Oro‐facial pain and temporomandibular disorders classification systems: A critical appraisal and future directions
Summary It is a difficult undertaking to design a classification system for any disease entity, let alone for oro‐facial pain (OFP) and more specifically for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A further complication of this task is that both physical and psychosocial variables must be included. To a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of oral rehabilitation 2018-03, Vol.45 (3), p.258-268 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 268 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 258 |
container_title | Journal of oral rehabilitation |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Klasser, G. D. Manfredini, D. Goulet, J.‐P. De Laat, A. |
description | Summary
It is a difficult undertaking to design a classification system for any disease entity, let alone for oro‐facial pain (OFP) and more specifically for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A further complication of this task is that both physical and psychosocial variables must be included. To augment this process, a two‐step systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, of the classification systems published during the last 20 years for OFP and TMD was performed. The first search step identified 190 potential citations which ultimately resulted in only 17 articles being included for in‐depth analysis and review. The second step resulted in only 5 articles being selected for inclusion in this review. Five additional articles and four classification guidelines/criteria were also included due to expansion of the search criteria. Thus, in total, 14 documents comprising articles and guidelines/criteria (8 proposals of classification systems for OFP; 6 for TMD) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. For each, a discussion as to their advantages, strengths and limitations was provided. Suggestions regarding the future direction for improving the classification process with the use of ontological principles rather than taxonomy are discussed. Furthermore, the potential for expanding the scope of axes included in existing classification systems, to include genetic, epigenetic and neurobiological variables, is explored. It is therefore recommended that future classification system proposals be based on combined approaches aiming to provide archetypal treatment‐oriented classifications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/joor.12590 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971664800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2002112160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-e81795cd38d8cda57e629d97bf33418e0134494497664301a0fc8bf16e0176633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxTAQhoMoeLxsfIKAGxGqM00vqTsRrwgHRMFdyElTyKGnqZkWOTsfwWf0SUw9rlwYBjLMfP_PwM_YEcIZxne-9D6cYZpXsMVmKIo8SWWWbrMZCMgTlOnrLtsjWgKAFHk5Y8M8-K-Pz0Ybp1vea9dx3dV8sKveB7-KvVuMrQ68duRDbQNx02oi1zijB-c7TmuKNF3wS26CG-K45brvg3Y0ddGsGYcx2OgQrJkkdMB2Gt2SPfz999nLzfXz1V3yOL-9v7p8TIwoARIrsaxyUwtZS1PrvLRFWtVVuWiEyFBaQJFlVayyKDIBqKExctFgETdxJMQ-O9n49sG_jZYGtXJkbNvqzvqRFFYlRqkEiOjxH3Tpx9DF61QKkCKmWEzU6YYywRMF26g-uJUOa4WgpgDUFID6CSDCuIHfXWvX_5DqYT5_2mi-AfpOiiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2002112160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oro‐facial pain and temporomandibular disorders classification systems: A critical appraisal and future directions</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Klasser, G. D. ; Manfredini, D. ; Goulet, J.‐P. ; De Laat, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Klasser, G. D. ; Manfredini, D. ; Goulet, J.‐P. ; De Laat, A.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
It is a difficult undertaking to design a classification system for any disease entity, let alone for oro‐facial pain (OFP) and more specifically for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A further complication of this task is that both physical and psychosocial variables must be included. To augment this process, a two‐step systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, of the classification systems published during the last 20 years for OFP and TMD was performed. The first search step identified 190 potential citations which ultimately resulted in only 17 articles being included for in‐depth analysis and review. The second step resulted in only 5 articles being selected for inclusion in this review. Five additional articles and four classification guidelines/criteria were also included due to expansion of the search criteria. Thus, in total, 14 documents comprising articles and guidelines/criteria (8 proposals of classification systems for OFP; 6 for TMD) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. For each, a discussion as to their advantages, strengths and limitations was provided. Suggestions regarding the future direction for improving the classification process with the use of ontological principles rather than taxonomy are discussed. Furthermore, the potential for expanding the scope of axes included in existing classification systems, to include genetic, epigenetic and neurobiological variables, is explored. It is therefore recommended that future classification system proposals be based on combined approaches aiming to provide archetypal treatment‐oriented classifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-182X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/joor.12590</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Classification ; Classification systems ; Dentistry ; ontology ; oro‐facial pain ; Pain ; Reviews ; Systematic review ; Taxonomy ; temporomandibular disorders</subject><ispartof>Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2018-03, Vol.45 (3), p.258-268</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-e81795cd38d8cda57e629d97bf33418e0134494497664301a0fc8bf16e0176633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-e81795cd38d8cda57e629d97bf33418e0134494497664301a0fc8bf16e0176633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2033-9066 ; 0000-0002-4352-3085 ; 0000-0003-3558-1418</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjoor.12590$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjoor.12590$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klasser, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manfredini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulet, J.‐P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Laat, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Oro‐facial pain and temporomandibular disorders classification systems: A critical appraisal and future directions</title><title>Journal of oral rehabilitation</title><description>Summary
It is a difficult undertaking to design a classification system for any disease entity, let alone for oro‐facial pain (OFP) and more specifically for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A further complication of this task is that both physical and psychosocial variables must be included. To augment this process, a two‐step systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, of the classification systems published during the last 20 years for OFP and TMD was performed. The first search step identified 190 potential citations which ultimately resulted in only 17 articles being included for in‐depth analysis and review. The second step resulted in only 5 articles being selected for inclusion in this review. Five additional articles and four classification guidelines/criteria were also included due to expansion of the search criteria. Thus, in total, 14 documents comprising articles and guidelines/criteria (8 proposals of classification systems for OFP; 6 for TMD) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. For each, a discussion as to their advantages, strengths and limitations was provided. Suggestions regarding the future direction for improving the classification process with the use of ontological principles rather than taxonomy are discussed. Furthermore, the potential for expanding the scope of axes included in existing classification systems, to include genetic, epigenetic and neurobiological variables, is explored. It is therefore recommended that future classification system proposals be based on combined approaches aiming to provide archetypal treatment‐oriented classifications.</description><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification systems</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>ontology</subject><subject>oro‐facial pain</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>temporomandibular disorders</subject><issn>0305-182X</issn><issn>1365-2842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctKxTAQhoMoeLxsfIKAGxGqM00vqTsRrwgHRMFdyElTyKGnqZkWOTsfwWf0SUw9rlwYBjLMfP_PwM_YEcIZxne-9D6cYZpXsMVmKIo8SWWWbrMZCMgTlOnrLtsjWgKAFHk5Y8M8-K-Pz0Ybp1vea9dx3dV8sKveB7-KvVuMrQ68duRDbQNx02oi1zijB-c7TmuKNF3wS26CG-K45brvg3Y0ddGsGYcx2OgQrJkkdMB2Gt2SPfz999nLzfXz1V3yOL-9v7p8TIwoARIrsaxyUwtZS1PrvLRFWtVVuWiEyFBaQJFlVayyKDIBqKExctFgETdxJMQ-O9n49sG_jZYGtXJkbNvqzvqRFFYlRqkEiOjxH3Tpx9DF61QKkCKmWEzU6YYywRMF26g-uJUOa4WgpgDUFID6CSDCuIHfXWvX_5DqYT5_2mi-AfpOiiw</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Klasser, G. D.</creator><creator>Manfredini, D.</creator><creator>Goulet, J.‐P.</creator><creator>De Laat, A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2033-9066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4352-3085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3558-1418</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Oro‐facial pain and temporomandibular disorders classification systems: A critical appraisal and future directions</title><author>Klasser, G. D. ; Manfredini, D. ; Goulet, J.‐P. ; De Laat, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3700-e81795cd38d8cda57e629d97bf33418e0134494497664301a0fc8bf16e0176633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification systems</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>ontology</topic><topic>oro‐facial pain</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>temporomandibular disorders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klasser, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manfredini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goulet, J.‐P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Laat, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klasser, G. D.</au><au>Manfredini, D.</au><au>Goulet, J.‐P.</au><au>De Laat, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oro‐facial pain and temporomandibular disorders classification systems: A critical appraisal and future directions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oral rehabilitation</jtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>258</spage><epage>268</epage><pages>258-268</pages><issn>0305-182X</issn><eissn>1365-2842</eissn><abstract>Summary
It is a difficult undertaking to design a classification system for any disease entity, let alone for oro‐facial pain (OFP) and more specifically for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). A further complication of this task is that both physical and psychosocial variables must be included. To augment this process, a two‐step systematic review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, of the classification systems published during the last 20 years for OFP and TMD was performed. The first search step identified 190 potential citations which ultimately resulted in only 17 articles being included for in‐depth analysis and review. The second step resulted in only 5 articles being selected for inclusion in this review. Five additional articles and four classification guidelines/criteria were also included due to expansion of the search criteria. Thus, in total, 14 documents comprising articles and guidelines/criteria (8 proposals of classification systems for OFP; 6 for TMD) were selected for inclusion in the systematic review. For each, a discussion as to their advantages, strengths and limitations was provided. Suggestions regarding the future direction for improving the classification process with the use of ontological principles rather than taxonomy are discussed. Furthermore, the potential for expanding the scope of axes included in existing classification systems, to include genetic, epigenetic and neurobiological variables, is explored. It is therefore recommended that future classification system proposals be based on combined approaches aiming to provide archetypal treatment‐oriented classifications.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/joor.12590</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2033-9066</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4352-3085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3558-1418</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-182X |
ispartof | Journal of oral rehabilitation, 2018-03, Vol.45 (3), p.258-268 |
issn | 0305-182X 1365-2842 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1971664800 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Classification Classification systems Dentistry ontology oro‐facial pain Pain Reviews Systematic review Taxonomy temporomandibular disorders |
title | Oro‐facial pain and temporomandibular disorders classification systems: A critical appraisal and future directions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T22%3A06%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oro%E2%80%90facial%20pain%20and%20temporomandibular%20disorders%20classification%20systems:%20A%20critical%20appraisal%20and%20future%20directions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oral%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Klasser,%20G.%20D.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=258&rft.epage=268&rft.pages=258-268&rft.issn=0305-182X&rft.eissn=1365-2842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/joor.12590&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2002112160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2002112160&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |