Are pathological high-risk features in locally advanced rectal cancer a useful selection tool for adjuvant chemotherapy?

Several histological high-risk factors are used as an indication for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. Those and other factors, including lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion (PNI), venous invasion and tumour budding are associated with decreased outcome. In this study, we evaluated the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cancer (1990) 2018-01, Vol.89, p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Swets, Marloes, Kuppen, Peter J.K., Blok, Erik J., Gelderblom, Hans, van de Velde, Cornelis J.H., Nagtegaal, Iris D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title European journal of cancer (1990)
container_volume 89
creator Swets, Marloes
Kuppen, Peter J.K.
Blok, Erik J.
Gelderblom, Hans
van de Velde, Cornelis J.H.
Nagtegaal, Iris D.
description Several histological high-risk factors are used as an indication for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. Those and other factors, including lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion (PNI), venous invasion and tumour budding are associated with decreased outcome. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive values of these biomarkers in a cohort of rectal cancer patients. The trial-based cohort consisted of 221npTNM stage II–III rectal cancer patients, included in the PROCTOR/SCRIPT trial, a multicentre randomised phase III trial. Patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and TME surgery were randomised between adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Lymphatic invasion, PNI, extramural venous invasion, intramural venous invasion and tumour budding were determined in standard tissue slides. The presence of PNI (HR 3.36; 95% CI 1.82–6.21), extramural vascular invasion (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17–3.19) and tumour budding (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.11–3.03) was associated with a significant worse overall survival. The presence of ≥2 adverse biomarkers resulted in a stronger prediction of adverse outcome in terms of overall survival (HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.66–4.79), disease-free survival (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.47–3.48), and distant recurrence (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.56–4.02). None of these markers alone or combined predicted a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. We confirmed that several stage-independent biomarkers were significantly associated with a decreased outcome in rectal cancer patients. More importantly, these markers did not have predictive value and are thus not useful to select for adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. •Additional pathological markers were associated with an adverse outcome.•The presence of ≥2 biomarkers resulted in a strong prediction of adverse outcome.•These biomarkers did not predict a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975032378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S095980491731403X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1975032378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c962ed38d8ea36afbd859d535de538510aee1da84cfdab0ea347dbca930239873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFrFDEYhoNY7Fr9Ax4kRy8zfkk2MwkIUkqrQsFLPYds8k0nY3azJjPF_fdm2OrRU_h4n_eFPIS8Y9AyYN3HqcXJ2ZYD61vGWoDuBdkw1esGlOQvyQa01I2Crb4kr0uZAKBXW3hFLrnmXADTG_L7OiM92nlMMT0GZyMdw-PY5FB-0gHtvGQsNBxoTDWLJ2r9kz049DSjmyvt1itTS5eCwxJpwViDkA50TinSIdXMT0stzdSNuE_ziNkeT5_fkIvBxoJvn98r8uPu9uHma3P__cu3m-v7xgnZzY3THUcvlFdoRWeHnVdSeymkRymUZGARmbdq6wZvd1Chbe93zmoBXGjViyvy4bx7zOnXgmU2-1AcxmgPmJZimO4lCC56VVF-Rl1OpWQczDGHvc0nw8Csxs1kVuNmNW4YM9V4Lb1_3l92e_T_Kn8VV-DTGcD6y6eA2RQXcHUYVofGp_C__T8yjpSy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975032378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are pathological high-risk features in locally advanced rectal cancer a useful selection tool for adjuvant chemotherapy?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Swets, Marloes ; Kuppen, Peter J.K. ; Blok, Erik J. ; Gelderblom, Hans ; van de Velde, Cornelis J.H. ; Nagtegaal, Iris D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Swets, Marloes ; Kuppen, Peter J.K. ; Blok, Erik J. ; Gelderblom, Hans ; van de Velde, Cornelis J.H. ; Nagtegaal, Iris D.</creatorcontrib><description>Several histological high-risk factors are used as an indication for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. Those and other factors, including lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion (PNI), venous invasion and tumour budding are associated with decreased outcome. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive values of these biomarkers in a cohort of rectal cancer patients. The trial-based cohort consisted of 221npTNM stage II–III rectal cancer patients, included in the PROCTOR/SCRIPT trial, a multicentre randomised phase III trial. Patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and TME surgery were randomised between adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Lymphatic invasion, PNI, extramural venous invasion, intramural venous invasion and tumour budding were determined in standard tissue slides. The presence of PNI (HR 3.36; 95% CI 1.82–6.21), extramural vascular invasion (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17–3.19) and tumour budding (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.11–3.03) was associated with a significant worse overall survival. The presence of ≥2 adverse biomarkers resulted in a stronger prediction of adverse outcome in terms of overall survival (HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.66–4.79), disease-free survival (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.47–3.48), and distant recurrence (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.56–4.02). None of these markers alone or combined predicted a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. We confirmed that several stage-independent biomarkers were significantly associated with a decreased outcome in rectal cancer patients. More importantly, these markers did not have predictive value and are thus not useful to select for adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. •Additional pathological markers were associated with an adverse outcome.•The presence of ≥2 biomarkers resulted in a strong prediction of adverse outcome.•These biomarkers did not predict a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8049</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0852</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29223019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy ; Biomarkers ; Histology ; Rectal cancer</subject><ispartof>European journal of cancer (1990), 2018-01, Vol.89, p.1-8</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c962ed38d8ea36afbd859d535de538510aee1da84cfdab0ea347dbca930239873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c962ed38d8ea36afbd859d535de538510aee1da84cfdab0ea347dbca930239873</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9579-4947</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095980491731403X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29223019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swets, Marloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuppen, Peter J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blok, Erik J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelderblom, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Velde, Cornelis J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagtegaal, Iris D.</creatorcontrib><title>Are pathological high-risk features in locally advanced rectal cancer a useful selection tool for adjuvant chemotherapy?</title><title>European journal of cancer (1990)</title><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><description>Several histological high-risk factors are used as an indication for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. Those and other factors, including lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion (PNI), venous invasion and tumour budding are associated with decreased outcome. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive values of these biomarkers in a cohort of rectal cancer patients. The trial-based cohort consisted of 221npTNM stage II–III rectal cancer patients, included in the PROCTOR/SCRIPT trial, a multicentre randomised phase III trial. Patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and TME surgery were randomised between adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Lymphatic invasion, PNI, extramural venous invasion, intramural venous invasion and tumour budding were determined in standard tissue slides. The presence of PNI (HR 3.36; 95% CI 1.82–6.21), extramural vascular invasion (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17–3.19) and tumour budding (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.11–3.03) was associated with a significant worse overall survival. The presence of ≥2 adverse biomarkers resulted in a stronger prediction of adverse outcome in terms of overall survival (HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.66–4.79), disease-free survival (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.47–3.48), and distant recurrence (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.56–4.02). None of these markers alone or combined predicted a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. We confirmed that several stage-independent biomarkers were significantly associated with a decreased outcome in rectal cancer patients. More importantly, these markers did not have predictive value and are thus not useful to select for adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. •Additional pathological markers were associated with an adverse outcome.•The presence of ≥2 biomarkers resulted in a strong prediction of adverse outcome.•These biomarkers did not predict a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.</description><subject>Adjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Rectal cancer</subject><issn>0959-8049</issn><issn>1879-0852</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFrFDEYhoNY7Fr9Ax4kRy8zfkk2MwkIUkqrQsFLPYds8k0nY3azJjPF_fdm2OrRU_h4n_eFPIS8Y9AyYN3HqcXJ2ZYD61vGWoDuBdkw1esGlOQvyQa01I2Crb4kr0uZAKBXW3hFLrnmXADTG_L7OiM92nlMMT0GZyMdw-PY5FB-0gHtvGQsNBxoTDWLJ2r9kz049DSjmyvt1itTS5eCwxJpwViDkA50TinSIdXMT0stzdSNuE_ziNkeT5_fkIvBxoJvn98r8uPu9uHma3P__cu3m-v7xgnZzY3THUcvlFdoRWeHnVdSeymkRymUZGARmbdq6wZvd1Chbe93zmoBXGjViyvy4bx7zOnXgmU2-1AcxmgPmJZimO4lCC56VVF-Rl1OpWQczDGHvc0nw8Csxs1kVuNmNW4YM9V4Lb1_3l92e_T_Kn8VV-DTGcD6y6eA2RQXcHUYVofGp_C__T8yjpSy</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Swets, Marloes</creator><creator>Kuppen, Peter J.K.</creator><creator>Blok, Erik J.</creator><creator>Gelderblom, Hans</creator><creator>van de Velde, Cornelis J.H.</creator><creator>Nagtegaal, Iris D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-4947</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Are pathological high-risk features in locally advanced rectal cancer a useful selection tool for adjuvant chemotherapy?</title><author>Swets, Marloes ; Kuppen, Peter J.K. ; Blok, Erik J. ; Gelderblom, Hans ; van de Velde, Cornelis J.H. ; Nagtegaal, Iris D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-c962ed38d8ea36afbd859d535de538510aee1da84cfdab0ea347dbca930239873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Rectal cancer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swets, Marloes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuppen, Peter J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blok, Erik J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gelderblom, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Velde, Cornelis J.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagtegaal, Iris D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swets, Marloes</au><au>Kuppen, Peter J.K.</au><au>Blok, Erik J.</au><au>Gelderblom, Hans</au><au>van de Velde, Cornelis J.H.</au><au>Nagtegaal, Iris D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are pathological high-risk features in locally advanced rectal cancer a useful selection tool for adjuvant chemotherapy?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of cancer (1990)</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Cancer</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>89</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>0959-8049</issn><eissn>1879-0852</eissn><abstract>Several histological high-risk factors are used as an indication for adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. Those and other factors, including lymphatic invasion, perineural invasion (PNI), venous invasion and tumour budding are associated with decreased outcome. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic and predictive values of these biomarkers in a cohort of rectal cancer patients. The trial-based cohort consisted of 221npTNM stage II–III rectal cancer patients, included in the PROCTOR/SCRIPT trial, a multicentre randomised phase III trial. Patients treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and TME surgery were randomised between adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. Lymphatic invasion, PNI, extramural venous invasion, intramural venous invasion and tumour budding were determined in standard tissue slides. The presence of PNI (HR 3.36; 95% CI 1.82–6.21), extramural vascular invasion (HR 1.93; 95% CI 1.17–3.19) and tumour budding (HR 1.83, 95% CI 1.11–3.03) was associated with a significant worse overall survival. The presence of ≥2 adverse biomarkers resulted in a stronger prediction of adverse outcome in terms of overall survival (HR 2.82; 95% CI 1.66–4.79), disease-free survival (HR 2.27; 95% CI 1.47–3.48), and distant recurrence (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.56–4.02). None of these markers alone or combined predicted a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. We confirmed that several stage-independent biomarkers were significantly associated with a decreased outcome in rectal cancer patients. More importantly, these markers did not have predictive value and are thus not useful to select for adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer. •Additional pathological markers were associated with an adverse outcome.•The presence of ≥2 biomarkers resulted in a strong prediction of adverse outcome.•These biomarkers did not predict a beneficial effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29223019</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.006</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9579-4947</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0959-8049
ispartof European journal of cancer (1990), 2018-01, Vol.89, p.1-8
issn 0959-8049
1879-0852
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975032378
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adjuvant chemotherapy
Biomarkers
Histology
Rectal cancer
title Are pathological high-risk features in locally advanced rectal cancer a useful selection tool for adjuvant chemotherapy?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A04%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20pathological%20high-risk%20features%20in%20locally%20advanced%20rectal%20cancer%20a%20useful%20selection%20tool%20for%20adjuvant%20chemotherapy?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20cancer%20(1990)&rft.au=Swets,%20Marloes&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=89&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=0959-8049&rft.eissn=1879-0852&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.11.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1975032378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975032378&rft_id=info:pmid/29223019&rft_els_id=S095980491731403X&rfr_iscdi=true