Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods

Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments: Ulva lactuca addition and zeolit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine pollution bulletin 2003-05, Vol.46 (5), p.607-618
Hauptverfasser: Burgess, R.M., Pelletier, M.C., Ho, K.T., Serbst, J.R., Ryba, S.A., Kuhn, A., Perron, M.M., Raczelowski, P., Cantwell, M.G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 618
container_issue 5
container_start_page 607
container_title Marine pollution bulletin
container_volume 46
creator Burgess, R.M.
Pelletier, M.C.
Ho, K.T.
Serbst, J.R.
Ryba, S.A.
Kuhn, A.
Perron, M.M.
Raczelowski, P.
Cantwell, M.G.
description Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments: Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod Ampelisca abdita and mysid Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH x and NH 3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH x and NH 3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19729150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X03000389</els_id><sourcerecordid>19729150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9CUpulAqO5mMmmfFGpFQtFARtwbtw5swZjEyS7SS7WH-9s93FXvYqF-d5zwnvw9gLKd5JIc37H0KoptLK_DwV-o0QQrdV94itZGu7SmujH7PVf-SIHef8e4GssvIpO5LK6qZr2hVL3ymkLUw8jRxCSNEDL-mPR19uuY88wOwj8UyDDxQLv7o4zx84cExhvYxyirvk9bQFPgGWDcJb_pfS5AtxiAMHmqH4hQpUfqUhP2NPRpgyPT-8J-z68_nV2dfq8tuXi7NPlxXU1pSqH6XUWpKWdqyxtcai7KmTJBQhaCtr1BahRyBFrZEN1qptlRLU02CQ9Al7vd-7ntPNhnJxwWekaYJIaZOd7KzqZCMeBmtjje7qBWz2IM4p55lGt579Us-tk8LtlLg7JW7XtxPa3Slx3ZJ7eTiw6QMN96mDgwV4dQAgI0zjDBF9vudqa42Qu0Uf9xwtvW09zS6jp4iLmpmwuCH5B77yD4xYqVM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14676394</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Burgess, R.M. ; Pelletier, M.C. ; Ho, K.T. ; Serbst, J.R. ; Ryba, S.A. ; Kuhn, A. ; Perron, M.M. ; Raczelowski, P. ; Cantwell, M.G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burgess, R.M. ; Pelletier, M.C. ; Ho, K.T. ; Serbst, J.R. ; Ryba, S.A. ; Kuhn, A. ; Perron, M.M. ; Raczelowski, P. ; Cantwell, M.G.</creatorcontrib><description>Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments: Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod Ampelisca abdita and mysid Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH x and NH 3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH x and NH 3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12735958</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPNBAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Americamysis bahia ; Ammonia ; Ammonia - isolation &amp; purification ; Ammonia - toxicity ; Ampelisca abdita ; Amphipoda ; Animals ; Applied sciences ; Bioavailability ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Biological Availability ; Chlorococcales ; Chlorophyta - chemistry ; Crustacea ; Decontamination. Miscellaneous ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration ; Interstitial water ; Marine ; Mysidae ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Soil and sediments pollution ; Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) ; Toxicity Tests ; Ulva lactuca ; Ulva lactuca addition ; Water Pollutants - isolation &amp; purification ; Water Pollutants - toxicity ; Zeolite addition ; zeolites ; Zeolites - chemistry</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 2003-05, Vol.46 (5), p.607-618</ispartof><rights>2003</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025326X03000389$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14776019$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12735958$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burgess, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, K.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serbst, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryba, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raczelowski, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantwell, M.G.</creatorcontrib><title>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><description>Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments: Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod Ampelisca abdita and mysid Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH x and NH 3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH x and NH 3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests.</description><subject>Americamysis bahia</subject><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Ammonia - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Ammonia - toxicity</subject><subject>Ampelisca abdita</subject><subject>Amphipoda</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Chlorococcales</subject><subject>Chlorophyta - chemistry</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</subject><subject>Interstitial water</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mysidae</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><subject>Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE)</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Ulva lactuca</subject><subject>Ulva lactuca addition</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Zeolite addition</subject><subject>zeolites</subject><subject>Zeolites - chemistry</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1rFDEUhoModlv9CUpulAqO5mMmmfFGpFQtFARtwbtw5swZjEyS7SS7WH-9s93FXvYqF-d5zwnvw9gLKd5JIc37H0KoptLK_DwV-o0QQrdV94itZGu7SmujH7PVf-SIHef8e4GssvIpO5LK6qZr2hVL3ymkLUw8jRxCSNEDL-mPR19uuY88wOwj8UyDDxQLv7o4zx84cExhvYxyirvk9bQFPgGWDcJb_pfS5AtxiAMHmqH4hQpUfqUhP2NPRpgyPT-8J-z68_nV2dfq8tuXi7NPlxXU1pSqH6XUWpKWdqyxtcai7KmTJBQhaCtr1BahRyBFrZEN1qptlRLU02CQ9Al7vd-7ntPNhnJxwWekaYJIaZOd7KzqZCMeBmtjje7qBWz2IM4p55lGt579Us-tk8LtlLg7JW7XtxPa3Slx3ZJ7eTiw6QMN96mDgwV4dQAgI0zjDBF9vudqa42Qu0Uf9xwtvW09zS6jp4iLmpmwuCH5B77yD4xYqVM</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Burgess, R.M.</creator><creator>Pelletier, M.C.</creator><creator>Ho, K.T.</creator><creator>Serbst, J.R.</creator><creator>Ryba, S.A.</creator><creator>Kuhn, A.</creator><creator>Perron, M.M.</creator><creator>Raczelowski, P.</creator><creator>Cantwell, M.G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</title><author>Burgess, R.M. ; Pelletier, M.C. ; Ho, K.T. ; Serbst, J.R. ; Ryba, S.A. ; Kuhn, A. ; Perron, M.M. ; Raczelowski, P. ; Cantwell, M.G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a476t-bf11331e317f4c8767c1be91e02eca3714c37cabcae2e8615c4288220ebed6ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Americamysis bahia</topic><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Ammonia - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Ammonia - toxicity</topic><topic>Ampelisca abdita</topic><topic>Amphipoda</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Chlorococcales</topic><topic>Chlorophyta - chemistry</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Decontamination. Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>Hydrogen-Ion Concentration</topic><topic>Interstitial water</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mysidae</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><topic>Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE)</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Ulva lactuca</topic><topic>Ulva lactuca addition</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Zeolite addition</topic><topic>zeolites</topic><topic>Zeolites - chemistry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burgess, R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelletier, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, K.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serbst, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryba, S.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhn, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perron, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raczelowski, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cantwell, M.G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burgess, R.M.</au><au>Pelletier, M.C.</au><au>Ho, K.T.</au><au>Serbst, J.R.</au><au>Ryba, S.A.</au><au>Kuhn, A.</au><au>Perron, M.M.</au><au>Raczelowski, P.</au><au>Cantwell, M.G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>607</spage><epage>618</epage><pages>607-618</pages><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><coden>MPNBAZ</coden><abstract>Toxicity Identification Evaluations (TIEs) can be used to determine the specific toxicant(s), including ammonia, causing toxicity observed in marine sediments. Two primary TIE manipulations are available for characterizing and identifying ammonia in marine sediments: Ulva lactuca addition and zeolite addition. In this study, we compared the efficacy of these methods to (1) remove NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters and (2) reduce toxicity to the amphipod Ampelisca abdita and mysid Americamysis bahia using both spiked and environmentally contaminated sediments. The utility of aeration for removing NH x and NH 3 during a marine sediment TIE was also evaluated preliminarily. In general, the U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods performed similarly well at removing spiked NH x and NH 3 from overlying and interstitial waters compared to an unmanipulated sediment. Toxicity to the amphipod was reduced approximately the same by both methods. However, toxicity to the mysid was most effectively reduced by the U. lactuca addition indicating this method functions best with epibenthic species exposed to ammonia in the water column. Aeration removed NH x and NH 3 from seawater when the pH was adjusted to 10; however, very little ammonia was removed at ambient pHs (∼8.0). This comparison demonstrates both U. lactuca and zeolite addition methods are effective TIE tools for reducing the concentrations and toxicity of ammonia in whole sediment toxicity tests.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12735958</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-326X
ispartof Marine pollution bulletin, 2003-05, Vol.46 (5), p.607-618
issn 0025-326X
1879-3363
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19729150
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Americamysis bahia
Ammonia
Ammonia - isolation & purification
Ammonia - toxicity
Ampelisca abdita
Amphipoda
Animals
Applied sciences
Bioavailability
Biodegradation, Environmental
Biological Availability
Chlorococcales
Chlorophyta - chemistry
Crustacea
Decontamination. Miscellaneous
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Environmental Monitoring
Exact sciences and technology
Geologic Sediments - chemistry
Hydrogen-Ion Concentration
Interstitial water
Marine
Mysidae
Pollution
Pollution, environment geology
Soil and sediments pollution
Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE)
Toxicity Tests
Ulva lactuca
Ulva lactuca addition
Water Pollutants - isolation & purification
Water Pollutants - toxicity
Zeolite addition
zeolites
Zeolites - chemistry
title Removal of ammonia toxicity in marine sediment TIEs: a comparison of Ulva lactuca, zeolite and aeration methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A12%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Removal%20of%20ammonia%20toxicity%20in%20marine%20sediment%20TIEs:%20a%20comparison%20of%20Ulva%20lactuca,%20zeolite%20and%20aeration%20methods&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Burgess,%20R.M.&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=607&rft.epage=618&rft.pages=607-618&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft.coden=MPNBAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0025-326X(03)00038-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19729150%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14676394&rft_id=info:pmid/12735958&rft_els_id=S0025326X03000389&rfr_iscdi=true