Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review

•Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in peri-implant mucositis (p-iM) was investigated.•Five studies included in the qualitative analysis.•Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT.•This study showed inconclusive findings regarding PDT or LT use in the treatment of p-iM...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy 2018-03, Vol.21, p.147-152
Hauptverfasser: Albaker, Abdulaziz M., ArRejaie, Aws S., Alrabiah, Mohammed, Abduljabbar, Tariq
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 152
container_issue
container_start_page 147
container_title Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy
container_volume 21
creator Albaker, Abdulaziz M.
ArRejaie, Aws S.
Alrabiah, Mohammed
Abduljabbar, Tariq
description •Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in peri-implant mucositis (p-iM) was investigated.•Five studies included in the qualitative analysis.•Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT.•This study showed inconclusive findings regarding PDT or LT use in the treatment of p-iM. The present study systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in the management of peri-implant mucositis (p-iM). The electronic databases were searched until October 2017. Outcome measures were bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), or probing depth (PD). The addressed PICO question was: “Is PDT and LT effective in the management of p-iM?” A total of five studies included in the qualitative analysis, two of which had a low risk of bias. Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT. All studies reported a significant improvement in clinical peri-implant inflammatory parameters in p-iM. For PDT, one study demonstrated a significant reduction for PDT group as compared to manual debridement (MD), while one study indicated comparable outcomes when tested with probiotics at follow-up. One study used PDT alone and indicated significant improvements in peri-implant parameters at follow-up. However, in the studies using LT, one study demonstrated a significant improvement in peri-implant parameters as compared to scaling and root planing alone, while other study indicated comparable outcomes when compared with manual debridement/chlorhexidine group at follow-up. This systematic review demonstrated inconclusive findings to show the effect of PDT or LT in the management of p-iM due to methodological heterogeneity such as non-standard control groups, laser parameters and short follow-up period. The results of this review should be considered preliminary and further, more robust, well-designed studies with long-term follow up and standardized comparators with laser parameters are warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.11.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969931336</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1572100017304982</els_id><sourcerecordid>1969931336</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-edec5055f2f8645f352abfa8dcef283fdc40bd125e06df695cfed6c173449a893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMovr9AkCzddJvqdLo7ggsRXyC40XXIJBUmw_TDJKPM35tx1KWrqoJ7q-oeQs6AlcCguVyUk51sKisGbQlQMoAdcghdywsQst3NvWirAhhjB-QoxgVjvJas3icHlYRW1I04JPM759AkOjo6zcc02vWge2-oHixd6oiBpjkGPa2pHzYtTQF16nHYWjD4wvfTUue5X5kx-uTjFb2hcR0T9jrlVQE_PH6ekD2nlxFPf-oxebu_e719LJ5fHp5ub54LU1ciFWjRCCaEq1zX1MJxUemZ05016KqOO2tqNrNQCWSNdY0UxqFtDLS8rqXuJD8mF9u9UxjfVxiT6n00uMwv4riKCmQjJQfOmyzlW6kJY4wBnZqC73VYK2Bqg1gt1DditUGsAFRGnF3nPwdWsx7tn-eXaRZcbwWYY-boQUXjcTBofciolR39vwe-AJ3TkCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969931336</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Albaker, Abdulaziz M. ; ArRejaie, Aws S. ; Alrabiah, Mohammed ; Abduljabbar, Tariq</creator><creatorcontrib>Albaker, Abdulaziz M. ; ArRejaie, Aws S. ; Alrabiah, Mohammed ; Abduljabbar, Tariq</creatorcontrib><description>•Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in peri-implant mucositis (p-iM) was investigated.•Five studies included in the qualitative analysis.•Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT.•This study showed inconclusive findings regarding PDT or LT use in the treatment of p-iM. The present study systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in the management of peri-implant mucositis (p-iM). The electronic databases were searched until October 2017. Outcome measures were bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), or probing depth (PD). The addressed PICO question was: “Is PDT and LT effective in the management of p-iM?” A total of five studies included in the qualitative analysis, two of which had a low risk of bias. Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT. All studies reported a significant improvement in clinical peri-implant inflammatory parameters in p-iM. For PDT, one study demonstrated a significant reduction for PDT group as compared to manual debridement (MD), while one study indicated comparable outcomes when tested with probiotics at follow-up. One study used PDT alone and indicated significant improvements in peri-implant parameters at follow-up. However, in the studies using LT, one study demonstrated a significant improvement in peri-implant parameters as compared to scaling and root planing alone, while other study indicated comparable outcomes when compared with manual debridement/chlorhexidine group at follow-up. This systematic review demonstrated inconclusive findings to show the effect of PDT or LT in the management of p-iM due to methodological heterogeneity such as non-standard control groups, laser parameters and short follow-up period. The results of this review should be considered preliminary and further, more robust, well-designed studies with long-term follow up and standardized comparators with laser parameters are warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1572-1000</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1597</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.11.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29175465</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Dental Plaque Index ; Humans ; Laser ; Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use ; Lasers, Solid-State - therapeutic use ; Low-Level Light Therapy - methods ; Peri-implant mucositis ; Peri-Implantitis - drug therapy ; Peri-Implantitis - radiotherapy ; Periodontal Debridement - methods ; Periodontal Index ; Photochemotherapy - methods ; Photodynamic therapy ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2018-03, Vol.21, p.147-152</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-edec5055f2f8645f352abfa8dcef283fdc40bd125e06df695cfed6c173449a893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-edec5055f2f8645f352abfa8dcef283fdc40bd125e06df695cfed6c173449a893</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572100017304982$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29175465$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Albaker, Abdulaziz M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ArRejaie, Aws S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alrabiah, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abduljabbar, Tariq</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review</title><title>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy</title><addtitle>Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther</addtitle><description>•Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in peri-implant mucositis (p-iM) was investigated.•Five studies included in the qualitative analysis.•Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT.•This study showed inconclusive findings regarding PDT or LT use in the treatment of p-iM. The present study systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in the management of peri-implant mucositis (p-iM). The electronic databases were searched until October 2017. Outcome measures were bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), or probing depth (PD). The addressed PICO question was: “Is PDT and LT effective in the management of p-iM?” A total of five studies included in the qualitative analysis, two of which had a low risk of bias. Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT. All studies reported a significant improvement in clinical peri-implant inflammatory parameters in p-iM. For PDT, one study demonstrated a significant reduction for PDT group as compared to manual debridement (MD), while one study indicated comparable outcomes when tested with probiotics at follow-up. One study used PDT alone and indicated significant improvements in peri-implant parameters at follow-up. However, in the studies using LT, one study demonstrated a significant improvement in peri-implant parameters as compared to scaling and root planing alone, while other study indicated comparable outcomes when compared with manual debridement/chlorhexidine group at follow-up. This systematic review demonstrated inconclusive findings to show the effect of PDT or LT in the management of p-iM due to methodological heterogeneity such as non-standard control groups, laser parameters and short follow-up period. The results of this review should be considered preliminary and further, more robust, well-designed studies with long-term follow up and standardized comparators with laser parameters are warranted.</description><subject>Dental Plaque Index</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laser</subject><subject>Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Lasers, Solid-State - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Low-Level Light Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Peri-implant mucositis</subject><subject>Peri-Implantitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Peri-Implantitis - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Periodontal Debridement - methods</subject><subject>Periodontal Index</subject><subject>Photochemotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Photodynamic therapy</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1572-1000</issn><issn>1873-1597</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKBDEQRYMovr9AkCzddJvqdLo7ggsRXyC40XXIJBUmw_TDJKPM35tx1KWrqoJ7q-oeQs6AlcCguVyUk51sKisGbQlQMoAdcghdywsQst3NvWirAhhjB-QoxgVjvJas3icHlYRW1I04JPM759AkOjo6zcc02vWge2-oHixd6oiBpjkGPa2pHzYtTQF16nHYWjD4wvfTUue5X5kx-uTjFb2hcR0T9jrlVQE_PH6ekD2nlxFPf-oxebu_e719LJ5fHp5ub54LU1ciFWjRCCaEq1zX1MJxUemZ05016KqOO2tqNrNQCWSNdY0UxqFtDLS8rqXuJD8mF9u9UxjfVxiT6n00uMwv4riKCmQjJQfOmyzlW6kJY4wBnZqC73VYK2Bqg1gt1DditUGsAFRGnF3nPwdWsx7tn-eXaRZcbwWYY-boQUXjcTBofciolR39vwe-AJ3TkCA</recordid><startdate>201803</startdate><enddate>201803</enddate><creator>Albaker, Abdulaziz M.</creator><creator>ArRejaie, Aws S.</creator><creator>Alrabiah, Mohammed</creator><creator>Abduljabbar, Tariq</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201803</creationdate><title>Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review</title><author>Albaker, Abdulaziz M. ; ArRejaie, Aws S. ; Alrabiah, Mohammed ; Abduljabbar, Tariq</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-edec5055f2f8645f352abfa8dcef283fdc40bd125e06df695cfed6c173449a893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Dental Plaque Index</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laser</topic><topic>Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Lasers, Solid-State - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Low-Level Light Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Peri-implant mucositis</topic><topic>Peri-Implantitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Peri-Implantitis - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Periodontal Debridement - methods</topic><topic>Periodontal Index</topic><topic>Photochemotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Photodynamic therapy</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Albaker, Abdulaziz M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ArRejaie, Aws S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alrabiah, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abduljabbar, Tariq</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Albaker, Abdulaziz M.</au><au>ArRejaie, Aws S.</au><au>Alrabiah, Mohammed</au><au>Abduljabbar, Tariq</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy</jtitle><addtitle>Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther</addtitle><date>2018-03</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><spage>147</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>147-152</pages><issn>1572-1000</issn><eissn>1873-1597</eissn><abstract>•Effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in peri-implant mucositis (p-iM) was investigated.•Five studies included in the qualitative analysis.•Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT.•This study showed inconclusive findings regarding PDT or LT use in the treatment of p-iM. The present study systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) or laser therapy (LT) in the management of peri-implant mucositis (p-iM). The electronic databases were searched until October 2017. Outcome measures were bleeding on probing (BOP), plaque index (PI), or probing depth (PD). The addressed PICO question was: “Is PDT and LT effective in the management of p-iM?” A total of five studies included in the qualitative analysis, two of which had a low risk of bias. Three studies used PDT while two studies used LT. All studies reported a significant improvement in clinical peri-implant inflammatory parameters in p-iM. For PDT, one study demonstrated a significant reduction for PDT group as compared to manual debridement (MD), while one study indicated comparable outcomes when tested with probiotics at follow-up. One study used PDT alone and indicated significant improvements in peri-implant parameters at follow-up. However, in the studies using LT, one study demonstrated a significant improvement in peri-implant parameters as compared to scaling and root planing alone, while other study indicated comparable outcomes when compared with manual debridement/chlorhexidine group at follow-up. This systematic review demonstrated inconclusive findings to show the effect of PDT or LT in the management of p-iM due to methodological heterogeneity such as non-standard control groups, laser parameters and short follow-up period. The results of this review should be considered preliminary and further, more robust, well-designed studies with long-term follow up and standardized comparators with laser parameters are warranted.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>29175465</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.11.011</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1572-1000
ispartof Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2018-03, Vol.21, p.147-152
issn 1572-1000
1873-1597
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969931336
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Dental Plaque Index
Humans
Laser
Lasers, Semiconductor - therapeutic use
Lasers, Solid-State - therapeutic use
Low-Level Light Therapy - methods
Peri-implant mucositis
Peri-Implantitis - drug therapy
Peri-Implantitis - radiotherapy
Periodontal Debridement - methods
Periodontal Index
Photochemotherapy - methods
Photodynamic therapy
Systematic review
title Effect of photodynamic and laser therapy in the treatment of peri-implant mucositis: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T01%3A27%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20photodynamic%20and%20laser%20therapy%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20peri-implant%20mucositis:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Photodiagnosis%20and%20photodynamic%20therapy&rft.au=Albaker,%20Abdulaziz%20M.&rft.date=2018-03&rft.volume=21&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=147-152&rft.issn=1572-1000&rft.eissn=1873-1597&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2017.11.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1969931336%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969931336&rft_id=info:pmid/29175465&rft_els_id=S1572100017304982&rfr_iscdi=true