Event-related Potentials Reveal Age Differences in the Encoding and Recognition of Scenes

The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate how the encoding and recognition of complex scenes change with normal aging. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified more drastic age impairments at encoding than at recognition, ERP studies a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cognitive neuroscience 2007-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1089-1103
Hauptverfasser: Gutchess, Angela H., Ieuji, Yoko, Federmeier, Kara D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1103
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1089
container_title Journal of cognitive neuroscience
container_volume 19
creator Gutchess, Angela H.
Ieuji, Yoko
Federmeier, Kara D.
description The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate how the encoding and recognition of complex scenes change with normal aging. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified more drastic age impairments at encoding than at recognition, ERP studies accumulate more evidence for age differences at retrieval. However, stimulus type and paradigm differences across the two literatures have made direct comparisons difficult. Here, we collected young and elderly adults' encoding- and recognition-phase ERPs using the same materials and paradigm as a previous fMRI study [Gutchess, A. H., Welsh, R. C., Hedden, T., Bangert, A., Minear, M., Liu, L., et al. Aging and the neural correlates of successful picture encoding: Frontal activations compensate for decreased medial temporal activity. , 84–96, 2005]. Twenty young and 20 elderly adults incidentally encoded and then recognized photographs of outdoor scenes. During encoding, young adults showed a frontocentral subsequent memory effect, with high-confidence hits exhibiting greater positivity than misses. Elderly adults showed a similar subsequent memory effect, which, however, did not differ as a function of confidence. During recognition, young adults elicited a widespread old/new effect, and high-confidence hits were distinct from both low-confidence hits and false alarms. Elderly adults elicited a smaller and later old/new effect, which was unaffected by confidence, and hits and false alarms were indistinguishable in the waveforms. Consistent with prior ERP work, these results point to important age-related changes in recognition-phase brain activity, even when behavioral measures of memory and confidence pattern similarly across groups. We speculate that memory processes with different time signatures contribute to the apparent differences across encoding and retrieval stages, and across methods.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1089
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19733950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19733950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-9706da94afa6ed63d7b9513dbfdbcf1a1a49e62d9cfcb9212fbed7ff0dad28f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2LEzEUhoMobl39BYIEQe-mm49pJrkRlrWuwoLiB-hVyCQn3ZRpUpNpQX-9GVrcVfy4OSHJk_e8Jy9CjymZUyrY2TrZOGeEdHOq5rUQqe6gGV1w0kip5F00qyeyUUx9PkEPSlkTQthCtPfRCe0WkispZujLcg9xbDIMZgSH36WxboMZCn4PezADPl8Bfhm8hwzRQsEh4vEa8DLa5EJcYRNdRW1axTCGFHHy-IOFCOUhuuerDjw6rqfo06vlx4vXzdXbyzcX51eNFYKOjeqIcEa1xhsBTnDX9WpBueu9662nhppWgWBOWW97xSjzPbjOe-KMY9JzfopeHHS3u34DrvYesxn0NoeNyd90MkH_ehPDtV6lvWZCMsEmgedHgZy-7qCMehOKhWEwEdKu6Gqw5S2j_wWp6jhXC1LBp7-B67TLsf6CZoyTrsYjKsQPkM2plAz-p2VK9BSwngLWU8BVWddS46yvntye9ubNMdEKPDsCplgz-GyiDeWGqxq0lV3lLg_cJtyyN7XcUxU6zQljTNb2jFY3mkj9PWz_YunsD0r_GuIHy4TW7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223078896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Event-related Potentials Reveal Age Differences in the Encoding and Recognition of Scenes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Gutchess, Angela H. ; Ieuji, Yoko ; Federmeier, Kara D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gutchess, Angela H. ; Ieuji, Yoko ; Federmeier, Kara D.</creatorcontrib><description>The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate how the encoding and recognition of complex scenes change with normal aging. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified more drastic age impairments at encoding than at recognition, ERP studies accumulate more evidence for age differences at retrieval. However, stimulus type and paradigm differences across the two literatures have made direct comparisons difficult. Here, we collected young and elderly adults' encoding- and recognition-phase ERPs using the same materials and paradigm as a previous fMRI study [Gutchess, A. H., Welsh, R. C., Hedden, T., Bangert, A., Minear, M., Liu, L., et al. Aging and the neural correlates of successful picture encoding: Frontal activations compensate for decreased medial temporal activity. , 84–96, 2005]. Twenty young and 20 elderly adults incidentally encoded and then recognized photographs of outdoor scenes. During encoding, young adults showed a frontocentral subsequent memory effect, with high-confidence hits exhibiting greater positivity than misses. Elderly adults showed a similar subsequent memory effect, which, however, did not differ as a function of confidence. During recognition, young adults elicited a widespread old/new effect, and high-confidence hits were distinct from both low-confidence hits and false alarms. Elderly adults elicited a smaller and later old/new effect, which was unaffected by confidence, and hits and false alarms were indistinguishable in the waveforms. Consistent with prior ERP work, these results point to important age-related changes in recognition-phase brain activity, even when behavioral measures of memory and confidence pattern similarly across groups. We speculate that memory processes with different time signatures contribute to the apparent differences across encoding and retrieval stages, and across methods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-929X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1089</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17583986</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCONEO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Adult. Elderly ; Aged ; Aging ; Aging - physiology ; Behavioral psychophysiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain ; Brain Mapping ; Developmental psychology ; Electroencephalography - methods ; Electrophysiology ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Neurology ; Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Recognition (Psychology) - physiology ; Tests</subject><ispartof>Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2007-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1089-1103</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Jul 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-9706da94afa6ed63d7b9513dbfdbcf1a1a49e62d9cfcb9212fbed7ff0dad28f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-9706da94afa6ed63d7b9513dbfdbcf1a1a49e62d9cfcb9212fbed7ff0dad28f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/doi/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1089$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,53984,53985</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18931487$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17583986$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gutchess, Angela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ieuji, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Federmeier, Kara D.</creatorcontrib><title>Event-related Potentials Reveal Age Differences in the Encoding and Recognition of Scenes</title><title>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><description>The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate how the encoding and recognition of complex scenes change with normal aging. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified more drastic age impairments at encoding than at recognition, ERP studies accumulate more evidence for age differences at retrieval. However, stimulus type and paradigm differences across the two literatures have made direct comparisons difficult. Here, we collected young and elderly adults' encoding- and recognition-phase ERPs using the same materials and paradigm as a previous fMRI study [Gutchess, A. H., Welsh, R. C., Hedden, T., Bangert, A., Minear, M., Liu, L., et al. Aging and the neural correlates of successful picture encoding: Frontal activations compensate for decreased medial temporal activity. , 84–96, 2005]. Twenty young and 20 elderly adults incidentally encoded and then recognized photographs of outdoor scenes. During encoding, young adults showed a frontocentral subsequent memory effect, with high-confidence hits exhibiting greater positivity than misses. Elderly adults showed a similar subsequent memory effect, which, however, did not differ as a function of confidence. During recognition, young adults elicited a widespread old/new effect, and high-confidence hits were distinct from both low-confidence hits and false alarms. Elderly adults elicited a smaller and later old/new effect, which was unaffected by confidence, and hits and false alarms were indistinguishable in the waveforms. Consistent with prior ERP work, these results point to important age-related changes in recognition-phase brain activity, even when behavioral measures of memory and confidence pattern similarly across groups. We speculate that memory processes with different time signatures contribute to the apparent differences across encoding and retrieval stages, and across methods.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adult. Elderly</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Behavioral psychophysiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - methods</subject><subject>Electrophysiology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Tests</subject><issn>0898-929X</issn><issn>1530-8898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2LEzEUhoMobl39BYIEQe-mm49pJrkRlrWuwoLiB-hVyCQn3ZRpUpNpQX-9GVrcVfy4OSHJk_e8Jy9CjymZUyrY2TrZOGeEdHOq5rUQqe6gGV1w0kip5F00qyeyUUx9PkEPSlkTQthCtPfRCe0WkispZujLcg9xbDIMZgSH36WxboMZCn4PezADPl8Bfhm8hwzRQsEh4vEa8DLa5EJcYRNdRW1axTCGFHHy-IOFCOUhuuerDjw6rqfo06vlx4vXzdXbyzcX51eNFYKOjeqIcEa1xhsBTnDX9WpBueu9662nhppWgWBOWW97xSjzPbjOe-KMY9JzfopeHHS3u34DrvYesxn0NoeNyd90MkH_ehPDtV6lvWZCMsEmgedHgZy-7qCMehOKhWEwEdKu6Gqw5S2j_wWp6jhXC1LBp7-B67TLsf6CZoyTrsYjKsQPkM2plAz-p2VK9BSwngLWU8BVWddS46yvntye9ubNMdEKPDsCplgz-GyiDeWGqxq0lV3lLg_cJtyyN7XcUxU6zQljTNb2jFY3mkj9PWz_YunsD0r_GuIHy4TW7g</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Gutchess, Angela H.</creator><creator>Ieuji, Yoko</creator><creator>Federmeier, Kara D.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Event-related Potentials Reveal Age Differences in the Encoding and Recognition of Scenes</title><author>Gutchess, Angela H. ; Ieuji, Yoko ; Federmeier, Kara D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c661t-9706da94afa6ed63d7b9513dbfdbcf1a1a49e62d9cfcb9212fbed7ff0dad28f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adult. Elderly</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Behavioral psychophysiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - methods</topic><topic>Electrophysiology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gutchess, Angela H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ieuji, Yoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Federmeier, Kara D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gutchess, Angela H.</au><au>Ieuji, Yoko</au><au>Federmeier, Kara D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Event-related Potentials Reveal Age Differences in the Encoding and Recognition of Scenes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1089</spage><epage>1103</epage><pages>1089-1103</pages><issn>0898-929X</issn><eissn>1530-8898</eissn><coden>JCONEO</coden><abstract>The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate how the encoding and recognition of complex scenes change with normal aging. Although functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have identified more drastic age impairments at encoding than at recognition, ERP studies accumulate more evidence for age differences at retrieval. However, stimulus type and paradigm differences across the two literatures have made direct comparisons difficult. Here, we collected young and elderly adults' encoding- and recognition-phase ERPs using the same materials and paradigm as a previous fMRI study [Gutchess, A. H., Welsh, R. C., Hedden, T., Bangert, A., Minear, M., Liu, L., et al. Aging and the neural correlates of successful picture encoding: Frontal activations compensate for decreased medial temporal activity. , 84–96, 2005]. Twenty young and 20 elderly adults incidentally encoded and then recognized photographs of outdoor scenes. During encoding, young adults showed a frontocentral subsequent memory effect, with high-confidence hits exhibiting greater positivity than misses. Elderly adults showed a similar subsequent memory effect, which, however, did not differ as a function of confidence. During recognition, young adults elicited a widespread old/new effect, and high-confidence hits were distinct from both low-confidence hits and false alarms. Elderly adults elicited a smaller and later old/new effect, which was unaffected by confidence, and hits and false alarms were indistinguishable in the waveforms. Consistent with prior ERP work, these results point to important age-related changes in recognition-phase brain activity, even when behavioral measures of memory and confidence pattern similarly across groups. We speculate that memory processes with different time signatures contribute to the apparent differences across encoding and retrieval stages, and across methods.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><pmid>17583986</pmid><doi>10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1089</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-929X
ispartof Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2007-07, Vol.19 (7), p.1089-1103
issn 0898-929X
1530-8898
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19733950
source MEDLINE; MIT Press Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Adult. Elderly
Aged
Aging
Aging - physiology
Behavioral psychophysiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain
Brain Mapping
Developmental psychology
Electroencephalography - methods
Electrophysiology
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Memory
Mental Recall - physiology
Middle Aged
Neurology
Neuropsychological Tests - statistics & numerical data
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Photic Stimulation - methods
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Reaction Time - physiology
Recognition (Psychology) - physiology
Tests
title Event-related Potentials Reveal Age Differences in the Encoding and Recognition of Scenes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T22%3A51%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Event-related%20Potentials%20Reveal%20Age%20Differences%20in%20the%20Encoding%20and%20Recognition%20of%20Scenes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cognitive%20neuroscience&rft.au=Gutchess,%20Angela%20H.&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1089&rft.epage=1103&rft.pages=1089-1103&rft.issn=0898-929X&rft.eissn=1530-8898&rft.coden=JCONEO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.7.1089&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E19733950%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223078896&rft_id=info:pmid/17583986&rfr_iscdi=true