Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?

Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal cognition 2018-03, Vol.21 (2), p.207-217
Hauptverfasser: Iwasaki, Sumie, Watanabe, Sota, Fujita, Kazuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 217
container_issue 2
container_start_page 207
container_title Animal cognition
container_volume 21
creator Iwasaki, Sumie
Watanabe, Sota
Fujita, Kazuo
description Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1976000393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1976000393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGwm40UU1adqkdSMy-AJBF7oObXI7E22TMWkdxl9vyqiI4CYJ3O_enHsOQgeUnFJCxFkYT5oQKhJKc5Z8rKFtmrE8KbOcr_-8s2IL7YTwQggpspJuoq20TBnJRbaNpo9mCs4GfDxx7dDVFW7Nu6lO8Kt1C7yYgcX9DJZ4YdoWWwCNZ8b24RzPvQtzUL15B9xBXyk3taY3zuLGeeyhAQ9WjbXO-eXFHtpoqjbA_te9i56vr54mt8n9w83d5PI-UUykfVITqnnGOWRUNZooyEtGiobnjLNK5KJhQuta0RKqoqizlOlGC8E08IKBSgu2i45Xc6O-twFCLzsTFLRtZcENQdJS8OgDK1lEj_6gL27wNqobqTyqIIJHiq4oFRcOcS8596ar_FJSIkf_5SoFGVOQYwryI_Ycfk0e6g70T8e37RFIV0CIJTsF_-vrf6d-Amf3kx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975466076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Iwasaki, Sumie ; Watanabe, Sota ; Fujita, Kazuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumie ; Watanabe, Sota ; Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><description>Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29230574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal cognition ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Cognitive ability ; Familiarity ; Learning ; Life Sciences ; Lists ; Matching-to-sample ; Memory ; Mental task performance ; Metacognition ; Original Paper ; Pigeons ; Psychology Research ; Short term memory ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2018-03, Vol.21 (2), p.207-217</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Animal Cognition is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6083-5902</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Sota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><title>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task.</description><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lists</subject><subject>Matching-to-sample</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pigeons</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGwm40UU1adqkdSMy-AJBF7oObXI7E22TMWkdxl9vyqiI4CYJ3O_enHsOQgeUnFJCxFkYT5oQKhJKc5Z8rKFtmrE8KbOcr_-8s2IL7YTwQggpspJuoq20TBnJRbaNpo9mCs4GfDxx7dDVFW7Nu6lO8Kt1C7yYgcX9DJZ4YdoWWwCNZ8b24RzPvQtzUL15B9xBXyk3taY3zuLGeeyhAQ9WjbXO-eXFHtpoqjbA_te9i56vr54mt8n9w83d5PI-UUykfVITqnnGOWRUNZooyEtGiobnjLNK5KJhQuta0RKqoqizlOlGC8E08IKBSgu2i45Xc6O-twFCLzsTFLRtZcENQdJS8OgDK1lEj_6gL27wNqobqTyqIIJHiq4oFRcOcS8596ar_FJSIkf_5SoFGVOQYwryI_Ycfk0e6g70T8e37RFIV0CIJTsF_-vrf6d-Amf3kx8</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Iwasaki, Sumie</creator><creator>Watanabe, Sota</creator><creator>Fujita, Kazuo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-5902</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</title><author>Iwasaki, Sumie ; Watanabe, Sota ; Fujita, Kazuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lists</topic><topic>Matching-to-sample</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pigeons</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Sota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iwasaki, Sumie</au><au>Watanabe, Sota</au><au>Fujita, Kazuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>207-217</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29230574</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-5902</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1435-9448
ispartof Animal cognition, 2018-03, Vol.21 (2), p.207-217
issn 1435-9448
1435-9456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1976000393
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Animal cognition
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds
Cognitive ability
Familiarity
Learning
Life Sciences
Lists
Matching-to-sample
Memory
Mental task performance
Metacognition
Original Paper
Pigeons
Psychology Research
Short term memory
Zoology
title Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T14%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pigeons%20(Columba%20livia)%20know%20when%20they%20will%20need%20hints:%20prospective%20metacognition%20for%20reference%20memory?&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Iwasaki,%20Sumie&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=207-217&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1976000393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975466076&rft_id=info:pmid/29230574&rfr_iscdi=true