The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes
New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students'...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anatomical sciences education 2018-07, Vol.11 (4), p.366-376 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 376 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 366 |
container_title | Anatomical sciences education |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Zureick, Andrew H. Burk‐Rafel, Jesse Purkiss, Joel A. Hortsch, Michael |
description | New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ase.1754 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969936769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1183775</ericid><sourcerecordid>2062885830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun6Af0ApePHSNUmbpPW2yPqF4EE9hzSZaqTbrEmz4r836-oKgqcZeB-eGV6EDgkeE4zpmQowJoKVG2hE6oLltajw5noXdAfthvCKMceE0W20Q2siKorxCJnHF8hsP4D3cT6AyTpQvgd_nl2798zYMHilB-v6kJnobf-cdXYBmepNtrAGXOL1ED2EJGm7CL2GlWKJujhoN4Owj7Za1QU4-J576Oly-nhxnd_dX91cTO5yXWJW5qBUiYlhJcOsIAy0oYQ3rKwoaYErqBvOGWkM5pSnjUFbqoox1gpRNKDbYg-drrxz794ihEHObNDQdaoHF4MkNa_rggteJ_TkD_rqou_Td5Imf1WxqsC_Qu1dCB5aOfd2pvyHJFgum5epeblsPqHH38LYzMCswZ-qE3C0AsBbvY6nt4RUhRAs5fkqf7cdfPx7SE4epl8HPwFDk5Yi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062885830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zureick, Andrew H. ; Burk‐Rafel, Jesse ; Purkiss, Joel A. ; Hortsch, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Zureick, Andrew H. ; Burk‐Rafel, Jesse ; Purkiss, Joel A. ; Hortsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-9772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-9780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ase.1754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29178200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Academic Performance ; Attendance ; Attention ; Attention Control ; Correlation ; Curriculum ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Environment ; Educational Technology ; e‐learning ; Histology ; Histology - education ; Humans ; interruptions ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Learning Activities ; Learning Processes ; lecture attendance ; Lecture Method ; lecture videos ; Medical Education ; Medical schools ; Medical Students ; Michigan ; Outcomes of Education ; Public speaking ; Retrospective Studies ; Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; Scores ; Self Report ; self‐directed learning ; Sleep ; Social Media ; Student Attitudes ; Student Behavior ; Students ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; study behaviors ; technology ; undergraduate education ; Universities - statistics & numerical data ; Video ; Video Recording - utilization ; Video Technology</subject><ispartof>Anatomical sciences education, 2018-07, Vol.11 (4), p.366-376</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association of Anatomists</rights><rights>2017 American Association of Anatomists.</rights><rights>2018 American Association of Anatomists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3750-737X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fase.1754$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fase.1754$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1183775$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zureick, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purkiss, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hortsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</title><title>Anatomical sciences education</title><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><description>New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Academic Performance</subject><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention Control</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>e‐learning</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Histology - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interruptions</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>lecture attendance</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>lecture videos</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>self‐directed learning</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>study behaviors</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>undergraduate education</subject><subject>Universities - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Video</subject><subject>Video Recording - utilization</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><issn>1935-9772</issn><issn>1935-9780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun6Af0ApePHSNUmbpPW2yPqF4EE9hzSZaqTbrEmz4r836-oKgqcZeB-eGV6EDgkeE4zpmQowJoKVG2hE6oLltajw5noXdAfthvCKMceE0W20Q2siKorxCJnHF8hsP4D3cT6AyTpQvgd_nl2798zYMHilB-v6kJnobf-cdXYBmepNtrAGXOL1ED2EJGm7CL2GlWKJujhoN4Owj7Za1QU4-J576Oly-nhxnd_dX91cTO5yXWJW5qBUiYlhJcOsIAy0oYQ3rKwoaYErqBvOGWkM5pSnjUFbqoox1gpRNKDbYg-drrxz794ihEHObNDQdaoHF4MkNa_rggteJ_TkD_rqou_Td5Imf1WxqsC_Qu1dCB5aOfd2pvyHJFgum5epeblsPqHH38LYzMCswZ-qE3C0AsBbvY6nt4RUhRAs5fkqf7cdfPx7SE4epl8HPwFDk5Yi</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Zureick, Andrew H.</creator><creator>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</creator><creator>Purkiss, Joel A.</creator><creator>Hortsch, Michael</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-737X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</title><author>Zureick, Andrew H. ; Burk‐Rafel, Jesse ; Purkiss, Joel A. ; Hortsch, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Academic Performance</topic><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention Control</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>e‐learning</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Histology - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interruptions</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>lecture attendance</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>lecture videos</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>self‐directed learning</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>study behaviors</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>undergraduate education</topic><topic>Universities - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Video</topic><topic>Video Recording - utilization</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zureick, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purkiss, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hortsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zureick, Andrew H.</au><au>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</au><au>Purkiss, Joel A.</au><au>Hortsch, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1183775</ericid><atitle>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>366-376</pages><issn>1935-9772</issn><eissn>1935-9780</eissn><abstract>New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>29178200</pmid><doi>10.1002/ase.1754</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-737X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-9772 |
ispartof | Anatomical sciences education, 2018-07, Vol.11 (4), p.366-376 |
issn | 1935-9772 1935-9780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969936769 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Academic Achievement Academic Performance Attendance Attention Attention Control Correlation Curriculum Education, Medical, Undergraduate Educational Environment Educational Technology e‐learning Histology Histology - education Humans interruptions Learner Engagement Learning Learning Activities Learning Processes lecture attendance Lecture Method lecture videos Medical Education Medical schools Medical Students Michigan Outcomes of Education Public speaking Retrospective Studies Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data Scores Self Report self‐directed learning Sleep Social Media Student Attitudes Student Behavior Students Students, Medical - psychology Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data study behaviors technology undergraduate education Universities - statistics & numerical data Video Video Recording - utilization Video Technology |
title | The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A34%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interrupted%20learner:%20How%20distractions%20during%20live%20and%20video%20lectures%20influence%20learning%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Anatomical%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Zureick,%20Andrew%20H.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=366-376&rft.issn=1935-9772&rft.eissn=1935-9780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ase.1754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062885830%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062885830&rft_id=info:pmid/29178200&rft_ericid=EJ1183775&rfr_iscdi=true |