Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O3/H2O2), and an electro-peroxone process
Pharmaceutical abatement in a groundwater (GW), surface water (SW), and secondary effluent (SE) by conventional ozonation, the conventional peroxone (O3/H2O2), and the electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) processes was compared in batch tests. SE had significantly more fast-reacting dissolved organic matte...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2018-03, Vol.130, p.127-138 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 138 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 127 |
| container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 130 |
| creator | Wang, Huijiao Zhan, Juhong Yao, Weikun Wang, Bin Deng, Shubo Huang, Jun Yu, Gang Wang, Yujue |
| description | Pharmaceutical abatement in a groundwater (GW), surface water (SW), and secondary effluent (SE) by conventional ozonation, the conventional peroxone (O3/H2O2), and the electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) processes was compared in batch tests. SE had significantly more fast-reacting dissolved organic matter (DOM) moieties than GW and SW. Therefore, O3 decomposed much faster in SE than in GW and SW. At specific ozone doses of 0.5–1.5 mg O3/mg dissolved organic carbon (DOC), the application of O3/H2O2 and E-peroxone process (by adding external H2O2 stocks or in-situ generating H2O2 from cathodic O2 reduction during ozonation) similarly enhanced the OH yield from O3 decomposition by ∼5–12% and 5–7% in GW and SW, respectively, compared to conventional ozonation. In contrast, due to the slower reaction kinetics of O3 with H2O2 than O3 with fast-reacting DOM moieties, the addition or electro-generation of H2O2 hardly increased the OH yield ( |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.054 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975015682</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004313541730982X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1975015682</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5e01fbbcb0c4f97180d2224cb0c0673bc326ce70e5ee2af0e20777a49500f4303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxkVJabZp3yAEHVOIndEfW_YlUJa2KQT20p6FLI-JFltyJO-m25foK1fLpjn2IEYDv28-Zj5CLhmUDFh9uy2fzRIxlRyYKhkroZJvyIo1qi24lM0ZWQFIUTBRyXPyPqUtAHAu2nfknLec1bKBFfmzDtNsokvB0zDQ-dHEyVjcLc6akZrOLDihX6jzdJ-xsEs022KkUzZ3FhPtDtQGv8-QCz5rwu9cjv8bOmMMv4JHer0Rt_d8wz_dUOP7_CiOaJcYildkjiFPSx_I28GMCT--1Avy8-uXH-v74mHz7fv680NhRc2XokJgQ9fZDqwcWsUa6Dnn8thDrURnBa8tKsAKkZsBkINSysi2AhikAHFBrk9zs-_TDtOiJ5csjqPxmJfUrFUVsKpueEblCbUxpBRx0HN0k4kHzUAfo9BbfYpCH6PQjOkcRZZdvTjsugn7V9G_22fg7gRg3nPvMOpkHXqLvYv5OLoP7v8OfwHOYp5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1975015682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O3/H2O2), and an electro-peroxone process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Wang, Huijiao ; Zhan, Juhong ; Yao, Weikun ; Wang, Bin ; Deng, Shubo ; Huang, Jun ; Yu, Gang ; Wang, Yujue</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Huijiao ; Zhan, Juhong ; Yao, Weikun ; Wang, Bin ; Deng, Shubo ; Huang, Jun ; Yu, Gang ; Wang, Yujue</creatorcontrib><description>Pharmaceutical abatement in a groundwater (GW), surface water (SW), and secondary effluent (SE) by conventional ozonation, the conventional peroxone (O3/H2O2), and the electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) processes was compared in batch tests. SE had significantly more fast-reacting dissolved organic matter (DOM) moieties than GW and SW. Therefore, O3 decomposed much faster in SE than in GW and SW. At specific ozone doses of 0.5–1.5 mg O3/mg dissolved organic carbon (DOC), the application of O3/H2O2 and E-peroxone process (by adding external H2O2 stocks or in-situ generating H2O2 from cathodic O2 reduction during ozonation) similarly enhanced the OH yield from O3 decomposition by ∼5–12% and 5–7% in GW and SW, respectively, compared to conventional ozonation. In contrast, due to the slower reaction kinetics of O3 with H2O2 than O3 with fast-reacting DOM moieties, the addition or electro-generation of H2O2 hardly increased the OH yield (<4% increases) in SE. Corresponding to the changes in the OH yields, the abatement efficiencies of ozone-resistant pharmaceuticals (ibuprofen and clofibric acid) increased evidently in GW (up to ∼14–18% at a specific ozone dose of 1.5 mg O3/mg DOC), moderately in SW (up to 6–10% at 0.5 mg O3/mg DOC), and negligibly in SE during the O3/H2O2 and E-peroxone treatment compared to conventional ozonation. These results indicate that similar to the conventional O3/H2O2 process, the E-peroxone process can more pronouncedly enhance O3 transformation to OH, and thus increase the abatement efficiency of ozone-resistant pharmaceuticals in water matrices exerting relatively high ozone stability (e.g., groundwater and surface water with low DOM contents). Therefore, by installing electrodes in existing ozone reactors, the E-peroxone process may provide a convenient way to enhance pharmaceutical abatement in drinking water applications, where groundwater and surface water with low DOM contents are used as the source waters.
[Display omitted]
•Water matrix has a significant effect on pharmaceutical abatement by E-peroxone.•E-peroxone enhances pharmaceutical abatement efficiencies more significantly in water with high ozone stability.•Similar pharmaceutical abatements can be obtained during conventional peroxone and the E-peroxone processes.•Pharmaceutical abatement by E-peroxone can be predicted using a chemical kinetic model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29216480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Advanced oxidation process ; Clofibric Acid - analysis ; Clofibric Acid - chemistry ; Groundwater - chemistry ; Hydrogen peroxide ; Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry ; Ibuprofen - analysis ; Ibuprofen - chemistry ; Kinetics ; Micropollutant ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Ozonation ; Ozone - chemistry ; Water matrix ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry ; Water Purification - methods</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2018-03, Vol.130, p.127-138</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5e01fbbcb0c4f97180d2224cb0c0673bc326ce70e5ee2af0e20777a49500f4303</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5e01fbbcb0c4f97180d2224cb0c0673bc326ce70e5ee2af0e20777a49500f4303</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6321-9542</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.054$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29216480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Huijiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Juhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Weikun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Shubo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yujue</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O3/H2O2), and an electro-peroxone process</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>Pharmaceutical abatement in a groundwater (GW), surface water (SW), and secondary effluent (SE) by conventional ozonation, the conventional peroxone (O3/H2O2), and the electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) processes was compared in batch tests. SE had significantly more fast-reacting dissolved organic matter (DOM) moieties than GW and SW. Therefore, O3 decomposed much faster in SE than in GW and SW. At specific ozone doses of 0.5–1.5 mg O3/mg dissolved organic carbon (DOC), the application of O3/H2O2 and E-peroxone process (by adding external H2O2 stocks or in-situ generating H2O2 from cathodic O2 reduction during ozonation) similarly enhanced the OH yield from O3 decomposition by ∼5–12% and 5–7% in GW and SW, respectively, compared to conventional ozonation. In contrast, due to the slower reaction kinetics of O3 with H2O2 than O3 with fast-reacting DOM moieties, the addition or electro-generation of H2O2 hardly increased the OH yield (<4% increases) in SE. Corresponding to the changes in the OH yields, the abatement efficiencies of ozone-resistant pharmaceuticals (ibuprofen and clofibric acid) increased evidently in GW (up to ∼14–18% at a specific ozone dose of 1.5 mg O3/mg DOC), moderately in SW (up to 6–10% at 0.5 mg O3/mg DOC), and negligibly in SE during the O3/H2O2 and E-peroxone treatment compared to conventional ozonation. These results indicate that similar to the conventional O3/H2O2 process, the E-peroxone process can more pronouncedly enhance O3 transformation to OH, and thus increase the abatement efficiency of ozone-resistant pharmaceuticals in water matrices exerting relatively high ozone stability (e.g., groundwater and surface water with low DOM contents). Therefore, by installing electrodes in existing ozone reactors, the E-peroxone process may provide a convenient way to enhance pharmaceutical abatement in drinking water applications, where groundwater and surface water with low DOM contents are used as the source waters.
[Display omitted]
•Water matrix has a significant effect on pharmaceutical abatement by E-peroxone.•E-peroxone enhances pharmaceutical abatement efficiencies more significantly in water with high ozone stability.•Similar pharmaceutical abatements can be obtained during conventional peroxone and the E-peroxone processes.•Pharmaceutical abatement by E-peroxone can be predicted using a chemical kinetic model.</description><subject>Advanced oxidation process</subject><subject>Clofibric Acid - analysis</subject><subject>Clofibric Acid - chemistry</subject><subject>Groundwater - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrogen peroxide</subject><subject>Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry</subject><subject>Ibuprofen - analysis</subject><subject>Ibuprofen - chemistry</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>Micropollutant</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Ozonation</subject><subject>Ozone - chemistry</subject><subject>Water matrix</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9q3DAQxkVJabZp3yAEHVOIndEfW_YlUJa2KQT20p6FLI-JFltyJO-m25foK1fLpjn2IEYDv28-Zj5CLhmUDFh9uy2fzRIxlRyYKhkroZJvyIo1qi24lM0ZWQFIUTBRyXPyPqUtAHAu2nfknLec1bKBFfmzDtNsokvB0zDQ-dHEyVjcLc6akZrOLDihX6jzdJ-xsEs022KkUzZ3FhPtDtQGv8-QCz5rwu9cjv8bOmMMv4JHer0Rt_d8wz_dUOP7_CiOaJcYildkjiFPSx_I28GMCT--1Avy8-uXH-v74mHz7fv680NhRc2XokJgQ9fZDqwcWsUa6Dnn8thDrURnBa8tKsAKkZsBkINSysi2AhikAHFBrk9zs-_TDtOiJ5csjqPxmJfUrFUVsKpueEblCbUxpBRx0HN0k4kHzUAfo9BbfYpCH6PQjOkcRZZdvTjsugn7V9G_22fg7gRg3nPvMOpkHXqLvYv5OLoP7v8OfwHOYp5w</recordid><startdate>20180301</startdate><enddate>20180301</enddate><creator>Wang, Huijiao</creator><creator>Zhan, Juhong</creator><creator>Yao, Weikun</creator><creator>Wang, Bin</creator><creator>Deng, Shubo</creator><creator>Huang, Jun</creator><creator>Yu, Gang</creator><creator>Wang, Yujue</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-9542</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180301</creationdate><title>Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O3/H2O2), and an electro-peroxone process</title><author>Wang, Huijiao ; Zhan, Juhong ; Yao, Weikun ; Wang, Bin ; Deng, Shubo ; Huang, Jun ; Yu, Gang ; Wang, Yujue</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-5e01fbbcb0c4f97180d2224cb0c0673bc326ce70e5ee2af0e20777a49500f4303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Advanced oxidation process</topic><topic>Clofibric Acid - analysis</topic><topic>Clofibric Acid - chemistry</topic><topic>Groundwater - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrogen peroxide</topic><topic>Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry</topic><topic>Ibuprofen - analysis</topic><topic>Ibuprofen - chemistry</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>Micropollutant</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Ozonation</topic><topic>Ozone - chemistry</topic><topic>Water matrix</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Huijiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Juhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Weikun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Shubo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Yujue</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Huijiao</au><au>Zhan, Juhong</au><au>Yao, Weikun</au><au>Wang, Bin</au><au>Deng, Shubo</au><au>Huang, Jun</au><au>Yu, Gang</au><au>Wang, Yujue</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O3/H2O2), and an electro-peroxone process</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2018-03-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>130</volume><spage>127</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>127-138</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><abstract>Pharmaceutical abatement in a groundwater (GW), surface water (SW), and secondary effluent (SE) by conventional ozonation, the conventional peroxone (O3/H2O2), and the electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) processes was compared in batch tests. SE had significantly more fast-reacting dissolved organic matter (DOM) moieties than GW and SW. Therefore, O3 decomposed much faster in SE than in GW and SW. At specific ozone doses of 0.5–1.5 mg O3/mg dissolved organic carbon (DOC), the application of O3/H2O2 and E-peroxone process (by adding external H2O2 stocks or in-situ generating H2O2 from cathodic O2 reduction during ozonation) similarly enhanced the OH yield from O3 decomposition by ∼5–12% and 5–7% in GW and SW, respectively, compared to conventional ozonation. In contrast, due to the slower reaction kinetics of O3 with H2O2 than O3 with fast-reacting DOM moieties, the addition or electro-generation of H2O2 hardly increased the OH yield (<4% increases) in SE. Corresponding to the changes in the OH yields, the abatement efficiencies of ozone-resistant pharmaceuticals (ibuprofen and clofibric acid) increased evidently in GW (up to ∼14–18% at a specific ozone dose of 1.5 mg O3/mg DOC), moderately in SW (up to 6–10% at 0.5 mg O3/mg DOC), and negligibly in SE during the O3/H2O2 and E-peroxone treatment compared to conventional ozonation. These results indicate that similar to the conventional O3/H2O2 process, the E-peroxone process can more pronouncedly enhance O3 transformation to OH, and thus increase the abatement efficiency of ozone-resistant pharmaceuticals in water matrices exerting relatively high ozone stability (e.g., groundwater and surface water with low DOM contents). Therefore, by installing electrodes in existing ozone reactors, the E-peroxone process may provide a convenient way to enhance pharmaceutical abatement in drinking water applications, where groundwater and surface water with low DOM contents are used as the source waters.
[Display omitted]
•Water matrix has a significant effect on pharmaceutical abatement by E-peroxone.•E-peroxone enhances pharmaceutical abatement efficiencies more significantly in water with high ozone stability.•Similar pharmaceutical abatements can be obtained during conventional peroxone and the E-peroxone processes.•Pharmaceutical abatement by E-peroxone can be predicted using a chemical kinetic model.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29216480</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.054</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-9542</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
| ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2018-03, Vol.130, p.127-138 |
| issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1975015682 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Advanced oxidation process Clofibric Acid - analysis Clofibric Acid - chemistry Groundwater - chemistry Hydrogen peroxide Hydrogen Peroxide - chemistry Ibuprofen - analysis Ibuprofen - chemistry Kinetics Micropollutant Oxidation-Reduction Ozonation Ozone - chemistry Water matrix Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - chemistry Water Purification - methods |
| title | Comparison of pharmaceutical abatement in various water matrices by conventional ozonation, peroxone (O3/H2O2), and an electro-peroxone process |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T16%3A29%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20pharmaceutical%20abatement%20in%20various%20water%20matrices%20by%20conventional%20ozonation,%20peroxone%20(O3/H2O2),%20and%20an%20electro-peroxone%20process&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Wang,%20Huijiao&rft.date=2018-03-01&rft.volume=130&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=127-138&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.watres.2017.11.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1975015682%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1975015682&rft_id=info:pmid/29216480&rft_els_id=S004313541730982X&rfr_iscdi=true |