Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy

The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniq...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Meat science 2018-02, Vol.136, p.59-67
Hauptverfasser: Rady, Ahmed, Adedeji, Akinbode
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 67
container_issue
container_start_page 59
container_title Meat science
container_volume 136
creator Rady, Ahmed
Adedeji, Akinbode
description The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork. •Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969932553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309174017307830</els_id><sourcerecordid>1969932553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gtKlm9abR9tkJSK-QHCjOyGkya1k6LRj0g7Mvzfz0K2rkMM599z7EXJJoaBAq5t5sUAzRusLBrROWgFUHJAZlTXPBeXykMyAg8ppLeCEnMY4BwDKmTwmJ0yBqpiUM_J5FyPG6PuvzPm2xYD9mC3DYJOILtt2ZO0QMuOmbsRg-vSftv6Vj77pMO_RhNz3bTAhJeIS7RiGaIfl-pwctaaLeLF_z8jH48P7_XP--vb0cn_3mltB2ZjXUjWiUVI2KAAMa1E2pakpL3nFBArn0h0OSqxQKisYq6SqeAMCFFrV1PyMXO_mpsW_J4yjXvhosetMj8MUNVWVUpyVJU_Wcme1accYsNXL4BcmrDUFvQGr53oPVm_AbuQENuWu9hVTs0D3l_olmQy3OwOmQ1ceg04jsLfofEhEtBv8PxU_1gyNnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969932553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rady, Ahmed ; Adedeji, Akinbode</creator><creatorcontrib>Rady, Ahmed ; Adedeji, Akinbode</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork. •Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29096288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adulteration ; Animals ; Cattle ; Chicken ; Chickens ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Gluten ; Machine Learning ; Meat Products - analysis ; Meat Products - standards ; Minced beef ; Plant Proteins - analysis ; Pork ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods ; Swine ; Texturized vegetable protein ; Vis-NIR spectroscopy</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 2018-02, Vol.136, p.59-67</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rady, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adedeji, Akinbode</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork. •Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible.</description><subject>Adulteration</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chicken</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Gluten</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Meat Products - analysis</subject><subject>Meat Products - standards</subject><subject>Minced beef</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Texturized vegetable protein</subject><subject>Vis-NIR spectroscopy</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gtKlm9abR9tkJSK-QHCjOyGkya1k6LRj0g7Mvzfz0K2rkMM599z7EXJJoaBAq5t5sUAzRusLBrROWgFUHJAZlTXPBeXykMyAg8ppLeCEnMY4BwDKmTwmJ0yBqpiUM_J5FyPG6PuvzPm2xYD9mC3DYJOILtt2ZO0QMuOmbsRg-vSftv6Vj77pMO_RhNz3bTAhJeIS7RiGaIfl-pwctaaLeLF_z8jH48P7_XP--vb0cn_3mltB2ZjXUjWiUVI2KAAMa1E2pakpL3nFBArn0h0OSqxQKisYq6SqeAMCFFrV1PyMXO_mpsW_J4yjXvhosetMj8MUNVWVUpyVJU_Wcme1accYsNXL4BcmrDUFvQGr53oPVm_AbuQENuWu9hVTs0D3l_olmQy3OwOmQ1ceg04jsLfofEhEtBv8PxU_1gyNnQ</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Rady, Ahmed</creator><creator>Adedeji, Akinbode</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</title><author>Rady, Ahmed ; Adedeji, Akinbode</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adulteration</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chicken</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Gluten</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Meat Products - analysis</topic><topic>Meat Products - standards</topic><topic>Minced beef</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Texturized vegetable protein</topic><topic>Vis-NIR spectroscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rady, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adedeji, Akinbode</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rady, Ahmed</au><au>Adedeji, Akinbode</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>59</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>59-67</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><abstract>The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork. •Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29096288</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1740
ispartof Meat science, 2018-02, Vol.136, p.59-67
issn 0309-1740
1873-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969932553
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adulteration
Animals
Cattle
Chicken
Chickens
Food Contamination - analysis
Gluten
Machine Learning
Meat Products - analysis
Meat Products - standards
Minced beef
Plant Proteins - analysis
Pork
Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods
Swine
Texturized vegetable protein
Vis-NIR spectroscopy
title Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A32%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20different%20processed%20meats%20for%20adulterants%20using%20visible-near-infrared%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Rady,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=59-67&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1969932553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969932553&rft_id=info:pmid/29096288&rft_els_id=S0309174017307830&rfr_iscdi=true