The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes

New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students'...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anatomical sciences education 2018-07, Vol.11 (4), p.366-376
Hauptverfasser: Zureick, Andrew H., Burk‐Rafel, Jesse, Purkiss, Joel A., Hortsch, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 4
container_start_page 366
container_title Anatomical sciences education
container_volume 11
creator Zureick, Andrew H.
Burk‐Rafel, Jesse
Purkiss, Joel A.
Hortsch, Michael
description New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ase.1754
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969936769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1183775</ericid><sourcerecordid>2062885830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun6Af0ApePHSNUmbpPW2yPqF4EE9hzSZaqTbrEmz4r836-oKgqcZeB-eGV6EDgkeE4zpmQowJoKVG2hE6oLltajw5noXdAfthvCKMceE0W20Q2siKorxCJnHF8hsP4D3cT6AyTpQvgd_nl2798zYMHilB-v6kJnobf-cdXYBmepNtrAGXOL1ED2EJGm7CL2GlWKJujhoN4Owj7Za1QU4-J576Oly-nhxnd_dX91cTO5yXWJW5qBUiYlhJcOsIAy0oYQ3rKwoaYErqBvOGWkM5pSnjUFbqoox1gpRNKDbYg-drrxz794ihEHObNDQdaoHF4MkNa_rggteJ_TkD_rqou_Td5Imf1WxqsC_Qu1dCB5aOfd2pvyHJFgum5epeblsPqHH38LYzMCswZ-qE3C0AsBbvY6nt4RUhRAs5fkqf7cdfPx7SE4epl8HPwFDk5Yi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2062885830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zureick, Andrew H. ; Burk‐Rafel, Jesse ; Purkiss, Joel A. ; Hortsch, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Zureick, Andrew H. ; Burk‐Rafel, Jesse ; Purkiss, Joel A. ; Hortsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-9772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-9780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ase.1754</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29178200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Academic Performance ; Attendance ; Attention ; Attention Control ; Correlation ; Curriculum ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate ; Educational Environment ; Educational Technology ; e‐learning ; Histology ; Histology - education ; Humans ; interruptions ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Learning Activities ; Learning Processes ; lecture attendance ; Lecture Method ; lecture videos ; Medical Education ; Medical schools ; Medical Students ; Michigan ; Outcomes of Education ; Public speaking ; Retrospective Studies ; Schools, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Scores ; Self Report ; self‐directed learning ; Sleep ; Social Media ; Student Attitudes ; Student Behavior ; Students ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Students, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; study behaviors ; technology ; undergraduate education ; Universities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Video ; Video Recording - utilization ; Video Technology</subject><ispartof>Anatomical sciences education, 2018-07, Vol.11 (4), p.366-376</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association of Anatomists</rights><rights>2017 American Association of Anatomists.</rights><rights>2018 American Association of Anatomists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3750-737X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fase.1754$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fase.1754$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27911,27912,45561,45562</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1183775$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29178200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zureick, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purkiss, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hortsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</title><title>Anatomical sciences education</title><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><description>New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Academic Performance</subject><subject>Attendance</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Attention Control</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>e‐learning</subject><subject>Histology</subject><subject>Histology - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>interruptions</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Activities</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>lecture attendance</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>lecture videos</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Michigan</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Public speaking</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Schools, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>self‐directed learning</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Students, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>study behaviors</subject><subject>technology</subject><subject>undergraduate education</subject><subject>Universities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Video</subject><subject>Video Recording - utilization</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><issn>1935-9772</issn><issn>1935-9780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun6Af0ApePHSNUmbpPW2yPqF4EE9hzSZaqTbrEmz4r836-oKgqcZeB-eGV6EDgkeE4zpmQowJoKVG2hE6oLltajw5noXdAfthvCKMceE0W20Q2siKorxCJnHF8hsP4D3cT6AyTpQvgd_nl2798zYMHilB-v6kJnobf-cdXYBmepNtrAGXOL1ED2EJGm7CL2GlWKJujhoN4Owj7Za1QU4-J576Oly-nhxnd_dX91cTO5yXWJW5qBUiYlhJcOsIAy0oYQ3rKwoaYErqBvOGWkM5pSnjUFbqoox1gpRNKDbYg-drrxz794ihEHObNDQdaoHF4MkNa_rggteJ_TkD_rqou_Td5Imf1WxqsC_Qu1dCB5aOfd2pvyHJFgum5epeblsPqHH38LYzMCswZ-qE3C0AsBbvY6nt4RUhRAs5fkqf7cdfPx7SE4epl8HPwFDk5Yi</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Zureick, Andrew H.</creator><creator>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</creator><creator>Purkiss, Joel A.</creator><creator>Hortsch, Michael</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-737X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</title><author>Zureick, Andrew H. ; Burk‐Rafel, Jesse ; Purkiss, Joel A. ; Hortsch, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4054-eaa401d54505315ecd216b54821fe6ae9b6651bd06266655ef4a8555f773becf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Academic Performance</topic><topic>Attendance</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Attention Control</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>e‐learning</topic><topic>Histology</topic><topic>Histology - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>interruptions</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Activities</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>lecture attendance</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>lecture videos</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Michigan</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Public speaking</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Schools, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>self‐directed learning</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Students, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>study behaviors</topic><topic>technology</topic><topic>undergraduate education</topic><topic>Universities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Video</topic><topic>Video Recording - utilization</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zureick, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purkiss, Joel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hortsch, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zureick, Andrew H.</au><au>Burk‐Rafel, Jesse</au><au>Purkiss, Joel A.</au><au>Hortsch, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1183775</ericid><atitle>The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>366</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>366-376</pages><issn>1935-9772</issn><eissn>1935-9780</eissn><abstract>New instructional technologies have been increasingly incorporated into the medical school learning environment, including lecture video recordings as a substitute for live lecture attendance. The literature presents varying conclusions regarding how this alternative experience impacts students' academic success. Previously, a multi‐year study of the first‐year medical histology component at the University of Michigan found that live lecture attendance was positively correlated with learning success, while lecture video use was negatively correlated. Here, three cohorts of first‐year medical students (N = 439 respondents, 86.6% response rate) were surveyed in greater detail regarding lecture attendance and video usage, focusing on study behaviors that may influence histology learning outcomes. Students who reported always attending lectures or viewing lecture videos had higher average histology scores than students who employed an inconsistent strategy (i.e., mixing live attendance and video lectures). Several behaviors were negatively associated with histology performance. Students who engaged in “non‐lecture activities” (e.g., social media use), students who reported being interrupted while watching the lecture video, or feeling sleepy/losing focus had lower scores than their counterparts not engaging in these behaviors. This study suggests that interruptions and distractions during medical learning activities—whether live or recorded—can have an important impact on learning outcomes. Anat Sci Educ 11: 366–376. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>29178200</pmid><doi>10.1002/ase.1754</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3750-737X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-9772
ispartof Anatomical sciences education, 2018-07, Vol.11 (4), p.366-376
issn 1935-9772
1935-9780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969936769
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Academic Achievement
Academic Performance
Attendance
Attention
Attention Control
Correlation
Curriculum
Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Educational Environment
Educational Technology
e‐learning
Histology
Histology - education
Humans
interruptions
Learner Engagement
Learning
Learning Activities
Learning Processes
lecture attendance
Lecture Method
lecture videos
Medical Education
Medical schools
Medical Students
Michigan
Outcomes of Education
Public speaking
Retrospective Studies
Schools, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Scores
Self Report
self‐directed learning
Sleep
Social Media
Student Attitudes
Student Behavior
Students
Students, Medical - psychology
Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data
study behaviors
technology
undergraduate education
Universities - statistics & numerical data
Video
Video Recording - utilization
Video Technology
title The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T18%3A34%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20interrupted%20learner:%20How%20distractions%20during%20live%20and%20video%20lectures%20influence%20learning%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Anatomical%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Zureick,%20Andrew%20H.&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=366&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=366-376&rft.issn=1935-9772&rft.eissn=1935-9780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ase.1754&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2062885830%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2062885830&rft_id=info:pmid/29178200&rft_ericid=EJ1183775&rfr_iscdi=true