Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer
The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relationship between intake of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar‐sweetened beverages with risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of cancer 2018-05, Vol.142 (9), p.1748-1758 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1758 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1748 |
container_title | International journal of cancer |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Schwingshackl, Lukas Schwedhelm, Carolina Hoffmann, Georg Knüppel, Sven Laure Preterre, Anne Iqbal, Khalid Bechthold, Angela De Henauw, Stefaan Michels, Nathalie Devleesschauwer, Brecht Boeing, Heiner Schlesinger, Sabrina |
description | The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relationship between intake of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar‐sweetened beverages with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and Embase for prospective studies investigating the association between these 12 food groups and risk of CRC until April 2017. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random effects model for high vs. low intake categories, as well as for linear and nonlinear relationships. An inverse association was observed for whole grains (RR30g/d: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.97; n = 9 studies), vegetables (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98; n = 15), fruit (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.99; n = 16) and dairy (RR200g/d: 0.93, 95% CI 0.91, 0.94; n = 15), while a positive association for red meat (RR100g/d: 1.12, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19; n = 21) and processed meat (RR50g/d: 1.17, 95% CI 1.10, 1.23; n = 16), was seen in the linear dose‐response meta‐analysis. Some evidence for nonlinear relationships was observed between vegetables, fruit and dairy and risk of colorectal cancer. Findings of this meta‐analysis showed that a diet characterized by high intake of whole grains, vegetables, fruit and dairy products and low amounts of red meat and processed meat was associated with lower risk of CRC.
What's new?
Diet is known to affect risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but what are the optimal intakes of foods remain unclear. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, the authors investigated the association between 12 a priori‐defined food groups and risk of CRC. Optimal consumption of risk‐decreasing foods (6 servings/day of whole grains, vegetables and dairy, and 3 servings/day of fruits) results in a 56% risk reduction. Consumption of risk‐increasing foods of 2 servings/day of red meat, and 4 servings/day of processed meat associated with a 1.8‐fold increased risk. A plant‐based diet can thus lead to an important risk reduction of CRC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ijc.31198 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973462272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2010810294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-b546f46552fb90e04a80a6c79db373d692069797315df9df9592c2cf436dfb013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4Mobk4PfgEpeHGHbi9JkzZHKU4nAy96DmmaSGfXzGRF9u2NdnoQhAfv8H7_P48fQpcYZhiAzJu1nlGMRXGExhhEngLB7BiN4w3SHFM-QmchrAEwZpCdohERJAYZHaPpwrk6efWu34ZEdXXim_CWOJto1zpv9E61iVadNv4cnVjVBnNx2BP0srh7Lh_S1dP9srxdpZoWRZFWLOM244wRWwkwkKkCFNe5qCua05oLAlzkIqeY1VbEYYJoom1GeW0rwHSCboberXfvvQk7uWmCNm2rOuP6IHHMZpyQnET0-g-6dr3v4neSAIYCAxFZpKYDpb0LwRsrt77ZKL-XGOSXPxn9yW9_kb06NPbVxtS_5I-wCMwH4KNpzf7_Jrl8LIfKTyl1deQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010810294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Schwingshackl, Lukas ; Schwedhelm, Carolina ; Hoffmann, Georg ; Knüppel, Sven ; Laure Preterre, Anne ; Iqbal, Khalid ; Bechthold, Angela ; De Henauw, Stefaan ; Michels, Nathalie ; Devleesschauwer, Brecht ; Boeing, Heiner ; Schlesinger, Sabrina</creator><creatorcontrib>Schwingshackl, Lukas ; Schwedhelm, Carolina ; Hoffmann, Georg ; Knüppel, Sven ; Laure Preterre, Anne ; Iqbal, Khalid ; Bechthold, Angela ; De Henauw, Stefaan ; Michels, Nathalie ; Devleesschauwer, Brecht ; Boeing, Heiner ; Schlesinger, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relationship between intake of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar‐sweetened beverages with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and Embase for prospective studies investigating the association between these 12 food groups and risk of CRC until April 2017. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random effects model for high vs. low intake categories, as well as for linear and nonlinear relationships. An inverse association was observed for whole grains (RR30g/d: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.97; n = 9 studies), vegetables (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98; n = 15), fruit (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.99; n = 16) and dairy (RR200g/d: 0.93, 95% CI 0.91, 0.94; n = 15), while a positive association for red meat (RR100g/d: 1.12, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19; n = 21) and processed meat (RR50g/d: 1.17, 95% CI 1.10, 1.23; n = 16), was seen in the linear dose‐response meta‐analysis. Some evidence for nonlinear relationships was observed between vegetables, fruit and dairy and risk of colorectal cancer. Findings of this meta‐analysis showed that a diet characterized by high intake of whole grains, vegetables, fruit and dairy products and low amounts of red meat and processed meat was associated with lower risk of CRC.
What's new?
Diet is known to affect risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but what are the optimal intakes of foods remain unclear. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, the authors investigated the association between 12 a priori‐defined food groups and risk of CRC. Optimal consumption of risk‐decreasing foods (6 servings/day of whole grains, vegetables and dairy, and 3 servings/day of fruits) results in a 56% risk reduction. Consumption of risk‐increasing foods of 2 servings/day of red meat, and 4 servings/day of processed meat associated with a 1.8‐fold increased risk. A plant‐based diet can thus lead to an important risk reduction of CRC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-7136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31198</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29210053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Beverages ; Cancer ; Case-Control Studies ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal cancer ; Colorectal carcinoma ; Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Dairy products ; diet ; Diet - statistics & numerical data ; dose‐response ; Eggs ; food groups ; Food intake ; Fruits ; Grain ; Health risk assessment ; Health risks ; Humans ; Legumes ; Meat ; Medical research ; Meta-analysis ; Sugar ; Vegetables</subject><ispartof>International journal of cancer, 2018-05, Vol.142 (9), p.1748-1758</ispartof><rights>2017 UICC</rights><rights>2017 UICC.</rights><rights>2018 UICC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-b546f46552fb90e04a80a6c79db373d692069797315df9df9592c2cf436dfb013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-b546f46552fb90e04a80a6c79db373d692069797315df9df9592c2cf436dfb013</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3407-7594</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fijc.31198$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fijc.31198$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29210053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schwingshackl, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwedhelm, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knüppel, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laure Preterre, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechthold, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Henauw, Stefaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michels, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devleesschauwer, Brecht</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeing, Heiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><title>Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer</title><title>International journal of cancer</title><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><description>The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relationship between intake of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar‐sweetened beverages with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and Embase for prospective studies investigating the association between these 12 food groups and risk of CRC until April 2017. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random effects model for high vs. low intake categories, as well as for linear and nonlinear relationships. An inverse association was observed for whole grains (RR30g/d: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.97; n = 9 studies), vegetables (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98; n = 15), fruit (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.99; n = 16) and dairy (RR200g/d: 0.93, 95% CI 0.91, 0.94; n = 15), while a positive association for red meat (RR100g/d: 1.12, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19; n = 21) and processed meat (RR50g/d: 1.17, 95% CI 1.10, 1.23; n = 16), was seen in the linear dose‐response meta‐analysis. Some evidence for nonlinear relationships was observed between vegetables, fruit and dairy and risk of colorectal cancer. Findings of this meta‐analysis showed that a diet characterized by high intake of whole grains, vegetables, fruit and dairy products and low amounts of red meat and processed meat was associated with lower risk of CRC.
What's new?
Diet is known to affect risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but what are the optimal intakes of foods remain unclear. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, the authors investigated the association between 12 a priori‐defined food groups and risk of CRC. Optimal consumption of risk‐decreasing foods (6 servings/day of whole grains, vegetables and dairy, and 3 servings/day of fruits) results in a 56% risk reduction. Consumption of risk‐increasing foods of 2 servings/day of red meat, and 4 servings/day of processed meat associated with a 1.8‐fold increased risk. A plant‐based diet can thus lead to an important risk reduction of CRC.</description><subject>Beverages</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Colorectal carcinoma</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dairy products</subject><subject>diet</subject><subject>Diet - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>dose‐response</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>food groups</subject><subject>Food intake</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legumes</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Sugar</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><issn>0020-7136</issn><issn>1097-0215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUx4Mobk4PfgEpeHGHbi9JkzZHKU4nAy96DmmaSGfXzGRF9u2NdnoQhAfv8H7_P48fQpcYZhiAzJu1nlGMRXGExhhEngLB7BiN4w3SHFM-QmchrAEwZpCdohERJAYZHaPpwrk6efWu34ZEdXXim_CWOJto1zpv9E61iVadNv4cnVjVBnNx2BP0srh7Lh_S1dP9srxdpZoWRZFWLOM244wRWwkwkKkCFNe5qCua05oLAlzkIqeY1VbEYYJoom1GeW0rwHSCboberXfvvQk7uWmCNm2rOuP6IHHMZpyQnET0-g-6dr3v4neSAIYCAxFZpKYDpb0LwRsrt77ZKL-XGOSXPxn9yW9_kb06NPbVxtS_5I-wCMwH4KNpzf7_Jrl8LIfKTyl1deQ</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Schwingshackl, Lukas</creator><creator>Schwedhelm, Carolina</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Georg</creator><creator>Knüppel, Sven</creator><creator>Laure Preterre, Anne</creator><creator>Iqbal, Khalid</creator><creator>Bechthold, Angela</creator><creator>De Henauw, Stefaan</creator><creator>Michels, Nathalie</creator><creator>Devleesschauwer, Brecht</creator><creator>Boeing, Heiner</creator><creator>Schlesinger, Sabrina</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-7594</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer</title><author>Schwingshackl, Lukas ; Schwedhelm, Carolina ; Hoffmann, Georg ; Knüppel, Sven ; Laure Preterre, Anne ; Iqbal, Khalid ; Bechthold, Angela ; De Henauw, Stefaan ; Michels, Nathalie ; Devleesschauwer, Brecht ; Boeing, Heiner ; Schlesinger, Sabrina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-b546f46552fb90e04a80a6c79db373d692069797315df9df9592c2cf436dfb013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Beverages</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Colorectal carcinoma</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dairy products</topic><topic>diet</topic><topic>Diet - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>dose‐response</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>food groups</topic><topic>Food intake</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legumes</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Sugar</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schwingshackl, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwedhelm, Carolina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Georg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knüppel, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laure Preterre, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iqbal, Khalid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bechthold, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Henauw, Stefaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michels, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devleesschauwer, Brecht</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeing, Heiner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlesinger, Sabrina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schwingshackl, Lukas</au><au>Schwedhelm, Carolina</au><au>Hoffmann, Georg</au><au>Knüppel, Sven</au><au>Laure Preterre, Anne</au><au>Iqbal, Khalid</au><au>Bechthold, Angela</au><au>De Henauw, Stefaan</au><au>Michels, Nathalie</au><au>Devleesschauwer, Brecht</au><au>Boeing, Heiner</au><au>Schlesinger, Sabrina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cancer</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1748</spage><epage>1758</epage><pages>1748-1758</pages><issn>0020-7136</issn><eissn>1097-0215</eissn><abstract>The aim of this systematic review and meta‐analysis was to summarize the evidence on the relationship between intake of 12 major food groups, including whole grains, refined grains, vegetables, fruit, nuts, legumes, eggs, dairy, fish, red meat, processed meat and sugar‐sweetened beverages with risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). We conducted a systematic search in PubMed and Embase for prospective studies investigating the association between these 12 food groups and risk of CRC until April 2017. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random effects model for high vs. low intake categories, as well as for linear and nonlinear relationships. An inverse association was observed for whole grains (RR30g/d: 0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.97; n = 9 studies), vegetables (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.96, 0.98; n = 15), fruit (RR100g/d: 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.99; n = 16) and dairy (RR200g/d: 0.93, 95% CI 0.91, 0.94; n = 15), while a positive association for red meat (RR100g/d: 1.12, 95% CI 1.06, 1.19; n = 21) and processed meat (RR50g/d: 1.17, 95% CI 1.10, 1.23; n = 16), was seen in the linear dose‐response meta‐analysis. Some evidence for nonlinear relationships was observed between vegetables, fruit and dairy and risk of colorectal cancer. Findings of this meta‐analysis showed that a diet characterized by high intake of whole grains, vegetables, fruit and dairy products and low amounts of red meat and processed meat was associated with lower risk of CRC.
What's new?
Diet is known to affect risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), but what are the optimal intakes of foods remain unclear. In this systematic review and meta‐analysis, the authors investigated the association between 12 a priori‐defined food groups and risk of CRC. Optimal consumption of risk‐decreasing foods (6 servings/day of whole grains, vegetables and dairy, and 3 servings/day of fruits) results in a 56% risk reduction. Consumption of risk‐increasing foods of 2 servings/day of red meat, and 4 servings/day of processed meat associated with a 1.8‐fold increased risk. A plant‐based diet can thus lead to an important risk reduction of CRC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>29210053</pmid><doi>10.1002/ijc.31198</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3407-7594</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-7136 |
ispartof | International journal of cancer, 2018-05, Vol.142 (9), p.1748-1758 |
issn | 0020-7136 1097-0215 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1973462272 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Beverages Cancer Case-Control Studies Cohort Studies Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma Colorectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Dairy products diet Diet - statistics & numerical data dose‐response Eggs food groups Food intake Fruits Grain Health risk assessment Health risks Humans Legumes Meat Medical research Meta-analysis Sugar Vegetables |
title | Food groups and risk of colorectal cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T10%3A34%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Food%20groups%20and%20risk%20of%20colorectal%20cancer&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cancer&rft.au=Schwingshackl,%20Lukas&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1748&rft.epage=1758&rft.pages=1748-1758&rft.issn=0020-7136&rft.eissn=1097-0215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ijc.31198&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2010810294%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010810294&rft_id=info:pmid/29210053&rfr_iscdi=true |