Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy
The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniq...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Meat science 2018-02, Vol.136, p.59-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Meat science |
container_volume | 136 |
creator | Rady, Ahmed Adedeji, Akinbode |
description | The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork.
•Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969932553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309174017307830</els_id><sourcerecordid>1969932553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gtKlm9abR9tkJSK-QHCjOyGkya1k6LRj0g7Mvzfz0K2rkMM599z7EXJJoaBAq5t5sUAzRusLBrROWgFUHJAZlTXPBeXykMyAg8ppLeCEnMY4BwDKmTwmJ0yBqpiUM_J5FyPG6PuvzPm2xYD9mC3DYJOILtt2ZO0QMuOmbsRg-vSftv6Vj77pMO_RhNz3bTAhJeIS7RiGaIfl-pwctaaLeLF_z8jH48P7_XP--vb0cn_3mltB2ZjXUjWiUVI2KAAMa1E2pakpL3nFBArn0h0OSqxQKisYq6SqeAMCFFrV1PyMXO_mpsW_J4yjXvhosetMj8MUNVWVUpyVJU_Wcme1accYsNXL4BcmrDUFvQGr53oPVm_AbuQENuWu9hVTs0D3l_olmQy3OwOmQ1ceg04jsLfofEhEtBv8PxU_1gyNnQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969932553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rady, Ahmed ; Adedeji, Akinbode</creator><creatorcontrib>Rady, Ahmed ; Adedeji, Akinbode</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork.
•Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29096288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adulteration ; Animals ; Cattle ; Chicken ; Chickens ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Gluten ; Machine Learning ; Meat Products - analysis ; Meat Products - standards ; Minced beef ; Plant Proteins - analysis ; Pork ; Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods ; Swine ; Texturized vegetable protein ; Vis-NIR spectroscopy</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 2018-02, Vol.136, p.59-67</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29096288$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rady, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adedeji, Akinbode</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork.
•Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible.</description><subject>Adulteration</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Chicken</subject><subject>Chickens</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Gluten</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Meat Products - analysis</subject><subject>Meat Products - standards</subject><subject>Minced beef</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Texturized vegetable protein</subject><subject>Vis-NIR spectroscopy</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLxDAUhYMoOj5-gtKlm9abR9tkJSK-QHCjOyGkya1k6LRj0g7Mvzfz0K2rkMM599z7EXJJoaBAq5t5sUAzRusLBrROWgFUHJAZlTXPBeXykMyAg8ppLeCEnMY4BwDKmTwmJ0yBqpiUM_J5FyPG6PuvzPm2xYD9mC3DYJOILtt2ZO0QMuOmbsRg-vSftv6Vj77pMO_RhNz3bTAhJeIS7RiGaIfl-pwctaaLeLF_z8jH48P7_XP--vb0cn_3mltB2ZjXUjWiUVI2KAAMa1E2pakpL3nFBArn0h0OSqxQKisYq6SqeAMCFFrV1PyMXO_mpsW_J4yjXvhosetMj8MUNVWVUpyVJU_Wcme1accYsNXL4BcmrDUFvQGr53oPVm_AbuQENuWu9hVTs0D3l_olmQy3OwOmQ1ceg04jsLfofEhEtBv8PxU_1gyNnQ</recordid><startdate>201802</startdate><enddate>201802</enddate><creator>Rady, Ahmed</creator><creator>Adedeji, Akinbode</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201802</creationdate><title>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</title><author>Rady, Ahmed ; Adedeji, Akinbode</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-789b4b988be400a2fe8b5a71353624e4dd309d05e6e89c42268963b0409ec9b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adulteration</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Chicken</topic><topic>Chickens</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Gluten</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Meat Products - analysis</topic><topic>Meat Products - standards</topic><topic>Minced beef</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Texturized vegetable protein</topic><topic>Vis-NIR spectroscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rady, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adedeji, Akinbode</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rady, Ahmed</au><au>Adedeji, Akinbode</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>2018-02</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>136</volume><spage>59</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>59-67</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><abstract>The main objective of this study was to investigate the use of spectroscopic systems in the range of 400–1000nm (visible/near-infrared or Vis-NIR) and 900–1700nm (NIR) to assess and estimate plant and animal proteins as potential adulterants in minced beef and pork. Multiple machine learning techniques were used for classification, adulterant prediction, and wavelength selection. Samples were first evaluated for the presence or absence of adulterants (6 classes), and secondly for adulterant type (6 classes) and level. Selected wavelengths models generally resulted in better classification and prediction outputs than full wavelengths. The first stage classification rates were 96% and 100% for pure/unadulterated and adulterated samples, respectively. Whereas, the second stage had classification rates of 69–100%. The optimal models for predicting adulterant levels yielded correlation coefficient, r of 0.78–0.86 and ratio of performance to deviation, RPD, of 1.19–1.98. The results from this study illustrate potential application of spectroscopic technology to rapidly and accurately detect adulterants in minced beef and pork.
•Vis-NIR and NIR spectroscopic systems were applied to asses minced beef adulteration.•Several animal and plant based adulterants were tested.•Classification rates of pure or adulterated samples were as high as 100%.•Prediction of adulterant levels is feasible.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>29096288</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1740 |
ispartof | Meat science, 2018-02, Vol.136, p.59-67 |
issn | 0309-1740 1873-4138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969932553 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adulteration Animals Cattle Chicken Chickens Food Contamination - analysis Gluten Machine Learning Meat Products - analysis Meat Products - standards Minced beef Plant Proteins - analysis Pork Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared - methods Swine Texturized vegetable protein Vis-NIR spectroscopy |
title | Assessing different processed meats for adulterants using visible-near-infrared spectroscopy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A32%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20different%20processed%20meats%20for%20adulterants%20using%20visible-near-infrared%20spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Rady,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2018-02&rft.volume=136&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=59-67&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.10.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1969932553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969932553&rft_id=info:pmid/29096288&rft_els_id=S0309174017307830&rfr_iscdi=true |