Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task
Reflecting the discrepancy between received and predicted outcomes, the reward prediction error (RPE) plays an important role in learning in a dynamic environment. A number of studies suggested that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component of an event-related potential, known to be associated...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental brain research 2018, Vol.236 (1), p.141-151 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 151 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 141 |
| container_title | Experimental brain research |
| container_volume | 236 |
| creator | Krugliakova, Elena Klucharev, Vasily Fedele, Tommaso Gorin, Alexey Kuznetsova, Aleksandra Shestakova, Anna |
| description | Reflecting the discrepancy between received and predicted outcomes, the reward prediction error (RPE) plays an important role in learning in a dynamic environment. A number of studies suggested that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component of an event-related potential, known to be associated with unexpected outcomes, encodes RPEs. While FRN was clearly shown to be sensitive to the probability of outcomes, the effect of outcome magnitude on FRN remains to be further clarified. In studies on the neural underpinnings of reward anticipation and outcome evaluation, a monetary incentive delay (MID) task proved to be particularly useful. We investigated whether feedback-locked FRN and cue-locked dN200 responses recorded during an auditory MID task were sensitive to the probability and magnitude of outcomes. The cue-locked dN200 is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes. Overall, we showed that feedback-locked FRN was modulated by both the magnitude and the probability of outcomes during an auditory version of MID task, whereas no such effect was found for cue-locked dN200. Furthermore, the cue-locked dN200, which is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes, correlated with the standard feedback-locked FRN, which is associated with a negative RPE. These results further expand our knowledge on the interplay between the processing of predictive cues that forecast future outcomes and the subsequent revision of these predictions during outcome delivery. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00221-017-5113-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971688663</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A525610475</galeid><sourcerecordid>A525610475</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-a689a7cdbf2c83596140b246fbf10f99a047f21765a15cf7c5c9ff66ec92d8e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1klGL1DAUhYMo7rj6A3yRgiD60DU3bZPmcRlcXVgUVn0OaXozk522WZNU3H9vyqw6I0oektx853C5OYQ8B3oGlIq3kVLGoKQgygagKtkDsoK6YiUA5Q_JilKoy7oFeUKexHizXCtBH5MTJkFyIdiKmLUPAQednJ8KbwszYzl4s8O-uLj-WOipLyxi32mzO6y7qUhbLPTcu-TDXTH6CZPOBzcZnJL7jkWfXe-KpOPuKXlk9RDx2f1-Sr5evPuy_lBefXp_uT6_Kk1D61Rq3kotTN9ZZtqqkRxq2rGa284CtVJqWgvLQPBGQ2OsMI2R1nKORrK-xao6Ja_3vrfBf5sxJjW6aHAY9IR-jgqkAN62nC_oy7_QGz-HKXe3ULQVrJb1H2qjB1Rusj4FbRZTdd6whkPuqMnU2T-ovHocncmDsS7XjwRvjgSZSfgjbfQco7r8fH3Mvjpgt6iHtI1-mJf_iscg7EETfIwBrboNbsxfooCqJS1qnxaV06KWtCiWNS_upzB3I_a_Fb_ikQG2B2J-mjYYDsb0X9efHovFkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1970872494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Krugliakova, Elena ; Klucharev, Vasily ; Fedele, Tommaso ; Gorin, Alexey ; Kuznetsova, Aleksandra ; Shestakova, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Krugliakova, Elena ; Klucharev, Vasily ; Fedele, Tommaso ; Gorin, Alexey ; Kuznetsova, Aleksandra ; Shestakova, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Reflecting the discrepancy between received and predicted outcomes, the reward prediction error (RPE) plays an important role in learning in a dynamic environment. A number of studies suggested that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component of an event-related potential, known to be associated with unexpected outcomes, encodes RPEs. While FRN was clearly shown to be sensitive to the probability of outcomes, the effect of outcome magnitude on FRN remains to be further clarified. In studies on the neural underpinnings of reward anticipation and outcome evaluation, a monetary incentive delay (MID) task proved to be particularly useful. We investigated whether feedback-locked FRN and cue-locked dN200 responses recorded during an auditory MID task were sensitive to the probability and magnitude of outcomes. The cue-locked dN200 is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes. Overall, we showed that feedback-locked FRN was modulated by both the magnitude and the probability of outcomes during an auditory version of MID task, whereas no such effect was found for cue-locked dN200. Furthermore, the cue-locked dN200, which is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes, correlated with the standard feedback-locked FRN, which is associated with a negative RPE. These results further expand our knowledge on the interplay between the processing of predictive cues that forecast future outcomes and the subsequent revision of these predictions during outcome delivery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-4819</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5113-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29196772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anticipation, Psychological - physiology ; Auditory perception ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Cues ; Electroencephalography ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Feedback ; Feedback (Communication) ; Feedback, Psychological - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Information processing ; Learning ; Male ; Monetary incentives ; Negative thinking (Psychology) ; Neurology ; Neurosciences ; Psychological aspects ; Psychological research ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reinforcement ; Research Article ; Reward ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Experimental brain research, 2018, Vol.236 (1), p.141-151</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Experimental Brain Research is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-a689a7cdbf2c83596140b246fbf10f99a047f21765a15cf7c5c9ff66ec92d8e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-a689a7cdbf2c83596140b246fbf10f99a047f21765a15cf7c5c9ff66ec92d8e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7915-4560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00221-017-5113-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-017-5113-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krugliakova, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klucharev, Vasily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedele, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorin, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuznetsova, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shestakova, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task</title><title>Experimental brain research</title><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><description>Reflecting the discrepancy between received and predicted outcomes, the reward prediction error (RPE) plays an important role in learning in a dynamic environment. A number of studies suggested that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component of an event-related potential, known to be associated with unexpected outcomes, encodes RPEs. While FRN was clearly shown to be sensitive to the probability of outcomes, the effect of outcome magnitude on FRN remains to be further clarified. In studies on the neural underpinnings of reward anticipation and outcome evaluation, a monetary incentive delay (MID) task proved to be particularly useful. We investigated whether feedback-locked FRN and cue-locked dN200 responses recorded during an auditory MID task were sensitive to the probability and magnitude of outcomes. The cue-locked dN200 is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes. Overall, we showed that feedback-locked FRN was modulated by both the magnitude and the probability of outcomes during an auditory version of MID task, whereas no such effect was found for cue-locked dN200. Furthermore, the cue-locked dN200, which is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes, correlated with the standard feedback-locked FRN, which is associated with a negative RPE. These results further expand our knowledge on the interplay between the processing of predictive cues that forecast future outcomes and the subsequent revision of these predictions during outcome delivery.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anticipation, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory perception</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Electroencephalography</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Feedback (Communication)</subject><subject>Feedback, Psychological - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monetary incentives</subject><subject>Negative thinking (Psychology)</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychological research</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0014-4819</issn><issn>1432-1106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1klGL1DAUhYMo7rj6A3yRgiD60DU3bZPmcRlcXVgUVn0OaXozk522WZNU3H9vyqw6I0oektx853C5OYQ8B3oGlIq3kVLGoKQgygagKtkDsoK6YiUA5Q_JilKoy7oFeUKexHizXCtBH5MTJkFyIdiKmLUPAQednJ8KbwszYzl4s8O-uLj-WOipLyxi32mzO6y7qUhbLPTcu-TDXTH6CZPOBzcZnJL7jkWfXe-KpOPuKXlk9RDx2f1-Sr5evPuy_lBefXp_uT6_Kk1D61Rq3kotTN9ZZtqqkRxq2rGa284CtVJqWgvLQPBGQ2OsMI2R1nKORrK-xao6Ja_3vrfBf5sxJjW6aHAY9IR-jgqkAN62nC_oy7_QGz-HKXe3ULQVrJb1H2qjB1Rusj4FbRZTdd6whkPuqMnU2T-ovHocncmDsS7XjwRvjgSZSfgjbfQco7r8fH3Mvjpgt6iHtI1-mJf_iscg7EETfIwBrboNbsxfooCqJS1qnxaV06KWtCiWNS_upzB3I_a_Fb_ikQG2B2J-mjYYDsb0X9efHovFkw</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Krugliakova, Elena</creator><creator>Klucharev, Vasily</creator><creator>Fedele, Tommaso</creator><creator>Gorin, Alexey</creator><creator>Kuznetsova, Aleksandra</creator><creator>Shestakova, Anna</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7915-4560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task</title><author>Krugliakova, Elena ; Klucharev, Vasily ; Fedele, Tommaso ; Gorin, Alexey ; Kuznetsova, Aleksandra ; Shestakova, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c504t-a689a7cdbf2c83596140b246fbf10f99a047f21765a15cf7c5c9ff66ec92d8e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anticipation, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory perception</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Electroencephalography</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Feedback (Communication)</topic><topic>Feedback, Psychological - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monetary incentives</topic><topic>Negative thinking (Psychology)</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychological research</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krugliakova, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klucharev, Vasily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedele, Tommaso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gorin, Alexey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuznetsova, Aleksandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shestakova, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krugliakova, Elena</au><au>Klucharev, Vasily</au><au>Fedele, Tommaso</au><au>Gorin, Alexey</au><au>Kuznetsova, Aleksandra</au><au>Shestakova, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task</atitle><jtitle>Experimental brain research</jtitle><stitle>Exp Brain Res</stitle><addtitle>Exp Brain Res</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>236</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>151</epage><pages>141-151</pages><issn>0014-4819</issn><eissn>1432-1106</eissn><abstract>Reflecting the discrepancy between received and predicted outcomes, the reward prediction error (RPE) plays an important role in learning in a dynamic environment. A number of studies suggested that the feedback-related negativity (FRN) component of an event-related potential, known to be associated with unexpected outcomes, encodes RPEs. While FRN was clearly shown to be sensitive to the probability of outcomes, the effect of outcome magnitude on FRN remains to be further clarified. In studies on the neural underpinnings of reward anticipation and outcome evaluation, a monetary incentive delay (MID) task proved to be particularly useful. We investigated whether feedback-locked FRN and cue-locked dN200 responses recorded during an auditory MID task were sensitive to the probability and magnitude of outcomes. The cue-locked dN200 is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes. Overall, we showed that feedback-locked FRN was modulated by both the magnitude and the probability of outcomes during an auditory version of MID task, whereas no such effect was found for cue-locked dN200. Furthermore, the cue-locked dN200, which is associated with the update of information about the magnitude of prospective outcomes, correlated with the standard feedback-locked FRN, which is associated with a negative RPE. These results further expand our knowledge on the interplay between the processing of predictive cues that forecast future outcomes and the subsequent revision of these predictions during outcome delivery.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>29196772</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00221-017-5113-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7915-4560</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-4819 |
| ispartof | Experimental brain research, 2018, Vol.236 (1), p.141-151 |
| issn | 0014-4819 1432-1106 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971688663 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adult Anticipation, Psychological - physiology Auditory perception Auditory Perception - physiology Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Cues Electroencephalography Evoked Potentials - physiology Feedback Feedback (Communication) Feedback, Psychological - physiology Female Humans Information processing Learning Male Monetary incentives Negative thinking (Psychology) Neurology Neurosciences Psychological aspects Psychological research Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reinforcement Research Article Reward Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
| title | Correlation of cue-locked FRN and feedback-locked FRN in the auditory monetary incentive delay task |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A19%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20cue-locked%20FRN%20and%20feedback-locked%20FRN%20in%20the%20auditory%20monetary%20incentive%20delay%20task&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20brain%20research&rft.au=Krugliakova,%20Elena&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=236&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=151&rft.pages=141-151&rft.issn=0014-4819&rft.eissn=1432-1106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00221-017-5113-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA525610475%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1970872494&rft_id=info:pmid/29196772&rft_galeid=A525610475&rfr_iscdi=true |