DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products
Background The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of gene medicine 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.175-185 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 185 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 175 |
container_title | The journal of gene medicine |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Smith, Catherine C. Aylott, Michael C. Fisher, Krishna J. Lynch, Anthony M. Gooderham, Nigel J. |
description | Background
The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA.
Methods
To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR).
Results
The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (>4‐fold) or MMS (>5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector.
Conclusions
The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jgm.827 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19739832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19739832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgitMp_gMpXuiFdOarTXIpzm2KHzeK4k1I2tOxua41aXH790Y6FASvci4e3nPyInRE8IBgTC_m03IgqdhCeyShJKY04dthxkrFXMnXHtr3fo4xEVKqXdQjKeFUknQPqeHDZZSb0kwhcuDraunBR6ZowEWwqivfOoiaKgostsZDHtWuytus8QdopzALD4ebt4-eR9dPV5P47nF8c3V5F2ecEBFLyTlNhOApTvOCAbZWGgkKU5rxQuKCSmsKS7ECmwoKNHxHUMuYVJlKbcH66LTLDYs_WvCNLmc-g8XCLKFqvSZKMCUZDfDkD5xXrVuG24JJFRc4YQGddShzlfcOCl27WWncWhOsv6vUoUodqgzyeBPX2hLyX7fpLoDzDnzOFrD-L0ffju-7uLjTM9_A6kcb965TwUSiXx7GejQaTu6f3t40YV_0AYkN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196947053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Smith, Catherine C. ; Aylott, Michael C. ; Fisher, Krishna J. ; Lynch, Anthony M. ; Gooderham, Nigel J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Catherine C. ; Aylott, Michael C. ; Fisher, Krishna J. ; Lynch, Anthony M. ; Gooderham, Nigel J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA.
Methods
To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR).
Results
The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (>4‐fold) or MMS (>5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector.
Conclusions
The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-2254</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jgm.827</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16142816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Cell Line ; Dependovirus ; DNA - physiology ; DNA damage ; DNA Damage - physiology ; DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology ; Gene therapy ; Gene Transfer Techniques ; Genetic Therapy - adverse effects ; Genetic Vectors ; Humans ; insertional mutagenesis ; Mutagenicity Tests ; plasmid vectors ; Plasmids ; repair ; Transduction, Genetic ; Transfection ; viral vectors</subject><ispartof>The journal of gene medicine, 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.175-185</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjgm.827$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjgm.827$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16142816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Catherine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylott, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Krishna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooderham, Nigel J.</creatorcontrib><title>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</title><title>The journal of gene medicine</title><addtitle>J. Gene Med</addtitle><description>Background
The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA.
Methods
To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR).
Results
The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (>4‐fold) or MMS (>5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector.
Conclusions
The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Cell Line</subject><subject>Dependovirus</subject><subject>DNA - physiology</subject><subject>DNA damage</subject><subject>DNA Damage - physiology</subject><subject>DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology</subject><subject>Gene therapy</subject><subject>Gene Transfer Techniques</subject><subject>Genetic Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Genetic Vectors</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>insertional mutagenesis</subject><subject>Mutagenicity Tests</subject><subject>plasmid vectors</subject><subject>Plasmids</subject><subject>repair</subject><subject>Transduction, Genetic</subject><subject>Transfection</subject><subject>viral vectors</subject><issn>1099-498X</issn><issn>1521-2254</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgitMp_gMpXuiFdOarTXIpzm2KHzeK4k1I2tOxua41aXH790Y6FASvci4e3nPyInRE8IBgTC_m03IgqdhCeyShJKY04dthxkrFXMnXHtr3fo4xEVKqXdQjKeFUknQPqeHDZZSb0kwhcuDraunBR6ZowEWwqivfOoiaKgostsZDHtWuytus8QdopzALD4ebt4-eR9dPV5P47nF8c3V5F2ecEBFLyTlNhOApTvOCAbZWGgkKU5rxQuKCSmsKS7ECmwoKNHxHUMuYVJlKbcH66LTLDYs_WvCNLmc-g8XCLKFqvSZKMCUZDfDkD5xXrVuG24JJFRc4YQGddShzlfcOCl27WWncWhOsv6vUoUodqgzyeBPX2hLyX7fpLoDzDnzOFrD-L0ffju-7uLjTM9_A6kcb965TwUSiXx7GejQaTu6f3t40YV_0AYkN</recordid><startdate>200602</startdate><enddate>200602</enddate><creator>Smith, Catherine C.</creator><creator>Aylott, Michael C.</creator><creator>Fisher, Krishna J.</creator><creator>Lynch, Anthony M.</creator><creator>Gooderham, Nigel J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200602</creationdate><title>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</title><author>Smith, Catherine C. ; Aylott, Michael C. ; Fisher, Krishna J. ; Lynch, Anthony M. ; Gooderham, Nigel J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-884425774606df3e0bb8a8e9022c4f80f28bafb209eb672e200272b3389c96bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Cell Line</topic><topic>Dependovirus</topic><topic>DNA - physiology</topic><topic>DNA damage</topic><topic>DNA Damage - physiology</topic><topic>DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology</topic><topic>Gene therapy</topic><topic>Gene Transfer Techniques</topic><topic>Genetic Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Genetic Vectors</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>insertional mutagenesis</topic><topic>Mutagenicity Tests</topic><topic>plasmid vectors</topic><topic>Plasmids</topic><topic>repair</topic><topic>Transduction, Genetic</topic><topic>Transfection</topic><topic>viral vectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Catherine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aylott, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Krishna J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Anthony M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gooderham, Nigel J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The journal of gene medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Catherine C.</au><au>Aylott, Michael C.</au><au>Fisher, Krishna J.</au><au>Lynch, Anthony M.</au><au>Gooderham, Nigel J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products</atitle><jtitle>The journal of gene medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J. Gene Med</addtitle><date>2006-02</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>185</epage><pages>175-185</pages><issn>1099-498X</issn><eissn>1521-2254</eissn><abstract>Background
The development of DNA‐based therapies holds great promise for the treatment of diseases that remain difficult to manage using conventional pharmaceuticals. Whilst there are considerable data regarding chemical‐induced DNA damage, there are limited reports published studying the potential of exogenous DNA to damage genomic DNA.
Methods
To investigate this problem, the differential gene expression (DGE) of DNA repair genes was examined to identify biomarkers, based on the hypothesis that DNA damage, including double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and insertional mutagenesis, would be expected to induce biological pathways associated with repair. Human HepG2 cells were exposed to the chemical genotoxins, etoposide (ETOP) and methylmethanesulphonate (MMS), as positive controls, or biological agents (i.e. exogenous DNA with and without the use of transfection complexes or via various viral vectors). Following transfection (6–72 h) the cells were harvested for RNA and DGE was determined by quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction (qRT‐PCR).
Results
The expression of genes involved in the repair of DSBs were significantly increased after treatment with ETOP (>4‐fold) or MMS (>5‐fold). Transfection using Effectene and ExGen 500 resulted in no significant changes; however, transfection with ExGen 500 resulted in an increase in the expression levels of GADD45 mRNA, consistent with global cellular stress. Viral vectors increased (3–6‐fold) expression of genes associated with DSBs and cellular stress responses and, as expected, the effect was the most marked with the retroviral vector.
Conclusions
The DGE profiles observed in HepG2 cells following transduction/transfection suggest that a subset of DNA repair genes may provide novel biomarkers to rapidly detect DNA damage induced by DNA products at the level of the genome, rather than at selected genes. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>16142816</pmid><doi>10.1002/jgm.827</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1099-498X |
ispartof | The journal of gene medicine, 2006-02, Vol.8 (2), p.175-185 |
issn | 1099-498X 1521-2254 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19739832 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cell Line Dependovirus DNA - physiology DNA damage DNA Damage - physiology DNA Repair Enzymes - physiology Gene therapy Gene Transfer Techniques Genetic Therapy - adverse effects Genetic Vectors Humans insertional mutagenesis Mutagenicity Tests plasmid vectors Plasmids repair Transduction, Genetic Transfection viral vectors |
title | DNA damage responses after exposure to DNA-based products |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T06%3A07%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=DNA%20damage%20responses%20after%20exposure%20to%20DNA-based%20products&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20gene%20medicine&rft.au=Smith,%20Catherine%20C.&rft.date=2006-02&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=185&rft.pages=175-185&rft.issn=1099-498X&rft.eissn=1521-2254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jgm.827&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19739832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196947053&rft_id=info:pmid/16142816&rfr_iscdi=true |