Relationships between analytical methods utilized as tools in the evaluation of landfill waste stability

In this study, the refuse from 12 landfills of various ages ranging from fresh refuse to material 11 years old was collected, and changes in the bio-stability parameters were determined. The parameters measured included cellulose, lignin, biochemical methane potential (BMP) and volatile solids, alon...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2006, Vol.26 (12), p.1349-1356
Hauptverfasser: Kelly, Ryan J., Shearer, Bradley D., Kim, Jongmin, Goldsmith, C. Douglas, Hater, Gary R., Novak, John T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1356
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1349
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 26
creator Kelly, Ryan J.
Shearer, Bradley D.
Kim, Jongmin
Goldsmith, C. Douglas
Hater, Gary R.
Novak, John T.
description In this study, the refuse from 12 landfills of various ages ranging from fresh refuse to material 11 years old was collected, and changes in the bio-stability parameters were determined. The parameters measured included cellulose, lignin, biochemical methane potential (BMP) and volatile solids, along with plastics. These parameters, along with the cellulose to lignin ratio were compared to determine which were most indicative of the bio-stability of the refuse. Lignin and volatile solids measurements were affected by plastics in refuse samples. Plastics increased both lignin and volatile solids measurements by approximately 10%. Cellulose and volatile solids measurements correlated well with age, each other, and with BMP measurements and were therefore considered the best parameters to determine stability. Data for the Riverbend landfill, a landfill with a moisture content of 48%, which is similar to that of bioreactor landfills, showed that degradation was nearly complete after 5 years as indicated by low values for cellulose and BMP.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19721150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X05003168</els_id><sourcerecordid>14794648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f64b502de45eaad8313f4f6ab2250ac4fdcd9a630729036d2a35781472981243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVGL1DAUhYMo7uzqPxDJi751zE2TtH0RZNFVWBBEwbdwm9wyGdJ2bNJdxl9v1hnYN326XPjO4XAOY69AbEGAebff3mMacdpKIfQWYCuge8I20DZdJZU2T9lGdNpUQtc_L9hlSnshQLUgnrMLMEo2TaM2bPeNIuYwT2kXDon3lO-JJo4TxmMODiMfKe9mn_iaQwy_yXNMPM9zTDxMPO-I0x3G9a8HnwcecfJDiJGXdJl4ytgXXT6-YM8GjIlenu8V-_Hp4_frz9Xt15sv1x9uK6e0zBUMRvVaSE9KE6Jva6gHNRjspdQCnRq88x2aWjSyE7XxEmvdtKDK24JU9RV7e_I9LPOvlVK2Y0iOYslF85osdI0E0OL_oGo6ZVRbQHUC3TKntNBgD0sYcTlaEPZhCru3pynswxQWwJYpiuz12X_tR_KPonP3BXhzBjCVoocFJxfSI9dKo5SGwr0_cVRquwu02OQCTY58WMhl6-fw7yR_AMlYqmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14794648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Relationships between analytical methods utilized as tools in the evaluation of landfill waste stability</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kelly, Ryan J. ; Shearer, Bradley D. ; Kim, Jongmin ; Goldsmith, C. Douglas ; Hater, Gary R. ; Novak, John T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ryan J. ; Shearer, Bradley D. ; Kim, Jongmin ; Goldsmith, C. Douglas ; Hater, Gary R. ; Novak, John T.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the refuse from 12 landfills of various ages ranging from fresh refuse to material 11 years old was collected, and changes in the bio-stability parameters were determined. The parameters measured included cellulose, lignin, biochemical methane potential (BMP) and volatile solids, along with plastics. These parameters, along with the cellulose to lignin ratio were compared to determine which were most indicative of the bio-stability of the refuse. Lignin and volatile solids measurements were affected by plastics in refuse samples. Plastics increased both lignin and volatile solids measurements by approximately 10%. Cellulose and volatile solids measurements correlated well with age, each other, and with BMP measurements and were therefore considered the best parameters to determine stability. Data for the Riverbend landfill, a landfill with a moisture content of 48%, which is similar to that of bioreactor landfills, showed that degradation was nearly complete after 5 years as indicated by low values for cellulose and BMP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16427774</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Biodegradation, Environmental ; Cellulose - analysis ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Garbage ; General treatment and storage processes ; Lignin - analysis ; Methane - analysis ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Plastics - analysis ; Pollution ; Refuse Disposal ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2006, Vol.26 (12), p.1349-1356</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f64b502de45eaad8313f4f6ab2250ac4fdcd9a630729036d2a35781472981243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f64b502de45eaad8313f4f6ab2250ac4fdcd9a630729036d2a35781472981243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18264451$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16427774$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, C. Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hater, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, John T.</creatorcontrib><title>Relationships between analytical methods utilized as tools in the evaluation of landfill waste stability</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>In this study, the refuse from 12 landfills of various ages ranging from fresh refuse to material 11 years old was collected, and changes in the bio-stability parameters were determined. The parameters measured included cellulose, lignin, biochemical methane potential (BMP) and volatile solids, along with plastics. These parameters, along with the cellulose to lignin ratio were compared to determine which were most indicative of the bio-stability of the refuse. Lignin and volatile solids measurements were affected by plastics in refuse samples. Plastics increased both lignin and volatile solids measurements by approximately 10%. Cellulose and volatile solids measurements correlated well with age, each other, and with BMP measurements and were therefore considered the best parameters to determine stability. Data for the Riverbend landfill, a landfill with a moisture content of 48%, which is similar to that of bioreactor landfills, showed that degradation was nearly complete after 5 years as indicated by low values for cellulose and BMP.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biodegradation, Environmental</subject><subject>Cellulose - analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Garbage</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>Lignin - analysis</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Plastics - analysis</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVGL1DAUhYMo7uzqPxDJi751zE2TtH0RZNFVWBBEwbdwm9wyGdJ2bNJdxl9v1hnYN326XPjO4XAOY69AbEGAebff3mMacdpKIfQWYCuge8I20DZdJZU2T9lGdNpUQtc_L9hlSnshQLUgnrMLMEo2TaM2bPeNIuYwT2kXDon3lO-JJo4TxmMODiMfKe9mn_iaQwy_yXNMPM9zTDxMPO-I0x3G9a8HnwcecfJDiJGXdJl4ytgXXT6-YM8GjIlenu8V-_Hp4_frz9Xt15sv1x9uK6e0zBUMRvVaSE9KE6Jva6gHNRjspdQCnRq88x2aWjSyE7XxEmvdtKDK24JU9RV7e_I9LPOvlVK2Y0iOYslF85osdI0E0OL_oGo6ZVRbQHUC3TKntNBgD0sYcTlaEPZhCru3pynswxQWwJYpiuz12X_tR_KPonP3BXhzBjCVoocFJxfSI9dKo5SGwr0_cVRquwu02OQCTY58WMhl6-fw7yR_AMlYqmw</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Kelly, Ryan J.</creator><creator>Shearer, Bradley D.</creator><creator>Kim, Jongmin</creator><creator>Goldsmith, C. Douglas</creator><creator>Hater, Gary R.</creator><creator>Novak, John T.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Relationships between analytical methods utilized as tools in the evaluation of landfill waste stability</title><author>Kelly, Ryan J. ; Shearer, Bradley D. ; Kim, Jongmin ; Goldsmith, C. Douglas ; Hater, Gary R. ; Novak, John T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-1f64b502de45eaad8313f4f6ab2250ac4fdcd9a630729036d2a35781472981243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biodegradation, Environmental</topic><topic>Cellulose - analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Garbage</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>Lignin - analysis</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Plastics - analysis</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shearer, Bradley D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jongmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsmith, C. Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hater, Gary R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, John T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, Ryan J.</au><au>Shearer, Bradley D.</au><au>Kim, Jongmin</au><au>Goldsmith, C. Douglas</au><au>Hater, Gary R.</au><au>Novak, John T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Relationships between analytical methods utilized as tools in the evaluation of landfill waste stability</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1349</spage><epage>1356</epage><pages>1349-1356</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>In this study, the refuse from 12 landfills of various ages ranging from fresh refuse to material 11 years old was collected, and changes in the bio-stability parameters were determined. The parameters measured included cellulose, lignin, biochemical methane potential (BMP) and volatile solids, along with plastics. These parameters, along with the cellulose to lignin ratio were compared to determine which were most indicative of the bio-stability of the refuse. Lignin and volatile solids measurements were affected by plastics in refuse samples. Plastics increased both lignin and volatile solids measurements by approximately 10%. Cellulose and volatile solids measurements correlated well with age, each other, and with BMP measurements and were therefore considered the best parameters to determine stability. Data for the Riverbend landfill, a landfill with a moisture content of 48%, which is similar to that of bioreactor landfills, showed that degradation was nearly complete after 5 years as indicated by low values for cellulose and BMP.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>16427774</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2006, Vol.26 (12), p.1349-1356
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19721150
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Applied sciences
Biodegradation, Environmental
Cellulose - analysis
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Exact sciences and technology
Garbage
General treatment and storage processes
Lignin - analysis
Methane - analysis
Other wastes and particular components of wastes
Plastics - analysis
Pollution
Refuse Disposal
Wastes
title Relationships between analytical methods utilized as tools in the evaluation of landfill waste stability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T00%3A03%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Relationships%20between%20analytical%20methods%20utilized%20as%20tools%20in%20the%20evaluation%20of%20landfill%20waste%20stability&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Kelly,%20Ryan%20J.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1349&rft.epage=1356&rft.pages=1349-1356&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14794648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14794648&rft_id=info:pmid/16427774&rft_els_id=S0956053X05003168&rfr_iscdi=true