Treatment of produced water originated from oil and gas production wells: a pilot study and cost analysis
Produced water originated from oil and gas production wells was treated by a pilot-scale system including pre-treatment (chemical precipitation), pre-filtration, and post-filtration units. Pre-filtration unit consisted of sand filter, granulated activated carbon (GAC) filter, and ultrafiltration (UF...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2018-03, Vol.25 (7), p.6398-6406 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 6406 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 6398 |
container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Ersahin, Mustafa Evren Ozgun, Hale Kaya, Recep Kose Mutlu, Borte Kinaci, Cumali Koyuncu, Ismail |
description | Produced water originated from oil and gas production wells was treated by a pilot-scale system including pre-treatment (chemical precipitation), pre-filtration, and post-filtration units. Pre-filtration unit consisted of sand filter, granulated activated carbon (GAC) filter, and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. Post-filtration unit included reverse osmosis (RO) membrane unit. In this study, two different RO membranes including sea water (SW) and brackish water (BW) membranes were comparatively evaluated in terms of treatment and filtration performance. Besides, a cost analysis was conducted for a real scale RO membrane unit by using the data obtained from the pilot plant study. Average fluxes of 12.7 and 9.4 L/m
2
h were obtained by SW and BW membrane units, respectively. Higher COD and conductivity removal efficiencies were obtained by SW membrane in comparison to BW membrane. Total cost of 0.88 €/m
3
was estimated for a RO plant treating produced water with a flowrate capacity of 300 m
3
/d. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-017-0961-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978320917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1977617365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1dff77cceb9921dea1e80d1ebb05915f309c4539b14967761234578db9f694bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1KJDEURsPgoK3jA8xGAm7clJNblar0dSeNo4LgpmcdUpWkiVRV2iSF9Nub_nEQwVUu5OTk436E_AZ2DYyJPxGgqpuCgSgYNlCIH2QGDfBCcMQjMmPIeQEV5yfkNMYXxkqGpTgmJyWWHFkpZsQtg1FpMGOi3tJ18HrqjKZvKplAfXArN-ZRUxv8QL3rqRo1Xal4QJPzI30zfR9vqKJr1_tEY5r0Zsd1PqY8qH4TXfxFflrVR3N-OM_Iv793y8VD8fR8_7i4fSo6zjAVoK0VoutMi1iCNgrMnGkwbctqhNpWDDteV9gCx0aIBsqK12KuW7QN8tZWZ-Rq780JXycTkxxc7HJENRo_RQko5lVeBIiMXn5BX_wUct4dld2iaupMwZ7qgo8xGCvXwQ0qbCQwue1B7nuQuQe57UFuzRcH89QORv9_8bH4DJR7IOarcWXCp6-_tb4DXxKTBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1977617365</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Treatment of produced water originated from oil and gas production wells: a pilot study and cost analysis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ; Ozgun, Hale ; Kaya, Recep ; Kose Mutlu, Borte ; Kinaci, Cumali ; Koyuncu, Ismail</creator><creatorcontrib>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ; Ozgun, Hale ; Kaya, Recep ; Kose Mutlu, Borte ; Kinaci, Cumali ; Koyuncu, Ismail</creatorcontrib><description>Produced water originated from oil and gas production wells was treated by a pilot-scale system including pre-treatment (chemical precipitation), pre-filtration, and post-filtration units. Pre-filtration unit consisted of sand filter, granulated activated carbon (GAC) filter, and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. Post-filtration unit included reverse osmosis (RO) membrane unit. In this study, two different RO membranes including sea water (SW) and brackish water (BW) membranes were comparatively evaluated in terms of treatment and filtration performance. Besides, a cost analysis was conducted for a real scale RO membrane unit by using the data obtained from the pilot plant study. Average fluxes of 12.7 and 9.4 L/m
2
h were obtained by SW and BW membrane units, respectively. Higher COD and conductivity removal efficiencies were obtained by SW membrane in comparison to BW membrane. Total cost of 0.88 €/m
3
was estimated for a RO plant treating produced water with a flowrate capacity of 300 m
3
/d.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0961-7</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29249027</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Activated carbon ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Brackish water ; Chemical analysis ; Chemical precipitation ; Cost analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Filtration ; Flow rates ; Fluxes ; Gas production ; Granulation ; Membranes ; Natural gas ; Oil and gas production ; Pretreatment ; Research Article ; Reverse osmosis ; Sand filters ; Seawater ; Ultrafiltration ; Waste Water Technology ; Water analysis ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water purification</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018-03, Vol.25 (7), p.6398-6406</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Environmental Science and Pollution Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1dff77cceb9921dea1e80d1ebb05915f309c4539b14967761234578db9f694bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1dff77cceb9921dea1e80d1ebb05915f309c4539b14967761234578db9f694bf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1607-0524</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-017-0961-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-017-0961-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29249027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgun, Hale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Recep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kose Mutlu, Borte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinaci, Cumali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyuncu, Ismail</creatorcontrib><title>Treatment of produced water originated from oil and gas production wells: a pilot study and cost analysis</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Produced water originated from oil and gas production wells was treated by a pilot-scale system including pre-treatment (chemical precipitation), pre-filtration, and post-filtration units. Pre-filtration unit consisted of sand filter, granulated activated carbon (GAC) filter, and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. Post-filtration unit included reverse osmosis (RO) membrane unit. In this study, two different RO membranes including sea water (SW) and brackish water (BW) membranes were comparatively evaluated in terms of treatment and filtration performance. Besides, a cost analysis was conducted for a real scale RO membrane unit by using the data obtained from the pilot plant study. Average fluxes of 12.7 and 9.4 L/m
2
h were obtained by SW and BW membrane units, respectively. Higher COD and conductivity removal efficiencies were obtained by SW membrane in comparison to BW membrane. Total cost of 0.88 €/m
3
was estimated for a RO plant treating produced water with a flowrate capacity of 300 m
3
/d.</description><subject>Activated carbon</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Brackish water</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chemical precipitation</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Granulation</subject><subject>Membranes</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Reverse osmosis</subject><subject>Sand filters</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Ultrafiltration</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water purification</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1KJDEURsPgoK3jA8xGAm7clJNblar0dSeNo4LgpmcdUpWkiVRV2iSF9Nub_nEQwVUu5OTk436E_AZ2DYyJPxGgqpuCgSgYNlCIH2QGDfBCcMQjMmPIeQEV5yfkNMYXxkqGpTgmJyWWHFkpZsQtg1FpMGOi3tJ18HrqjKZvKplAfXArN-ZRUxv8QL3rqRo1Xal4QJPzI30zfR9vqKJr1_tEY5r0Zsd1PqY8qH4TXfxFflrVR3N-OM_Iv793y8VD8fR8_7i4fSo6zjAVoK0VoutMi1iCNgrMnGkwbctqhNpWDDteV9gCx0aIBsqK12KuW7QN8tZWZ-Rq780JXycTkxxc7HJENRo_RQko5lVeBIiMXn5BX_wUct4dld2iaupMwZ7qgo8xGCvXwQ0qbCQwue1B7nuQuQe57UFuzRcH89QORv9_8bH4DJR7IOarcWXCp6-_tb4DXxKTBQ</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</creator><creator>Ozgun, Hale</creator><creator>Kaya, Recep</creator><creator>Kose Mutlu, Borte</creator><creator>Kinaci, Cumali</creator><creator>Koyuncu, Ismail</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-0524</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Treatment of produced water originated from oil and gas production wells: a pilot study and cost analysis</title><author>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren ; Ozgun, Hale ; Kaya, Recep ; Kose Mutlu, Borte ; Kinaci, Cumali ; Koyuncu, Ismail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-1dff77cceb9921dea1e80d1ebb05915f309c4539b14967761234578db9f694bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Activated carbon</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Brackish water</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chemical precipitation</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Granulation</topic><topic>Membranes</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Reverse osmosis</topic><topic>Sand filters</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Ultrafiltration</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozgun, Hale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaya, Recep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kose Mutlu, Borte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinaci, Cumali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koyuncu, Ismail</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ersahin, Mustafa Evren</au><au>Ozgun, Hale</au><au>Kaya, Recep</au><au>Kose Mutlu, Borte</au><au>Kinaci, Cumali</au><au>Koyuncu, Ismail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Treatment of produced water originated from oil and gas production wells: a pilot study and cost analysis</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>6398</spage><epage>6406</epage><pages>6398-6406</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Produced water originated from oil and gas production wells was treated by a pilot-scale system including pre-treatment (chemical precipitation), pre-filtration, and post-filtration units. Pre-filtration unit consisted of sand filter, granulated activated carbon (GAC) filter, and ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. Post-filtration unit included reverse osmosis (RO) membrane unit. In this study, two different RO membranes including sea water (SW) and brackish water (BW) membranes were comparatively evaluated in terms of treatment and filtration performance. Besides, a cost analysis was conducted for a real scale RO membrane unit by using the data obtained from the pilot plant study. Average fluxes of 12.7 and 9.4 L/m
2
h were obtained by SW and BW membrane units, respectively. Higher COD and conductivity removal efficiencies were obtained by SW membrane in comparison to BW membrane. Total cost of 0.88 €/m
3
was estimated for a RO plant treating produced water with a flowrate capacity of 300 m
3
/d.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29249027</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-017-0961-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1607-0524</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018-03, Vol.25 (7), p.6398-6406 |
issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1978320917 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Activated carbon Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Brackish water Chemical analysis Chemical precipitation Cost analysis Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Filtration Flow rates Fluxes Gas production Granulation Membranes Natural gas Oil and gas production Pretreatment Research Article Reverse osmosis Sand filters Seawater Ultrafiltration Waste Water Technology Water analysis Water Management Water Pollution Control Water purification |
title | Treatment of produced water originated from oil and gas production wells: a pilot study and cost analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Treatment%20of%20produced%20water%20originated%20from%20oil%20and%20gas%20production%20wells:%20a%20pilot%20study%20and%20cost%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Ersahin,%20Mustafa%20Evren&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=6398&rft.epage=6406&rft.pages=6398-6406&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-017-0961-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1977617365%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1977617365&rft_id=info:pmid/29249027&rfr_iscdi=true |