Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods
Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments: Ulva lactuca addition and zeolit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine pollution bulletin 2003-05, Vol.46 (5), p.607-618 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 618 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 607 |
container_title | Marine pollution bulletin |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Burgess, R.M. Pelletier, M.C. Ho, K.T. Serbst, J.R. Ryba, S.A. Kuhn, A. Perron, M.M. Raczelowski, P. Cantwell, M.G. |
description | Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments:
Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod
Ampelisca abdita and mysid
Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH
x
and NH
3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the
U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH
x
and NH
3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19729150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X03000389</els_id><sourcerecordid>19729150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9CUpulAqO5mMmmfFGpFQtFARtwbtw5swZjEyS7SS7WH-9s93FXvYqF-d5zwnvw9gLKd5JIc37H0KoptLK_DwV-o0QQrdV94itZGu7SmujH7PVf-SIHef8e4GssvIpO5LK6qZr2hVL3ymkLUw8jRxCSNEDL-mPR19uuY88wOwj8UyDDxQLv7o4zx84cExhvYxyirvk9bQFPgGWDcJb_pfS5AtxiAMHmqH4hQpUfqUhP2NPRpgyPT-8J-z68_nV2dfq8tuXi7NPlxXU1pSqH6XUWpKWdqyxtcai7KmTJBQhaCtr1BahRyBFrZEN1qptlRLU02CQ9Al7vd-7ntPNhnJxwWekaYJIaZOd7KzqZCMeBmtjje7qBWz2IM4p55lGt579Us-tk8LtlLg7JW7XtxPa3Slx3ZJ7eTiw6QMN96mDgwV4dQAgI0zjDBF9vudqa42Qu0Uf9xwtvW09zS6jp4iLmpmwuCH5B77yD4xYqVM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14676394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Burgess, R.M. ; Pelletier, M.C. ; Ho, K.T. ; Serbst, J.R. ; Ryba, S.A. ; Kuhn, A. ; Perron, M.M. ; Raczelowski, P. ; Cantwell, M.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burgess, R.M. ; Pelletier, M.C. ; Ho, K.T. ; Serbst, J.R. ; Ryba, S.A. ; Kuhn, A. ; Perron, M.M. ; Raczelowski, P. ; Cantwell, M.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments:
Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod
Ampelisca abdita and mysid
Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH
x
and NH
3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the
U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH
x
and NH
3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12735958</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPNBAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Americamysis bahia ; Ammonia ; Ammonia - isolation & purification ; Ammonia - toxicity ; Ampelisca abdita ; Amphipoda ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Bioavailability ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological Availability ; Chlorococcales ; Chlorophyta - chemistry ; Crustacea ; Decontamination. Miscellaneous ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Interstitial water ; Marine ; Mysidae ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Soil and sediments pollution ; Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) ; Toxicity Tests ; Ulva lactuca ; Ulva lactuca addition ; Water Pollutants - isolation & purification ; Water Pollutants - toxicity ; Zeolite addition ; zeolites ; Zeolites - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 2003-05, Vol.46 (5), p.607-618</ispartof><rights>2003</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X03000389$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14776019$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12735958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burgess, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, K.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serbst, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryba, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raczelowski, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantwell, M.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><description>Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments:
Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod
Ampelisca abdita and mysid
Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH
x
and NH
3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the
U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH
x
and NH
3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests.</description><subject>Americamysis bahia</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonia - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Ammonia - toxicity</subject><subject>Ampelisca abdita</subject><subject>Amphipoda</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Chlorococcales</subject><subject>Chlorophyta - chemistry</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Interstitial water</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mysidae</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><subject>Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE)</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Ulva lactuca</subject><subject>Ulva lactuca addition</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Zeolite addition</subject><subject>zeolites</subject><subject>Zeolites - chemistry</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9CUpulAqO5mMmmfFGpFQtFARtwbtw5swZjEyS7SS7WH-9s93FXvYqF-d5zwnvw9gLKd5JIc37H0KoptLK_DwV-o0QQrdV94itZGu7SmujH7PVf-SIHef8e4GssvIpO5LK6qZr2hVL3ymkLUw8jRxCSNEDL-mPR19uuY88wOwj8UyDDxQLv7o4zx84cExhvYxyirvk9bQFPgGWDcJb_pfS5AtxiAMHmqH4hQpUfqUhP2NPRpgyPT-8J-z68_nV2dfq8tuXi7NPlxXU1pSqH6XUWpKWdqyxtcai7KmTJBQhaCtr1BahRyBFrZEN1qptlRLU02CQ9Al7vd-7ntPNhnJxwWekaYJIaZOd7KzqZCMeBmtjje7qBWz2IM4p55lGt579Us-tk8LtlLg7JW7XtxPa3Slx3ZJ7eTiw6QMN96mDgwV4dQAgI0zjDBF9vudqa42Qu0Uf9xwtvW09zS6jp4iLmpmwuCH5B77yD4xYqVM</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Burgess, R.M.</creator><creator>Pelletier, M.C.</creator><creator>Ho, K.T.</creator><creator>Serbst, J.R.</creator><creator>Ryba, S.A.</creator><creator>Kuhn, A.</creator><creator>Perron, M.M.</creator><creator>Raczelowski, P.</creator><creator>Cantwell, M.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</title><author>Burgess, R.M. ; Pelletier, M.C. ; Ho, K.T. ; Serbst, J.R. ; Ryba, S.A. ; Kuhn, A. ; Perron, M.M. ; Raczelowski, P. ; Cantwell, M.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Americamysis bahia</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonia - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Ammonia - toxicity</topic><topic>Ampelisca abdita</topic><topic>Amphipoda</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Chlorococcales</topic><topic>Chlorophyta - chemistry</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Interstitial water</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mysidae</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><topic>Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE)</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Ulva lactuca</topic><topic>Ulva lactuca addition</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Zeolite addition</topic><topic>zeolites</topic><topic>Zeolites - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgess, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, K.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serbst, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryba, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raczelowski, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantwell, M.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgess, R.M.</au><au>Pelletier, M.C.</au><au>Ho, K.T.</au><au>Serbst, J.R.</au><au>Ryba, S.A.</au><au>Kuhn, A.</au><au>Perron, M.M.</au><au>Raczelowski, P.</au><au>Cantwell, M.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>607-618</pages><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><coden>MPNBAZ</coden><abstract>Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments:
Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod
Ampelisca abdita and mysid
Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH
x
and NH
3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH
x
and NH
3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the
U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH
x
and NH
3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both
U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12735958</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-326X |
ispartof | Marine pollution bulletin, 2003-05, Vol.46 (5), p.607-618 |
issn | 0025-326X 1879-3363 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19729150 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Americamysis bahia Ammonia Ammonia - isolation & purification Ammonia - toxicity Ampelisca abdita Amphipoda Animals Applied sciences Bioavailability Biodegradation, Environmental Biological Availability Chlorococcales Chlorophyta - chemistry Crustacea Decontamination. Miscellaneous Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Environmental Monitoring Exact sciences and technology Geologic Sediments - chemistry Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Interstitial water Marine Mysidae Pollution Pollution, environment geology Soil and sediments pollution Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) Toxicity Tests Ulva lactuca Ulva lactuca addition Water Pollutants - isolation & purification Water Pollutants - toxicity Zeolite addition zeolites Zeolites - chemistry |
title | Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A12%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20ammonia%20toxicity%20in%20marine%20sediment%20TIEs:%20a%20comparison%20of%20Ulva%20lactuca,%20zeolite%20and%20aeration%20methods&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Burgess,%20R.M.&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=607-618&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft.coden=MPNBAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19729150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14676394&rft_id=info:pmid/12735958&rft_els_id=S0025326X03000389&rfr_iscdi=true |