Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training
•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice. In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of infection control 2018-04, Vol.46 (4), p.393-396 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 396 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 393 |
container_title | American journal of infection control |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Gould, Dinah J. Chudleigh, Jane Purssell, Edward Hawker, Clare Gaze, Sarah James, Deborah Lynch, Mary Pope, Nicola Drey, Nicholas |
description | •Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice.
In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood.
A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire.
The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique.
Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1968442820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196655317311501</els_id><sourcerecordid>1968442820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u2zAQhIkiQeP8vEAOAY-5yCUpipaKXAKjbQoECIK0Z4ImV_UaMqWSlBs_St62VJ3mmBOB4bezmB1CLjmbc8bVp83cbNDOBeOLLMwZqz-QGa_EoihFo47IjPFGFaqqyhNyGuOGMdaUqvpITkTDVdOU1Yy8PI1hB3uaegrPQ9cHoKN3EGIy3qH_RfuWpjXQIaC3OHQQJ8VEGBJamsCuPf4e4TN9HE2HySTcAbW9T-ATNd50-4iR_sG0pg6iDTj8I95-slmmW3Tg7SQ7moJBnzefk-PWdBEuXt8z8vPrlx_Lu-L-4dv35e19YSVjqRClMTLnaWppRM3VCixruapXILmVfMGFszmqrbhrFRcVqytRy1XrDBjZMFeekeuD7xD6nCQmvcVooeuMh36MOt-wllLUgmVUHFAb-hgDtDqfZWvCXnOmp0r0Rk-V6KmSScuV5KGrV_9xtQX3NvK_gwzcHADIKXcIQUeL0zkcBrBJux7f8_8Lft6g3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1968442820</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gould, Dinah J. ; Chudleigh, Jane ; Purssell, Edward ; Hawker, Clare ; Gaze, Sarah ; James, Deborah ; Lynch, Mary ; Pope, Nicola ; Drey, Nicholas</creator><creatorcontrib>Gould, Dinah J. ; Chudleigh, Jane ; Purssell, Edward ; Hawker, Clare ; Gaze, Sarah ; James, Deborah ; Lynch, Mary ; Pope, Nicola ; Drey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><description>•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice.
In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood.
A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire.
The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique.
Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-6553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-3296</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29169935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Asepsis - methods ; Asepsis - standards ; Aseptic technique ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Content analysis ; Data Collection ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Humans ; Infection prevention and control ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><ispartof>American journal of infection control, 2018-04, Vol.46 (4), p.393-396</ispartof><rights>2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29169935$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gould, Dinah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudleigh, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purssell, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawker, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaze, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><title>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</title><title>American journal of infection control</title><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><description>•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice.
In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood.
A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire.
The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique.
Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.</description><subject>Asepsis - methods</subject><subject>Asepsis - standards</subject><subject>Aseptic technique</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infection prevention and control</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Staff, Hospital</subject><issn>0196-6553</issn><issn>1527-3296</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u2zAQhIkiQeP8vEAOAY-5yCUpipaKXAKjbQoECIK0Z4ImV_UaMqWSlBs_St62VJ3mmBOB4bezmB1CLjmbc8bVp83cbNDOBeOLLMwZqz-QGa_EoihFo47IjPFGFaqqyhNyGuOGMdaUqvpITkTDVdOU1Yy8PI1hB3uaegrPQ9cHoKN3EGIy3qH_RfuWpjXQIaC3OHQQJ8VEGBJamsCuPf4e4TN9HE2HySTcAbW9T-ATNd50-4iR_sG0pg6iDTj8I95-slmmW3Tg7SQ7moJBnzefk-PWdBEuXt8z8vPrlx_Lu-L-4dv35e19YSVjqRClMTLnaWppRM3VCixruapXILmVfMGFszmqrbhrFRcVqytRy1XrDBjZMFeekeuD7xD6nCQmvcVooeuMh36MOt-wllLUgmVUHFAb-hgDtDqfZWvCXnOmp0r0Rk-V6KmSScuV5KGrV_9xtQX3NvK_gwzcHADIKXcIQUeL0zkcBrBJux7f8_8Lft6g3A</recordid><startdate>201804</startdate><enddate>201804</enddate><creator>Gould, Dinah J.</creator><creator>Chudleigh, Jane</creator><creator>Purssell, Edward</creator><creator>Hawker, Clare</creator><creator>Gaze, Sarah</creator><creator>James, Deborah</creator><creator>Lynch, Mary</creator><creator>Pope, Nicola</creator><creator>Drey, Nicholas</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201804</creationdate><title>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</title><author>Gould, Dinah J. ; Chudleigh, Jane ; Purssell, Edward ; Hawker, Clare ; Gaze, Sarah ; James, Deborah ; Lynch, Mary ; Pope, Nicola ; Drey, Nicholas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-23aa4291984a2816bec0f168be41c41712dc993c51df6125085284bfdaea490d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Asepsis - methods</topic><topic>Asepsis - standards</topic><topic>Aseptic technique</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infection prevention and control</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Staff, Hospital</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gould, Dinah J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chudleigh, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purssell, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawker, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaze, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynch, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drey, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gould, Dinah J.</au><au>Chudleigh, Jane</au><au>Purssell, Edward</au><au>Hawker, Clare</au><au>Gaze, Sarah</au><au>James, Deborah</au><au>Lynch, Mary</au><au>Pope, Nicola</au><au>Drey, Nicholas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training</atitle><jtitle>American journal of infection control</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Infect Control</addtitle><date>2018-04</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>393-396</pages><issn>0196-6553</issn><eissn>1527-3296</eissn><abstract>•Aseptic technique is an important part of clinical care.•Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique appears to be suboptimal.•Education and periodic reassessment could improve practice.
In many countries, aseptic procedures are undertaken by nurses in the general ward setting, but variation in practice has been reported, and evidence indicates that the principles underpinning aseptic technique are not well understood.
A survey was conducted, employing a brief, purpose-designed, self-reported questionnaire.
The response rate was 72%. Of those responding, 65% of nurses described aseptic technique in terms of the procedure used to undertake it, and 46% understood the principles of asepsis. The related concepts of cleanliness and sterilization were frequently confused with one another. Additionally, 72% reported that they not had received training for at least 5 years; 92% were confident of their ability to apply aseptic technique; and 90% reported that they had not been reassessed since their initial training. Qualitative analysis confirmed a lack of clarity about the meaning of aseptic technique.
Nurses' understanding of aseptic technique and the concepts of sterility and cleanliness is inadequate, a finding in line with results of previous studies. This knowledge gap potentially places patients at risk. Nurses' understanding of the principles of asepsis could be improved. Further studies should establish the generalizability of the study findings. Possible improvements include renewed emphasis during initial nurse education, greater opportunity for updating knowledge and skills post-qualification, and audit of practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29169935</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-6553 |
ispartof | American journal of infection control, 2018-04, Vol.46 (4), p.393-396 |
issn | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1968442820 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Asepsis - methods Asepsis - standards Aseptic technique Clinical Competence - standards Content analysis Data Collection Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Humans Infection prevention and control Nurses Nursing Nursing Staff, Hospital |
title | Survey to explore understanding of the principles of aseptic technique: Qualitative content analysis with descriptive analysis of confidence and training |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T22%3A45%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survey%20to%20explore%20understanding%20of%20the%20principles%20of%20aseptic%20technique:%20Qualitative%20content%20analysis%20with%20descriptive%20analysis%20of%20confidence%20and%20training&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20infection%20control&rft.au=Gould,%20Dinah%20J.&rft.date=2018-04&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=393-396&rft.issn=0196-6553&rft.eissn=1527-3296&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajic.2017.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1968442820%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1968442820&rft_id=info:pmid/29169935&rft_els_id=S0196655317311501&rfr_iscdi=true |