol</topic><topic>Alcohols</topic><topic>Aroma</topic><topic>Beer</topic><topic>Breweries</topic><topic>Brewing</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Essential oils</topic><topic>Esters</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Headspace</topic><topic>HS‐SPME</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Lager</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Solid phase methods</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatiles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ocvirk, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Košir, Iztok J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ocvirk, Miha</au><au>Mlinarič, Nataša Kočar</au><au>Košir, Iztok J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><date>2018-08-15</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3627</spage><epage>3635</epage><pages>3627-3635</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND Although the evaluation of beer is conducted by sensory experts, we cannot neglect the influence of human factors and subjectivity. This problem could be solved by the chemical analysis of the volatile part of beer aroma and, from this, we can build a database for the construction of a model that classifies samples in a comparable manner to sensory assessment. RESULTS Twenty‐two batches of the same beer brand were assessed by sensory evaluation and described chemically in terms of the contents of alcohols and esters (n = 9), hop essential oil compounds (n = 15) using gas chromatography (GC) and other aroma volatiles (n = 33) as analysed by head space solid‐phase microextraction (SPME)‐GC/mass spectrometry. The best match of 91% with respect to sample classification on the basis of chemical analyses to sensory scores was achieved with a dataset of results from headspace‐SPME and analyses of higher alcohols and esters by regularized discriminant analysis. CONCLUSION The results of the present study show that deviations in beer aroma are not a consequence of a permanent repeatable error in brewing process, nor are they influenced by raw materials, but, instead, they are a consequence of alcoholic fermentation. Sensory analysis could be replaced with chemical/statistical analysis on an appropriate data set and for a distinct beer brand. The good results achieved confirm our approach; however, for different beer brands or types, this method should be optimised. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/jsfa.8840</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2829-1335</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-5142
ispartof Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2018-08, Vol.98 (10), p.3627-3635
issn 0022-5142
1097-0010
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978321410
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Alcohol
Alcohols
Aroma
Beer
Breweries
Brewing
Chemical analysis
Chromatography
Discriminant analysis
Essential oils
Esters
Fermentation
Gas chromatography
Headspace
HS‐SPME
Human factors
Lager
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy
Organic chemistry
Raw materials
Scientific imaging
Sensory evaluation
Solid phase methods
Spectroscopy
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
Volatile compounds
Volatiles
title Comparison of sensory and chemical evaluation of lager beer aroma by gas chromatography and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T14%3A53%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20sensory%20and%20chemical%20evaluation%20of%20lager%20beer%20aroma%20by%20gas%20chromatography%20and%20gas%20chromatography/mass%20spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Ocvirk,%20Miha&rft.date=2018-08-15&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3627&rft.epage=3635&rft.pages=3627-3635&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jsfa.8840&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2053444653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2053444653&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true