Electrofishing Capture Probability of Smallmouth Bass in Streams
Abundance estimation is an integral part of understanding the ecology and advancing the management of fish populations and communities. Mark–recapture and removal methods are commonly used to estimate the abundance of stream fishes. Alternatively, abundance can be estimated by dividing the number of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | North American journal of fisheries management 2007-02, Vol.27 (1), p.162-171 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 171 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | North American journal of fisheries management |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Dauwalter, Daniel C. Fisher, William L. |
description | Abundance estimation is an integral part of understanding the ecology and advancing the management of fish populations and communities. Mark–recapture and removal methods are commonly used to estimate the abundance of stream fishes. Alternatively, abundance can be estimated by dividing the number of individuals sampled by the probability of capture. We conducted a mark–recapture study and used multiple repeated‐measures logistic regression to determine the influence of fish size, sampling procedures, and stream habitat variables on the cumulative capture probability for smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu in two eastern Oklahoma streams. The predicted capture probability was used to adjust the number of individuals sampled to obtain abundance estimates. The observed capture probabilities were higher for larger fish and decreased with successive electrofishing passes for larger fish only. Model selection suggested that the number of electrofishing passes, fish length, and mean thalweg depth affected capture probabilities the most; there was little evidence for any effect of electrofishing power density and woody debris density on capture probability. Leave‐one‐out cross validation showed that the cumulative capture probability model predicts smallmouth abundance accurately. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1577/M06-008.1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19697618</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19697618</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3002-86d19755d630a9292af3d7c92e08a4801bbe528f7263047767e881ede6eba4863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10D1PwzAQgGELgUQpDPyDTEgMac9O_JGNUrWA1AJSYbac5EKNnKbYiVD_PUZlZbrhHp1OLyHXFCaUSzldg0gB1ISekBHluUqVkPyUjIBJnvIil-fkIoRPAOCKsxG5Wziset81Nmzt7iOZm30_eExefVea0jrbH5KuSTatca7thn6b3JsQErtLNr1H04ZLctYYF_Dqb47J-3LxNn9MVy8PT_PZKq0yABbfqGkhOa9FBqZgBTNNVsuqYAjK5ApoWSJnqpEsglxKIVEpijUKLONeZGNyc7y7993XgKHXrQ0VOmd22A1B00IUUlAV4e0RVr4LwWOj9962xh80Bf3bSMdGOjbSNNrp0X5bh4f_oX6eLddABct-AMrOZlA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19697618</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrofishing Capture Probability of Smallmouth Bass in Streams</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Dauwalter, Daniel C. ; Fisher, William L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dauwalter, Daniel C. ; Fisher, William L.</creatorcontrib><description>Abundance estimation is an integral part of understanding the ecology and advancing the management of fish populations and communities. Mark–recapture and removal methods are commonly used to estimate the abundance of stream fishes. Alternatively, abundance can be estimated by dividing the number of individuals sampled by the probability of capture. We conducted a mark–recapture study and used multiple repeated‐measures logistic regression to determine the influence of fish size, sampling procedures, and stream habitat variables on the cumulative capture probability for smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu in two eastern Oklahoma streams. The predicted capture probability was used to adjust the number of individuals sampled to obtain abundance estimates. The observed capture probabilities were higher for larger fish and decreased with successive electrofishing passes for larger fish only. Model selection suggested that the number of electrofishing passes, fish length, and mean thalweg depth affected capture probabilities the most; there was little evidence for any effect of electrofishing power density and woody debris density on capture probability. Leave‐one‐out cross validation showed that the cumulative capture probability model predicts smallmouth abundance accurately.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1577/M06-008.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Freshwater ; Micropterus dolomieu</subject><ispartof>North American journal of fisheries management, 2007-02, Vol.27 (1), p.162-171</ispartof><rights>2007 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3002-86d19755d630a9292af3d7c92e08a4801bbe528f7263047767e881ede6eba4863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3002-86d19755d630a9292af3d7c92e08a4801bbe528f7263047767e881ede6eba4863</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1577%2FM06-008.1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1577%2FM06-008.1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dauwalter, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, William L.</creatorcontrib><title>Electrofishing Capture Probability of Smallmouth Bass in Streams</title><title>North American journal of fisheries management</title><description>Abundance estimation is an integral part of understanding the ecology and advancing the management of fish populations and communities. Mark–recapture and removal methods are commonly used to estimate the abundance of stream fishes. Alternatively, abundance can be estimated by dividing the number of individuals sampled by the probability of capture. We conducted a mark–recapture study and used multiple repeated‐measures logistic regression to determine the influence of fish size, sampling procedures, and stream habitat variables on the cumulative capture probability for smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu in two eastern Oklahoma streams. The predicted capture probability was used to adjust the number of individuals sampled to obtain abundance estimates. The observed capture probabilities were higher for larger fish and decreased with successive electrofishing passes for larger fish only. Model selection suggested that the number of electrofishing passes, fish length, and mean thalweg depth affected capture probabilities the most; there was little evidence for any effect of electrofishing power density and woody debris density on capture probability. Leave‐one‐out cross validation showed that the cumulative capture probability model predicts smallmouth abundance accurately.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Micropterus dolomieu</subject><issn>0275-5947</issn><issn>1548-8675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10D1PwzAQgGELgUQpDPyDTEgMac9O_JGNUrWA1AJSYbac5EKNnKbYiVD_PUZlZbrhHp1OLyHXFCaUSzldg0gB1ISekBHluUqVkPyUjIBJnvIil-fkIoRPAOCKsxG5Wziset81Nmzt7iOZm30_eExefVea0jrbH5KuSTatca7thn6b3JsQErtLNr1H04ZLctYYF_Dqb47J-3LxNn9MVy8PT_PZKq0yABbfqGkhOa9FBqZgBTNNVsuqYAjK5ApoWSJnqpEsglxKIVEpijUKLONeZGNyc7y7993XgKHXrQ0VOmd22A1B00IUUlAV4e0RVr4LwWOj9962xh80Bf3bSMdGOjbSNNrp0X5bh4f_oX6eLddABct-AMrOZlA</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Dauwalter, Daniel C.</creator><creator>Fisher, William L.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>Electrofishing Capture Probability of Smallmouth Bass in Streams</title><author>Dauwalter, Daniel C. ; Fisher, William L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3002-86d19755d630a9292af3d7c92e08a4801bbe528f7263047767e881ede6eba4863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Micropterus dolomieu</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dauwalter, Daniel C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, William L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dauwalter, Daniel C.</au><au>Fisher, William L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrofishing Capture Probability of Smallmouth Bass in Streams</atitle><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>171</epage><pages>162-171</pages><issn>0275-5947</issn><eissn>1548-8675</eissn><abstract>Abundance estimation is an integral part of understanding the ecology and advancing the management of fish populations and communities. Mark–recapture and removal methods are commonly used to estimate the abundance of stream fishes. Alternatively, abundance can be estimated by dividing the number of individuals sampled by the probability of capture. We conducted a mark–recapture study and used multiple repeated‐measures logistic regression to determine the influence of fish size, sampling procedures, and stream habitat variables on the cumulative capture probability for smallmouth bass Micropterus dolomieu in two eastern Oklahoma streams. The predicted capture probability was used to adjust the number of individuals sampled to obtain abundance estimates. The observed capture probabilities were higher for larger fish and decreased with successive electrofishing passes for larger fish only. Model selection suggested that the number of electrofishing passes, fish length, and mean thalweg depth affected capture probabilities the most; there was little evidence for any effect of electrofishing power density and woody debris density on capture probability. Leave‐one‐out cross validation showed that the cumulative capture probability model predicts smallmouth abundance accurately.</abstract><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1577/M06-008.1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-5947 |
ispartof | North American journal of fisheries management, 2007-02, Vol.27 (1), p.162-171 |
issn | 0275-5947 1548-8675 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_19697618 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Freshwater Micropterus dolomieu |
title | Electrofishing Capture Probability of Smallmouth Bass in Streams |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T10%3A12%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrofishing%20Capture%20Probability%20of%20Smallmouth%20Bass%20in%20Streams&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20management&rft.au=Dauwalter,%20Daniel%20C.&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=171&rft.pages=162-171&rft.issn=0275-5947&rft.eissn=1548-8675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1577/M06-008.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19697618%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19697618&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |