Contribution of the two dsRBM motifs to the double‐stranded RNA binding and protein interactions of PACT
PACT is a stress‐modulated activator of protein kinase PKR (protein kinase, RNA activated), which is involved in antiviral innate immune responses and stress‐induced apoptosis. Stress‐induced phosphorylation of PACT is essential for PACT's increased association with PKR leading to PKR activatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cellular biochemistry 2018-04, Vol.119 (4), p.3598-3607 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3607 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 3598 |
container_title | Journal of cellular biochemistry |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Chukwurah, Evelyn Willingham, Victoria Singh, Madhurima Castillo‐Azofeifa, David Patel, Rekha C. |
description | PACT is a stress‐modulated activator of protein kinase PKR (protein kinase, RNA activated), which is involved in antiviral innate immune responses and stress‐induced apoptosis. Stress‐induced phosphorylation of PACT is essential for PACT's increased association with PKR leading to PKR activation, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor eIF2α, inhibition of protein synthesis, and apoptosis. PACT‐induced PKR activation is negatively regulated by TRBP (transactivation response element RNA‐binding protein), which dissociates from PACT after PACT phosphorylation in response to stress signals. The conserved double‐stranded RNA binding motifs (dsRBMs) in PKR, PACT, and TRBP mediate protein‐protein interactions, and the stress‐dependent phosphorylation of PACT changes the relative strengths of PKR‐PACT, PACT‐TRBP, and PACT‐PACT interactions to bring about a timely and transient PKR activation. This regulates the general kinetics as well as level of eIF2α phosphorylation, thereby influencing the cellular response to stress either as recovery and survival or elimination by apoptosis. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of specific mutations within PACT's two evolutionarily conserved dsRBMs on dsRNA‐binding, and protein‐protein interactions between PKR, PACT, and TRBP. Our data show that the two motifs contribute to varying extents in dsRNA binding, and protein interactions. These findings indicate that although the dsRBM motifs have high sequence conservation, their functional contribution in the context of the whole proteins needs to be determined by mutational analysis. Furthermore, using a PACT mutant that is deficient in PACT‐PACT interaction but competent for PACT‐PKR interaction, we demonstrate that PACT‐PACT interaction is essential for efficient PKR activation.
The article focuses on characterizing the contribution of specific amino acids within the conserved dsRBM domains of PACT toward its dsRNA‐binding and protein interaction activities. Furthermore, it outlines the importance of PACT‐PACT interactions in PKR activation by demonstrating that the stress‐induced phosphorylation is not sufficient for PKR activation for a PACT mutant that lacks PACT‐PACT interaction ability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jcb.26561 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975999306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1975999306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-284680bccbb741b25284ad8787b86e4cfaf3665c08e9471b40bdc20947e80b5d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURq2Kqgy0C14AWWIDi8C14zjJciZqoRW0FaJrK_4J9Shjg-0IseMReEaeBA8DXVRiZevTuUdX90Noj8AxAaAnSyWPKa84-YBmBNq6YJyxLTSDuoSCloRuo50YlwDQtiX9hLZpu055PUPLzrsUrJyS9Q77Aae_Bqc7j3W8XFzglU92iDj5l1z7SY7m6eExptA7bTS-_DnH0jpt3TXOCb4JPhnrsHXJhF6tpXFt_T3vrj6jj0M_RvPl9d1Ff759verOivNfp9-7-XmhyqokBW0Yb0AqJWXNiKRVDnrd1E0tG26YGvqh5LxS0JiW1UQykFpRyH-Txypd7qLDjTcvczuZmMTKRmXGsXfGT1GQtq7afAjgGT34D136Kbi8naAADRDG2ypTRxtKBR9jMIO4CXbVh3tBQKwLELkA8VJAZvdfjZNcGf2PfLt4Bk42wJ0dzf37JvGjW2yUz8fwjsM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2008014695</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contribution of the two dsRBM motifs to the double‐stranded RNA binding and protein interactions of PACT</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chukwurah, Evelyn ; Willingham, Victoria ; Singh, Madhurima ; Castillo‐Azofeifa, David ; Patel, Rekha C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chukwurah, Evelyn ; Willingham, Victoria ; Singh, Madhurima ; Castillo‐Azofeifa, David ; Patel, Rekha C.</creatorcontrib><description>PACT is a stress‐modulated activator of protein kinase PKR (protein kinase, RNA activated), which is involved in antiviral innate immune responses and stress‐induced apoptosis. Stress‐induced phosphorylation of PACT is essential for PACT's increased association with PKR leading to PKR activation, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor eIF2α, inhibition of protein synthesis, and apoptosis. PACT‐induced PKR activation is negatively regulated by TRBP (transactivation response element RNA‐binding protein), which dissociates from PACT after PACT phosphorylation in response to stress signals. The conserved double‐stranded RNA binding motifs (dsRBMs) in PKR, PACT, and TRBP mediate protein‐protein interactions, and the stress‐dependent phosphorylation of PACT changes the relative strengths of PKR‐PACT, PACT‐TRBP, and PACT‐PACT interactions to bring about a timely and transient PKR activation. This regulates the general kinetics as well as level of eIF2α phosphorylation, thereby influencing the cellular response to stress either as recovery and survival or elimination by apoptosis. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of specific mutations within PACT's two evolutionarily conserved dsRBMs on dsRNA‐binding, and protein‐protein interactions between PKR, PACT, and TRBP. Our data show that the two motifs contribute to varying extents in dsRNA binding, and protein interactions. These findings indicate that although the dsRBM motifs have high sequence conservation, their functional contribution in the context of the whole proteins needs to be determined by mutational analysis. Furthermore, using a PACT mutant that is deficient in PACT‐PACT interaction but competent for PACT‐PKR interaction, we demonstrate that PACT‐PACT interaction is essential for efficient PKR activation.
The article focuses on characterizing the contribution of specific amino acids within the conserved dsRBM domains of PACT toward its dsRNA‐binding and protein interaction activities. Furthermore, it outlines the importance of PACT‐PACT interactions in PKR activation by demonstrating that the stress‐induced phosphorylation is not sufficient for PKR activation for a PACT mutant that lacks PACT‐PACT interaction ability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-2312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcb.26561</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29231267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Activation ; Apoptosis ; Conserved sequence ; Double-stranded RNA ; dsRBM ; eIF-2 kinase ; Immune response ; Initiation factor eIF-2α ; Innate immunity ; Kinases ; Kinetics ; Mutation ; Next-generation sequencing ; PACT ; Phosphorylation ; PKR ; Protein biosynthesis ; Protein interaction ; Protein kinase ; Protein synthesis ; Proteins ; Ribonucleic acid ; RNA ; Stresses ; TRBP</subject><ispartof>Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2018-04, Vol.119 (4), p.3598-3607</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-284680bccbb741b25284ad8787b86e4cfaf3665c08e9471b40bdc20947e80b5d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-284680bccbb741b25284ad8787b86e4cfaf3665c08e9471b40bdc20947e80b5d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9434-4880</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcb.26561$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcb.26561$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29231267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chukwurah, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willingham, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Madhurima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo‐Azofeifa, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Rekha C.</creatorcontrib><title>Contribution of the two dsRBM motifs to the double‐stranded RNA binding and protein interactions of PACT</title><title>Journal of cellular biochemistry</title><addtitle>J Cell Biochem</addtitle><description>PACT is a stress‐modulated activator of protein kinase PKR (protein kinase, RNA activated), which is involved in antiviral innate immune responses and stress‐induced apoptosis. Stress‐induced phosphorylation of PACT is essential for PACT's increased association with PKR leading to PKR activation, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor eIF2α, inhibition of protein synthesis, and apoptosis. PACT‐induced PKR activation is negatively regulated by TRBP (transactivation response element RNA‐binding protein), which dissociates from PACT after PACT phosphorylation in response to stress signals. The conserved double‐stranded RNA binding motifs (dsRBMs) in PKR, PACT, and TRBP mediate protein‐protein interactions, and the stress‐dependent phosphorylation of PACT changes the relative strengths of PKR‐PACT, PACT‐TRBP, and PACT‐PACT interactions to bring about a timely and transient PKR activation. This regulates the general kinetics as well as level of eIF2α phosphorylation, thereby influencing the cellular response to stress either as recovery and survival or elimination by apoptosis. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of specific mutations within PACT's two evolutionarily conserved dsRBMs on dsRNA‐binding, and protein‐protein interactions between PKR, PACT, and TRBP. Our data show that the two motifs contribute to varying extents in dsRNA binding, and protein interactions. These findings indicate that although the dsRBM motifs have high sequence conservation, their functional contribution in the context of the whole proteins needs to be determined by mutational analysis. Furthermore, using a PACT mutant that is deficient in PACT‐PACT interaction but competent for PACT‐PKR interaction, we demonstrate that PACT‐PACT interaction is essential for efficient PKR activation.
The article focuses on characterizing the contribution of specific amino acids within the conserved dsRBM domains of PACT toward its dsRNA‐binding and protein interaction activities. Furthermore, it outlines the importance of PACT‐PACT interactions in PKR activation by demonstrating that the stress‐induced phosphorylation is not sufficient for PKR activation for a PACT mutant that lacks PACT‐PACT interaction ability.</description><subject>Activation</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Conserved sequence</subject><subject>Double-stranded RNA</subject><subject>dsRBM</subject><subject>eIF-2 kinase</subject><subject>Immune response</subject><subject>Initiation factor eIF-2α</subject><subject>Innate immunity</subject><subject>Kinases</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Mutation</subject><subject>Next-generation sequencing</subject><subject>PACT</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>PKR</subject><subject>Protein biosynthesis</subject><subject>Protein interaction</subject><subject>Protein kinase</subject><subject>Protein synthesis</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Ribonucleic acid</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><subject>TRBP</subject><issn>0730-2312</issn><issn>1097-4644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc1O3DAURq2Kqgy0C14AWWIDi8C14zjJciZqoRW0FaJrK_4J9Shjg-0IseMReEaeBA8DXVRiZevTuUdX90Noj8AxAaAnSyWPKa84-YBmBNq6YJyxLTSDuoSCloRuo50YlwDQtiX9hLZpu055PUPLzrsUrJyS9Q77Aae_Bqc7j3W8XFzglU92iDj5l1z7SY7m6eExptA7bTS-_DnH0jpt3TXOCb4JPhnrsHXJhF6tpXFt_T3vrj6jj0M_RvPl9d1Ff759verOivNfp9-7-XmhyqokBW0Yb0AqJWXNiKRVDnrd1E0tG26YGvqh5LxS0JiW1UQykFpRyH-Txypd7qLDjTcvczuZmMTKRmXGsXfGT1GQtq7afAjgGT34D136Kbi8naAADRDG2ypTRxtKBR9jMIO4CXbVh3tBQKwLELkA8VJAZvdfjZNcGf2PfLt4Bk42wJ0dzf37JvGjW2yUz8fwjsM</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Chukwurah, Evelyn</creator><creator>Willingham, Victoria</creator><creator>Singh, Madhurima</creator><creator>Castillo‐Azofeifa, David</creator><creator>Patel, Rekha C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-4880</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Contribution of the two dsRBM motifs to the double‐stranded RNA binding and protein interactions of PACT</title><author>Chukwurah, Evelyn ; Willingham, Victoria ; Singh, Madhurima ; Castillo‐Azofeifa, David ; Patel, Rekha C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-284680bccbb741b25284ad8787b86e4cfaf3665c08e9471b40bdc20947e80b5d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Activation</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Conserved sequence</topic><topic>Double-stranded RNA</topic><topic>dsRBM</topic><topic>eIF-2 kinase</topic><topic>Immune response</topic><topic>Initiation factor eIF-2α</topic><topic>Innate immunity</topic><topic>Kinases</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Mutation</topic><topic>Next-generation sequencing</topic><topic>PACT</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>PKR</topic><topic>Protein biosynthesis</topic><topic>Protein interaction</topic><topic>Protein kinase</topic><topic>Protein synthesis</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Ribonucleic acid</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><topic>TRBP</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chukwurah, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willingham, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Madhurima</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castillo‐Azofeifa, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Rekha C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cellular biochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chukwurah, Evelyn</au><au>Willingham, Victoria</au><au>Singh, Madhurima</au><au>Castillo‐Azofeifa, David</au><au>Patel, Rekha C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contribution of the two dsRBM motifs to the double‐stranded RNA binding and protein interactions of PACT</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cellular biochemistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Cell Biochem</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3598</spage><epage>3607</epage><pages>3598-3607</pages><issn>0730-2312</issn><eissn>1097-4644</eissn><abstract>PACT is a stress‐modulated activator of protein kinase PKR (protein kinase, RNA activated), which is involved in antiviral innate immune responses and stress‐induced apoptosis. Stress‐induced phosphorylation of PACT is essential for PACT's increased association with PKR leading to PKR activation, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor eIF2α, inhibition of protein synthesis, and apoptosis. PACT‐induced PKR activation is negatively regulated by TRBP (transactivation response element RNA‐binding protein), which dissociates from PACT after PACT phosphorylation in response to stress signals. The conserved double‐stranded RNA binding motifs (dsRBMs) in PKR, PACT, and TRBP mediate protein‐protein interactions, and the stress‐dependent phosphorylation of PACT changes the relative strengths of PKR‐PACT, PACT‐TRBP, and PACT‐PACT interactions to bring about a timely and transient PKR activation. This regulates the general kinetics as well as level of eIF2α phosphorylation, thereby influencing the cellular response to stress either as recovery and survival or elimination by apoptosis. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of specific mutations within PACT's two evolutionarily conserved dsRBMs on dsRNA‐binding, and protein‐protein interactions between PKR, PACT, and TRBP. Our data show that the two motifs contribute to varying extents in dsRNA binding, and protein interactions. These findings indicate that although the dsRBM motifs have high sequence conservation, their functional contribution in the context of the whole proteins needs to be determined by mutational analysis. Furthermore, using a PACT mutant that is deficient in PACT‐PACT interaction but competent for PACT‐PKR interaction, we demonstrate that PACT‐PACT interaction is essential for efficient PKR activation.
The article focuses on characterizing the contribution of specific amino acids within the conserved dsRBM domains of PACT toward its dsRNA‐binding and protein interaction activities. Furthermore, it outlines the importance of PACT‐PACT interactions in PKR activation by demonstrating that the stress‐induced phosphorylation is not sufficient for PKR activation for a PACT mutant that lacks PACT‐PACT interaction ability.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29231267</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcb.26561</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9434-4880</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-2312 |
ispartof | Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2018-04, Vol.119 (4), p.3598-3607 |
issn | 0730-2312 1097-4644 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975999306 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Activation Apoptosis Conserved sequence Double-stranded RNA dsRBM eIF-2 kinase Immune response Initiation factor eIF-2α Innate immunity Kinases Kinetics Mutation Next-generation sequencing PACT Phosphorylation PKR Protein biosynthesis Protein interaction Protein kinase Protein synthesis Proteins Ribonucleic acid RNA Stresses TRBP |
title | Contribution of the two dsRBM motifs to the double‐stranded RNA binding and protein interactions of PACT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T19%3A41%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contribution%20of%20the%20two%20dsRBM%20motifs%20to%20the%20double%E2%80%90stranded%20RNA%20binding%20and%20protein%20interactions%20of%20PACT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cellular%20biochemistry&rft.au=Chukwurah,%20Evelyn&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3598&rft.epage=3607&rft.pages=3598-3607&rft.issn=0730-2312&rft.eissn=1097-4644&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcb.26561&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1975999306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2008014695&rft_id=info:pmid/29231267&rfr_iscdi=true |