Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training

•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice. In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2018-04, Vol.46 (4), p.393-396
Hauptverfasser: Gould, Dinah J., Chudleigh, Jane, Purssell, Edward, Hawker, Clare, Gaze, Sarah, James, Deborah, Lynch, Mary, Pope, Nicola, Drey, Nicholas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 396
container_issue 4
container_start_page 393
container_title American journal of infection control
container_volume 46
creator Gould, Dinah J.
Chudleigh, Jane
Purssell, Edward
Hawker, Clare
Gaze, Sarah
James, Deborah
Lynch, Mary
Pope, Nicola
Drey, Nicholas
description •Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice. In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood. A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire. The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique. Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1968442820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196655317311501</els_id><sourcerecordid>1968442820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u2zAQhIkiQeP8vEAOAY-5yCUpipaKXAKjbQoECIK0Z4ImV_UaMqWSlBs_St62VJ3mmBOB4bezmB1CLjmbc8bVp83cbNDOBeOLLMwZqz-QGa_EoihFo47IjPFGFaqqyhNyGuOGMdaUqvpITkTDVdOU1Yy8PI1hB3uaegrPQ9cHoKN3EGIy3qH_RfuWpjXQIaC3OHQQJ8VEGBJamsCuPf4e4TN9HE2HySTcAbW9T-ATNd50-4iR_sG0pg6iDTj8I95-slmmW3Tg7SQ7moJBnzefk-PWdBEuXt8z8vPrlx_Lu-L-4dv35e19YSVjqRClMTLnaWppRM3VCixruapXILmVfMGFszmqrbhrFRcVqytRy1XrDBjZMFeekeuD7xD6nCQmvcVooeuMh36MOt-wllLUgmVUHFAb-hgDtDqfZWvCXnOmp0r0Rk-V6KmSScuV5KGrV_9xtQX3NvK_gwzcHADIKXcIQUeL0zkcBrBJux7f8_8Lft6g3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968442820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gould, Dinah J. ; Chudleigh, Jane ; Purssell, Edward ; Hawker, Clare ; Gaze, Sarah ; James, Deborah ; Lynch, Mary ; Pope, Nicola ; Drey, Nicholas</creator><creatorcontrib>Gould, Dinah J. ; Chudleigh, Jane ; Purssell, Edward ; Hawker, Clare ; Gaze, Sarah ; James, Deborah ; Lynch, Mary ; Pope, Nicola ; Drey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><description>•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice. In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood. A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire. The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique. Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29169935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Asepsis - methods ; Asepsis - standards ; Aseptic technique ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Content analysis ; Data Collection ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Infection prevention and control ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2018-04, Vol.46 (4), p.393-396</ispartof><rights>2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gould, Dinah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudleigh, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purssell, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawker, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaze, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><title>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice. In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood. A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire. The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique. Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.</description><subject>Asepsis - methods</subject><subject>Asepsis - standards</subject><subject>Aseptic technique</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection prevention and control</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u2zAQhIkiQeP8vEAOAY-5yCUpipaKXAKjbQoECIK0Z4ImV_UaMqWSlBs_St62VJ3mmBOB4bezmB1CLjmbc8bVp83cbNDOBeOLLMwZqz-QGa_EoihFo47IjPFGFaqqyhNyGuOGMdaUqvpITkTDVdOU1Yy8PI1hB3uaegrPQ9cHoKN3EGIy3qH_RfuWpjXQIaC3OHQQJ8VEGBJamsCuPf4e4TN9HE2HySTcAbW9T-ATNd50-4iR_sG0pg6iDTj8I95-slmmW3Tg7SQ7moJBnzefk-PWdBEuXt8z8vPrlx_Lu-L-4dv35e19YSVjqRClMTLnaWppRM3VCixruapXILmVfMGFszmqrbhrFRcVqytRy1XrDBjZMFeekeuD7xD6nCQmvcVooeuMh36MOt-wllLUgmVUHFAb-hgDtDqfZWvCXnOmp0r0Rk-V6KmSScuV5KGrV_9xtQX3NvK_gwzcHADIKXcIQUeL0zkcBrBJux7f8_8Lft6g3A</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Gould, Dinah J.</creator><creator>Chudleigh, Jane</creator><creator>Purssell, Edward</creator><creator>Hawker, Clare</creator><creator>Gaze, Sarah</creator><creator>James, Deborah</creator><creator>Lynch, Mary</creator><creator>Pope, Nicola</creator><creator>Drey, Nicholas</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</title><author>Gould, Dinah J. ; Chudleigh, Jane ; Purssell, Edward ; Hawker, Clare ; Gaze, Sarah ; James, Deborah ; Lynch, Mary ; Pope, Nicola ; Drey, Nicholas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asepsis - methods</topic><topic>Asepsis - standards</topic><topic>Aseptic technique</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection prevention and control</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gould, Dinah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudleigh, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purssell, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawker, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaze, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gould, Dinah J.</au><au>Chudleigh, Jane</au><au>Purssell, Edward</au><au>Hawker, Clare</au><au>Gaze, Sarah</au><au>James, Deborah</au><au>Lynch, Mary</au><au>Pope, Nicola</au><au>Drey, Nicholas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>393-396</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice. In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood. A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire. The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique. Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29169935</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-6553
ispartof American journal of infection control, 2018-04, Vol.46 (4), p.393-396
issn 0196-6553
1527-3296
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1968442820
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Asepsis - methods
Asepsis - standards
Aseptic technique
Clinical Competence - standards
Content analysis
Data Collection
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Infection prevention and control
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing Staff, Hospital
title Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T22%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20to%20explore%20understanding%20of%20the%20principles%20of%20aseptic%20technique:%20Qualitative%20content%20analysis%20with%20descriptive%20analysis%20of%20confidence%20and%20training&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Gould,%20Dinah%20J.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=393-396&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1968442820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968442820&rft_id=info:pmid/29169935&rft_els_id=S0196655317311501&rfr_iscdi=true