Changes of bite force and occlusal contacts in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A controlled clinical trial

We aimed to determine whether appliance type affects changes in maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF) and the number of occlusal contacts (NOC) during retention, controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. The sample comprised 176 examinees (70 male, 106 female) aged 14 to 20 years: 30 had maxillar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics 2017-12, Vol.152 (6), p.767-777
Hauptverfasser: Varga, Suzana, Spalj, Stjepan, Anic Milosevic, Sandra, Lapter Varga, Marina, Mestrovic, Senka, Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda, Slaj, Mladen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 777
container_issue 6
container_start_page 767
container_title American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics
container_volume 152
creator Varga, Suzana
Spalj, Stjepan
Anic Milosevic, Sandra
Lapter Varga, Marina
Mestrovic, Senka
Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda
Slaj, Mladen
description We aimed to determine whether appliance type affects changes in maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF) and the number of occlusal contacts (NOC) during retention, controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. The sample comprised 176 examinees (70 male, 106 female) aged 14 to 20 years: 30 had maxillary and mandibular Essix retainers, 30 had wrap-around retainers, and 30 had a combination of fixed mandibular canine-to-canine retainers bonded on each tooth separately (double twisted, 0.254 mm in diameter, stainless steel ligature wire) and Essix retainer in the maxillary arch; 86 with normal occlusion were not treated. MVBF and the NOC were measured immediately after removal of preadjusted edgewise appliances (Roth prescription), 6 weeks after that, and after the next 4 weeks. Increases in MVBF and the NOC were demonstrated, but subjects with 2 Essix retainers showed lower values than did the others. Changes were related to type of appliance, sex, and age (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969926646</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0889540617306005</els_id><sourcerecordid>1969926646</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-31fd7f79eeedc7232e7c615ff538739d617aa480afedf5d6edefcb3a2c98403a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rVDEUhkNR2rH6CwTJ0s295uPe5EZwUYbWFgpudB0yyYmTIZOMSUb035vpVJeuDhye93w8CL2lZKSEig-70eyyyyMjVI6Ej4QtF2hFiZKDkDN7gVZkWdQwT0RcoVe17gghamLkEl0xRSVfZrFCv9Zbk75DxdnjTWiAfS4WsEkOZ2vjsZqIbU7N2FZxSLhtARdokFrICR-2psIpmkvb9lt61-JWwLR9Jz7im6dsyTGCwzaGFGyf10ow8TV66U2s8Oa5XqNvd7df1_fD45fPD-ubx8HyWbWBU--klwoAnJWMM5BW0Nn7mS-SKyeoNGZaiPHg_OwEOPB2ww2zapkIN_wavT_PPZT84wi16X2oFmI0CfKxaqqEUkyISXSUn1Fbcq0FvD6UsDflt6ZEn5TrnX5Srk_KNeG6K--pd88Ljps9uH-Zv4478OkMQH_zZ4Ciqw2QLLhQwDbtcvjvgj8A9ZYf</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1969926646</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changes of bite force and occlusal contacts in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A controlled clinical trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Varga, Suzana ; Spalj, Stjepan ; Anic Milosevic, Sandra ; Lapter Varga, Marina ; Mestrovic, Senka ; Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda ; Slaj, Mladen</creator><creatorcontrib>Varga, Suzana ; Spalj, Stjepan ; Anic Milosevic, Sandra ; Lapter Varga, Marina ; Mestrovic, Senka ; Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda ; Slaj, Mladen</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to determine whether appliance type affects changes in maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF) and the number of occlusal contacts (NOC) during retention, controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. The sample comprised 176 examinees (70 male, 106 female) aged 14 to 20 years: 30 had maxillary and mandibular Essix retainers, 30 had wrap-around retainers, and 30 had a combination of fixed mandibular canine-to-canine retainers bonded on each tooth separately (double twisted, 0.254 mm in diameter, stainless steel ligature wire) and Essix retainer in the maxillary arch; 86 with normal occlusion were not treated. MVBF and the NOC were measured immediately after removal of preadjusted edgewise appliances (Roth prescription), 6 weeks after that, and after the next 4 weeks. Increases in MVBF and the NOC were demonstrated, but subjects with 2 Essix retainers showed lower values than did the others. Changes were related to type of appliance, sex, and age (P &lt;0.05) but not to body mass index. The increase in NOC occurred faster than the increase of MVBF, more and sooner with the wrap-around retainer and in male subjects than with the Essix and in female subjects. MVBF and NOC nearly reached the values of the control subjects. Settling of the occlusion depends on appliance type: it takes longer in female patients and with Essix in both dental arches than with the other tested appliances. •Maximum voluntary bite force and number of occlusal contacts increase during the first 10 weeks of retention.•Settling occurs sooner with the wrap-around retainer and in males than with the Essix and in females.•Body mass index is not related to changes in maximum voluntary bite force and number of occlusal contacts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0889-5406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29173856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Bite Force ; Dental Occlusion ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Orthodontic Retainers ; Prospective Studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2017-12, Vol.152 (6), p.767-777</ispartof><rights>2017 American Association of Orthodontists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-31fd7f79eeedc7232e7c615ff538739d617aa480afedf5d6edefcb3a2c98403a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-31fd7f79eeedc7232e7c615ff538739d617aa480afedf5d6edefcb3a2c98403a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0175-1071</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29173856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varga, Suzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalj, Stjepan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anic Milosevic, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapter Varga, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mestrovic, Senka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaj, Mladen</creatorcontrib><title>Changes of bite force and occlusal contacts in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A controlled clinical trial</title><title>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</title><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><description>We aimed to determine whether appliance type affects changes in maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF) and the number of occlusal contacts (NOC) during retention, controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. The sample comprised 176 examinees (70 male, 106 female) aged 14 to 20 years: 30 had maxillary and mandibular Essix retainers, 30 had wrap-around retainers, and 30 had a combination of fixed mandibular canine-to-canine retainers bonded on each tooth separately (double twisted, 0.254 mm in diameter, stainless steel ligature wire) and Essix retainer in the maxillary arch; 86 with normal occlusion were not treated. MVBF and the NOC were measured immediately after removal of preadjusted edgewise appliances (Roth prescription), 6 weeks after that, and after the next 4 weeks. Increases in MVBF and the NOC were demonstrated, but subjects with 2 Essix retainers showed lower values than did the others. Changes were related to type of appliance, sex, and age (P &lt;0.05) but not to body mass index. The increase in NOC occurred faster than the increase of MVBF, more and sooner with the wrap-around retainer and in male subjects than with the Essix and in female subjects. MVBF and NOC nearly reached the values of the control subjects. Settling of the occlusion depends on appliance type: it takes longer in female patients and with Essix in both dental arches than with the other tested appliances. •Maximum voluntary bite force and number of occlusal contacts increase during the first 10 weeks of retention.•Settling occurs sooner with the wrap-around retainer and in males than with the Essix and in females.•Body mass index is not related to changes in maximum voluntary bite force and number of occlusal contacts.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Bite Force</subject><subject>Dental Occlusion</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Orthodontic Retainers</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0889-5406</issn><issn>1097-6752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1rVDEUhkNR2rH6CwTJ0s295uPe5EZwUYbWFgpudB0yyYmTIZOMSUb035vpVJeuDhye93w8CL2lZKSEig-70eyyyyMjVI6Ej4QtF2hFiZKDkDN7gVZkWdQwT0RcoVe17gghamLkEl0xRSVfZrFCv9Zbk75DxdnjTWiAfS4WsEkOZ2vjsZqIbU7N2FZxSLhtARdokFrICR-2psIpmkvb9lt61-JWwLR9Jz7im6dsyTGCwzaGFGyf10ow8TV66U2s8Oa5XqNvd7df1_fD45fPD-ubx8HyWbWBU--klwoAnJWMM5BW0Nn7mS-SKyeoNGZaiPHg_OwEOPB2ww2zapkIN_wavT_PPZT84wi16X2oFmI0CfKxaqqEUkyISXSUn1Fbcq0FvD6UsDflt6ZEn5TrnX5Srk_KNeG6K--pd88Ljps9uH-Zv4478OkMQH_zZ4Ciqw2QLLhQwDbtcvjvgj8A9ZYf</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Varga, Suzana</creator><creator>Spalj, Stjepan</creator><creator>Anic Milosevic, Sandra</creator><creator>Lapter Varga, Marina</creator><creator>Mestrovic, Senka</creator><creator>Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda</creator><creator>Slaj, Mladen</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0175-1071</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Changes of bite force and occlusal contacts in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A controlled clinical trial</title><author>Varga, Suzana ; Spalj, Stjepan ; Anic Milosevic, Sandra ; Lapter Varga, Marina ; Mestrovic, Senka ; Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda ; Slaj, Mladen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-31fd7f79eeedc7232e7c615ff538739d617aa480afedf5d6edefcb3a2c98403a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Bite Force</topic><topic>Dental Occlusion</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Orthodontic Retainers</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varga, Suzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spalj, Stjepan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anic Milosevic, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapter Varga, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mestrovic, Senka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slaj, Mladen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varga, Suzana</au><au>Spalj, Stjepan</au><au>Anic Milosevic, Sandra</au><au>Lapter Varga, Marina</au><au>Mestrovic, Senka</au><au>Trinajstic Zrinski, Magda</au><au>Slaj, Mladen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changes of bite force and occlusal contacts in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop</addtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>777</epage><pages>767-777</pages><issn>0889-5406</issn><eissn>1097-6752</eissn><abstract>We aimed to determine whether appliance type affects changes in maximum voluntary bite force (MVBF) and the number of occlusal contacts (NOC) during retention, controlling for sex, age, and body mass index. The sample comprised 176 examinees (70 male, 106 female) aged 14 to 20 years: 30 had maxillary and mandibular Essix retainers, 30 had wrap-around retainers, and 30 had a combination of fixed mandibular canine-to-canine retainers bonded on each tooth separately (double twisted, 0.254 mm in diameter, stainless steel ligature wire) and Essix retainer in the maxillary arch; 86 with normal occlusion were not treated. MVBF and the NOC were measured immediately after removal of preadjusted edgewise appliances (Roth prescription), 6 weeks after that, and after the next 4 weeks. Increases in MVBF and the NOC were demonstrated, but subjects with 2 Essix retainers showed lower values than did the others. Changes were related to type of appliance, sex, and age (P &lt;0.05) but not to body mass index. The increase in NOC occurred faster than the increase of MVBF, more and sooner with the wrap-around retainer and in male subjects than with the Essix and in female subjects. MVBF and NOC nearly reached the values of the control subjects. Settling of the occlusion depends on appliance type: it takes longer in female patients and with Essix in both dental arches than with the other tested appliances. •Maximum voluntary bite force and number of occlusal contacts increase during the first 10 weeks of retention.•Settling occurs sooner with the wrap-around retainer and in males than with the Essix and in females.•Body mass index is not related to changes in maximum voluntary bite force and number of occlusal contacts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29173856</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.028</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0175-1071</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0889-5406
ispartof American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 2017-12, Vol.152 (6), p.767-777
issn 0889-5406
1097-6752
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1969926646
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adolescent
Bite Force
Dental Occlusion
Dentistry
Female
Humans
Male
Orthodontic Retainers
Prospective Studies
Young Adult
title Changes of bite force and occlusal contacts in the retention phase of orthodontic treatment: A controlled clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A17%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changes%20of%20bite%20force%20and%20occlusal%20contacts%20in%20the%20retention%20phase%20of%20orthodontic%20treatment:%20A%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20orthodontics%20and%20dentofacial%20orthopedics&rft.au=Varga,%20Suzana&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=777&rft.pages=767-777&rft.issn=0889-5406&rft.eissn=1097-6752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.03.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1969926646%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1969926646&rft_id=info:pmid/29173856&rft_els_id=S0889540617306005&rfr_iscdi=true