COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF PASSIVE DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS IN SCANNING PROTON RADIOTHERAPY-A STUDY USING PAEDIATRIC ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS
Proton beam therapy has advantages in comparison to conventional photon radiotherapy due to the physical properties of proton beams (e.g. sharp distal fall off, adjustable range and modulation). In proton therapy, there is the possibility of sparing healthy tissue close to the target volume. This is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2018-08, Vol.180 (1-4), p.256-260 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 260 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-4 |
container_start_page | 256 |
container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
container_volume | 180 |
creator | Kneževic, Ž Ambrozova, I Domingo, C De Saint-Hubert, M Majer, M Martínez-Rovira, I Miljanic, S Mojzeszek, N Porwol, P Ploc, O Romero-Expósito, M Stolarczyk, L Trinkl, S Harrison, R M Olko, P |
description | Proton beam therapy has advantages in comparison to conventional photon radiotherapy due to the physical properties of proton beams (e.g. sharp distal fall off, adjustable range and modulation). In proton therapy, there is the possibility of sparing healthy tissue close to the target volume. This is especially important when tumours are located next to critical organs and while treating cancer in paediatric patients. On the other hand, the interactions of protons with matter result in the production of secondary radiation, mostly neutrons and gamma radiation, which deposit their energy at a distance from the target. The aim of this study was to compare the response of different passive dosimetry systems in mixed radiation field induced by proton pencil beam inside anthropomorphic phantoms representing 5 and 10 years old children. Doses were measured in different organs with thermoluminescent (MTS-7, MTS-6 and MCP-N), radiophotoluminescent (GD-352 M and GD-302M), bubble and poly-allyl-diglycol carbonate (PADC) track detectors. Results show that RPL detectors are the less sensitive for neutrons than LiF TLDs and can be applied for in-phantom dosimetry of gamma component. Neutron doses determined using track detectors, bubble detectors and pairs of MTS-7/MTS-6 are consistent within the uncertainty range. This is the first study dealing with measurements on child anthropomorphic phantoms irradiated by a pencil scanning beam technique. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/ncx254 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1967463511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1967463511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-cb3bb934e809059b68be8f05600eb231bc11b714398472b2bba79bc3ee7502cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMtKw0AYRgdRbK1ufACZpQixc8tllkMam4EmE2ZSoavQSadQ6c3Egj6A721qq6v_wvm-xQHgHqNnjDgdNvvFcFt_Ep9dgD4OGfEoQ8El6CPMmBcxgnrgpm3fECIh99k16BGOAz_AvA--Y5UVQkujcqheoE5MoXKTHPdCGCNfEzhSRmZJqWfQzEyZZAbKHJpY5LnMx7DQquyyWoykKtNEi2LmCWjK6WgGp-aXEMlIilLLGIq8TLUqVKZ0kXZ3kXYflZlbcLWcr1t3d54DMH1Jyjj1JmosYzHxahKFH15tqbWcMhchjnxug8i6aIn8ACFnCcW2xtiGmFEesZBYYu085LamzoU-Il16AB5Pvftm935w7Ue1WbW1W6_nW7c7tBXmQcgC6mPcoU8ntG52bdu4ZbVvVpt581VhVB21V5326qS9gx_OvQe7cYt_9M8z_QFCi3Sn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1967463511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF PASSIVE DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS IN SCANNING PROTON RADIOTHERAPY-A STUDY USING PAEDIATRIC ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kneževic, Ž ; Ambrozova, I ; Domingo, C ; De Saint-Hubert, M ; Majer, M ; Martínez-Rovira, I ; Miljanic, S ; Mojzeszek, N ; Porwol, P ; Ploc, O ; Romero-Expósito, M ; Stolarczyk, L ; Trinkl, S ; Harrison, R M ; Olko, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Kneževic, Ž ; Ambrozova, I ; Domingo, C ; De Saint-Hubert, M ; Majer, M ; Martínez-Rovira, I ; Miljanic, S ; Mojzeszek, N ; Porwol, P ; Ploc, O ; Romero-Expósito, M ; Stolarczyk, L ; Trinkl, S ; Harrison, R M ; Olko, P</creatorcontrib><description>Proton beam therapy has advantages in comparison to conventional photon radiotherapy due to the physical properties of proton beams (e.g. sharp distal fall off, adjustable range and modulation). In proton therapy, there is the possibility of sparing healthy tissue close to the target volume. This is especially important when tumours are located next to critical organs and while treating cancer in paediatric patients. On the other hand, the interactions of protons with matter result in the production of secondary radiation, mostly neutrons and gamma radiation, which deposit their energy at a distance from the target. The aim of this study was to compare the response of different passive dosimetry systems in mixed radiation field induced by proton pencil beam inside anthropomorphic phantoms representing 5 and 10 years old children. Doses were measured in different organs with thermoluminescent (MTS-7, MTS-6 and MCP-N), radiophotoluminescent (GD-352 M and GD-302M), bubble and poly-allyl-diglycol carbonate (PADC) track detectors. Results show that RPL detectors are the less sensitive for neutrons than LiF TLDs and can be applied for in-phantom dosimetry of gamma component. Neutron doses determined using track detectors, bubble detectors and pairs of MTS-7/MTS-6 are consistent within the uncertainty range. This is the first study dealing with measurements on child anthropomorphic phantoms irradiated by a pencil scanning beam technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29165619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Anthropometry ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Equipment Design ; Gamma Rays - therapeutic use ; Humans ; Monte Carlo Method ; Neutrons ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Proton Therapy - instrumentation ; Protons ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation, Ionizing ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Radionuclide Imaging ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2018-08, Vol.180 (1-4), p.256-260</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-cb3bb934e809059b68be8f05600eb231bc11b714398472b2bba79bc3ee7502cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-cb3bb934e809059b68be8f05600eb231bc11b714398472b2bba79bc3ee7502cb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5554-8178</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29165619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kneževic, Ž</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrozova, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Saint-Hubert, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Rovira, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miljanic, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojzeszek, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porwol, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploc, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Expósito, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolarczyk, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinkl, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olko, P</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF PASSIVE DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS IN SCANNING PROTON RADIOTHERAPY-A STUDY USING PAEDIATRIC ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>Proton beam therapy has advantages in comparison to conventional photon radiotherapy due to the physical properties of proton beams (e.g. sharp distal fall off, adjustable range and modulation). In proton therapy, there is the possibility of sparing healthy tissue close to the target volume. This is especially important when tumours are located next to critical organs and while treating cancer in paediatric patients. On the other hand, the interactions of protons with matter result in the production of secondary radiation, mostly neutrons and gamma radiation, which deposit their energy at a distance from the target. The aim of this study was to compare the response of different passive dosimetry systems in mixed radiation field induced by proton pencil beam inside anthropomorphic phantoms representing 5 and 10 years old children. Doses were measured in different organs with thermoluminescent (MTS-7, MTS-6 and MCP-N), radiophotoluminescent (GD-352 M and GD-302M), bubble and poly-allyl-diglycol carbonate (PADC) track detectors. Results show that RPL detectors are the less sensitive for neutrons than LiF TLDs and can be applied for in-phantom dosimetry of gamma component. Neutron doses determined using track detectors, bubble detectors and pairs of MTS-7/MTS-6 are consistent within the uncertainty range. This is the first study dealing with measurements on child anthropomorphic phantoms irradiated by a pencil scanning beam technique.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Gamma Rays - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Neutrons</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Protons</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation, Ionizing</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radionuclide Imaging</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kMtKw0AYRgdRbK1ufACZpQixc8tllkMam4EmE2ZSoavQSadQ6c3Egj6A721qq6v_wvm-xQHgHqNnjDgdNvvFcFt_Ep9dgD4OGfEoQ8El6CPMmBcxgnrgpm3fECIh99k16BGOAz_AvA--Y5UVQkujcqheoE5MoXKTHPdCGCNfEzhSRmZJqWfQzEyZZAbKHJpY5LnMx7DQquyyWoykKtNEi2LmCWjK6WgGp-aXEMlIilLLGIq8TLUqVKZ0kXZ3kXYflZlbcLWcr1t3d54DMH1Jyjj1JmosYzHxahKFH15tqbWcMhchjnxug8i6aIn8ACFnCcW2xtiGmFEesZBYYu085LamzoU-Il16AB5Pvftm935w7Ue1WbW1W6_nW7c7tBXmQcgC6mPcoU8ntG52bdu4ZbVvVpt581VhVB21V5326qS9gx_OvQe7cYt_9M8z_QFCi3Sn</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Kneževic, Ž</creator><creator>Ambrozova, I</creator><creator>Domingo, C</creator><creator>De Saint-Hubert, M</creator><creator>Majer, M</creator><creator>Martínez-Rovira, I</creator><creator>Miljanic, S</creator><creator>Mojzeszek, N</creator><creator>Porwol, P</creator><creator>Ploc, O</creator><creator>Romero-Expósito, M</creator><creator>Stolarczyk, L</creator><creator>Trinkl, S</creator><creator>Harrison, R M</creator><creator>Olko, P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-8178</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF PASSIVE DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS IN SCANNING PROTON RADIOTHERAPY-A STUDY USING PAEDIATRIC ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS</title><author>Kneževic, Ž ; Ambrozova, I ; Domingo, C ; De Saint-Hubert, M ; Majer, M ; Martínez-Rovira, I ; Miljanic, S ; Mojzeszek, N ; Porwol, P ; Ploc, O ; Romero-Expósito, M ; Stolarczyk, L ; Trinkl, S ; Harrison, R M ; Olko, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-cb3bb934e809059b68be8f05600eb231bc11b714398472b2bba79bc3ee7502cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Gamma Rays - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Neutrons</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Protons</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation, Ionizing</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radionuclide Imaging</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kneževic, Ž</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrozova, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domingo, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Saint-Hubert, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Majer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Rovira, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miljanic, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mojzeszek, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porwol, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ploc, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero-Expósito, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stolarczyk, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trinkl, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harrison, R M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olko, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kneževic, Ž</au><au>Ambrozova, I</au><au>Domingo, C</au><au>De Saint-Hubert, M</au><au>Majer, M</au><au>Martínez-Rovira, I</au><au>Miljanic, S</au><au>Mojzeszek, N</au><au>Porwol, P</au><au>Ploc, O</au><au>Romero-Expósito, M</au><au>Stolarczyk, L</au><au>Trinkl, S</au><au>Harrison, R M</au><au>Olko, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF PASSIVE DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS IN SCANNING PROTON RADIOTHERAPY-A STUDY USING PAEDIATRIC ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>180</volume><issue>1-4</issue><spage>256</spage><epage>260</epage><pages>256-260</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>Proton beam therapy has advantages in comparison to conventional photon radiotherapy due to the physical properties of proton beams (e.g. sharp distal fall off, adjustable range and modulation). In proton therapy, there is the possibility of sparing healthy tissue close to the target volume. This is especially important when tumours are located next to critical organs and while treating cancer in paediatric patients. On the other hand, the interactions of protons with matter result in the production of secondary radiation, mostly neutrons and gamma radiation, which deposit their energy at a distance from the target. The aim of this study was to compare the response of different passive dosimetry systems in mixed radiation field induced by proton pencil beam inside anthropomorphic phantoms representing 5 and 10 years old children. Doses were measured in different organs with thermoluminescent (MTS-7, MTS-6 and MCP-N), radiophotoluminescent (GD-352 M and GD-302M), bubble and poly-allyl-diglycol carbonate (PADC) track detectors. Results show that RPL detectors are the less sensitive for neutrons than LiF TLDs and can be applied for in-phantom dosimetry of gamma component. Neutron doses determined using track detectors, bubble detectors and pairs of MTS-7/MTS-6 are consistent within the uncertainty range. This is the first study dealing with measurements on child anthropomorphic phantoms irradiated by a pencil scanning beam technique.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>29165619</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/ncx254</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-8178</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2018-08, Vol.180 (1-4), p.256-260 |
issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1967463511 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Algorithms Anthropometry Child Child, Preschool Equipment Design Gamma Rays - therapeutic use Humans Monte Carlo Method Neutrons Phantoms, Imaging Proton Therapy - instrumentation Protons Radiation Dosage Radiation, Ionizing Radiometry - instrumentation Radionuclide Imaging Radiotherapy Dosage Thermoluminescent Dosimetry - instrumentation |
title | COMPARISON OF RESPONSE OF PASSIVE DOSIMETRY SYSTEMS IN SCANNING PROTON RADIOTHERAPY-A STUDY USING PAEDIATRIC ANTHROPOMORPHIC PHANTOMS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T08%3A45%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20RESPONSE%20OF%20PASSIVE%20DOSIMETRY%20SYSTEMS%20IN%20SCANNING%20PROTON%20RADIOTHERAPY-A%20STUDY%20USING%20PAEDIATRIC%20ANTHROPOMORPHIC%20PHANTOMS&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Kne%C5%BEevic,%20%C5%BD&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=180&rft.issue=1-4&rft.spage=256&rft.epage=260&rft.pages=256-260&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/ncx254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1967463511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1967463511&rft_id=info:pmid/29165619&rfr_iscdi=true |