Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?
Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Animal cognition 2018-03, Vol.21 (2), p.207-217 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 217 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Animal cognition |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Iwasaki, Sumie Watanabe, Sota Fujita, Kazuo |
description | Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1976000393</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1976000393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGwm40UU1adqkdSMy-AJBF7oObXI7E22TMWkdxl9vyqiI4CYJ3O_enHsOQgeUnFJCxFkYT5oQKhJKc5Z8rKFtmrE8KbOcr_-8s2IL7YTwQggpspJuoq20TBnJRbaNpo9mCs4GfDxx7dDVFW7Nu6lO8Kt1C7yYgcX9DJZ4YdoWWwCNZ8b24RzPvQtzUL15B9xBXyk3taY3zuLGeeyhAQ9WjbXO-eXFHtpoqjbA_te9i56vr54mt8n9w83d5PI-UUykfVITqnnGOWRUNZooyEtGiobnjLNK5KJhQuta0RKqoqizlOlGC8E08IKBSgu2i45Xc6O-twFCLzsTFLRtZcENQdJS8OgDK1lEj_6gL27wNqobqTyqIIJHiq4oFRcOcS8596ar_FJSIkf_5SoFGVOQYwryI_Ycfk0e6g70T8e37RFIV0CIJTsF_-vrf6d-Amf3kx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975466076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Iwasaki, Sumie ; Watanabe, Sota ; Fujita, Kazuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumie ; Watanabe, Sota ; Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><description>Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-9448</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-9456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29230574</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Animal cognition ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Birds ; Cognitive ability ; Familiarity ; Learning ; Life Sciences ; Lists ; Matching-to-sample ; Memory ; Mental task performance ; Metacognition ; Original Paper ; Pigeons ; Psychology Research ; Short term memory ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Animal cognition, 2018-03, Vol.21 (2), p.207-217</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>Animal Cognition is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6083-5902</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29230574$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Sota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><title>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</title><title>Animal cognition</title><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><description>Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task.</description><subject>Animal cognition</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lists</subject><subject>Matching-to-sample</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pigeons</subject><subject>Psychology Research</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1435-9448</issn><issn>1435-9456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLxDAUhYMovn-AGwm40UU1adqkdSMy-AJBF7oObXI7E22TMWkdxl9vyqiI4CYJ3O_enHsOQgeUnFJCxFkYT5oQKhJKc5Z8rKFtmrE8KbOcr_-8s2IL7YTwQggpspJuoq20TBnJRbaNpo9mCs4GfDxx7dDVFW7Nu6lO8Kt1C7yYgcX9DJZ4YdoWWwCNZ8b24RzPvQtzUL15B9xBXyk3taY3zuLGeeyhAQ9WjbXO-eXFHtpoqjbA_te9i56vr54mt8n9w83d5PI-UUykfVITqnnGOWRUNZooyEtGiobnjLNK5KJhQuta0RKqoqizlOlGC8E08IKBSgu2i45Xc6O-twFCLzsTFLRtZcENQdJS8OgDK1lEj_6gL27wNqobqTyqIIJHiq4oFRcOcS8596ar_FJSIkf_5SoFGVOQYwryI_Ycfk0e6g70T8e37RFIV0CIJTsF_-vrf6d-Amf3kx8</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Iwasaki, Sumie</creator><creator>Watanabe, Sota</creator><creator>Fujita, Kazuo</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-5902</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</title><author>Iwasaki, Sumie ; Watanabe, Sota ; Fujita, Kazuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-b01d6466e41cfd0ce59308f65363a757f37ddbc19ea88b423dfd773de683ec283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Animal cognition</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lists</topic><topic>Matching-to-sample</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pigeons</topic><topic>Psychology Research</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iwasaki, Sumie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Sota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujita, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iwasaki, Sumie</au><au>Watanabe, Sota</au><au>Fujita, Kazuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory?</atitle><jtitle>Animal cognition</jtitle><stitle>Anim Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Anim Cogn</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>217</epage><pages>207-217</pages><issn>1435-9448</issn><eissn>1435-9456</eissn><abstract>Despite their impressive cognitive abilities, avian species have shown less evidence for metacognition than mammals. We suspect that commonly used tasks such as matching to sample might be too demanding to allow metacognitive processing within birds’ working memory. Here, we examined whether pigeons could control their behavior as a function of knowledge levels on a three-item sequence learning task, a reference memory task supposedly requiring fewer working memory resources. The experiment used two types of lists differing in familiarity. One was familiar to the pigeons through repeated exposure, whereas the other was novel in every new session. In test sessions, pigeons could choose between a trial with a hint specifying the next item to peck and one with no hint. However, successful responses in trials with a hint resulted in lowered rates of primary reinforcement: .60 in the first test and .75 in the second. Results showed that two of four pigeons chose the trial with a hint significantly more often before receiving a novel list than the familiar list in the four sessions of the first test, and three did so in the second test. Impressively, one bird showed robust evidence in the very first sessions in both tests. These results suggest that pigeons may monitor their long-term knowledge states and thereby control their environment before starting to solve a task.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29230574</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6083-5902</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-9448 |
ispartof | Animal cognition, 2018-03, Vol.21 (2), p.207-217 |
issn | 1435-9448 1435-9456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1976000393 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal cognition Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Birds Cognitive ability Familiarity Learning Life Sciences Lists Matching-to-sample Memory Mental task performance Metacognition Original Paper Pigeons Psychology Research Short term memory Zoology |
title | Pigeons (Columba livia) know when they will need hints: prospective metacognition for reference memory? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T14%3A09%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pigeons%20(Columba%20livia)%20know%20when%20they%20will%20need%20hints:%20prospective%20metacognition%20for%20reference%20memory?&rft.jtitle=Animal%20cognition&rft.au=Iwasaki,%20Sumie&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=217&rft.pages=207-217&rft.issn=1435-9448&rft.eissn=1435-9456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10071-017-1153-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1976000393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975466076&rft_id=info:pmid/29230574&rfr_iscdi=true |