DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products

Background The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of gene medicine 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.175-185
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Catherine C., Aylott, Michael C., Fisher, Krishna J., Lynch, Anthony M., Gooderham, Nigel J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185
container_issue 2
container_start_page 175
container_title The journal of gene medicine
container_volume 8
creator Smith, Catherine C.
Aylott, Michael C.
Fisher, Krishna J.
Lynch, Anthony M.
Gooderham, Nigel J.
description Background The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA. Methods To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Results The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (>4‐fold) or MMS (>5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector. Conclusions The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jgm.827
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19739832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19739832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgitMp_gMpXuiFdOarTXIpzm2KHzeK4k1I2tOxua41aXH790Y6FASvci4e3nPyInRE8IBgTC_m03IgqdhCeyShJKY04dthxkrFXMnXHtr3fo4xEVKqXdQjKeFUknQPqeHDZZSb0kwhcuDraunBR6ZowEWwqivfOoiaKgostsZDHtWuytus8QdopzALD4ebt4-eR9dPV5P47nF8c3V5F2ecEBFLyTlNhOApTvOCAbZWGgkKU5rxQuKCSmsKS7ECmwoKNHxHUMuYVJlKbcH66LTLDYs_WvCNLmc-g8XCLKFqvSZKMCUZDfDkD5xXrVuG24JJFRc4YQGddShzlfcOCl27WWncWhOsv6vUoUodqgzyeBPX2hLyX7fpLoDzDnzOFrD-L0ffju-7uLjTM9_A6kcb965TwUSiXx7GejQaTu6f3t40YV_0AYkN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196947053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Smith, Catherine C. ; Aylott, Michael C. ; Fisher, Krishna J. ; Lynch, Anthony M. ; Gooderham, Nigel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Catherine C. ; Aylott, Michael C. ; Fisher, Krishna J. ; Lynch, Anthony M. ; Gooderham, Nigel J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA. Methods To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Results The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (&gt;4‐fold) or MMS (&gt;5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector. Conclusions The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-2254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgm.827</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16142816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Cell Line ; Dependovirus ; DNA - physiology ; DNA damage ; DNA Damage - physiology ; DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology ; Gene therapy ; Gene Transfer Techniques ; Genetic Therapy - adverse effects ; Genetic Vectors ; Humans ; insertional mutagenesis ; Mutagenicity Tests ; plasmid vectors ; Plasmids ; repair ; Transduction, Genetic ; Transfection ; viral vectors</subject><ispartof>The journal of gene medicine, 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.175-185</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjgm.827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjgm.827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16142816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Catherine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylott, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Krishna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooderham, Nigel J.</creatorcontrib><title>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</title><title>The journal of gene medicine</title><addtitle>J. Gene Med</addtitle><description>Background The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA. Methods To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Results The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (&gt;4‐fold) or MMS (&gt;5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector. Conclusions The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Dependovirus</subject><subject>DNA - physiology</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>DNA Damage - physiology</subject><subject>DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology</subject><subject>Gene therapy</subject><subject>Gene Transfer Techniques</subject><subject>Genetic Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Genetic Vectors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>insertional mutagenesis</subject><subject>Mutagenicity Tests</subject><subject>plasmid vectors</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>repair</subject><subject>Transduction, Genetic</subject><subject>Transfection</subject><subject>viral vectors</subject><issn>1099-498X</issn><issn>1521-2254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgitMp_gMpXuiFdOarTXIpzm2KHzeK4k1I2tOxua41aXH790Y6FASvci4e3nPyInRE8IBgTC_m03IgqdhCeyShJKY04dthxkrFXMnXHtr3fo4xEVKqXdQjKeFUknQPqeHDZZSb0kwhcuDraunBR6ZowEWwqivfOoiaKgostsZDHtWuytus8QdopzALD4ebt4-eR9dPV5P47nF8c3V5F2ecEBFLyTlNhOApTvOCAbZWGgkKU5rxQuKCSmsKS7ECmwoKNHxHUMuYVJlKbcH66LTLDYs_WvCNLmc-g8XCLKFqvSZKMCUZDfDkD5xXrVuG24JJFRc4YQGddShzlfcOCl27WWncWhOsv6vUoUodqgzyeBPX2hLyX7fpLoDzDnzOFrD-L0ffju-7uLjTM9_A6kcb965TwUSiXx7GejQaTu6f3t40YV_0AYkN</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Smith, Catherine C.</creator><creator>Aylott, Michael C.</creator><creator>Fisher, Krishna J.</creator><creator>Lynch, Anthony M.</creator><creator>Gooderham, Nigel J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</title><author>Smith, Catherine C. ; Aylott, Michael C. ; Fisher, Krishna J. ; Lynch, Anthony M. ; Gooderham, Nigel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Dependovirus</topic><topic>DNA - physiology</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>DNA Damage - physiology</topic><topic>DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology</topic><topic>Gene therapy</topic><topic>Gene Transfer Techniques</topic><topic>Genetic Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Genetic Vectors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>insertional mutagenesis</topic><topic>Mutagenicity Tests</topic><topic>plasmid vectors</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>repair</topic><topic>Transduction, Genetic</topic><topic>Transfection</topic><topic>viral vectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Catherine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylott, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Krishna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooderham, Nigel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The journal of gene medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Catherine C.</au><au>Aylott, Michael C.</au><au>Fisher, Krishna J.</au><au>Lynch, Anthony M.</au><au>Gooderham, Nigel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</atitle><jtitle>The journal of gene medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J. Gene Med</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>175-185</pages><issn>1099-498X</issn><eissn>1521-2254</eissn><abstract>Background The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA. Methods To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR). Results The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (&gt;4‐fold) or MMS (&gt;5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector. Conclusions The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>16142816</pmid><doi>10.1002/jgm.827</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-498X
ispartof The journal of gene medicine, 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.175-185
issn 1099-498X
1521-2254
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19739832
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Cell Line
Dependovirus
DNA - physiology
DNA damage
DNA Damage - physiology
DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology
Gene therapy
Gene Transfer Techniques
Genetic Therapy - adverse effects
Genetic Vectors
Humans
insertional mutagenesis
Mutagenicity Tests
plasmid vectors
Plasmids
repair
Transduction, Genetic
Transfection
viral vectors
title DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T06%3A07%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20damage%20responses%20after%20exposure%20to%20DNA-based%20products&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20gene%20medicine&rft.au=Smith,%20Catherine%20C.&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=175-185&rft.issn=1099-498X&rft.eissn=1521-2254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgm.827&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19739832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196947053&rft_id=info:pmid/16142816&rfr_iscdi=true