Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as part of the provisional stent technique in the percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations. CR12 Registry

To analyse systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as a part of provisional stent technique. 1960 angioplasties performed in two centres were prospectively registered, of which 382 were coronary bifurcations with a side branch>2mm. In centre A, isolated post-dilatation of the side...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular revascularization medicine 2018-07, Vol.19 (5), p.493-497
Hauptverfasser: Jurado-Román, Alfonso, Rubio-Alonso, Belén, García-Tejada, Julio, Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio, López-Lluva, María T., Gómez-Blázquez, Iván, Velázquez-Martín, María T., Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín, Hernández-Hernández, Felipe, Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 497
container_issue 5
container_start_page 493
container_title Cardiovascular revascularization medicine
container_volume 19
creator Jurado-Román, Alfonso
Rubio-Alonso, Belén
García-Tejada, Julio
Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio
López-Lluva, María T.
Gómez-Blázquez, Iván
Velázquez-Martín, María T.
Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín
Hernández-Hernández, Felipe
Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando
description To analyse systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as a part of provisional stent technique. 1960 angioplasties performed in two centres were prospectively registered, of which 382 were coronary bifurcations with a side branch>2mm. In centre A, isolated post-dilatation of the side branch was performed regardless its impairment after main vessel stenting. In centre B, side branch post-dilatation was performed only if it was severely affected after stent implantation. There was no difference between the two centres in the rate of side branch affection after stent implantation (A: 44.6 vs B: 49.3%, p=0.48) nor in the procedural success rate (A: 98.6% vs B: 96.7%, p=0.45). After one-year follow-up, a reduction of cardiovascular events was observed in centre A (A: 4.4% vs B: 10.4%, p=0.043) with a trend towards lower cardiac mortality (A: 2.2% vs B: 6.5%, p=0.093) and stent thrombosis (A: 0% vs B: 2.6%, p=0.077). There were no differences in the rate of myocardial infarction related to the treated artery (A: 1.4% vs B: 3.9%, p=0.29), or target lesion revascularization (A: 1.4% vs. B: 3.2%, p=0.45). Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch in the provisional stent technique was associated with a high angiographic success rate, and a low rate of cardiovascular events during follow-up. Although the study design does not allow definitive conclusions, this strategy could be considered a valid option in some cases or even as part of the provisional stent technique. •Several options exist on side branch treatment in provisional stent technique.•Systematic post-dilatation of the side branch was associated with a lower MACE rate.•This technique showed a trend towards lower cardiac mortality and stent thrombosis.•It was not associated with greater complications or increasing fluoroscopy time.•This technique could be considered as a part of the provisional stent technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1968443549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1553838917304049</els_id><sourcerecordid>1968443549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-753e536cd5b139b1984e2efdbadde699e48ed40461ae4f4db2946efbcfa0e0393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqPlp3yCKWHZjBwy2YVMpGqVNpUiRknSNMFx3GNlmCnikeaK8ZnGdZNkVcPnuuffoIHRJSUkJba53pdEhwKGsCG1zqSSUf0BnVLSiIJKJj_le16wQTMhTdB7jjhDWVk37CZ1WkjZSiuoMvTwdY4JRJ2ewi37QCSze-5gK6_Ij1_2EfY_TFnB0FnAX9GS2WEe81yG9fe2DP7iYWT3grDclnMBsJ_dnBuymFYFg5qQn8HPEKYBO48JlAeNDbgxH3Ll-DubfzFjizSOt8CP8djGF42d00ushwpfX8wL9-n77vLkr7h9-_Nzc3BeGNVUq2ppBzRpj644y2VEpOFTQ205bC9kycAGWE95QDbzntqskb6DvTK8JECbZBfq66mZHefmY1OiigWFYF1dUNoJzVvMF5Stqgo8xQK_2wY3Zh6JELRGpnVojUktESzVHlNuuXifM3Qj2vektkwx8WwHIPg8OgorGwWTAugAmKevd_yf8BYSEqW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968443549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as part of the provisional stent technique in the percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations. CR12 Registry</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jurado-Román, Alfonso ; Rubio-Alonso, Belén ; García-Tejada, Julio ; Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio ; López-Lluva, María T. ; Gómez-Blázquez, Iván ; Velázquez-Martín, María T. ; Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín ; Hernández-Hernández, Felipe ; Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Jurado-Román, Alfonso ; Rubio-Alonso, Belén ; García-Tejada, Julio ; Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio ; López-Lluva, María T. ; Gómez-Blázquez, Iván ; Velázquez-Martín, María T. ; Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín ; Hernández-Hernández, Felipe ; Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>To analyse systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as a part of provisional stent technique. 1960 angioplasties performed in two centres were prospectively registered, of which 382 were coronary bifurcations with a side branch&gt;2mm. In centre A, isolated post-dilatation of the side branch was performed regardless its impairment after main vessel stenting. In centre B, side branch post-dilatation was performed only if it was severely affected after stent implantation. There was no difference between the two centres in the rate of side branch affection after stent implantation (A: 44.6 vs B: 49.3%, p=0.48) nor in the procedural success rate (A: 98.6% vs B: 96.7%, p=0.45). After one-year follow-up, a reduction of cardiovascular events was observed in centre A (A: 4.4% vs B: 10.4%, p=0.043) with a trend towards lower cardiac mortality (A: 2.2% vs B: 6.5%, p=0.093) and stent thrombosis (A: 0% vs B: 2.6%, p=0.077). There were no differences in the rate of myocardial infarction related to the treated artery (A: 1.4% vs B: 3.9%, p=0.29), or target lesion revascularization (A: 1.4% vs. B: 3.2%, p=0.45). Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch in the provisional stent technique was associated with a high angiographic success rate, and a low rate of cardiovascular events during follow-up. Although the study design does not allow definitive conclusions, this strategy could be considered a valid option in some cases or even as part of the provisional stent technique. •Several options exist on side branch treatment in provisional stent technique.•Systematic post-dilatation of the side branch was associated with a lower MACE rate.•This technique showed a trend towards lower cardiac mortality and stent thrombosis.•It was not associated with greater complications or increasing fluoroscopy time.•This technique could be considered as a part of the provisional stent technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-8389</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0938</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29169982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bifurcation ; Post-dilatation ; Provisional stent technique ; Side branch</subject><ispartof>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2018-07, Vol.19 (5), p.493-497</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-753e536cd5b139b1984e2efdbadde699e48ed40461ae4f4db2946efbcfa0e0393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-753e536cd5b139b1984e2efdbadde699e48ed40461ae4f4db2946efbcfa0e0393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jurado-Román, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio-Alonso, Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Tejada, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Lluva, María T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Blázquez, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velázquez-Martín, María T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Hernández, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as part of the provisional stent technique in the percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations. CR12 Registry</title><title>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</title><addtitle>Cardiovasc Revasc Med</addtitle><description>To analyse systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as a part of provisional stent technique. 1960 angioplasties performed in two centres were prospectively registered, of which 382 were coronary bifurcations with a side branch&gt;2mm. In centre A, isolated post-dilatation of the side branch was performed regardless its impairment after main vessel stenting. In centre B, side branch post-dilatation was performed only if it was severely affected after stent implantation. There was no difference between the two centres in the rate of side branch affection after stent implantation (A: 44.6 vs B: 49.3%, p=0.48) nor in the procedural success rate (A: 98.6% vs B: 96.7%, p=0.45). After one-year follow-up, a reduction of cardiovascular events was observed in centre A (A: 4.4% vs B: 10.4%, p=0.043) with a trend towards lower cardiac mortality (A: 2.2% vs B: 6.5%, p=0.093) and stent thrombosis (A: 0% vs B: 2.6%, p=0.077). There were no differences in the rate of myocardial infarction related to the treated artery (A: 1.4% vs B: 3.9%, p=0.29), or target lesion revascularization (A: 1.4% vs. B: 3.2%, p=0.45). Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch in the provisional stent technique was associated with a high angiographic success rate, and a low rate of cardiovascular events during follow-up. Although the study design does not allow definitive conclusions, this strategy could be considered a valid option in some cases or even as part of the provisional stent technique. •Several options exist on side branch treatment in provisional stent technique.•Systematic post-dilatation of the side branch was associated with a lower MACE rate.•This technique showed a trend towards lower cardiac mortality and stent thrombosis.•It was not associated with greater complications or increasing fluoroscopy time.•This technique could be considered as a part of the provisional stent technique.</description><subject>Bifurcation</subject><subject>Post-dilatation</subject><subject>Provisional stent technique</subject><subject>Side branch</subject><issn>1553-8389</issn><issn>1878-0938</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u3CAUhVHVqPlp3yCKWHZjBwy2YVMpGqVNpUiRknSNMFx3GNlmCnikeaK8ZnGdZNkVcPnuuffoIHRJSUkJba53pdEhwKGsCG1zqSSUf0BnVLSiIJKJj_le16wQTMhTdB7jjhDWVk37CZ1WkjZSiuoMvTwdY4JRJ2ewi37QCSze-5gK6_Ij1_2EfY_TFnB0FnAX9GS2WEe81yG9fe2DP7iYWT3grDclnMBsJ_dnBuymFYFg5qQn8HPEKYBO48JlAeNDbgxH3Ll-DubfzFjizSOt8CP8djGF42d00ushwpfX8wL9-n77vLkr7h9-_Nzc3BeGNVUq2ppBzRpj644y2VEpOFTQ205bC9kycAGWE95QDbzntqskb6DvTK8JECbZBfq66mZHefmY1OiigWFYF1dUNoJzVvMF5Stqgo8xQK_2wY3Zh6JELRGpnVojUktESzVHlNuuXifM3Qj2vektkwx8WwHIPg8OgorGwWTAugAmKevd_yf8BYSEqW0</recordid><startdate>201807</startdate><enddate>201807</enddate><creator>Jurado-Román, Alfonso</creator><creator>Rubio-Alonso, Belén</creator><creator>García-Tejada, Julio</creator><creator>Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio</creator><creator>López-Lluva, María T.</creator><creator>Gómez-Blázquez, Iván</creator><creator>Velázquez-Martín, María T.</creator><creator>Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín</creator><creator>Hernández-Hernández, Felipe</creator><creator>Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201807</creationdate><title>Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as part of the provisional stent technique in the percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations. CR12 Registry</title><author>Jurado-Román, Alfonso ; Rubio-Alonso, Belén ; García-Tejada, Julio ; Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio ; López-Lluva, María T. ; Gómez-Blázquez, Iván ; Velázquez-Martín, María T. ; Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín ; Hernández-Hernández, Felipe ; Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-753e536cd5b139b1984e2efdbadde699e48ed40461ae4f4db2946efbcfa0e0393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bifurcation</topic><topic>Post-dilatation</topic><topic>Provisional stent technique</topic><topic>Side branch</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jurado-Román, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio-Alonso, Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García-Tejada, Julio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Lluva, María T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Blázquez, Iván</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Velázquez-Martín, María T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Hernández, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jurado-Román, Alfonso</au><au>Rubio-Alonso, Belén</au><au>García-Tejada, Julio</au><au>Sánchez-Pérez, Ignacio</au><au>López-Lluva, María T.</au><au>Gómez-Blázquez, Iván</au><au>Velázquez-Martín, María T.</au><au>Albarrán-González-Trevilla, Agustín</au><au>Hernández-Hernández, Felipe</au><au>Lozano-Ruíz-Poveda, Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as part of the provisional stent technique in the percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations. CR12 Registry</atitle><jtitle>Cardiovascular revascularization medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Cardiovasc Revasc Med</addtitle><date>2018-07</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>493</spage><epage>497</epage><pages>493-497</pages><issn>1553-8389</issn><eissn>1878-0938</eissn><abstract>To analyse systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as a part of provisional stent technique. 1960 angioplasties performed in two centres were prospectively registered, of which 382 were coronary bifurcations with a side branch&gt;2mm. In centre A, isolated post-dilatation of the side branch was performed regardless its impairment after main vessel stenting. In centre B, side branch post-dilatation was performed only if it was severely affected after stent implantation. There was no difference between the two centres in the rate of side branch affection after stent implantation (A: 44.6 vs B: 49.3%, p=0.48) nor in the procedural success rate (A: 98.6% vs B: 96.7%, p=0.45). After one-year follow-up, a reduction of cardiovascular events was observed in centre A (A: 4.4% vs B: 10.4%, p=0.043) with a trend towards lower cardiac mortality (A: 2.2% vs B: 6.5%, p=0.093) and stent thrombosis (A: 0% vs B: 2.6%, p=0.077). There were no differences in the rate of myocardial infarction related to the treated artery (A: 1.4% vs B: 3.9%, p=0.29), or target lesion revascularization (A: 1.4% vs. B: 3.2%, p=0.45). Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch in the provisional stent technique was associated with a high angiographic success rate, and a low rate of cardiovascular events during follow-up. Although the study design does not allow definitive conclusions, this strategy could be considered a valid option in some cases or even as part of the provisional stent technique. •Several options exist on side branch treatment in provisional stent technique.•Systematic post-dilatation of the side branch was associated with a lower MACE rate.•This technique showed a trend towards lower cardiac mortality and stent thrombosis.•It was not associated with greater complications or increasing fluoroscopy time.•This technique could be considered as a part of the provisional stent technique.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29169982</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.014</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-8389
ispartof Cardiovascular revascularization medicine, 2018-07, Vol.19 (5), p.493-497
issn 1553-8389
1878-0938
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1968443549
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Bifurcation
Post-dilatation
Provisional stent technique
Side branch
title Systematic isolated post-dilatation of the side branch as part of the provisional stent technique in the percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcations. CR12 Registry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A41%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20isolated%20post-dilatation%20of%20the%20side%20branch%20as%20part%20of%20the%20provisional%20stent%20technique%20in%20the%20percutaneous%20treatment%20of%20coronary%20bifurcations.%20CR12%20Registry&rft.jtitle=Cardiovascular%20revascularization%20medicine&rft.au=Jurado-Rom%C3%A1n,%20Alfonso&rft.date=2018-07&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=493&rft.epage=497&rft.pages=493-497&rft.issn=1553-8389&rft.eissn=1878-0938&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1968443549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968443549&rft_id=info:pmid/29169982&rft_els_id=S1553838917304049&rfr_iscdi=true